Re: little mass rebuild required Re: x264 so bump

Richard Shaw wrote: I'm guessing linpng soname was bumped in rawhide? It was not bumped. From the build root.log I don't see libpng-devel being installed. You're missing a BR.

Builder stuck?

I tried to kick off an XBMC build but it has been in checkout for over an hour. Any ideas? Job ID 19954

Re: Builder stuck?

On 03/21/2014 03:57 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: I meant : you may try submit a new build ... Yes, thanks. A new build completed successfully.

Re: ffmpeg-2.2 released

Julian Sikorski wrote: ffmpeg-2.2 was released today. I did a test rebuild and all but one deps have compiled successfully (I could not believe it myself). The only one that failed was mlt, but the failure was due to freetype and not due to ffmpeg. As such, I will be pushing it to devel shortly

Re: ffmpeg-2.2 released

On 03/25/2014 01:29 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: I have submitted the build, the following packages need to be rebuilt: xbmc Rebuilt.

Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2014-04-22

rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org wrote: ffmpeg-2.2.1-1.fc21 --- * Fri Apr 18 2014 Nicolas Chauvetkwiz...@gmail.com - 2.2.1-1 - Update to 2.2.1 Now that this is out did those parties that wanted to push this to F20 want to do so?

Rawhide buildroot broken

Hi all, The buildroot appears to be broken with the rtmpdump rebuild a few days ago. The new rtmpdump build hasn't made it in to the buildroot. (404 error[1]) There also appears to be a bug in the RPM Fusion build system regarding the string length of the URL of the logs for the rtmpdump

Re: problems with Intel VA

On 07/11/2014 10:13 AM, Nux! wrote: Has anyone hit this problem before, there must be something that I'm obviously missing. Are you guys aware of any issues? My only guess is that the Mesa in RHEL/CentOS 7 is not new enough for the latest libva.

Rpmfusion NFS issue

We still cannot upload new source files. Is there an ETA on addressing the NFS storage? Thanks, Michael

Re: ffmpeg-2.3.1 released

On 08/06/2014 05:40 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi , ok , I will rebuild [1] , tomorrow should be done, any objection ? . I just rebuilt xbmc without any errors. http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=20773

Re: ffmpeg-2.3.1 released

On 08/06/2014 05:40 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi , ok , I will rebuild [1] , tomorrow should be done, any objection ? . I just rebuilt xbmc without any errors. http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=20773

repo data rebuild

Hello, Can someone regenerate the repo data[1] for rawhide? The repo data is dated Aug 12th but the last push seems to be Aug 14th. This is causing my XBMC build to fail[2] (missing ffmpeg package). Thanks, Michael [1]

repo data rebuild

Hello, Can someone regenerate the repo data[1] for rawhide? The repo data is dated Aug 12th but the last push seems to be Aug 14th. This is causing my XBMC build to fail[2] (missing ffmpeg package). Thanks, Michael P.S. This mailing list either heavily delays email or drops it completely.

Package push

Hello, @Nicolas or anyone else with the privileges to do so. Could we have a package push? It's been over a week... Thanks, Michael

Re: Package push

On 08/28/2014 02:42 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, have you anything in specific to push ? Yes: xbmc I've already had one user ask where the new version is. I suspect more are waiting for it.

Re: Package push

On 08/29/2014 09:14 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: here [snip] Thanks, Sergio. I'm well aware of where the build results live. However, I'm not going to tell every Fedora user to grab packages that way.

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 09/26/2014 07:29 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Ssome packages were published already : ffmpeg mplayer xine-lib Additionnaly, k3b-extras-freeworld was built earlier today but is not pushed yet. I'm not sure what remains to be rebuilt against ffmpeg 2.4, but at least mplayer, xine-lib and

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 10/01/2014 12:43 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: Should I still attempt the downgrade? No. You need to downgrade mplayer. mplayer was built against ffmpeg 2.4, but you do not have ffmpeg 2.4 installed.

