If you're just looking to make examples of non-standard tunings, csound is
probably your most direct route. While csound's learning curve is genarally
alarmingly precipitous, in this instance it might be what you're looking
for.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 10:18 AM Tom Peters wrote:
> On 09-02-2021
On 09-02-2021 05:46, Ted Felix wrote:
On 2/8/21 10:19 PM, david wrote:
Also, what's a "sensible default" vs something that someone else might
consider a headache or bloatware?
Heh. Yeah. VMPK just added a built-in synth. That caused me a
bunch of head scratching since it broke my
On 2/9/21 8:33 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
Given the current popularity of video, would it be helpful if someone
(TM) made a youtube video on how to get things started?
There are already a few up there. Demonic Sweaters has one, I think.
We should probably do a better job of referencing
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 14:12, D. Michael McIntyre <
rosegarden.trumpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rosegarden decided long ago to focus on being Rosegarden.
>
Underrated opinion!
R
___
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use
On 09/02/21 14:12, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
On 2/8/21 6:00 PM, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote:
Is it THAT difficult to hardwire
SOME minimal sound ability if only to show
that the right software is being tried?
Other apps can do it, at least at some
rudimentary level at first.
Other apps
On 2/8/21 6:00 PM, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote:
Is it THAT difficult to hardwire
SOME minimal sound ability if only to show
that the right software is being tried?
Other apps can do it, at least at some
rudimentary level at first.
Other apps provide their own soundfont and their own synth
Sorry, I consider AppImages/flatpacks bloatware. Never made either one
work on my Debian systems and see no reason to bother. I think they'd
just add yet another layer to have to sort out when it comes to making
audio work.
So, no.
On 2/8/21 7:09 PM, r...@hydrophones.com wrote:
Hi all,
On 2/8/21 6:46 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
On 2/8/21 10:19 PM, david wrote:
Also, what's a "sensible default" vs something that someone else
might consider a headache or bloatware?
Heh. Yeah. VMPK just added a built-in synth. That caused me a
bunch of head scratching since it broke my setup.
Hi all,
This whole packaging and dependency thing is why I suggested that
RoseGarden also be made available as an AppImage. Even for experienced
Linux music users and developers getting the most recent versions of
RoseGarden to "work" leads to dependency hell. Try to compile it on a
somewhat
On February 8, 2021 6:35:09 PM HST, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:19:58 -1000
> david wrote:
>
> > On 2/8/21 1:00 PM, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:05:04 +0100
> > > Tom Peters wrote:
> > >
> > >> Chuck, Michael, Lorenzo:
> > >> thank you very
On 2/8/21 10:19 PM, david wrote:
Also, what's a "sensible default" vs something that someone else might
consider a headache or bloatware?
Heh. Yeah. VMPK just added a built-in synth. That caused me a
bunch of head scratching since it broke my setup. Had to dig through
the menus to get
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:19:58 -1000
david wrote:
> On 2/8/21 1:00 PM, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:05:04 +0100
> > Tom Peters wrote:
> >
> >> Chuck, Michael, Lorenzo:
> >> thank you very much for your input.
> >> Michael, Lorenzo, I share your sentiment. I think it is fair
On 2/8/21 1:00 PM, krsg...@trixtar.org wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:05:04 +0100
Tom Peters wrote:
Chuck, Michael, Lorenzo:
thank you very much for your input.
Michael, Lorenzo, I share your sentiment. I think it is fair now in the
22nd year of the 21st century to expect from a computer
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:05:04 +0100
Tom Peters wrote:
> Chuck, Michael, Lorenzo:
> thank you very much for your input.
> Michael, Lorenzo, I share your sentiment. I think it is fair now in the
> 22nd year of the 21st century to expect from a computer application:
> 1) that the package management
On 2/7/21 12:11 PM, Tom Peters wrote:
Hi, I am a beginner with Rosegarden and indeed with sound editing. I am
struggling with what appears to be everybodies first problem: getting
sound out of my computer.
Yep. I recommend my page on the subject. It takes you through ALSA,
JACK,
Op 08-02-2021 om 14:05 schreef Tom Peters:
That said, I wonder if you can recommend a simpler and more complete
alternative. What I have been looking for is a tool to generate scores
and accompanying sound files to study scales and tunings, as examples
for my website on music theory
Tom,
as Lorenzo said, freedom comes at a price ;o)
I think RG can do what you want easily (I have no vested interest btw).
There is no need to mess up your established audio setup if you use the
alsa layer only.
Here's what I recommend:
1. Use fluidsynth standalone with alsa ( -a alsa)
Chuck, Michael, Lorenzo:
thank you very much for your input.
Michael, Lorenzo, I share your sentiment. I think it is fair now in the
22nd year of the 21st century to expect from a computer application:
1) that the package management system like apt is configured that an
application will get all
On 2/7/21 12:11 PM, Tom Peters wrote:
Hi, I am a beginner with Rosegarden and indeed with sound editing. I am
struggling with what appears to be everybodies first problem: getting
sound out of my computer.
First of all, I just want to take a moment to hang my head in
disappointment that this
Hi, I am a beginner with Rosegarden and indeed with sound editing. I am
struggling with what appears to be everybodies first problem: getting
sound out of my computer.
The FAQ:
https://www.rosegardenmusic.com/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions#playback_and_recording
has 2 lines of explanation
20 matches
Mail list logo