Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

Hi Bob, On 19/03/2023 10:18, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-developers wrote: RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected: xine-lib xine-lib has been moved to Fedora. Regards, Xavier ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

Re: Several multimedia packages moved to Fedora

On 25/01/2023 00:11, Neal Gompa via rpmfusion-developers wrote: Hey all, I've been working on refreshing and migrating packages to Fedora for a while now, and I've completed some already. The following packages have been moved to Fedora 36+ and EPEL 9: * kdenlive * ffmpegthumbs *

Re: RPMFusion el8 buildroot broken?

Le 01/02/2022 à 17:53, Gary Buhrmaster a écrit : FWIW for EL9 (the future) there are some missing dependencies for both xmltv and mythtv in EPEL9. I believe there are open bugzillas with requests for branching for most/all of the known missing packages. But all that is for the future. There

Re: RPMFusion el8 buildroot broken?

Le 01/02/2022 à 16:14, Andrew Bauer a écrit : I think Nicolas is referring to fixing the perl-XML-TreeBuilder runtime requirement for mythtv. Until recently, it was missing from el8. perl-XMl-TreeBuilder is now available for EL8

Re: [xine-lib] add define for legacy_common_support

Hi Leigh, Le 06/02/2020 à 01:40, Leigh Scott a écrit : commit c4ab58259110eb1bf55a67a464b00a156abd3364 Author: Leigh Scott Date: Thu Feb 6 00:40:27 2020 + add define for legacy_common_support xine-lib.spec | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- diff --git a/xine-lib.spec

Re: [audacity-freeworld] Update to Audacity 2.3.3 - how to use appstream / override in mock

Le 01/12/2019 à 11:46, David Timms a écrit : What do I need to do to enable "appstream" in a build ? How to enable override repo in a local mock build ? Appstream is enabled by default. The RPM Fusion override repo is defined but disabled by default. There are various solutions to enable it:

Re: libdvdread SONAME bump

Le 21/11/2019 à 20:29, FeRD a écrit : My attempts to build it in F31 mock are failing out of the gate, though, due to a dependency resolution failure involving libdav1d and ffmpeg. HandBrake 1.3.0 also adds a new dependency on libdav1d, but it's not even getting that far, mock fails at the

Re: libdav1d SONAME bump

Le 11/10/2019 à 16:10, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : Hello, Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so. 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0. I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers of these libraries (ffmpeg, xine-lib, vlc) will need to rebuild their

Re: [mp3gain/f30] (2 commits) ...Moved to Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664399

Le 19/09/2019 à 09:27, Karel Volný a écrit : ... All but the F29 branch have been retired, as this is what we agreed with Karel. ahem, what about that EL6? mp3gain was branched for EL6, but never built. X. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list

Re: [mp3gain/f30] (2 commits) ...Moved to Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664399

Le 18/09/2019 à 15:55, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit : Please remind that it's not needed to merge dead.package into branches, specially as we won't remove packages in stables (same as in fedora). Which is appropriate since the fedora package will have a higher EVR. Please remind to retire de package

Re: [mjpegtools] Disable use of SDL_gfx on EL8

Le 10/09/2019 à 18:43, Sérgio Basto a écrit : On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 18:38 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi Sergio, Le 10/09/2019 à 18:27, Sérgio Basto a écrit : One question, just a question, mjpegtools is need for what ? gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld shoundn't be better remove

Re: [mjpegtools] Disable use of SDL_gfx on EL8

Hi Sergio, Le 10/09/2019 à 18:27, Sérgio Basto a écrit : One question, just a question, mjpegtools is need for what ? gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld Regards, Xavier ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list --

Re: Building packages for EL8

On 05/08/2019 19:15, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > RPM Fusion is preparing for EL8. > Contributors can start to request branches and build packages. > ffmpeg is getting closer... Still missing are libass and soxr. jack-audio-connection-kit will have to be disabled for now. Mor

Building packages for EL8

Hi, RPM Fusion is preparing for EL8. Contributors can start to request branches and build packages. Branching for RPM Fusion is described here: https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Requesting_a_new_branch_for_a_package However, RPM Fusion relies on EPEL, so you might need to also branch or

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 13/04/2019 18:30, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:03 PM Xavier Bachelot wrote: > > A couple of observation regarding lack of viability > for some packages being moved to Fedora (I > have not actually looked at the code bases to > know if there are any

