I can understand citadel going from 6.60 to 6.70...but was there enough
change to warrant a jump in webcit from 6.40 to 6.70?
I'd like to try to keep them in sync with each other. They're
always used together and thought of as a complete system, so the
slightly different version numbers were potentially confusing.
Good deal.
That shouldn't be all there is, though. I'll give an example I sent myself a message...sent it to my regular system account, and to myself on DP2.The headers, on my regular
account, look like this:Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
Thought I should copy in the room, here. Seems more like a feature
request for WebCit...the ability to define your day's start and stop
times.
I tried that, but it didn't seem to go...--without-libical wasn't an
option I noted when I did a ./configure --help.
I'm not sure I understand why one would need to rename and/or move those
particular rooms.
Cripes...every time there's a freaking Perl update, this happens.Feb 10 2006 10:20am from IGnatius T [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored) Attention please: Will whoever broke Bugzilla please put it back online? Thank you...
Looks to me like there's a URL there...
It's also possible to pull from the shell, via date %z on pretty much
any *nix system.
And how the heck do they wind up in this room?
Shouldn't the server be scanning mail, incoming to rooms, through
spamassassin?
I have a buttload of spam and ham available...as root, I run:
sa-learn --spam --mbox /path/to/spam
sa-learn --ham --mbox /path/to/ham
Or, I can also take the bayesian database that I've already built, and
put it into the root user's .spamassassin directory.
Freakdog: how do you export Citadel mail to sa-learn? Are you using
the netcat trick?
At present, I'm not, at all, as I'm still using Postfix and external
mailboxes, primarily.
I'm guessing that it would/could be set via text client or webcit, based
on the fact that setting the other port related options are handled from
those interfaces.
dothebart: Everyone should have a room called page logs or
send/received something or other...pages should be there.
Neither...they come in via the 'send email to a room by using
room_roomname' interface.
Could 4739 be something that addresses the disappearing netconfigs that
Ian, Campy (and, occasionally, I) have come across?
Are we going to roll out 7.03 with the client fix for my .ASG crash?
Actually...I've got a question...maybe it's better suited for Citadel
Support, than here, but:
In TinyMCE, how can I insert my responses within the quoted part of a
message, without having it look like my responses are *part* of the quoted
message?
Mon 26 Feb 2007 10:50:17 AM EST from Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored) I guess I should ask in here...does any other client than the text client use ipc_c_tcp.c?Or call serv_read? Doesn't webcit use it?
Ok...as long as it works, then, I guess I'm ok.
Sat 28 Jul 2007 09:01:34 AM EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored) I've just noticed that webcit shows the time as server time when creating a message and in bbs view when reading a message instead of local time.Is this a bug?Is there any code to translate the posted time to the local time of
Sun 16 Sep 2007 06:51:32 PM EDT from IGnatius T [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored) 7.20? Because the Easy Install system gets new releases first.So, then, you're about to announce the release?
Only two things to note:
The 7.21 tarball untars into citadel-7.20, and when I log into it, it
reports itself as 7.20.
Other than that...
Isn't libcitadel going to be part of the full citadel distro? Rather,
will it be rolled into the citadel trunk?
Thanks.
As I'm not a developer, I'm afraid that I won't be much use in helping
with the algorithm...though, as such, I wasn't questioning the algorithm.
I was really just curious as to how the numbers were reached, as the
system load average was actually around 1.0x to 1.5x, and wanted
What version is that, now? I've got 0.30 installed on my system, already.
*snicker* hosekeeping.
Here it is, folks. Easy Install is updated. tarballs and packages
next ... I'd like to give it a couple of days of testing before a
general announcement.
Is this what's currently in SVN, then? If I download the trunk (revision
6004), this will be 7.30?
Fedora Core 5, fully updated (I know...I need to update the server, already).
Downloaded and unpacked the 7.30 tarball.