SONAME bump in libcdio-paranoia

Heads up: An SONAME bump occurred with libcdio-paranoia-10.2+0.93+1-1 and ffmpeg needs a rebuild. Michael

Re: SONAME bump in libcdio-paranoia

On 11/14/2014 01:48 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Heads up: An SONAME bump occurred with libcdio-paranoia-10.2+0.93+1-1 and ffmpeg needs a rebuild. Michael I would do this if I had commit access to ffmpeg. I'll put in a request. In the mean time I'll attach a patch to show only a release

Re: SONAME bump in libcdio-paranoia

On 11/14/2014 09:51 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I would do this if I had commit access to ffmpeg. I'll put in a request. I cannot find the original review bug for ffmpeg. How would I go about getting myself added to the ACL for ffmpeg? RPMfusion username: mooninite

Re: SONAME bump in libcdio-paranoia

On 11/14/2014 12:46 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: The problem is that rpmfusion isn't branched for f21 which means devel still target F-21 packages. Given that I don't see that we'll branch before switching to git I don't expect this to be done before f21 GA. Yep, but some strange things may

Re: branch for F-21

On 01/20/2015 06:59 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Can I create rpmfusion organization ? what Billing email should I choose ? One has been setup, but there are no repositories yet. https://github.com/rpmfusion

Re: rpms/VirtualBox-kmod/devel VirtualBox-kmod.spec,1.46,1.47

On 02/04/2015 01:43 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: #global prerel RC4 +%global __arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot %global prereltag %{?prerel:_%(awk 'BEGIN {print toupper(%{prerel})}')} %global vboxrel 1 What this fix is for ? this fix is need only

buildroot repos

For two days now I've been unsuccessfully trying to build a Kodi package update. DEBUG util.py:257: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-21-rpmfusion_free/ffmpeg/2.4.8-1.fc21/x86_64/ffmpeg-libs-2.4.8-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - The requested URL returned

Re: Kodi update for Fedora 22

On 07/22/2015 08:15 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I have pushed an update to CVS devel for Kodi. This will update Kodi from 14.2 to 15.0. Please push this update for Fedora 22. I will not push a F21 update at this time, but I may after a few weeks of testing 15.0. Ping: anyone home?

Kodi 16 testing

Hello, Kodi 16 is nearing release and I would like to get out in front of it with some testing. Here are the RPMs and SRPMs for Kodi 16 beta 3: http://cchtml.com/kodi16/ A new library, dcadec, is now required and I will bring it into RPMFusion shortly. Please let me know if any issues here

Re: Cleaning the bugzilla product Fedora AKA cleaning the house.

On 01/10/2016 05:12 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: I intend, if I may, clean / close RPMFusion bugzilla , Fedora Product [1] . First remind all maintainers that now we got the sources on github.com [2] and they can make pull requests and update his packages with the instructions on this [3] wiki page.

Re: Kodi

On 06/22/2016 03:34 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Not at all, sir, alpha is way too late for f24 GA, about to be released just NOW! Also I'm not very pleased with me having to fix your FTBFS kodi package despite the appropriate backport was made available to you via github. I'm fine if you update

Re: Kodi

On 06/22/2016 05:17 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: So we agree! We do not agree. Now do you really beleive I should untag koji-16 from koji for f24-free and build kodi-17 instead ? I have not asked for that.

Kodi

Please do not touch Kodi. Do not commit patches. Do not create a build. Do not collect $200. I am in the process of updating Kodi to 17 alpha. I do not want a Fedora 24+ build yet. Thanks, Michael

Re: Kodi

On 06/22/2016 04:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Please read again what I've said, I have no issue to backport kodi 17 to stable (f24) at some point. There is nothing wrong against updating f24 kodi 16 to 17 18 or whatever. But having the repo and upgrade path broken for 23-->24 user migration is

Re: Kodi 16 testing

On 12/06/2015 04:07 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Kodi 16 is nearing release and I would like to get out in front of it with some testing. Here are the RPMs and SRPMs for Kodi 16 beta 3: http://cchtml.com/kodi16/ A new library, dcadec, is now required and I will bring it into RPMFusion

Re: I'm not receivng emails

I have received your e-mails from Bugzilla and from the mailing list. Perhaps you have a spam filter on your end? On 04/05/2016 06:23 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: In my email ser...@serjux.com , I don't have any email since 26 of March , no emails from bugzilla or

Fedora legal clarification on emulator software

Hello, Fedora / Red Hat Legal has clarified[1] its stance on emulation software, which include game emulators that until now have been restrained to RPMFusion. With the clarification today game emulator software that doesn't require a proprietary ROM to bootstrap are allowed in Fedora.

Re: Kodi

Please do not touch Kodi. I am on vacation for a few more days, but when I return I will build 17a2 for rawhide without DVD support since no one is willing to discuss libdvdcss on this list.