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 13/04/2019 12:56, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Xavier Bachelot wrote: >> A trimmed naive dnf search brought me this : > > Looks like only the packages showing up with .src in your list are actually > from RPM Fusion, the .x86_64 and i686 ones are actually already in Fedora. > &

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 11/04/2019 19:09, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 4/11/19 11:52 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: >> Hello, RPM Fusion devs, >> in case you missed it, MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 are now permitted in Fedora: > > That's great news. Thanks for the notice. Anyone to start a list of packages that

Re: Branching f30 is DONE

On 02/04/2019 23:29, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Monday, 1 April 2019 14:19:01 CEST Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> FYI, branching f30 is done, branch repos are published. Rawhide is now f31. >> This work was mainly done by Leigh. >> >> Many thanks for him! >> > > Sorry but why do

Re: Open pkgdb requests?

Le 23/01/2019 à 15:07, Richard Shaw a écrit : I may have missed an email  but was wondering if we're not processing pkgdb requests right now? https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packager/hobbes1069/requests I submitted the unifi-lts requests a while back. Thanks, Richard Hi Richard, I just

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

On 20/11/2018 23:57, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 20/11/2018 17:35, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm for keeping 3.3 in EL7 if it makes things a lot easier... EL 8 is >> around the corner and thus the opportunity to for major updates. >> > Well, I'd say around the corner is at lea

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

On 20/11/2018 17:35, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm for keeping 3.3 in EL7 if it makes things a lot easier... EL 8 is > around the corner and thus the opportunity to for major updates. > Well, I'd say around the corner is at least 6 months from now, so there is still room for updates. Also, EL8 will

Re: Plans regarding EL 8

Le 16/11/2018 à 10:14, Leigh Scott a écrit : I have zero interest in supporting RHEL7 or 8 as their point releases generate to much work, IMO rpmfusion's focus should remain on fedora. That is a perfectly valid position, and actually the same position a number of Fedora developers have wrt

Re: Plans regarding EL 8

Hi, Le 15/11/2018 à 16:29, Nux! a écrit : Hello, Now that RHEL 8 Beta is out it makes me wonder whether RPMFusion will give more attention and resources to EL? There's tons of users who need it. It'd be nice if users got their much needed packages from a nice collaborative project such as

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

Le 14/11/2018 à 15:00, Antonio Trande a écrit : All srpm are ready: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/centos7/ I have conformed/patched some of them to recent Fedora packaging guidelines. Just tvheadend-4.2.7 has a missing dependence (dtv-scan-tables) that is not on Fedora neither on CentOS.

Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?

On 10/3/18 12:47 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? As per the Fedora schedule the Final freeze should be next Tuesday the 9th. On my side, I still expect to land an updated libplacebo for vlc There is also a kodi update to beta3 that should

Re: [xine-lib] ImageMagick soname bump

On 30/08/2018 02:52, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Xavier, > This rebuild was to soon from [1] RPMFusion buildroot still have > ImageMagick 6.9.9 (ImageMagick 6.9.9 => 6.9.10 introduces a SONAME bump > from .so.5 to .so.6) > > [1] > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/packages/xine-lib/1.2.9/10.fc30/dat

Re: binutils bug causing broken ELF binaries, affected packages need to be rebuilt

Le 02/08/2018 à 08:57, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit : Le mar. 31 juil. 2018 à 11:36, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski a écrit : Hi, the binutils package in Fedora between versions 2.31.1-4.fc29 and 2.31.1-7.fc29 (inclusive) was producing broken binaries and any package built with any binutils

Re: RPM Fusion Projects for 2018

Hi Nicolas, On 24/01/2018 14:50, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > - libdvdcss: With the new "cuda-drivers repository", it's now possible > to have another "side repository" to handle this package, over using > livna. Last time we discussed this topic, I beleive this solution was > talked about but none

Re: Introduction and looking for a sponsorship

Hi Robert-André, Le 19/01/2018 à 15:48, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : Hello, I'm Robert-André, I have been using Fedora and RPMFusion for several years and I've started contributing as a packager for Fedora in August of last year. Since then, I have packaged near 50 apps or libraries [1] and

Re: lame for Fedora

On 03/05/2017 19:53, Sérgio Basto wrote: > The rules of RPMFusion is move all packages to Fedora when it is > possible , after be in Fedora we may retire it in Fusion ... > So don't see any problem . > > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 13:41 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote: >> Hi Sergio and Nicolas, >>

