On 09/09/2013 02:22 AM, Jim Cochrane wrote:
> "If your keyboard transmits bank/program changes, Rosegarden should
> record them, and they should work when played back. ..."
I was probably just mistaken.
My key suspect in any change relating to MIDI is the floating channel
allocation. I went ba
On 09/09/2013 01:31 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> That decision was before my time, but the code suggests no.
That's an interesting legacy. When that code in what is now
RosegardenDocument.cpp says "got Program Change (unsupported)," it ain't
just whistling Dixie. It really was totally unsu
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:31:56 -0400
"Tom Breton (Tehom)" wrote:
>
> > I was surprised to find that rosegarden is not recording program change
> > events. Before I describe my setup in detail and what I've tried, I'd
> > like to first make sure that I'm not expecting something that does not
> > ex
can some body tell how this AVL 32 bit distribution runs on i64/amd64 hardware
?is this as good / as fast as 64bit CPU ?
I mean running other apps than music : database, imaging (GIMP), word
processors, web browser, and so on.thank you
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 21:51:16 -0400
From: david.tisd...@g
> I was surprised to find that rosegarden is not recording program change
> events. Before I describe my setup in detail and what I've tried, I'd
> like to first make sure that I'm not expecting something that does not
> exist - so, as my subject suggests, my question is: Is the current
> version
Its a lightweight music distro so running LXDE makes it fast to me. I
understand the desire to run 86_64 software but the 32bit is probably
better for compatibility (at least that used to be the case... maybe not so
much anymore).
My recommendation is to open the software sources and check the ba
Thanks, Michael and Tom, for looking into this.
On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:04:12 -0400
"D. Michael McIntyre" wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 01:31 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
> > That decision was before my time, but the code suggests no.
>
> That's an interesting legacy. When that code in what is now
On 09/09/2013 09:10 PM, Jim Cochrane wrote:
> Anyone reading this list who would like program-change recording added,
> please speak up. The more demand, the more likely someone will be
> inspired to put it in. Will Godfrey has already spoken up - anyone
> else? :-)
No need. The demand is alre
>> Anyone reading this list who would like program-change recording added,
>> please speak up.
>
> No need. The demand is already sufficient to warrant attention. I'll
> look into it later today.
Committed revision 13404.
I knocked together a test sample by putting program changes into a
Roseg
