Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 20:52:29 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> Hi,
Hallo!
> > Note: there is no [Unnamed][Active] but default.rko [Active]
>
> thanks. With this, and the other log, I think I now understand what
> happens.
>
> 1. The initial difference between our setups is that
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:30:49 +0200
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 15:10:26 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> écrivait :
>
> > And as an afterthought: What happens when you select Window->Show
> > Output->[Unnamed][Active] in a fresh session? If the same, could you
> > follow
Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 15:10:26 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> And as an afterthought: What happens when you select Window->Show
> Output->[Unnamed][Active] in a fresh session? If the same, could you
> follow the above procedure, too, to produce a debug log?
Attached too.
Note:
Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 14:49:44 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> > > Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests in,
> > > or a different one? While the error still baffles me, the auto-tests
> > > session is known to be somewhat broken. So if that might be it,
> >
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:49:44 +0200
Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:17:22 +0200
> thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > Selon Thomas Friedrichsmeier le
> > mer. 27 avr. 23:07:59 2022 :
> >
> > > Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests
> > > in, or a
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:17:22 +0200
thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Selon Thomas Friedrichsmeier le mer.
> 27 avr. 23:07:59 2022 :
>
> > Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests in,
> > or a different one? While the error still baffles me, the auto-tests
> > session is known
Selon Thomas Friedrichsmeier le mer.
27 avr. 23:07:59 2022 :
Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests in, or
a different one? While the error still baffles me, the auto-tests
session is known to be somewhat broken. So if that might be it, please
do your manual action
