Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-12-10 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 12/10/2016 01:46 AM, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:24:02PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 10/17/2016 11:05 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 10/16/2016 10:15 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: Hey

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-19 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 19 October 2016 at 12:35, Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> Anyway, the list above is not set in stone, otherwise there'd be little >>> point in posting it here. If you think something absolutely critical is >>> missing from that list, or that something should not be there,

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-19 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/19/2016 01:25 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote: On 14 October 2016 at 15:33, Panu Matilainen wrote: Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. The idea is to get

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-19 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 14 October 2016 at 15:33, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need > to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. > > The idea is to get -rc2 out next week (ie by Oct 21st at

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 17 October 2016 at 11:42, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/17/2016 12:30 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote: >> >> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen >> wrote: What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember,

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a): >> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10, Panu Matilainen >> wrote: What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/17/2016 10:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi Panu, What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is controversial change which should make

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/16/2016 10:15 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: Hey folks, Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. The idea is to

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi Panu, What is the chance to get [1, 2] into the release? I mildly remember, that once I was offered to get this patch into Fedora, but that never materialized and now it is almost a year. I don't think this is controversial change which should make anything break. Thx for considering. Vít

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-16 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:33:00PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll > need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into > final. > > The idea is to get -rc2 out next week (ie by

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-15 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Panu Matilainen > wrote: >> >> Hey folks, >> >> Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need >> to cut -rc2 first, there's just too

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need > to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. > > The idea is to get -rc2 out next week

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-14 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 14 October 2016 at 15:33, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need > to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. > > The idea is to get -rc2 out next week (ie by Oct 21st at

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-14 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/14/2016 04:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: Hey folks, Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final.

Re: [Rpm-maint] Planning for rpm 4.13.0 (-rc2)

2016-10-14 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > Time to get rpm 4.13.0 out of the door. But in order to do that, we'll need > to cut -rc2 first, there's just too much change to jump right into final. Would be nice if you could send this to