Re: Kodi

On 07/19/2016 07:01 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: I forgot to tell you , I and DavidVa , built kodi 16.1 for Fedora 24 in unitedrpms , https://github.com/UnitedRPMs?utf8=%E2%9C%93=kodi https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/kodi https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/kodi-platform (with support for p8- platform )

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

On 07/08/2016 12:59 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: The reasoning is VideoLAN is a French organization and libdvdcss is legal in France. Seehttp://www.videolan.org/legal.html Starting from that point, the first question to answer to be able to distribute libdvdcss in RPM Fusion is which laws do

Re: Kodi

On 07/22/2016 11:39 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: I saw today, melmorabity built kodi-platform, but packaging kodi is confusing [¹] : F23 got 16.0 F24 got 16.1 , but git is already in 17 alpha F25 build kodi-17.0-0.2.fc25 failed May I build 16.1 on F23 and respective kodi-platform ?

Re: Kodi

On 07/28/2016 11:02 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Please do not touch Kodi. I am on vacation for a few more days, but when I return I will build 17a2 for rawhide without DVD support since no one is willing to discuss libdvdcss on this list. Kodi 17 alpha 2 has been built for Rawhide. DVD

Re: rfpkg build fixed, you can build on koji !

On 07/04/2016 03:01 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: rfpkg build has been fixed, it's now possible to submit build request with rfpkg-1.23-4 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=851 Please build your packages for f23 to f25 (devel), el7 build might be possible, but it sounds like there

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

On 07/02/2016 04:47 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Any comments are welcome, I'll enhance the wiki page with them. I'm especially interested in comments_against_ hosting libdvdcss in RPM Fusion, with facts on why it would be bad. Once we'll have enough input, we can then collectively try to reach a

Re: RPM Fusion pkgs is branched for f25

On 08/09/2016 04:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: @Michael, Have you retried since your last attempt ? I ran another push today and it worked. Thank you.

Re: As of today, MP3 decoding software is permissible in Fedora.

On 11/10/2016 03:11 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: That's a good news for old audio files. From a quick review libmad, madplay mpg123 could get it, but not lame. Anyone to start reviewing theses into fedora ? The Workstation SIG is planning to introduce mpg123 through a gstreamer1 plugin[1].

Re: As of today, MP3 decoding software is permissible in Fedora.

On 11/10/2016 12:42 PM, Felix Kaechele wrote: this is just in. Seehttps://twitter.com/spotrh/status/796783023471656961 WOW! *cues up Hallelujah from Handel's Messiah*

Re: Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: I think we can perform the mass rebuild (or not) just in F24 without touching F25 and rawhide. May I ask why a mass rebuild was not performed? I just uncovered an issue with the FFMpeg 3.1 update. Kodi core dumps when attempting to play MPEG2

Re: Looking for new maintainer for the rpmfusion gstreamer* pkgs

On 11/13/2016 05:26 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: As such I'm looking for someone to take over the rpmfusion gstreamer* pkgs from me. I welcome new maintainers for any other rpmfusion pkgs I maintain as well. Hi Hans, If Leigh (your co-maintainer) doesn't want them then I would be happy to help.

Re: Removing ARM support in Kodi

On 11/02/2016 12:19 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Kodi is totally relevant on ARM, but according to Rob Clark (the freedreno developper), kodi is one of theses projects that suffer from assuming arm == gles. In Fedora, we prefer to build for gl over gles in every arches because it's well supported

Re: Updating ffmpeg to 3.2 in rawhide

On 10/29/2016 04:01 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: - kodi requires an upstream patch [1] The patch is included in 17 beta 5, which I will be building this week. Thanks, Michael

Removing ARM support in Kodi

I'm going to remove the ARM build for Kodi unless someone can give me a compelling reason to keep it. The Kodi build has never worked even if it was successfully building. You have to tell Kodi at compile time what graphics processor you want to support. One build of Kodi only supports one ARM

Re: Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

On 10/11/2016 07:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: the mailing list". I hope have one decision, quickly and close this subject (update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ? ). This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not going unmaintained AFAIK. We can't push out a big rebuild of a major library so one,

Re: Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

On 10/12/2016 09:15 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Huh? Upstream says 3.1 is API- and ABI-compatible to 3.0 (with only one application needed fixing for some reason), so it should be perfectly suitable as an update. This is similar to Qt upgrades that have often been done in Fedora (where there are

