Re: Removal from default bugzilla CC list

Am 18.01.24 um 12:57 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via rpmfusion-developers: On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 12:51, Julian Sikorski via rpmfusion-developers wrote: Hi list, where can I request to be removed as a co-maintainer/default bugzilla CC for ffmpeg and mplayer? Bug 6843

Removal from default bugzilla CC list

Hi list, where can I request to be removed as a co-maintainer/default bugzilla CC for ffmpeg and mplayer? Bug 6843 is the straw that broke the camel's back, sorry. Best regards, Julian ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

nvidia power management

Hello, I have recently experienced a resume failure with nvidia [1]. Upon deeper investigation, it turns out that PreserveVideoMemoryAllocations was enabled recently [2]. According to documentation [3] and to Arch Wiki [4], for this option to work, nvidia systemd units need to be enabled

Re: Packaging libopenaptx for pipewire

Am 17.07.21 um 02:37 schrieb Sérgio Basto: Hi, Julian this emsil was marked as SPAM because 1.0 FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD 'From' gmail.com does not match 'Received' headers 1.0 FORGED_SPF_HELONo description available. 4.0 SPF_FAIL SPF:

Re: Packaging libopenaptx for pipewire

Am 18.12.20 um 00:17 schrieb Gombos Gergely via rpmfusion-developers: Re: Packaging libopenaptx for pipewire.eml Betreff: Re: Packaging libopenaptx for pipewire Von: Gombos Gergely Datum: 18.12.20, 00:17 An: rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org Kopie (CC): pa...@iki.fi Hi, Update: I

Updating F27 and F26 ffmpeg to 3.3

Hi List, ffmpeg-3.3 was released recently and I would like to suggest that we update f27 and f26 to it. Unfortunately, mockchain is currenly broken [1] which means I cannot proceed with my usual local rebuild. Any suggestions how we could proceed? Best regards, Julian [1]

Re: Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

W dniu 23.11.2016 o 09:14, Xavier Bachelot pisze: > Hi, > > On 23/11/2016 08:41, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> I think we can perform the mass rebuild (or not) just in F24 without >>> touching F25 and rawhide. >> >> May I ask why a mass rebuild was

Re: Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

W dniu 12.10.2016 o 16:15, Kevin Kofler pisze: > Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not going unmaintained >> AFAIK. We can't push out a big rebuild of a major library so one, new >> package can be introduced into F24. > > Huh? Upstream says 3.1 is API-

Re: Updating ffmpeg to 3.2 in rawhide

W dniu 29.10.2016 o 21:37, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Sáb, 2016-10-29 at 11:01 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> ffmpeg-3.2 was released two days ago. As mentioned by Nicolas, this >> update is only in scope for F26 currently. The good news is that it >

Re: Updating ffmpeg to 3.2 in rawhide

W dniu 02.11.2016 o 19:09, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > 2016-10-29 11:01 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski <beleg...@gmail.com>: >> Hi list, >> >> ffmpeg-3.2 was released two days ago. As mentioned by Nicolas, this >> update is only in scope for F26 currently. The good new

Re: Updating ffmpeg to 3.2 in rawhide

W dniu 02.11.2016 o 19:09, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > 2016-10-29 11:01 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski > <belegdol-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org>: >> Hi list, >> >> ffmpeg-3.2 was released two days ago. As mentioned by Nicolas, this >> update is only in sc

Updating ffmpeg to 3.2 in rawhide

Hi list, ffmpeg-3.2 was released two days ago. As mentioned by Nicolas, this update is only in scope for F26 currently. The good news is that it is looking better than I ever remember ffmpeg rebase to be: - there are currently 48 ffmpeg dependencies in rpmfusion git - 46 build fine against 3.2

Re: mlt-freeworld Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

W dniu 31.07.2016 o 17:12, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Dom, 2016-07-31 at 09:41 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> The mlt failure is due to php-7.0: >> http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15442 > > Hello Julian , great work ! , can you share yours scripts :), I'm >

Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

han Underwood >> <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'll work on moving to xpra 0.17.4 in fedora this evening, and will do >>> similarly for the rpm fusion package. >>> >>> >>> On 31 Jul 2016 08:41, "Julian Sikorski" <bele

Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

W dniu 31.07.2016 o 07:29, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 28.07.2016 o 07:41, Julian Sikorski pisze: >> W dniu 28.07.2016 o 04:48, Sérgio Basto pisze: >>> On Qua, 2016-07-27 at 20:18 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>> I have done a test rebuild and found the followi

Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

W dniu 28.07.2016 o 07:41, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 28.07.2016 o 04:48, Sérgio Basto pisze: >> On Qua, 2016-07-27 at 20:18 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>> I have done a test rebuild and found the following: >>> - there are currently 40 packages dependent on ff

Re: rpmfusion rawhide is currently broken hold your build

W dniu 30.07.2016 o 15:45, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 30.07.2016 o 12:09, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: >> 2016-07-30 10:04 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski <beleg...@gmail.com>: >>> W dniu 28.07.2016 o 15:29, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: >>>> 2016-07-28 8:47 GMT+02:0

Re: rpmfusion rawhide is currently broken hold your build

W dniu 28.07.2016 o 15:29, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > 2016-07-28 8:47 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet : >> Hi, >> >> As fedora is now branched for f25, we will do the same in RPM Fusion shortly >> Now until before it's done we need to adapt the koji external repo URL >> to switch to f25

Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

W dniu 28.07.2016 o 04:48, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Qua, 2016-07-27 at 20:18 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> I have done a test rebuild and found the following: >> - there are currently 40 packages dependent on ffmpeg >> - out of those, 37 rebuilt correctly >> -

Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

W dniu 27.07.2016 o 22:34, Sandro Mani pisze: > > > On 27.07.2016 21:38, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> [...] >> http://lesloueizeh.com/belegdol/ffmpeg-3.1.1-1.fc25.src.rpm > > Patch: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/ffmpeg_opj2.patch > > Not sure why they insist

Re: updating ffmpeg to 3.1.x in rawhide

W dniu 27.07.2016 o 21:27, Sandro Mani pisze: > > > On 27.07.2016 21:24, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> W dniu 27.07.2016 o 20:27, Sandro Mani pisze: >>> >>> On 27.07.2016 20:18, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>> Hi list, >>>> >>>&g

Re: Workaround of some buildroot failure and ffmpeg

W dniu 07.07.2016 o 08:17, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 06.07.2016 o 23:44, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: >> There are still some issues with buildroot, some of theses are >> >> >> - ffmpeg is broken in rawhide. probably because of some header changes >> with op

Re: How much RAM do the arm builders have?

W dniu 06.07.2016 o 13:55, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > 2016-07-05 7:35 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski > <belegdol-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org>: >> Hi list, >> >> first of all thank you to Nicolas, Sergio and others for setting up the >> new infra! Keep up

How much RAM do the arm builders have?

Hi list, first of all thank you to Nicolas, Sergio and others for setting up the new infra! Keep up the good work guys! May I ask how much memory do the arm build servers have available? My qmc2 and mame builds have both failed due to memory exhaustion. While I am in the process of moving them to

Re: rfpkg build fixed, you can build on koji !

W dniu 04.07.2016 o 22:01, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > Hi, > > rfpkg build has been fixed, it's now possible to submit build request > with rfpkg-1.23-4 > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=851 > > Please build your packages for f23 to f25 (devel), > > el7 build might be possible,

livna finishes at f21

Hello, it seems that livna does not have packages for Fedora releases beyond f21. Can we somehow fix this? Or would it be possible to bring libdvdcss into rpm fusion? Best regards, Julian

Re: Fedora legal clarification on emulator software

W dniu 03.05.2016 o 22:10, Michael Cronenworth pisze: > Hello, > > > Fedora / Red Hat Legal has clarified[1] its stance on emulation > software, which include game emulators that until now have been > restrained to RPMFusion. With the clarification today game emulator > software that doesn't

nailer, gmtk, gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer

Hi list, the main developer behind nailer, gmtk, gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer has switched to Mac in late 2013 [1]. Since then, only one release was made [2], after which the code has not seen much activity (2 commits). Github migration has not helped either [3]. All of the above makes me

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede > >: > > Hi, > > > On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hello mates > > On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200,

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

W dniu 23.10.2015 o 13:57, Sérgio Basto pisze: > Hello mates > > On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede : >> Hi All, >> >> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to