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

On 18/04/2017 12:08, Antonio Trande wrote: On 04/18/2017 11:48 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: Despite your patch for ffmpeg31, xpra still fails with following error: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/FUA8uWN~mNELJYwEicqWaV5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=/raw The error is not visible. Here:

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

On 17/04/2017 12:44, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 17/04/2017 12:27, Antonio Trande wrote: >> I take it. >> >> On 04/17/2017 12:18 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> Hello , >>> >>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4432 >>> >>

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

On 17/04/2017 13:09, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Seg, 2017-04-17 at 12:44 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >> On 17/04/2017 12:27, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> >>> I take it. >>> >>> On 04/17/2017 12:18 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>>> >>>> H

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

ate to 1.0.2 to match rawhide and f26. Regards, Xavier >From 42467d3666478779e760f00e647f564478d5ecbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xavier Bachelot <xav...@bachelot.org> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:40:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] 1.0; sync with Fedora --- xpra-codecs-freeworld.spec | 31 +++---

Re: Unable to approve ACLS in pkgdb

On 27/03/2017 07:04, Jonathan Dieter wrote: Sorry if this is known to be not working, but I'm unable to approve ACLs in https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb. It goes around and around for a long time, and then I finally get the following error: Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid

Re: Mass rebuild for f26 is almost finished

On 25/03/2017 04:09, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > Almost all packages have been rebuilt, we have these FTBFS (so far) : > > ./bombono-dvd/ftbfs > ./dhewm3/ftbfs > ./libdvbcsa/ftbfs > ./lightspark/ftbfs > ./mythtv/ftbfs > ./openmw/ftbfs > ./qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld/ftbfs >

Re: libbluray soname bump

On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early > enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname > bump. This is a critical path package. > > According to repoquery, t

Re: libbluray soname bump

On 09/03/2017 17:38, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 09.03.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Xavier Bachelot: >> oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... >> >> On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm going to update libb

Re: libbluray soname bump

oops, with the proper fedora devel mail now... On 09/03/2017 17:11, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname bump. This is a critical path package. According

libbluray soname bump

Hi, I'm going to update libbluray in rawhide (and f26 as I believe its early enough in the release cycle) to version 1.0.0, which includes a soname bump. This is a critical path package. According to repoquery, the following packages will need to be rebuild : In Fedora : - gvfs In RPM

Re: phonon-backend-vlc for EL7

On 24/02/2017 01:20, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/23/2017 04:38 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I've taken a look at building phonon-backend-vlc for EL7. The version that >> is >> in the el7 branch in git is 0.7.1-1, which does not build because it requires >> phonon 4.7.0, and EL7 has phonon

Re: [Announce] RPM Fusion for EL is restored - EL7 support started

On 08/02/2017 23:41, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/01/2017 09:53, Simone Caronni wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com >> <mailto:kwiz...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> For the r

Re: [Announce] RPM Fusion for EL is restored - EL7 support started

Hi, On 27/01/2017 09:53, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Nicolas Chauvet > wrote: > > For the record EL6 repo is provided as i686 and x86_64 whereas EL7 is > only provided as x86_64 at this time. This

Re: Introduction and a Question

Hi Sean, On 31/01/2017 19:46, Sean Callaway wrote: > Good morning, > > My name is Sean Callaway and I'm a Linux SA in southern California. I > currently am the maintainer of two packages for EPEL > (openvpn-auth-ldap and re2c). > > I am interested in seeing about getting Discord, a gaming chat

Re: EL7 bootstrap status

On 12/01/2017 19:19, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2017-01-12 at 07:54 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Many of the mythtv dependencies may very well be taken care of now, >> my last attempt was shortly after 0.28 was released and I could use >> the qt5 from EPEL. >> >> Here's the list of packages

Re: EL7 bootstrap status

On 12/01/2017 12:36, Xavier Bachelot wrote: xmltv is also failing because of missing perl dependencies. xmltv needs : perl(HTTP::Cache::Transparent) perl(Lingua::EN::Numbers::Ordinate) perl(Lingua::Preferred) >= 0.2.4 perl(Log::TraceMessages) perl(Tk::TableMatrix) I'll look at them la

Re: EL7 bootstrap status

On 12/01/2017 11:08, Xavier Bachelot wrote: That indeed doesn't mean all run time dependencies are here, I'll be checking that later on. Nonfree is clean However, Free does have a few unresolvable deps : package: 10:buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current-20-100.x86_64 from rf-free

