Hi,
On 09-01-16 21:57, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
I've just sponsored you in rpmfusion fas now, so you have all
the same rights as in Fedora now.
Ok thanks, will wait on CVSsync then
Yes that may take a while though due to the infra wip.
Regards,
Hans
Le dimanche 10 janvier 2016, 14:13:58 Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 09-01-16 21:57, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> >> I've just sponsored you in rpmfusion fas now, so you have all
> >> the same rights as in Fedora now.
> >
> > Ok thanks, will wait on CVSsync then
>
> Yes that may take a while
Hi,
On 03-01-16 22:15, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
I still believe that innoextract belongs in Fedora proper,
so a first step at getting g-d-p in rpmfusion would be
to get innoextract into Fedora, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
I can act as a sponsor
> I've just sponsored you in rpmfusion fas now, so you have all
> the same rights as in Fedora now.
Ok thanks, will wait on CVSsync then
Alexandre
> I still believe that innoextract belongs in Fedora proper,
> so a first step at getting g-d-p in rpmfusion would be
> to get innoextract into Fedora, see:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
>
> I can act as a sponsor for you in Fedora. I believe this is
Hi,
On 07-11-15 18:23, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le mercredi 4 novembre 2015, 13:01:51 Hans de Goede a écrit :
So for now I'll just use/suggest the innoextract package provided by upstream.
I do not think this is a good idea, we really want to do this properly.
Ok I'll start with this one,
Hi,
On 20-11-15 01:09, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le jeudi 19 novembre 2015, 13:23:48 Hans de Goede a écrit :
[htmlcxx]
Ok my bad, if it uses autoconf and a straight-forward build, then by
all means do package it for Fedora.
Is it ok for Fedora that the current only reverse dependency is in
Le mercredi 4 novembre 2015, 13:01:51 Hans de Goede a écrit :
> > So for now I'll just use/suggest the innoextract package provided by
> > upstream.
>
> I do not think this is a good idea, we really want to do this properly.
Ok I'll start with this one, because:
- it's the most usefull utility
Hi,
On 03-11-15 17:07, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le mardi 3 novembre 2015, 14:49:47 Hans de Goede a écrit :
I'm now running it thourgh virtualbox, maintenance will be more bearable
when I manage to run it in a thin container with full X/OpenGl support.
(systemd-nspawn ?)
Ok, so you do plan
Hi,
On 03-11-15 16:17, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 11/03/2015 02:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
lgogdownloader is more interesting. Which also makes me wonder about
game-data-packager itself. I really do not see any reason for them not to
be in Fedora proper, but I must admit it sort of a gray area.
Hi,
On 02-11-15 14:54, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
(reposting message first sent to ga...@lists.fedoraproject.org)
Hi,
My redhat/fedora skills were a bit rusty (1998-rusty),
so as an exercice I dediced to port to fedora
the game-data-packager Debian native project I'm working on.
So far, so
The fedora support branch has now been completely merged in master :-)
Running it from the git tree is explained here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/doc/adding_a_game.mdwn
$ git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git
$ make
Le mardi 3 novembre 2015, 14:49:47 Hans de Goede a écrit :
>
> > I'm now running it thourgh virtualbox, maintenance will be more bearable
> > when I manage to run it in a thin container with full X/OpenGl support.
> > (systemd-nspawn ?)
>
> Ok, so you do plan to maintain it, that would be great
Hi,
On 11/03/2015 11:57 AM, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
The fedora support branch has now been completely merged in master :-)
Running it from the git tree is explained here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/doc/adding_a_game.mdwn
$ git clone
14 matches
Mail list logo