Re: orphaning mame-data-extras

W dniu 07.10.2015 o 17:59, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Qua, 2015-10-07 at 07:50 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> please be advised that I am orphaning mame-data-extras. This package has >> become too much of a burden to maintain with monthly mame releases

orphaning mame-data-extras

Dear all, please be advised that I am orphaning mame-data-extras. This package has become too much of a burden to maintain with monthly mame releases one one hand and various files included in it lagging behind the mame releases on the other. Not to mention that it was in violation of

Re: Updating F-20 to ffmpeg-2.2.11

W dniu 05.11.2014 o 17:05, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qua, 2014-11-05 at 07:33 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 05.11.2014 o 03:55, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-11-02 at 08:02 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38

Re: can someone run make build for all branches of qmc2 and ffmpeg/F-20

W dniu 29.11.2014 o 10:09, Mamoru TASAKA pisze: Julian Sikorski wrote on 11/29/2014 05:50 PM: Hi, I cannot do make build due to recent updgrade to F-21: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169033 Please someone may do me a solid and issue a make build? Everything is good to go

Re: can someone run make build for all branches of qmc2 and ffmpeg/F-20

W dniu 29.11.2014 o 10:09, Mamoru TASAKA pisze: Julian Sikorski wrote on 11/29/2014 05:50 PM: Hi, I cannot do make build due to recent updgrade to F-21: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169033 Please someone may do me a solid and issue a make build? Everything is good to go

Re: Updating F-20 to ffmpeg-2.2.10

W dniu 05.11.2014 o 03:55, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-11-02 at 08:02 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze: Hi, On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Please be advised

Updating F-20 to ffmpeg-2.2.10 (was: ffmpeg-2.4 released)

W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze: Hi, On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained branches list: https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze: Hi, On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained branches list: https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html Thus, if we ever rebase

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 04.10.2014 o 11:39, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com mailto:ser...@serjux.com: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 07.10.2014 o 08:02, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 04.10.2014 o 11:39, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com mailto:ser...@serjux.com: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet

Re: How to test build for F21+rpmfusion devel ?

W dniu 07.10.2014 o 22:58, David Timms pisze: On 04/10/14 23:57, David Timms wrote: On 02/10/14 22:52, David Timms wrote: On 02/10/14 15:36, Julian Sikorski wrote: .. Which packages are remaining please ? dvbcut and kmediafactory. ... I did a mock test build with: mock -r fedora-rawhide

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com mailto:ser...@serjux.com: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com mailto:beleg

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 02.10.2014 o 07:41, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 02.10.2014 o 01:46, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 19:38 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 01.10.2014 o 16:38, Ankur Sinha pisze: On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 14:29 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: mplayer I'm still seeing this on my F21 up to date system: Error: nothing provides libavutil.so.54()(64bit) needed by mplayer-1.1-28.20140919svn.fc21.x86_64. nothing provides

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 21.09.2014 o 19:11, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 21.09.2014 o 19:03, Julian Sikorski pisze: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is not bad given the extent of API changes

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 01.10.2014 o 23:03, David Timms pisze: On 02/10/14 03:51, Julian Sikorski wrote: ... Looks like we are almost there. The two remaining packages have not been touched by upstream in ages and maybe we should reconsider whether it is worth carrying them. Which packages are remaining

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 01.10.2014 o 19:43, Ankur Sinha pisze: On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: t is related. Try doing # yum downgrade ffmpeg\* I only have 2.3.3 here: [asinha@localhost 99_Current_papers]$ rpm -qa \*ffmpeg\* ffmpeg-libs-2.3.3-3.fc21.x86_64 gstreamer-ffmpeg

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:56, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is not bad given the extent of API

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 22.09.2014 o 16:57, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Seg, 2014-09-22 at 06:50 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 22.09.2014 o 05:35, Ralf Corsepius pisze: On 09/21/2014 11:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released

ffmpeg-2.4 released

Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is not bad given the extent of API changes: - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: 'struct a52_ctx' has no member named 'frame' - dvbcut:

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 21.09.2014 o 19:03, Julian Sikorski pisze: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is not bad given the extent of API changes: - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 22.09.2014 o 05:35, Ralf Corsepius pisze: On 09/21/2014 11:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed

Re: mass rebuild plan

W dniu 05.09.2014 03:15, Orion Poplawski pisze: On 09/01/2014 10:14 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, Mass rebuild is finished ! . Resubmitted all other packages from group 3 that have buildtime 2014-07-18 (July 18) [7] and also removing noarch packages and we got more 2 FTBFS :

ffmpeg-2.3.1 released

Dear all, ffmpeg-2.3.1 has been released recently. I have done a test rebuild, and only 3 packages have failed: - audacious-plugins-freeworld: fails due to missing glib.h - looks like it is not related to ffmpeg - xbmc: fails during debuginfo extraction (/usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh: line 127:

Re: ffmpeg-2.2 released

W dniu 24.03.2014 18:56, Michael Cronenworth pisze: Julian Sikorski wrote: ffmpeg-2.2 was released today. I did a test rebuild and all but one deps have compiled successfully (I could not believe it myself). The only one that failed was mlt, but the failure was due to freetype and not due

ffmpeg-2.2 released

Dear all, ffmpeg-2.2 was released today. I did a test rebuild and all but one deps have compiled successfully (I could not believe it myself). The only one that failed was mlt, but the failure was due to freetype and not due to ffmpeg. As such, I will be pushing it to devel shortly unless someone

Re: little mass rebuild required Re: x264 so bump

W dniu 15.03.2014 16:54, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sex, 2014-03-14 at 03:16 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Qua, 2014-03-05 at 23:37 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, with x264 submitted into rawhide we need rebuild * List what requires x264: (build in first place) *

Re: little mass rebuild required Re: x264 so bump

W dniu 18.03.2014 07:17, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 15.03.2014 16:54, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sex, 2014-03-14 at 03:16 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Qua, 2014-03-05 at 23:37 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, with x264 submitted into rawhide we need rebuild * List what

Re: x264 and ffmpeg - here we go again

W dniu 02.11.2013 02:52, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Qui, 2013-10-31 at 07:45 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: we should definitely do x264 first to save time. OK!, x264 built with bootstrap , we can follow, this wiki page http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists first paragraph Mass rebuild

Re: x264 and ffmpeg - here we go again

W dniu 30.10.2013 22:18, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2013/10/30 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com mailto:ser...@serjux.com On Qua, 2013-10-30 at 07:22 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 29.10.2013 22:11, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Ter, 2013-10-29 at 14:32 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote

Re: ffmpeg - here we go again

W dniu 29.10.2013 22:11, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Ter, 2013-10-29 at 14:32 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: If we push ffmpeg 2.1 before we branch, we would ship F20 with a broken VLC, in that case? No, of course we won't ship VLC broken . We just ship F20 in day of release or very closer until

ffmpeg - here we go again

Hi list, ffmpeg-2.1 is out. preliminary rebuild shows 21 successes and 8 failures - and 4 of those are due to vlc's libfreerdp issues. I think we should branch first in any case: $ find -name success | sort ./audacious-plugins-freeworld-3.4.1-1.fc20/success ./chromaprint-tools-1.0-2.fc20/success

Re: ffmpeg - here we go again

W dniu 29.10.2013 21:11, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Ter, 2013-10-29 at 20:21 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi list, ffmpeg-2.1 is out. preliminary rebuild shows 21 successes and 8 failures - and 4 of those are due to vlc's libfreerdp issues. I think we should branch first in any case: $ find

Re: ffmpeg - here we go again

W dniu 29.10.2013 21:32, Ken Dreyer pisze: If we push ffmpeg 2.1 before we branch, we would ship F20 with a broken VLC, in that case? I vote that we branch sooner than later, since Beta is scheduled to ship in a month. Pushing back the branch date even further seems risky. - Ken Keep in

Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix

W dniu 27.08.2013 13:47, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2013/8/27 Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org mailto:j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com ... I've fixed libquicktime, gstreamer1-libav and frogatto (for new boost, not ffmpeg, building now). But it seems

Re: x264 soname change for rawhide

or let me know when I need to kick them off. About bump ffmpeg, Julian Sikorski is in better place to say, if we should bump it or not. But thinking about it, we just need bootstrap x264, when both (x264 and ffmpeg) bump soname. In this case, I can just push x264 and after we will see, if ffmpeg

Re: x264 soname change for rawhide

W dniu 01.08.2013 10:38, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 14.07.2013 18:30, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2013-07-14 at 09:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: Hi, before update x264 to last stable commit