Re: EL7 bootstrap status

On 12/01/2017 11:13, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2017-01-12 11:08 GMT+01:00 Xavier Bachelot <xav...@bachelot.org>: On 12/01/2017 02:51, Richard Shaw wrote: As far as MythTV goes, I would like it to be available for EL7 but there's just too many missing dependencies last time I worked on it

Re: EL7 bootstrap status

On 12/01/2017 02:51, Richard Shaw wrote: As far as MythTV goes, I would like it to be available for EL7 but there's just too many missing dependencies last time I worked on it and I don't have time to take on more packages. From the build log :

Re: EL7 bootstrap status

On 08/01/2017 20:52, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > Quick status on RPM Fusion for EL7... > > The infra is ready and some packages have already been built : > https://koji.rpmfusion.org/mash/free/el7/x86_64/repoview/ > https://koji.rpmfusion.org/mash/nonfree/el7/x86_64

EL7 bootstrap status

Hi, Quick status on RPM Fusion for EL7... The infra is ready and some packages have already been built : https://koji.rpmfusion.org/mash/free/el7/x86_64/repoview/ https://koji.rpmfusion.org/mash/nonfree/el7/x86_64/repoview/ I've locally built a selection of packages : * Free : amule

Re: EL7 status?

On 02/01/2017 17:32, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2017-01-02 17:06 GMT+01:00 Karel Volný : Hi, thanks, Afaiu, everything is ready for EL7, but no push has happened yet. Nicolas is waiting for more packages to be available, most notably ffmpeg I guess. There is a mash tree

Re: EL7 status?

Hi Karel, On 02/01/2017 16:32, Karel Volný wrote: pls, what's the status of EL7 repos? Afaiu, everything is ready for EL7, but no push has happened yet. Nicolas is waiting for more packages to be available, most notably ffmpeg I guess. There is a mash tree somewhere, but I don't have the

Re: new to RPM Fusion

On 28/12/2016 19:03, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been a Fedora packager for many years and now I'd like to join > the RPM Fusion community, primarily to assist Andy with the transition > of the zoneminder package from Fedora. I'm also interested in > packaging emulators, sound

Re: Newcomer seeking sponsorship

Hi Andy, On 28/12/2016 15:44, Andrew Bauer wrote: Hi Xavier, The conversation with Fedora was in an email conversation. For lack of a better place, I've put the conversation here for review: https://gist.github.com/knnniggett/87962ab97a6ffbc139083b07d0522231 I'll ping Chuck regarding this

Re: Newcomer seeking sponsorship

Hi Andy, On 27/12/2016 19:52, Andrew Bauer wrote: Greetings, My real name is Andy, and I just went through the RPMFusion crash course for submitting my first package, zoneminder. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393 I am part of the upstream zoneminder development team, and

Re: Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

Hi, On 23/11/2016 08:41, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> I think we can perform the mass rebuild (or not) just in F24 without >> touching F25 and rawhide. > > May I ask why a mass rebuild was not performed? > > I just uncovered an issue with the

Re: Buildroot override request

On 07/09/2016 08:33, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, You can now use koji-rpmfusion tag-build f2?-{,non}free-override your_rpmfusion_build_nvr for rpmfusion build to request an override tag. This will trigger a regen-repo task (if there is a metadata issue, that migh be possible to workaround to

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

Hi, On 05/09/2016 15:56, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Nicolas Chauvet > wrote: > As a package maintainer and end-user, I think it'd be valuable to have > libdvdcss in RPM Fusion. > > If there is some

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

On 06/09/2016 10:03, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-09-06 9:48 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de>: On 09/01/2016 06:56 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Nicolas, can you share your thoughts on this? libdvdcss's legal situation in Germany is widely unclear[1]. According to Germa

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

On 23/07/2016 08:27, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 07/08/2016 12:59 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: The reasoning is VideoLAN is a French organization and libdvdcss is legal in France. Seehttp://www.videolan.org/legal.html Starting from that point, the first question to answer to be able

Re: mirrors Re: RPM Fusion branched tree for Fedora 25 published

Hi Sérgio, On 14/08/2016 02:51, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Xavier , > Can you add to homepage (http://rpmfusion.org/RPM%20Fusion) ? > > Version 25 / branched > > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/25/Everything/ > >

Re: please update homepage wikipage

On 21/07/2016 14:37, Xavier Bachelot wrote: BTW about wikipage can someone edit http://rpmfusion.org/keys and correct one link: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3314 The ACL for this page is AdminGroup:read,write,revert. I don't know who is currently in this AdminGroup, but I