Configure runs without error, but Citadel won't compile cleanly:
user_ops.c: In function 'session_startup':
user_ops.c:547: error: 'VIEW_MAILBOX' undeclared (first use
Thu Jan 31 2008 09:00:23 PM EST from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fedora Core 5, fully updated (I know...I need to update the server, already). Downloaded and unpacked the 7.30 tarball. Configure runs without error, but Citadel won't compile cleanly: user_ops.c: In function 'session_startup':
Fri Mar 07 2008 03:01:55 PM EST from ajc to room_citadel_development@uncensored.citadel.org Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 6097r6097 | ajc | 2008-03-07 15:01:54 -0500 (Fri, 07 Mar 2008) | 1 lineChanged paths: M
As a user, I don't see an issue.
Ok...so, if I want to export/import, it would be best to upgrade the
exporting systtem to 7.33.
Wed Mar 26 2008 11:00:49 PM EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored)
Wed Mar 26 2008 18:55:20 EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dog Pound BBS II)
Ok...so, if I want to export/import, it would be best to upgrade the
exporting systtem to 7.33.
As of the current SVN it is the only way.
BTW
Fri Mar 28 2008 01:33:44 PM EDT from IGnatius T [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored)
Carefull though since the latest SVN may have other bugs since
someone
mentioned failing server shutdowns beyond the one I mentioned in my
previous
post.
That was me, it was my fault, and I
Good deal.
I only ask because I've got a ton of hoops to jump through, in order to
install SVN on the system, in question...it's quite possible that davew
will bless it before I finish the SVN install.
Oy. ;-)
Well, after dealing with APR/APR-UTIL dependency hell, I got SVN
compiled/installed, have checked out the latest SVN, and am compiling
Citadel, now.
Blarg...had to get libcitadel from SVN, too. Heh.
Fri Mar 28 2008 09:23:21 PM EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored)
Subject: Re:Citadel commit log: revision 6159
So here it is.
This code fixes ARTV import.
I tested the import by doing export - import on my entire system, something
like 3 messages varying in size up to 9MB.
Seems
Well, the watchdog didn't die, and the import was mostly successful.
It imported the rooms, the users...maybe the floors...it didn't import
the messages. I was able to log into the imported BBS, and each room
showed x new of x messages, but all I got was message num X not
found when
So what did it do? What did you get from sendcommand after the importing
data type floor ?
After importing data type floor0 nothing, until the the message that
it was ended.
Hmm, actually I wonder... Is it possible that your export file is
incomplete? I've not looked at
Saw a new drop in here, so I'll SVN 6160, and try again.
Sat Mar 29 2008 04:04:24 PM EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saw a new drop in here, so I'll SVN 6160, and try again.
Running r6160, now, on both sides.
I've now got Importing datatype floor0 again...no dots, no lines...nothing.
We'll see what happens.
davew:
Any other ideas?
I think davew is still looking at the ARTV issues I'm having.
One thing I should perhaps mention is that I did NOT clean out the
data
directoryafter the first import failed.
So, you imported, twice...once, it failed, but you left stuff in place,
and then ran it again?
Yeah...it's not a whole lot shorter over here, either.
Got an issue building Citadel (at least, so far, libcitadel) on Fedora 9.
configure exits with the following:
checking how to run teh C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C++ preprocessor /lib/cpp fails sanity check
See 'config.log' for more details.
Attached is my cconfig.log from
The only difference between the cpp on the workstation where I'm trying to
rebuild the client (and libcitadel to go with it) and the server where I have
the citadel server is that the server is Fedora Core 5 and the workstation is
Fedora 9. The workstation used to run Fedora 8, and it was ok.
I take it back...there might be something. Looks like on my server, when it
looks for the C++ preprocessor, it runs g++.
My workstation doesn't seem to have g++ (gc-c++ package) installed.
I'm installing, now, and will see how that works out for me.
Fri May 30 2008 12:54:47 PM EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:Can't compile libcitadel-1.09 on Fedora 9
I take it back...there might be something. Looks like on my server, when it
looks for the C++ preprocessor, it runs g++.
