As some of you may have noticed, there was an issue with the
rpmfusion-users mailing list posting.
As of today, the issue is fixed, it was a duplicate archiver listed in
the mailman SQL that was crashing the mail acceptation.
Thx for Aurélien Bompard for the help fixing this issue.
If you had
Hi,
Can I or better Should I give needsign repo to our users on bugzilla ?
We have 2 tickets on dvdstyler , can I wrote to them say to test
needsign packages , instead wait for push to testing and mirror
propagation.
We can save many hours ...
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
Can I or better Should I give needsign repo to our users on bugzilla ?
I think so. I sometimes point users at Plague builds myself. It's an
advantage to having an open architecture.
As you mention, it saves time
Looks like we need to stay way from the 285 series for now.
Richard
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gabe Rubin gaberu...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] Problems since installing nVidia 285.05.09
on f14 x86_64
To: User discussion about
2011/10/28 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
Looks like we need to stay way from the 285 series for now.
Richard
Any nvidia bug that doesn't come with the output of
nvidia-bug-report.sh is desperately pointless.
Nicolas (kwizart)
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/28 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
Looks like we need to stay way from the 285 series for now.
Richard
Any nvidia bug that doesn't come with the output of
nvidia-bug-report.sh is desperately pointless.
That
Hi,
xorg-x11-drv-fglrx and kmod-fglrx have been updated to the 9.4 beta
which is originally found in Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04) and have been patched
for 2.6.29, so it should be working well with Fedora 11. However, one of
the side effects of the 2.6.29 patch is that fglrx repeats the same few
-pulse.html
I quote
But still, I think the biggest issue here is that rsyslog doesn't
enforce any kind of rate limitting and is happy to let random users
fill up /var.
This is a first-class DoS. Simply do a cat /dev/urandom | strings |
logger and you can make the whole system go bonkers. And it won't
even
On 02.11.2008 00:18, Xavier Lamien wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
Given my new employer I won't be doing it. So I
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
Given my new employer I won't be doing it. So I think either you are Xavier
should do it.
Christopher Stone pisze:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do
we send it besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
Given my new
2008/11/2 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thx; I'd say a time somewhere around 14:00 or 15:00 UTC is likely the best
to send it out.
Before sending out the announcement, you should also delete the wiki
page called Configuration and rename ConfigurationNew as
Configuration.
Bye,
Andrea.
On 31.10.2008 16:28, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
The ... and plays DVDs. part is mostly a lie. If you only use RPMFusion,
you won't be able to play most DVDs.
Speaking on that, is there anything going on to have the missing bits
hosted in a wiser country ? I'd
On 31.10.2008 12:23, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/10/30 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok, but I have the feeling it needs a higher advertising rate.
I'm thinking about adding things like: Do you want playback of various
multimedia formats to work painlessly
Are you stuck with an
2008/11/1 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
I'd say the more the better :)
I thought about:
slashdot.org
linux.com
www.osnews.com
lwn.net
punto-informatico.it (an
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/11/1 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
I'd say the more the better
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send
it besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
Given my new employer I won't be doing it. So I think either you are Xavier
should do it.
Regards,
Hans
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
Given my new employer I won't be doing it. So I think either you are Xavier
should do it.
2008/10/30 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok, but I have the feeling it needs a higher advertising rate.
I'm thinking about adding things like: Do you want playback of various
multimedia formats to work painlessly
Are you stuck with an nvidea card and do you want to use 3D?
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/10/30 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok, but I have the feeling it needs a higher advertising rate.
I'm thinking about adding things like: Do you want playback of various
multimedia formats to work painlessly
Are you stuck with an nvidea card and do
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
The ... and plays DVDs. part is mostly a lie. If you only use
RPMFusion,
you won't be able to play most DVDs.
Speaking on that, is there anything going on to have the missing bits
hosted in a wiser country ? I'd like to at least lurk and possibly help
)
so, they linked - if *this* is the court evidence, is it
necessary to link? (Google is filtered in Germany?)
in a news story - what was the story about, how was it written?
what if you say something like: Dear German users, our law
forbids this and that, so if you encounter it, do not download
2008/10/30 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/10/29 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, does anybody want to prepare the two announcement mails for Monday
(more a PR style RPM Fusion launched) and Tuesday (for the fedora-announce
mailing list)?
I'll try to write down something :)
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/10/30 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/10/29 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, does anybody want to prepare the two announcement mails for Monday
(more a PR style RPM Fusion launched) and Tuesday (for the fedora-announce
mailing list)?