Re: mass rebuild for x264/ffmpeg/mplayer on F19

W dniu 25.05.2013 14:00, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sáb, 2013-05-25 at 10:27 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Sérgio Basto sergio-icfkjj3otdhqt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org wrote: [...] 9 - build what requires ffmpeg. repoquery

ffmpeg-compat question

Hi, I was wondering why are we shipping 0.6 as ffmpeg-compat and not 0.7. From ffmpeg download page: - 0.6: This release is not actively maintained and thus we discourage its use. If you want to maintain this old version, contact us. - 0.7: It contains almost all features and bugfixes of 0.8.14

Re: mass rebuild for x264/ffmpeg/mplayer on F19

W dniu 25.05.2013 01:43, Sérgio Basto pisze: Review On Sex, 2013-05-24 at 08:13 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Ok, Please bootstrap x264/ffmpeg ASAP, It would be fine to have the rebuilt done this week-end. Built x264 with bootstrap , we also have mplayer updates ... So steps are:

Re: mass rebuild for x264/ffmpeg/mplayer on F19

W dniu 25.05.2013 14:03, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sáb, 2013-05-25 at 11:32 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 25.05.2013 01:43, Sérgio Basto pisze: Review On Sex, 2013-05-24 at 08:13 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Ok, Please bootstrap x264/ffmpeg ASAP, It would be fine to have

Re: buildsys out of disk space?

W dniu 06.05.2013 17:17, Richard Shaw pisze: I was working on some new mythtv builds and saw this in the log after it failed: install: error writing '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mythtv-0.26.0-9.fc20.x86_64/usr/lib64/libmythtv-0.26.so.0.26.0': No space left on device Is the builder out of

Re: ffmpeg-1.2 update

W dniu 20.03.2013 23:53, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2013/3/18 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com mailto:kwiz...@gmail.com 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com mailto:beleg...@gmail.com W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2013/3/18 Julian

ffmpeg-1.2 update

Dear all, ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though. I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe even to F-18 -

Re: ffmpeg-1.2 update

W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com mailto:beleg...@gmail.com Dear all, ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep rebuilds and the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark

Re: updated ffmpeg.spec for rhel5 too

W dniu 23.01.2013 09:58, Farkas Levente pisze: and of course the spec file:-) On 01/23/2013 09:51 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: hi, there is a little bit modified ffmpeg.spec file which can be build on rhel6 and rhel5 too (and of course fedora too). it'd be nice to update rpmfusion spec file

Re: updated ffmpeg.spec for rhel5 too

W dniu 30.01.2013 19:44, Farkas Levente pisze: On 01/30/2013 07:13 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 23.01.2013 09:58, Farkas Levente pisze: and of course the spec file:-) On 01/23/2013 09:51 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: hi, there is a little bit modified ffmpeg.spec file which can be build

Re: updated ffmpeg.spec for rhel5 too

W dniu 30.01.2013 19:56, Farkas Levente pisze: On 01/30/2013 07:52 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 30.01.2013 19:44, Farkas Levente pisze: On 01/30/2013 07:13 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 23.01.2013 09:58, Farkas Levente pisze: and of course the spec file:-) On 01/23/2013 09:51 AM

Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

W dniu 19.01.2013 13:19, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sáb, 2013-01-19 at 12:16 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Meanwhile I build x264-0.129 (soname bump) to rawhide (though that already have new ffmpeg there) . Meanwhile I built x264-0.129 (soname bump) to rawhide (though that already have new

Re: ffmpeg: here we go again

W dniu 20.01.2013 22:09, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 19.01.2013 13:19, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sáb, 2013-01-19 at 12:16 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Meanwhile I build x264-0.129 (soname bump) to rawhide (though that already have new ffmpeg there) . Meanwhile I built x264-0.129 (soname bump

ffmpeg: here we go again

Hi list, ffmpeg-1.1 was released today. Out of 32 deps we are carrying, only 2 failed to rebuild (bino and motion). Given how early in F-19 cycle we are, I'm inclined to push it sooner than later. Keep in mind that dvdstyler and kmediafactory can only be rebuilt in the 2nd round. I'll commit the

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 2012-12-20 01:41, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sáb, 2012-11-10 at 11:57 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 08.11.2012 21:43, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 16:42 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 07:38 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: It built, but the process

