Re: [rkward-devel] RKWard Git repos up for testing
2014-11-10 17:23 GMT-03:00 meik michalke : > hi thomas, > > Am Montag, 10. November 2014, 19:37:09 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: >> g...@git.kde.org:scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > > how would i get my pubkey up there? shall i send it to you? Apply for a developer account at identity.kde.org, enter tfry as your supporter. -- Nicolás -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
Re: [rkward-devel] RKWard Git repos up for testing
2014-11-10 16:08 GMT-03:00 Thomas Friedrichsmeier : > Hi, > > On Monday 10 November 2014 15:49:30 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >> I was at a conference (and helping with its organization too!) this >> whole weekend so I had no time to even read your emails. I'll take a >> look at your conversion now. > > great, thanks! The branch switchover seems to have been handled correctly by svn2git. Just don't push the backup tags. Version tags are usually called v1.2.3 in KDE, not release/v1.2.3. You may want to change that for consistency with other KDE projects. Note that you can use regular expressions to generalize rules. The lack of consistency in names (or branch/foo/ vs branch/foo/rkward) makes things harder, though. For example, you can do: match /tags/release-(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)/rkward/ repository rkward branch refs/tags/v\1 annotated true end match And then add separate rules only for those without the rkward/ part. Remember to run "git gc --aggressive" on the repository before pushing it. svn2git produces very badly optimized git packs. Running gc can shrink the repository by half or more. Other than that I approve this conversion \o/ -- Nicolás -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
Re: [rkward-devel] RKWard Git repos up for testing
hi thomas, Am Montag, 10. November 2014, 19:37:09 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > g...@git.kde.org:scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git how would i get my pubkey up there? shall i send it to you? > The second repository is for external plugins. It is much easier, since this > only ever was a single branch, and never had any tags. It's temporary place > is https://github.com/tfry-git/rkward-external-plugins . Questions > regarding this one: > - Where exactly should this end up? I think it should be group-owned, > somehow. i could simply fork it and send you pull requests all the time ;-) > - Meik, do you recall, whether there is anything left in rk.subset > that we did not merge into the main distribution? Can this be deleted? it should be completely implemented by now, and i believe the (implemented) code was already altered after that. however, keeping the plugin there might be an option for people who don't want to upgrade to the most recent version of RKWard just yet. but in general, i guess it can be removed. which brings me to: how/where will we host the package repository (http://rkward.sourceforge.net/R/)? > - Also, Meik, could you add some README to the "stuff" directory? This is > supposed to be the bikeshed for stuff that is not really something, but > should not be thrown away, either? yeah, although thinking about it... it can also just be discarded, i don't know if it's of any use for anyone besides me. viele grüße :: m.eik -- dipl. psych. meik michalke institut f"ur experimentelle psychologie abt. f"ur diagnostik und differentielle psychologie heinrich-heine-universit"at d-40204 d"usseldorf signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
Re: [rkward-devel] RKWard Git repos up for testing
Hi, On Monday 10 November 2014 15:49:30 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > I was at a conference (and helping with its organization too!) this > whole weekend so I had no time to even read your emails. I'll take a > look at your conversion now. great, thanks! > By the way, just to make sure: was your SVN repository always SVN, or > was rkward ever in CVS? Yes, we've come a long way. Conversion from CVS to SVN happened on 19.09.2006 AFAICS. Which reminds me, I forgot to mention, that I also ran kde-ruleset/bin/fix-tags on the converted repo. This was needed to make the tags from CVS times pushable. Regards Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
Re: [rkward-devel] RKWard Git repos up for testing
2014-11-10 15:37 GMT-03:00 Thomas Friedrichsmeier : > Hi all! > > So we just hit revision number 5000 in SVN, yesterday. Let's celebrate this by > getting ready to switch to git ;-) > > As discussed, the repository is split into two (actually three, but one of > them is just an archive of our JSS article). The main repository is at > g...@git.kde.org:scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > or (anonymously) at > git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > A simple web view at > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git > Of course this is just a temporary place for the purpose of testing. Which is > what I would like to ask you to do. > > Things look pretty good to me, but I'm no expert in looking at git branch > visualizations, and it would really be great, if the experts (Jeremy, Nicolás) > could give this a short look. One thing that may be particularly touchy is the > switchover between SVN branches we did on December, 30, 2007 (SVN revs 2289 > and 2290). Here, SVN trunk was _moved_ to branches/release_branch_0.4.9/, and > branches/KDE4_port/ was moved to trunk. > > What svn2git made of this looks pretty sane to me, but again, I'd like to be > sure. One detail that is worrying me, here, is that svn2git deemed it > necessary to create the two tags > backups/development/port_to_kde4@2290 > (3ad98a97b114510d97061e06fbde8247453d40ee) > backups/master@2289 > (bd1394fd635d020321955010bb7646284c15) > These are lightweight tags and can't be pushed. Would these be