Re: please update homepage wikipage

Hi Sérgio, On 21/07/2016 05:51, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi Xavier , Could you please fix rawhide links in "Browse available packages" links for rawhide: download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/source/SRPMS/repoview/index.html we miss the world "Everything/" in URL and

Re: libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

Hi Michael, On 07/07/2016 23:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 07/02/2016 04:47 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >> Any comments are welcome, I'll enhance the wiki page with them. >> I'm especially interested in comments_against_ hosting libdvdcss in RPM >> Fusion, with facts o

libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

Hi, It's been a few years we did not discuss hosting libdvdcss in RPM Fusion, and as Livna seems to be really dead now, I'd like to have this discussion again. As this has already been discussed many time, I gathered some information in a wiki page : http://rpmfusion.org/libdvdcss Any comments

Re: livna finishes at f21

On 21/06/2016 22:11, Stuart Gathman wrote: > On 06/21/2016 03:48 PM, Mario Blättermann wrote: >> Don't know about the reasons anymore why libdvdcss is not in >> rpmfusion... But if you want to have it, consider to enable the repo >> of Remi Collet: >> http://rpms.famillecollet.com/ > > Probably

Re: State of the RPM Fusion repository for f22

On 29/04/2015 09:54, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Progress is been made, but there is probably some tasks that can be done by someone else. For example this one: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3606 Patch attached to the bug. Regards, Xavier

Re: Livna broken

Hi kevin, On 17/03/2015 19:29, Kevin Kofler wrote: rpm.livna.org has been broken for several days now. Does anybody know what's up there? If Livna is not coming back, where should we get libdvdcss from now? No idea what's going on with Livna, but it seems more or less abandonned for quite

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 26/09/2014 14:15, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 21:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was done in Rawhide. I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have coordinated the update. Sorry I'm in work and

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 25/09/2014 07:47, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed,

Re: repo data rebuild

On 22/08/2014 21:44, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 21/08/2014 20:40, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, Can someone regenerate the repo data[1] for rawhide? The repo data is dated Aug 12th but the last push seems to be Aug 14th. This is causing my XBMC build to fail[2] (missing ffmpeg package

Re: repo data rebuild

On 23/08/2014 14:33, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2014-08-22 at 21:44 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 21/08/2014 20:40, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, Can someone regenerate the repo data[1] for rawhide? The repo data is dated Aug 12th but the last push seems to be Aug 14th

Re: repo data rebuild

On 21/08/2014 20:40, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Hello, Can someone regenerate the repo data[1] for rawhide? The repo data is dated Aug 12th but the last push seems to be Aug 14th. This is causing my XBMC build to fail[2] (missing ffmpeg package). Thanks, Michael P.S. This mailing list

Re: cairo-dock dependency broken

On 06/03/2014 03:34 AM, Steve Roylance wrote: # yum install cairo-dock-plug-ins cairo-dock Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, versionlock Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: mirror.aarnet.edu.au * rpmfusion-free: rpmfusion.mirror.uber.com.au *

Re: broken deps in rawhide

On 03/25/2014 12:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, libcdio [1] and libass [1] has bumped soname in rawhide therefore we have some broken deps in rawhide . bino mpv oxine pcsxr please submit a rebuilt for each . oxine has been rebuilt. Regards, Xavier

Re: ffmpeg-2.2 released

On 03/25/2014 07:29 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 24.03.2014 18:56, Michael Cronenworth pisze: Julian Sikorski wrote: ffmpeg-2.2 was released today. I did a test rebuild and all but one deps have compiled successfully (I could not believe it myself). The only one that failed was mlt, but

Re: EPEL libbluray soname bump in

On 01/04/2014 07:14 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, On 01/03/2014 10:05 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'd like to call attention to: Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package libbluray.x86_64 0:0.2-0.6.20110710git51d7d60a96d06.el6 will be updated

Buildroot override / Retire package [was : Re: EPEL libbluray soname bump in]

On 01/04/2014 07:14 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: how to request an override in RPM Fusion is not documented, so I did not know it was even possible. If anyone feels like explaining the process, I might add it to the wiki, to avoid other people wasting time searching about this like I did

Re: Packaging 3-rd party repositories in rpmfusion

On 02/03/2014 11:04 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2/3/14, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On 02/03/2014 10:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Hi! On 03.02.2014 10:52, Hans de Goede wrote: On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...] In other words, I'd recommend not doing