Re: kodi-17.0-0.8.fc25 successfully untagged from f25-free-updates by kwizart

On 12/14/2016 03:01 PM, RPM Fusion Koji Build System wrote: Package: kodi NVR: kodi-17.0-0.8.fc25 User: kwizart Status: complete Tag Operation: untagged From Tag: f25-free-updates kodi-17.0-0.8.fc25 successfully untagged from f25-free-updates by kwizart I noticed that kodi-17.0-0.9.fc25 was

Call to retire gstreamer 0.10

Hi, I've opened a discussion[1] on the Fedora devel list to begin retirement for gstreamer 0.10. I would like to extend that discussion to include RPMFusion. RPMFusion gst-0.10 packages: gstreamer-ffmpeg gstreamer-plugins-bad gstreamer-plugins-ugly libnice-gstreamer - obsoleted by

Re: Build overrides for Fedora packages

On 12/02/2016 10:44 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: I've put the updates manually for f25-free, the long term way would be to have a script that automatically grab a list of package to put in overrides. You will have to wait for a rawhide push for f26-free to grab them. Rawhide has had libcec 4.0

Build overrides for Fedora packages

Hi, Is it possible to ask for an override for a package in Fedora proper? Kodi 17 beta 6 requires libcec 4.0 and Fedora 25 currently ships 3.1. The libcec 4.0 update is entering[1] updates-testing now. Without an override there will be a short window where Fedora users may try to upgrade and

Re: RPM Fusion ready for f26 !

On 07/11/2017 02:33 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi there. I would just like to let you know that RPM Fusion is ready for Fedora 26. Please enjoy and forward the news! Good work everyone! It shows how all your hard work has paid off to have a new, smooth Fedora release!

Re: Using openh264 repository by default in RPM Fusion

On 06/29/2017 01:48 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: As a consequence , the problem remains for kodi, if libdvdcss cannot be required from the repos. Kodi needs to be patched to dlopen it. Or maybe using libdvdcss-devel would be enought for kodi to dlopen but not link ? Kodi uses its own upstream

Re: ffmpeg-3.2 on f25

On 05/11/2017 07:17 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: who vote on this (ffmpeg-3.2 on f25 ) ? we need some quorum , to address this to kwizart , also we may start discuss of revive Steering Committee -1 We're 1 month away from F26. FFMpeg 3.1 is still receiving updates. One of the two apps with issues

Re: [lpf-flash-plugin] Update to 27 in same way

On 11/07/2017 06:27 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: FTR, old flash-plugin is back in business since some months ago , for who still use flash plugin, this is the quick way to update it ... So I hope be allowed to update all branches . Thanks and best regards, FYI, version 11 is the last version

Github discussion

As I hope you're all aware by now github has been purchased by Microsoft. Are there any plans to move RPMFusion from github to gitlab? Thanks, Michael ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe

Re: F28 ffmpeg-3.5 rebuild, FTBFS list

On 01/18/2018 06:03 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: Here's a list of the packages that fail to build ... kodi ... Upstream hasn't moved to 3.5 yet. They just moved to 3.4 last month. It will take me time to patch this. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list

FFmpeg 3.5 support now in Kodi

Hello, Rawhide now has kodi-17.6-4.fc28, which features ffmpeg-3.5 support. Please test this against video files, addons, and music files. Thanks, Michael ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To

Heads-up: ImageMagick SONAME bump

ImageMagick 6.9.9 => 6.9.10 introduces a SONAME bump from .so.5 to .so.6. Only 2 packages are affected in RPMFusion. libopenshot xine-lib Thanks, Michael ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe

Re: RPM Fusion mediacenter Spin

On 03/09/2018 01:06 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: - Setup a dedicated "product" to enable firewall, tuning and services options as appropriate Required ports: * TCP    - 8080 (web UI)    - 9090 (JSON API)    - 3-36667 (AirPlay) * UDP    - 1900 (DNLP)    - 9777 (EventServer)

Re: RPM Fusion mediacenter Spin

On 03/13/2018 10:30 AM, David Demelier wrote: I see kodi is included within the kickstart. Since we now ship libdvdcss in RPM Fusion it could be nice to enable DVD support in kodi. I think it's very important and a useful feature. Raspbian has kodi with disc support by default too. That would

Re: RPM Fusion mediacenter Spin

On 03/14/2018 06:00 AM, Mohamed El Morabity wrote: Unbundling may be impossible, unfortunately. Such bundled libraries are too heavily modified by the Kodi team. And if I remember well, their modifications weren't accepted (yet?) upstream. Yes, this is the major problem. Kodi bundles custom

