I've created an issue for the kdereview process
https://invent.kde.org/education/rkward/-/issues/23
Jonathan
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 20:34, Thomas Friedrichsmeier <
thomas.friedrichsme...@kdemail.net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
> decade on
Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 20:52:29 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> Hi,
Hallo!
> > Note: there is no [Unnamed][Active] but default.rko [Active]
>
> thanks. With this, and the other log, I think I now understand what
> happens.
>
> 1. The initial difference between our setups is that
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:30:49 +0200
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 15:10:26 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> écrivait :
>
> > And as an afterthought: What happens when you select Window->Show
> > Output->[Unnamed][Active] in a fresh session? If the same, could you
> > follow
Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 15:10:26 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> And as an afterthought: What happens when you select Window->Show
> Output->[Unnamed][Active] in a fresh session? If the same, could you
> follow the above procedure, too, to produce a debug log?
Attached too.
Note:
Le jeu. 28 avr. 22 à 14:49:44 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> > > Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests in,
> > > or a different one? While the error still baffles me, the auto-tests
> > > session is known to be somewhat broken. So if that might be it,
> >
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:49:44 +0200
Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:17:22 +0200
> thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > Selon Thomas Friedrichsmeier le
> > mer. 27 avr. 23:07:59 2022 :
> >
> > > Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests
> > > in, or a
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:17:22 +0200
thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Selon Thomas Friedrichsmeier le mer.
> 27 avr. 23:07:59 2022 :
>
> > Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests in,
> > or a different one? While the error still baffles me, the auto-tests
> > session is known
Selon Thomas Friedrichsmeier le mer.
27 avr. 23:07:59 2022 :
Is this inside the same session that you were running the tests in, or
a different one? While the error still baffles me, the auto-tests
session is known to be somewhat broken. So if that might be it, please
do your manual action
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:59:43 +0200
Thierry Thomas wrote:
[...]
> Something strange: when running all_tests, many output windows are
> opened, and everything is fine.
>
> But for manual actions, the error appears, even for very simple
> things.
[...]
Is this inside the same session that
Le mer. 27 avr. 22 à 22:04:14 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
écrivait :
> Hi,
Hello,
> > I just upgraded RKWard to 0.7.3 (just locally, not yet in the ports
> > tree), and the patch of FindR.cmake is no more necessary.
> >
> > It builds and installs clearly, but I noticed 2 problems:
> >
>
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:09:51 +0200
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> I just upgraded RKWard to 0.7.3 (just locally, not yet in the ports
> tree), and the patch of FindR.cmake is no more necessary.
>
> It builds and installs clearly, but I noticed 2 problems:
>
> 1- the tests do not run:
>
> >
Hello,
Le lun. 28 mars 22 à 16:53:28 +0200, Adriaan de Groot
écrivait :
> > RKWard is used productively on Linux/BSD, Mac, and Windows.
>
> Congratulations! RKWard has been packaged on FreeBSD for a long time already
> (although it's only at version 0.7.1, not the latest release -- cc'ing
On Saturday, 26 March 2022 21:34:06 CEST Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
> decade on sourceforge), but we still haven't left playground... After a
> lot of procrastination on that matter, a previous review failed due to
> lack of time
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:09:38 +0200
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
[...]
> Results of running clang-tidy with some of my favorite options
> attached.
Thanks!
> The first group [bugprone-integer-division] seems an actual bug since
>double RKGraphicsDeviceFrontendTransmitter::lwdscale = 72/96;
>
On 3/28/22 16:53, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
On Saturday, 26 March 2022 21:34:06 CEST Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
decade on sourceforge), but we still haven't left playground... After a
lot of procrastination on that matter, a
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:39:55 +0200
Nicolas Fella wrote:
> I recently used RKWard for my Master Thesis, cool project!
thanks!
> A couple of observations:
>
> - CommitPolicy.txt still mentions Phabricator, that should point to
> Gitlab instead
Done.
> - CommitPolicy.txt mentions Ubuntu
Hi,
I recently used RKWard for my Master Thesis, cool project!
A couple of observations:
- CommitPolicy.txt still mentions Phabricator, that should point to
Gitlab instead
- CommitPolicy.txt mentions Ubuntu Trusty as base for requirements, that
is *ancient* by now, maybe 20.04 would be a more
El dilluns, 28 de març de 2022, a les 0:09:38 (CEST), Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
> El dissabte, 26 de març de 2022, a les 21:34:06 (CEST), Thomas
> Friedrichsmeier va escriure:
> > Hi!
> >
> > KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
> > decade on sourceforge), but we
El dissabte, 26 de març de 2022, a les 21:34:06 (CEST), Thomas Friedrichsmeier
va escriure:
> Hi!
>
> KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
> decade on sourceforge), but we still haven't left playground... After a
> lot of procrastination on that matter, a previous
Hi!
KDE.org has been our home for a 7.5(!) years, now (after over a
decade on sourceforge), but we still haven't left playground... After a
lot of procrastination on that matter, a previous review failed due to
lack of time on my part. Sorry! Now, finally, I'd like to ask you to
start reviewing
I've now moved this back to playground/edu/rkward as there had not been
movement on all the issues people had brought up and kdereview should only
last a couple months at most. It would be great to see RKWard brought back
through kdereview and driven to release soon as it looks like a worthy
There's no appstream metainfo file nor product-screenshot
https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/AppStream
Jonathan
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 14:47, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> KDE.org has been our home for a almost four years, now (after over a
> decade on sourceforge), but
Yes, I have already begun the process of taking this over in debian
official.
Cheers,
Scarlett
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:24 AM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:03:16PM +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> > Ok, will do. It may take me a while, though, as I'll have to be
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:03:16PM +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> Ok, will do. It may take me a while, though, as I'll have to be careful
> not to break our automated builds on our Ubuntu PPAs (as pointed out by
> Meik). But ideally, I'd also like to combine this step with handing
> over
hi,
Am Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018, 22:03:16 CEST schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> 1. When invoking RKWard from the Application Menu, always start a new
> instance.
> 2. When invoking RKWard from Open With..., always open the file in an
> existing RKWard instance (if any).
>
> We already have a
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 18:04:45 +0100
Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> I added it into Neon
> https://packaging.neon.kde.org/neon-packaging/rkward.git/
> https://build.neon.kde.org/view/1%20release%20⛰/job/bionic_release_neon-packaging_rkward/
thanks!
> It's the norm for Debian packages to have
I added it into Neon
https://packaging.neon.kde.org/neon-packaging/rkward.git/
https://build.neon.kde.org/view/1%20release%20⛰/job/bionic_release_neon-packaging_rkward/
It's the norm for Debian packages to have their packaging kept
separate from the upstream source including for PPAs, keeping
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:24:38 +0200
meik michalke wrote:
> how would it affect our various PPAs if there was no debian/
> directory in the sources?
In fact, we'd have to keep the debian packaging somewhere, and "merge"
it into the sources while building (we do the same for translations in
the
hi,
just two small suggestions:
Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018, 16:53:59 CEST schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> > The .desktop files call it a "GUI for R" which is not a great
> > description, everything in the menu is a GUI. I recommend "R
> > Statistical Programming" or "IDE for R" maybe.
>
>
El dissabte, 6 d’octubre de 2018, a les 15:45:39 CEST, Thomas Friedrichsmeier
va escriure:
> Hi!
>
> KDE.org has been our home for a almost four years, now (after over a
> decade on sourceforge), but somehow I've kept procrastinating on the
> final step: Today I'd like to ask you to start
30 matches
Mail list logo