My workstation doesn't seem to have g++ (gc-c++ package)
I take it back...there might be something. Looks like on my server,
when it
looks for the C++ preprocessor, it runs g++.
My workstation doesn't seem to have g++ (gc-c++ package) installed.
I'm installing, now, and will see how that works out for me.
Mon Jun 30 2008 08:10:06 AM EDT from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uncensored)
Subject: Re:sending from a sub domain needs auth.
Got an MX record for domain.com.
So I assume it works for sub.domain.com.
if you want sub.domain.com to receive mail on another Server, you need to
add an MX for it.
Hang on.
I think everyone keeps getting the wrong end of this.
I am NOT relaying.
I am simply DELIVERING direct and because the machine trying to deliver
is a
peer in the domain it needs to auth. I argue it shouldn't.
I'll recap again.
Hang on.
I think everyone keeps getting the wrong end of this.
I am NOT relaying.
I am simply DELIVERING direct and because the machine trying to
deliver is a
peer in the domain it needs to auth. I argue it shouldn't.
Ok...just wondering.
Move from messages to etc...I'm going to assume that's $CITADELHOME/etc,
and not /etc, as the notes appeared to imply.
Fri Jan 09 2009 10:48:37 AM EST from bofhm...@mycastlewall (My Castle Wall)
Subject: ETA?
Any ETA on the next version release? I'm looking to upgrade in the next
week, but will hold off a few days if a new release is around the corner...
Go with the current version, Mike...it's been pretty
Wow...I don't even see --with-apr as an option when I run configure
--help.
Interesting...thanks.
Rock on!!! Nothing touches the Superfly leap off the top of the cage onto
the Magnificent Muraco...not even Undertaker dropping Mick Foley through
the cage.
So it seems that our biggest bug right now is that people still are
having trouble logging in using WebCit and SSL. This would seem to
imply that
the buffered I/O thing is still broken?
Besides my expired ssl cert, that's
Thu Aug 27 2009 11:21:31 AM EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II
So it seems that our biggest bug right now is that people still are
having trouble logging in using WebCit and SSL. This would seem to
imply that
the buffered I/O thing is still
Mon 12 Feb 2007 08:15:40 AM EST from fl...@uncnsrd (Uncensored) I mentioned this idea elsewhere, but in case anyone else wanted to comment... Uncensored has lately had this problem where, occasionally, people cannot log in due to a DoS event. The event usually seems to involve
Blarg...upgraded my workstation to FC6, and now the citadel client barfs
on .ASG at the same place as on my FC5 server.
nice spam pixel transmitts over.
Not like we don't get some of the same from Uncensored.
Mon 26 Feb 2007 10:50:17 AM EST from Ford i...@uncnsrd (Uncensored) I guess I should ask in here...does any other client than the text client use ipc_c_tcp.c?Or call serv_read? Doesn't webcit use it?
Weird question...when using libical 0.27, the configure script still seems
to identify it as 0.26...is there something that needs to be updated in
the configure script?
Ok...as long as it works, then, I guess I'm ok.
Sun 16 Sep 2007 06:51:32 PM EDT from IGnatius T foo...@uncnsrd (Uncensored) 7.20? Because the Easy Install system gets new releases first.So, then, you're about to announce the release?
Only two things to note:
The 7.21 tarball untars into citadel-7.20, and when I log into it, it
reports itself as 7.20.
Other than that...
Mon Feb 01 2010 08:21:37 AM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored
http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/01/modern-browsers-for-modern-applications.html
pull the plug!
I can understand IE 6, and even FF 2...but FF 3.0.x is still supported by Mozilla, at this point.
Ok...where I'm seeing it is at the login screen, at the moment. If I log in
as me (auto login enabled), it prompts at 24 lines.
If I do the userlist, it prompts after an actual screenful (43 lines).
Cool.
In the meantime, I noted, this morning, that my server had not been importing
network packets again...had several built up in the spoolin directory. Stop
and restart of citadel cleaned them all up, but oddly enough, this even
prevented
my external RSS feeds from being pulled in.