FAS cert generation

I am trying to build a kodi update, but rfpkg build stated a certificate error. Could not execute build: Could not auth with koji. Login failed: [('SSL routines', 'ssl3_read_bytes', 'sslv3 alert certificate expired')] My certificate expires today but not for several more hours. I attempted

Kodi 18 alpha 1 + ARM

Hello, Kodi 18 alpha 1 is now available for Rawhide. The ARM 64-bit arch is now enabled, but I do not have any hardware to test it. If anyone does I am interested in test results. The ARM 32-bit build is not enabled at this time as it requires floating point support not in the ARMv7hl arch

Koji build space

Hi, It appears the x86/x86_64 builders have run out of hard disk space. Is that anyone can address? Thanks, Michael ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fwd: Re: [HEADS UP] tinyxml2 SONAME bump (7.x)

To: Michael Cronenworth Please rebuild kodi. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:29 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 11/27/18 3:54 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: * kodi (rpmfusion) You're welcome to ping me when you need this rebuilt. Thanks, Michael ___ devel mailing

Re: Switching from GCC to llvm-clang for building chromium(vaapi)

On 3/16/19 7:10 AM, Akarshan Biswas wrote: With the above stated reasons, I am willing to know your suggestions/opinions on this. Building with GCC has become quite a headache for me. If it goes against the packaging rules, I think we can make an exception for this particular package. There

Kodi 18.1 update

Hi all, I was attempting to push the Kodi 18.1 update, but the aarch64 build failed with a strange error. It looks like gcc or annobin didn't fully install. Is it a disk space issue? http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=296321 Thanks, Michael

Re: [kodi] Kodi 18.0 final

On 1/29/19 8:24 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Please refrain from pushing any further updates until it can be tested. I have tested the update and I don't see any regressions. I've pushed a minor commit so that it is now ready to push out, but the Koji builders have run out of room

Re: [kodi] Kodi 18.0 final

On 1/29/19 2:54 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: commit 2241df2e88107357e79d23640e781fa6e6b2978b Author: Leigh Scott Date: Tue Jan 29 08:53:57 2019 + Kodi 18.0 final It may be nice to push an update within hours of them tagging the release, but have you tested the build? Please refrain

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 4/11/19 11:52 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hello, RPM Fusion devs, in case you missed it, MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 are now permitted in Fedora: That's great news. Thanks for the notice. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

Re: [kodi-inputstream-adaptive] Update to 2.3.17

On 5/11/19 4:26 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: commit 29273fccbb7aefaa4ef2d5f4ead59cf6e6563b89 Author: Leigh Scott Date: Sat May 11 10:26:36 2019 +0100 Update to 2.3.17 Thanks for this. It was severely out of date. 2.3.18 actually just came out a few days ago and has some good bug fixes in

Koji needs some attention

There seems to be some filesystem breakage and one Kodi build is stuck in building mode without a way to cancel. http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=322191 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11144 ___ rpmfusion-developers

Re: [kodi/f29] Build with debugging symbols (rfbz#5248)

On 5/6/19 7:21 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Can you check that you are not building with assert? Usually cmake should use RelWithDebug or something like this to have debbugging symbols but without assert that will dramatically slow down production build. It means building with -DNDEBUG or

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 4/28/19 4:23 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers wrote: +1. FFmpeg without patented codecs support will be unusable trash. It's also unfortunate that the discussion regarding all of this is being done on Twitter. ___

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 4/28/19 3:39 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Could you point to the discussion? https://twitter.com/cfkschaller/status/1121061262107054080 The only way I knew about this is from a Phoronix post. I don't have a Twitter account nor do I want one. There are plenty of official

Re: About the i686 kernel/repository drops for f31

On 7/14/19 10:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: - We are using the i686 repository to build few packages into the i686 buildroot. (steam, libva-intel-driver, pcsx, etc). not to take into account the usual multilibs packages. According to the Change the 'fedora-31-i386' mock config will be updated

F31 ffmpeg / x264 out of sync

Is anyone looking into this? "nothing provides libx264.so.157()(64bit) needed by ffmpeg-libs-4.2-3.fc31.x86_64" Thanks, Michael ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F31 ffmpeg / x264 out of sync

On 9/3/19 2:17 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: The ffmpeg/x264 build are appropriate, but the regen-repo task might have crashed leading to this depency issue. I'v regenerated it and it went further. But for some reason it failed to build only on f31... Thanks. I've fixed the issue and started a