important to > keep? > > In case it is relevant, a summary of the key ingredients of the conversion: > Getting SVN repo: rsync -av svn.code.sf.net::p/rkward/code rkwardsvn > Conversion rules: > http://sourceforge.net/p/rkward/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/rkward/scripts/svn2git_rules?format=raw > > The second repository is for external plugins. It is much easier, since this > only ever was a single branch, and never had any tags. It's temporary place is > https://github.com/tfry-git/rkward-external-plugins . Questions regarding this > one: > - Where exactly should this end up? I think it should be group-owned, somehow. > - Meik, do you recall, whether there is anything left in rk.subset that we did > not merge into the main distribution? Can this be deleted? > - Also, Meik, could you add some README to the "stuff" directory? This is > supposed to be the bikeshed for stuff that is not really something, but should > not be thrown away, either? I was at a conference (and helping with its organization too!) this whole weekend so I had no time to even read your emails. I'll take a look at your conversion now. By the way, just to make sure: was your SVN repository always SVN, or was rkward ever in CVS? -- Nicolás -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
Re: [rkward-devel] Endless errors starting up org.freedesktop.dbus-system on OSX
Hi Aaron, no, this is not yet forgotten, we're just stuck... On Thursday 23 October 2014 15:26:28 meik michalke wrote: > now, this is a portion from "man launchctl": > > > Note that per-user configuration files (LaunchAgents) must be owned by the > user loading them. All system-wide daemons (LaunchDaemons) must be owned by > root. Configuration files must not be group- or world-writable. > [...] > on the other hand, i find it hard to believe that a > system-wide config file is supposed to be owned by one ordinary user and > all other users can't launch it. can you make sense of this? after all, > wrong permissions could be the actual problem here. I don't believe this is the problem, here. It's the same situation on the build mac, either way. Another bit from the man page is this: -w Overrides the Disabled key and sets it to false. In previous versions, this option would modify the configuration file. Now the state of the Disabled key is stored elsewhere on-disk. Now, thank you, Apple for being so specific, on just where that would be stored. But either way, I guess that could be a historical explanation for the note on file ownership, too. Either way, perhaps our new angle at this problem should be: Step 1: Find out, how we can _stop_ whatever thing is going wild trying to launch dbus. Step 2: Find out, if that actually has any negative side-effects. Step 3: Find out, where it came from. So for step 1., could you try: sudo launchctl unload -w /Library/LaunchDaemons/org.freedesktop.dbus- system.plist launchctl unload -w /Library/LaunchAgents/org.freedesktop.dbus-session.plist (sudo) killall dbus-daemon ps a | grep "dbus" # and kill anything still around. launchctl -l # look for any signs of dbus launchers left After that, - check the logs - try starting RKWard. (And well, you may want to try on a machine that is not mission critical, first). Regards Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
[rkward-devel] RKWard Git repos up for testing
Hi all! So we just hit revision number 5000 in SVN, yesterday. Let's celebrate this by getting ready to switch to git ;-) As discussed, the repository is split into two (actually three, but one of them is just an archive of our JSS article). The main repository is at g...@git.kde.org:scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git or (anonymously) at git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git A simple web view at http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch/tfry/rkward-svn-import.git Of course this is just a temporary place for the purpose of testing. Which is what I would like to ask you to do. Things look pretty good to me, but I'm no expert in looking at git branch visualizations, and it would really be great, if the experts (Jeremy, Nicolás) could give this a short look. One thing that may be particularly touchy is the switchover between SVN branches we did on December, 30, 2007 (SVN revs 2289 and 2290). Here, SVN trunk was _moved_ to branches/release_branch_0.4.9/, and branches/KDE4_port/ was moved to trunk. What svn2git made of this looks pretty sane to me, but again, I'd like to be sure. One detail that is worrying me, here, is that svn2git deemed it necessary to create the two tags backups/development/port_to_kde4@2290 (3ad98a97b114510d97061e06fbde8247453d40ee) backups/master@2289 (bd1394fd635d020321955010bb7646284c15) These are lightweight tags and can't be pushed. Would these be important to keep? In case it is relevant, a summary of the key ingredients of the conversion: Getting SVN repo: rsync -av svn.code.sf.net::p/rkward/code rkwardsvn Conversion rules: http://sourceforge.net/p/rkward/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/rkward/scripts/svn2git_rules?format=raw The second repository is for external plugins. It is much easier, since this only ever was a single branch, and never had any tags. It's temporary place is https://github.com/tfry-git/rkward-external-plugins . Questions regarding this one: - Where exactly should this end up? I think it should be group-owned, somehow. - Meik, do you recall, whether there is anything left in rk.subset that we did not merge into the main distribution? Can this be deleted? - Also, Meik, could you add some README to the "stuff" directory? This is supposed to be the bikeshed for stuff that is not really something, but should not be thrown away, either? Thanks! Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- ___ RKWard-devel mailing list RKWard-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkward-devel
