Hi,
> I don't believe it would be very likely that no one would step up if the
> seat really was vacant.
Unfortunately I know of at least two instances where that has happened
in the past few years, after repeated calls for volunteers when the
in-situ chair was stepping down, or had not decided
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 05.00 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list, <
ripe-list@ripe.net> wrote:
>
> It could also be the other way round. People might be discouraged to
> run
> against the long-time chairs.
>
>
> Exactly, that's was my point, it looks that I was not able to find
> the
On 11.02.2021 11:52, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
> Come on Jordi, you know better than that...
>
You too, Jan ;-)
Arnold
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/02/2021 09:00, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid
cases where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
I would completely support this if there weren't already problems
in getting enough people to take on the extra workload
>
>> 2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid
>> cases where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
>
> I would completely support this if there weren't already problems in
> getting enough people to take on the extra workload of becoming a WG
> chair.
On 10.02.2021 13:32, Nigel Titley wrote:
>
>
> On 10/02/2021 12:27, Carlos Friaças via ripe-list wrote:
>
>> 2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid
>> cases where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
>
> I would completely support this if there weren't already problems in
>
I'm convinced that if you allow infinite terms, most of the people in the WG,
will support the same existing folks. I did, now I realize it was a wrong
decision in some case.
In Spanish we have a said "the bad known is better than the good to know" (not
sure if the translation is correct, or
Hi Jordi,
On 10.02.21 14:13, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> I've the feeling that in part, the lack of volunteers is due to the fact that
> existing ones can continue in perpetuity.
I do not see any facts supporting your claim.
> Also the details that we have in some
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
Hi Nigel,
I've the feeling that in part, the lack of volunteers is due to the fact that
existing ones can continue in perpetuity.
Hi,
Just let me share a thought about this:
"existing ones can continue in pertetuity"
For
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:57:44PM +0100, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
> As also Sander pointed out - there is a process in place for WG chairs
> rotation and if a chair is not doing her/his job properly - the WG will
> most probably make sure that the chair rotation happens ;)
Also, it should be
On 10/02/2021 15:42, Nigel Titley wrote:
I've policy proposals under discussion in several RIRs, that precisely ask for 2 years
terms, maximum 2 consecutive terms and then a minimim of 1-year "rest".
I'm very much against term limits. I see no reason to remove someone
from office as long as
On 10/02/2021 13:13, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> I've the feeling that in part, the lack of volunteers is due to the fact that
> existing ones can continue in perpetuity.
Well, possibly, but most of the WGs I've had anything to do with are
quite assiduous in
Hi Nigel,
I've the feeling that in part, the lack of volunteers is due to the fact that
existing ones can continue in perpetuity.
Also the details that we have in some cases 3 WG chairs and that means 1 less
chair available for another WG. Note that I think that, considering that in
other
On 10/02/2021 12:27, Carlos Friaças via ripe-list wrote:
> 2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid cases
> where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
I would completely support this if there weren't already problems in
getting enough people to take on the extra workload of
Hi,
Please see inline.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
Hi all,
(...)
It is even more sad that some of those provocations come from people
that are (or have been) chairs of WGs and I think they must be
exemplary. It looks like some of them believe
Hi all,
Yesterday I should have reacted in a different way, ignoring the provocations,
so I want to ask excuses for that.
I think we (all) in those situations must privately ask the chairs to enforce
he AUP and call to the order to the authors of inappropriate postings.
I need to make clear
16 matches
Mail list logo