Re: x264 soname bump on rawhide

W dniu 23.11.2012 22:04, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sex, 2012-11-23 at 09:52 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/11/23 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com W dniu 22.11.2012 18:16, Sérgio Basto pisze: Hi, in rawhide x264 soname change from .125 to .128

Re: x264 soname bump on rawhide

W dniu 22.11.2012 18:16, Sérgio Basto pisze: Hi, in rawhide x264 soname change from .125 to .128 repoquery --releasever=18 x264-libs --whatrequires --source | sort -u avidemux-2.5.6-9.fc18.src.rpm ffmpeg-0.11.2-1.fc18.src.rpm ffmpeg-compat-0.6.6-3.fc18.src.rpm

Re: x264 soname bump on rawhide

W dniu 23.11.2012 01:21, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Sex, 2012-11-23 at 00:39 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 22.11.2012 18:16, Sérgio Basto pisze: Hi, in rawhide x264 soname change from .125 to .128 repoquery --releasever=18 x264-libs --whatrequires --source | sort -u avidemux-2.5.6-9

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 08.11.2012 21:43, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 16:42 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 07:38 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: It built, but the process took 600 minutes. This is still a bit slow IMO. I'll just build the missing mame-0.147 for F-18 and hold

Re: ffmpeg 1.0

W dniu 01.11.2012 23:18, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/10/31 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com mailto:beleg...@gmail.com W dniu 20.10.2012 20:53, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 04.10.2012 19 tel:04.10.2012%2019:04, Julian Sikorski pisze: Hi, ffmpeg 1.0 was released

Re: ffmpeg 1.0

W dniu 03.11.2012 19:01, Andrea Musuruane pisze: On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote: Out of those, kmediafactory, minidlna and motion fail due to glibc, vlc due to kernel, and kdemultimedia-extras-freeworld should be retired [1]. So it seems we have only

builder1.rpmfusion.org has 1 thread blocked by something

Hi, in my futile attempts to build mame-0.147u2 I have noticed that something is blocking 1 out of 4 builder1.rpmfusion.org threads. If that is not an artifact, maybe it is eating memory mame build needs so badly? Could someone please have a look? Regards, Julian

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 29.10.2012 07:14, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 29.10.2012 00:54, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 21:42 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: Keep in mind that it was 0.147u1 which was built for rawhide, and 0.147 for F-18. You haven't test 0.147u1 or other than 0.147 on F-18

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 29.10.2012 00:54, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 21:42 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: Keep in mind that it was 0.147u1 which was built for rawhide, and 0.147 for F-18. You haven't test 0.147u1 or other than 0.147 on F-18 builder http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 27.10.2012 21:21, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 27.10.2012 12:52, Dan Horák pisze: Dan Horák píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:48 +0200: Nicolas Chauvet píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:40 +0200: Yesterday. Le 27 oct. 2012 10:43, Julian Sikorski belegdol-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 28.10.2012 17:42, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 07:38 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: It built, but the process took 600 minutes. This is still a bit slow IMO. I'll just build the missing mame-0.147 for F-18 and hold on with u-releases until we get more memory

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 28.10.2012 21:42, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 28.10.2012 17:42, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 07:38 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: It built, but the process took 600 minutes. This is still a bit slow IMO. I'll just build the missing mame-0.147 for F-18 and hold on with u

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 11.10.2012 07:28, Julian Sikorski pisze: W dniu 11.10.2012 00:27, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2012/10/10 Julian Sikorski belegdol-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w-xmd5yjdbdmrexy1tmh2...@public.gmane.org: W dniu 2012-10-10 12:22, Leigh Scott pisze: Hi Julian, If I could somehow force only one

Re: buildsystem mame

W dniu 27.10.2012 12:52, Dan Horák pisze: Dan Horák píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:48 +0200: Nicolas Chauvet píše v So 27. 10. 2012 v 12:40 +0200: Yesterday. Le 27 oct. 2012 10:43, Julian Sikorski belegdol-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org a écrit : W dniu 11.10.2012 07:28, Julian

Re: ffmpeg 1.0

W dniu 04.10.2012 19:04, Julian Sikorski pisze: Hi, ffmpeg 1.0 was released a few days ago. It is definitely suited for devel. I'll prepare a build soon-ish, and then we can see if the fallout is small enough to warrant trying to squeeze it into F-18. Regards, Julian OK, it's been long

  1   2   3   >