Kodi 18.4

The next update is building. Python 3 support has been added to Rawhide only. If anyone can test this build please provide feedback. Python 2 add-ons won't work. I'm going to try testing it myself but more eyes are better. I'm also going to push an InputStream update after Kodi 18.4 is

Re: Unable to use mock or rfpkg mockbuild

On 2/24/20 7:46 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Should be fixed with latest mock commit [1] Unfortunately there is no mock update and who knows when one might be released. Can you push an update to the rpmfusion mock configs? ___ rpmfusion-developers

Re: f32-free ftbfs list

On 2/5/20 11:12 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: I might have experienced a similar issue with a particular function from opencl headers. Is there any way to workaround the issue on the "consumer package" level ? The only workaround I can think of is to proven packager the patch through if the

Re: f32-free ftbfs list

On 2/5/20 6:10 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Actually waylandpp-0.2.7-3.fc32 has the fix and now this waylandcpp is in f32 buildroot. The package used during mass build was waylandpp-0.2.7-1.fc32 . I guess Rawhide is not getting fully composed right now. The -1 package is still in the repo. :(

Re: f32-free ftbfs list

On 2/5/20 10:03 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: ... kodi This guy and anyone else that compiles against waylandpp will be affected by gcc 10 changes. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798253 ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

Re: [kodi-inputstream-adaptive] Update to 2.4.2

On 1/20/20 4:13 AM, Mohamed ElMorabity wrote: commit 857230579e49fb22c3ba8b709660d1bf8cff10d0 Author: Mohamed El Morabity Date: Mon Jan 20 11:12:54 2020 +0100 Update to 2.4.2 FYI - there were no actual changes in this update. Upstream just bumped version numbers due to a SCM mess.

build host disk space

Hi, Can someone free up some disk space on all build hosts (x86 and ARM)? The Kodi 18.5 build failed, as it usually does, on low free space. Thanks, Michael ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To

Re: Kodi 18 and Fedora 32+

On 4/27/20 5:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Many users expect their software to be functional by design once they updates to f32. So I'm a little chocked that such concern appear that late in the f32 development process. It boils down to time and resources. No one must be testing F32 and

Kodi 18 and Fedora 32+

Hi all, With the Fedora 32 release only a few days away I would like to share some info about Kodi 18. As you may already be aware Kodi 18 officially supports Python 2.7. Kodi 19 will support Python 3. Fedora 32 is deprecating Python 2 in a big way. While a barebones python27 package is

Re: Kodi 18 and Fedora 32+

On 5/18/20 3:49 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: IMO, it's the proper way to ship kodi until Kodi 19 is released where python3 is supported upstream. @Michael We requires your opinion here. Thanks in advance. Yes, it is the proper way to use Kodi 18. Upstream add-on developers have no interest in

Re: Kodi 18 and Fedora 32+

On 5/8/20 3:41 PM, Wade Berrier wrote: Were there specific issues with using python2 with the current set of packages in f32 and rpmfusion? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetirePython2 ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

Re: Kodi 18 and Fedora 32+

On 5/18/20 12:41 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Local testing on a F32 box with no prior Kodi install does show promise. I still want to test my daily driver system before pushing this to stable. I will start F32 builds, but please give them several days in testing before pushing to stable

Re: [kodi] Update release tag

On 8/25/20 3:28 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: commit a481c9662caf573b98e11a8b859e137a29c01f52 Author: Nicolas Chauvet Date: Tue Aug 25 22:25:33 2020 +0200 Update release tag kodi.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- diff --git a/kodi.spec b/kodi.spec index

Kodi 19 Rawhide build

I saw the latest attempt failed. http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=420003 The 32-bit ARM build couldn't link. http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=420006=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 Do we want to drop 32-bit ARM starting with Kodi 19? I certainly don't have the time or

Re: Kodi 19 Rawhide build

On 7/8/20 11:29 AM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: "Out of memory" would suggest that this is a build infrastructure issue (whether the VM memory allocation needs to be bigger or more disk swap needs to be assigned are all various trade-offs for builders, and none are ever perfect). The reality is

Re: Kodi 19 Rawhide build

On 7/8/20 2:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: One way would be to lower the debug verbosity to lower link time requirement. This was picked from fedora chromium for ix86, but can be done for %{arm} Thanks for the tip. I've added it. We'll see in a few hours if it helps.

  1   2   >