On 12/10/2016 01:46 AM, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:24:02PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/17/2016 11:05 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/16/2016 10:15 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hey
On 19 October 2016 at 12:35, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> Anyway, the list above is not set in stone, otherwise there'd be little
>>> point in posting it here. If you think something absolutely critical is
>>> missing from that list, or that something should not be there,
On 10/19/2016 01:25 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 14 October 2016 at 15:33, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.
The idea is to get
On 14 October 2016 at 15:33, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
> to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.
>
> The idea is to get -rc2 out next week (ie by Oct 21st at
On 17 October 2016 at 11:42, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 12:30 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
>>
>> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen
>> wrote:
What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember,
On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a):
>> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen
>> wrote:
What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember,
that once
On 10/17/2016 10:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Panu,
What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember,
that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never
materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is
controversial change which should make
On 10/16/2016 10:15 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hey folks,
Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll
need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into
final.
The idea is to
Hi Panu,
What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember,
that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never
materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is
controversial change which should make anything break.
Thx for considering.
Vít
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll
> need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into
> final.
>
> The idea is to get -rc2 out next week (ie by
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Panu Matilainen
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
>> to cut -rc2 first, there's just too
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
> to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.
>
> The idea is to get -rc2 out next week
On 14 October 2016 at 15:33, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
> to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.
>
> The idea is to get -rc2 out next week (ie by Oct 21st at
On 10/14/2016 04:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
Hey folks,
Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need
> to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.
Would be nice if you could send this to
15 matches
Mail list logo