> Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type
> (unless I am wrong, which happens once in a while).
The spec says "If no type is indicated, the type is string."
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 22:39, Michael Guymon wrote:
>
> > IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> > If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
>
>
> Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and i
> IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type
(unless I am wrong, which ha
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:55, Michael Guymon wrote:
> hola,
>
>
> I pulled the latest greatest build from CVS for xml-rpc and built the
> example. Using the package org.apache.xmlrpc.WebServer for the server
> and org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient for the client, it worked fine. The
> method call to
hola,
I pulled the latest greatest build from CVS for xml-rpc and built the
example. Using the package org.apache.xmlrpc.WebServer for the server
and org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient for the client, it worked fine. The
method call to 'hello.sayHello' was fine.
My problems started when I used a tc
