Re: TODOs before releasing [Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions]

2010-04-27 Thread Jeff Lawson
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:31 AM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote: The current version number is 0.8.0, but sometime in the past someone (David?) created a 1_0 branch. I think we should eventually release with a number that won't bring confusion or misunderstandings when we create a

Re: TODOs before releasing [Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions]

2010-04-27 Thread Massimo Manghi
1.1 was also my proposal. Damon suggested 2.0 instead on the argument that such a version number would make clear that this release is meant to work also with Apache 2.x. -- Massimo On 04/27/2010 10:44 PM, Jeff Lawson wrote: How about calling it version 1.1 instead? Then it won't seem

Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-16 Thread Massimo Manghi
The projects is slowly changing lately. I can only suggest we pick one of the latest snapshots, rename it as rivet-0.8.0.tar.gz (perhaps we may add a 'b1') and put it on the website. The websites I made cannot be compared to filghtaware to any extent, but I've been running rivet on apache2.2

RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-15 Thread Karl Lehenbauer
Hey Gang, Jeff Lawson aka Cow has made an RPM of Rivet and has rpmforge.nethttp://rpmforge.net, the largest third-party RPM repo for CentOS/Fedora/RHEL (and other RHEL-based) distros, willing to carry it. The issue is right now we only have the snapshots. They need tarballs to stay around

Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-15 Thread Jeff Lawson
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Karl Lehenbauer k...@flightaware.com wrote: Hey Gang, Jeff Lawson aka Cow has made an RPM of Rivet and has rpmforge.net, the largest third-party RPM repo for CentOS/Fedora/RHEL (and other RHEL-based) distros, willing to carry it.  The issue is right now we only

Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-15 Thread David Welton
It's been so long that I've forgotten how to go about things officially. I know we have to vote on it... I'd still be a little bit concerned about the 2.X support. Are you guys using that at flightaware? -- David N. Welton http://www.welton.it/davidw/ http://www.dedasys.com/

Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-15 Thread Jeff Lawson
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:15 PM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote: It's been so long that I've forgotten how to go about things officially.  I know we have to vote on it... I'd still be a little bit concerned about the 2.X support.  Are you guys using that at flightaware? Yep, we're

Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-15 Thread Damon Courtney
On Apr 15, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Jeff Lawson wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:15 PM, David Welton dav...@dedasys.com wrote: It's been so long that I've forgotten how to go about things officially. I know we have to vote on it... I'd still be a little bit concerned about the 2.X support. Are

Re: RPM created for Rivet -- some questions

2010-04-15 Thread Karl Lehenbauer
Yeah we're on 2.2. On Apr 15, 2010, at 3:15 PM, David Welton wrote: It's been so long that I've forgotten how to go about things officially. I know we have to vote on it... I'd still be a little bit concerned about the 2.X support. Are you guys using that at flightaware? -- David N.