On 22/08/2023 18:03, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
Hi Michele -
On 22.08.2023 18:17, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
So it wasn’t awarded between 2018 and 2022?
no.
I'm not on the foundation's board - but Corona and even just a small
award ceremony didn't go well together, me thinks.
On 28/07/2023 13:14, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
On 28.07.2023 10:38, Daniel Karrenberg via ripe-list wrote:
[...]
As a community we have much to gain and little to loose by welcoming
RIPE NCC staff to participate fully and -of course- transparently in
the work we do.
On the other hand we
On 21/07/2023 16:32, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Dear colleagues,
On 14 Jul 2023, at 13:29, I wrote:
Unless there is strong feedback from others in the community not to bother, I
will work with the other authors to revise the draft accordingly. After that,
Mirjam or I will announce a fresh
On 11/05/2023 14:51, Joe Abley wrote:
Following on from my previous comment, I think it would be better to
focus on avoiding *actual* conflicts of interest. I think worrying
about appearances is what happens when there is a lack of understanding
of the substance and, in the case of managing
On 11/05/2023 12:12, denis walker wrote:
Hi guys
People who work for a national lottery company are also citizens and
residents of the country. But they are usually not allowed to buy
lottery tickets. Pro footballers are also football supporters. But
they cannot gamble on the outcome of a
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-documents/other-documents/ripe-ncc-staff-participation-in-the-ripe-community
Please review this document. If you have any comments, questions,
suggestions, please send them to this list or to me directly before 31
May 2023.
Whilst I'm happy with the
Joe
On 15/03/2023 12:38, Joe Abley wrote:
Making the amount of funding clear and known before people are asked to
throw their hats in the ring makes it more likely that people will feel
comfortable accepting nominations.
I think this actually addressed in the document by making it clear
On 15/03/2023 10:08, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote:
On 14 Mar 2023, at 17:59, Nigel Titley via ripe-list wrote:
Having said that, it may well be that continuing to accept that the RIPE NCC
continues to employ the RIPE Chair(s) is the only workable solution.
Would it be any better
On 07/03/2023 16:40, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Dear friends,
After much unexpected delay, I am at last ready to ask you to read and
comment on this DRAFT statement of principles for remuneration of the
RIPE Chairs, which follows from a recommendation of the RIPE 2020
Nominating Committee.
As
Ladies and gentlemen
On 14/03/2023 15:14, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
Kurtis,colleagues,
this is indeedone of the scenarios where the remuneration
arrangementwouldnot work.We should not put a specific way to deal with
situations like this in the document because we cannot foresee the
details
On 23/03/2022 14:38, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
[Please view this message as either plain text or HTML, according to
your preference.]
In view of significant comments received during what we had expected to
be a restricted last call, Mirjam and I have decided to make a fresh
11 matches
Mail list logo