Re: Packaging 3-rd party repositories in rpmfusion

On 02/03/2014 10:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 02/03/2014 02:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [2nd attempt to answer to this. My initial response from quite a while age seems to have gone lost.] On 01/29/2014 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: Formally, this is about review request 3152 for

Re: repoview not being updated

On 11/26/2013 08:21 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi all, Can one of the admins please fix repoview updating, currently it is not being updated, ie: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/repoview/gstreamer1-libav.html Points to the quite old 1.1.3, rather then

Re: comps-devel update needed for xine-lib 1.2

On 11/13/2013 06:33 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: On 11/12/2013 06:29 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Hi, I filed: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3003 over 2 weeks ago. It still hasn't got any attention. Can somebody please take care of the required comps-devel.xml.in updates? done.

Re: wl-kmod for F-18

Nicolas Viéville nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr a écrit : According to the situation in this case the only alternative I have is to submit a new job (that I can re-submit eventually if needed), but the counter part is to bump the minor release version number, even if the package was not

Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

Hi, On 10/13/2013 11:36 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi maintainers, On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

On 10/22/2013 11:27 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 10/15/2013 10:13 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: ECC seems to be allowed in Fedora now. I've filled a bug against libgcrypt requesting to enable it : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019126 Once this is done, the libgcrypt-freeworld

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

On 10/15/2013 10:13 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: ECC seems to be allowed in Fedora now. I've filled a bug against libgcrypt requesting to enable it : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019126 Once this is done, the libgcrypt-freeworld will become useless. ECC-enabled libgcrypt is now

Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

On 10/14/2013 10:27 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: I'm in rpmfusion's fas, bz and devel-ml now, applied for cvs. [BTW: self-signed cert on fas makes me feel a bit uneasy.] Thanks Michael (and Kevin, who replied off-list, too). Every current (co-)maintainer but Martin have an RPM Fusion account

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

On 07/31/2013 11:21 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, New version, merging changes from the new Fedora release : spec : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libgcrypt-freeworld.spec srpm : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libgcrypt-freeworld-1.5.3-1.fc19.1.src.rpm Shall I open a formal review

Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

Hi maintainers, On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go to the Free section, of course. My proposal is to go

Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix

On 08/29/2013 12:14 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Yep but BTW what to do with xine-lib 1.2 ? I've not tried to rebuild and thus neither to possibly fix xine-lib 1.2 if needed. I'll take a look. Is it possible to bundle the libav.. .so into the fedora build and add a xine-lib-extras with

Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix

On 08/29/2013 11:16 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 08/29/2013 12:14 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Yep but BTW what to do with xine-lib 1.2 ? I've not tried to rebuild and thus neither to possibly fix xine-lib 1.2 if needed. I'll take a look. fwiw, xine-lib-1.2.3 builds unpatched against ffmpeg

Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix

On 08/28/2013 07:29 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 27.08.2013 13:47, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2013/8/27 Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org mailto:j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com ... I've fixed libquicktime, gstreamer1-libav and frogatto (for new boost,

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

On 08/09/2013 12:37 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 08/08/2013 11:01 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: For me the problem wasn't libaacs, but the aacs_info binary which seems to independently link to libgcrypt. Before setting the LD_PRELOAD environment variable it pretty much gave up getting any

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

On 08/03/2013 06:00 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: Have you been able to set this? I installed the resultant RPM but even with the ldconf file, all programs seem to prefer the official libgcrypt library. In order to force it I had to specify the freeworld library with

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

On 08/08/2013 11:01 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: For me the problem wasn't libaacs, but the aacs_info binary which seems to independently link to libgcrypt. Before setting the LD_PRELOAD environment variable it pretty much gave up getting any information about the blu-ray video, afterwards it

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

Hi, New version, merging changes from the new Fedora release : spec : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libgcrypt-freeworld.spec srpm : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libgcrypt-freeworld-1.5.3-1.fc19.1.src.rpm Shall I open a formal review ticket or does anyone think that another

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

Hi, On 06/11/2012 08:27 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 06/11/2012 06:08 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Hi, As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some reason. This is actually libgcrypt, not openssl

Re: [RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

Hi Richard, On 07/19/2013 05:17 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: Xavier, Thanks for taking this up. I recently got a bluray drive for my desktop machine but haven't gotten around to trying it yet... It should hopefully be quite straightforward now. yum install $PREFERRED_VIDEO_PLAYER libaacs

Re: Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

Hi Kevin, On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later anyway. I took a look at kaffeine as found in F19 yesterday, and it is still using

  1   2   >