Ok...running into something else, at present, that might be a little more
pressing for me.
I had upgraded to Cit 8.03 and Webcit 8.02 on my 32bit system, and all was
well from a Webcit perspective.
Migrated my citadel to my 64bit system, built webcit 8.02 and started it.
When I go
Sat Dec 10 2011 09:53:38 AM EST from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II
Ok...running into something else, at present, that might be a little more pressing for me. I had upgraded to Cit 8.03 and Webcit 8.02 on my 32bit system, and all was well from a Webcit perspective. Migrated my citadel to my
I've noted two things, today, that might merit being looked at:
1) The Human readable node name is limited to 20 characters. Doesn't affect
me, much, but a new node came online that wanted to have a name that was 21
characters, and that last character is dropped.
2) When using
Mon Aug 12 2013 05:17:50 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored
hm, somethings smelly around the network queue importer.
it seems there is some sort of double close here (though I couldn't find it by browsing the source)
and from
sendcommand rwho
I see something messing with the current room of
Jus tupgraded...will let you all know how I make out.
Wed Aug 06 2014 09:50:33 AM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
Have I mentioned lately how wonderful it is that our Berkeley DB layer is so stable? How it almost never breaks because it's well tested, well tuned, and nobody's in there messing with it? Let's keep it that way.
Silly
Mon Sep 01 2014 03:20:13 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored
hm,the disk is full on startup case isn't caught at all in the db-layer...
some pointers become NULL and we crash.
Is this in response to my question about spool files?
If so, the disk isn't full when the spool file issue crops
Tue Sep 02 2014 09:33:37 AM EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II
Mon Sep 01 2014 03:20:13 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored
hm,the disk is full on startup case isn't caught at all in the db-layer...
some pointers become NULL and we crash.
Is this in response to my question about spool
Tue Sep 02 2014 05:20:32 PM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored
I don't have any troubles with spool files, probably due to the single coredness of my server.
If you have, you will have to provide more information so that we can fix this.WFM YMMV ;-)
Hmm...I'm running my Citadel in a
Wed Sep 03 2014 09:23:26 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored
Wed Sep 03 2014 07:51:50 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II
Tue Sep 02 2014 05:20:32 PM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored
I don't have any troubles with spool files, probably due to the single coredness of my server
Greetings, all.
A bug seems to have crept (back?) into the codebase as pertains to networking.
Every couple of days, networking between my node and Uncensored! seems to stop working. I don't see any spool files that might be gumming up the works, like used to be the case Stopping and restarting
Thu Jul 09 2015 08:25:13 AM EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Networking issues in 9.01
if you run sendcommand RWHO do you see a citadel networker (believing to be...) talking to uncensored?
I'll need to try that the next time that it fouls up.
Assuming that I do see such
> Ok, it's time!
>
> "Release_902" is the git tag for our official Version 902 release of
>the Citadel system.
>
> Easy Install has been updated, and I'm building source tarballs now.
I just tried to upgrade via Easy Install...the only thing updated was the
text
>Oops. I only upgraded Queasy Install.
>
> Easy Install is now updated too.
D'oh!!! I'll give it another try. Thanks.
Um...maybe not?
Installation will now begin.
Command output will not be sent to the terminal.
To view progress, see the /tmp/citadel-install-log.txt file.
* libical does not need updating.
* libsieve does not need updating.
* Berkeley DB does not need updating.
* expat does
WOOT!!!
Citadel 902
Dog Pound BBS II
Fishers, IN
LOL...I'm trying it again.
Wed May 11 2016 05:31:46 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
The very bottom layers of webcit-ng are taking shape. It is so refreshing to be able to throw away code that implements assumptions and requirements from 20 years ago. The new code requires no per-thread state, since it's
Thu Dec 14 2017 07:26:17 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored
How did it go?
Very badly. It wiped out most of my Internet email address directory. I had to restore from a backup.
Oy gevalt!
94 matches
Mail list logo