I'll try to
2008/10/30 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok, but I have the feeling it needs a higher advertising rate.
I'm thinking about adding things like: Do you want playback of various
multimedia formats to work painlessly
Are you stuck with an nvidea card and do you want to use 3D?
I
2008/10/28 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* the wiki could need a lot of love but nobody takes care of it; help
appreciated
I gave the wiki some TLCs today. In particular:
* updated FoundingPrinciples: used present tense and not future, said
that we support kernel module (in kmod2
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
* renamed InitialPackageMerge to PackageMergeStatus. Both Thorsten and
I wondered if we should updated this page since it is a PITA to keep
it in sync.
I don't think we should update it, I see 2 options:
1) Nuke it
2) Preserve it as a place to point to which packages
Hi,
I see that rpmfusion is working already on Fedora but the
Configuration page for users is still empty:
http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
Why?
Thank you for your hard work! My Fedora box automatically switched to
rpmfusion without a glitch and it is working perfectly!
Thank you!
Valent
On 28.10.2008 08:23, Valent Turkovic wrote:
I see that rpmfusion is working already on Fedora but the
Configuration page for users is still empty:
http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration
Why?
Because
* the wiki could need a lot of love but nobody takes care of it; help
appreciated
* RPM
On 26.10.2008 14:35, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
/me removed a few mailing lists from the CC
One more ripped
On 25.10.2008 19:16, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 18:47 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
On 25.10.2008 18:23, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le samedi 25 octobre 2008
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:39:46 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I had to disable repoview for now, as it fails for SRPM repos with the
repodata generated by the new createrepo:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/repoview, line 865, in ?
main()
File
On 27.10.2008 09:56, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:39:46 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I had to disable repoview for now, as it fails for SRPM repos with the
repodata generated by the new createrepo:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/repoview, line 865,
imported and
build for RPM Fusion already, hence we now begin to slowly enable RPM
Fusion for users of Livna by activating the RPM Fusion free and
nonfree repos for users of livna's F8 and F9 testing repos *now*.
The process works like this: I added the rpmfusion-release packages for
RPM Fusion's
On 25.10.2008 18:23, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le samedi 25 octobre 2008 à 17:04 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
Find below a cut'n'pasted and slightly enhanced version of a post from
my blog FYI:
As you'll likely have heard by now: RPM Fusion ( http://rpmfusion.org ),
the merger of Dribble,
in. That way those users that have
livna properly installed will get rpmfusion automatically enabled. Once
we have everything in place we'll later let rpmfusion-release obsolete
livna-release and then the transition is done.
Does that sound like a plan? Is everyone (especially the livna
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karel Volný wrote:
hi,
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to
projects or cooperation's not to mention or link to us.
That's not limited to Fedora or Red Hat; also some
journalists and howto-writers will
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karel Volný wrote:
this is a really bad attitude, and I'm sad to hear that from you :-(
basically, you have two options: the gutless way or the brave way
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Karel Volný wrote:
this is a really bad attitude, and I'm sad to hear that from you
:-(
hi,
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to
projects or cooperation's not to mention or link to us.
That's not limited to Fedora or Red Hat; also some
journalists and howto-writers will also chose to *not*
mention RPM Fusion and thus not link to us, as it might be
to
Am Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:01:38 +0200
schrieb Karel Volný [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi,
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to
projects or cooperation's not to mention or link to us.
That's not limited to Fedora or Red Hat; also some
journalists and howto-writers will also
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 18:34 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
For now just continue to obtain it where you got it from until now (e.g.
livna or freshrpms)
, so let's have the people willing to endorse that do it,
+1 -- I suppose those people will start to act once we definitely
decided
On Thursday, 16 October 2008 at 16:38, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
Am Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:01:38 +0200
schrieb Karel Volný [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
basically, you have two options: the gutless way or the brave way
the first one is to write about it in a way which cannot be seen
in violation
of the packages from Livna have been imported and build
for RPM Fusion already, hence we now begin to slowly move users from Livna
over to RPM Fusion by activating the RPM Fusion free and nonfree rawhide
repos for users of livna's devel branch *now*.
[...]
Is there any chance of getting all the kmod
Hi!
* having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to projects or
cooperation's not to mention or link to us. That's not limited to Fedora
or Red Hat; also some journalists and howto-writers will also chose to
*not* mention RPM Fusion and thus not link to us, as it might be to
dangerous
On Tuesday, 14 October 2008 at 19:05, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Brought over there from fedora-devel; see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg01408.html
for details.
On 14.10.2008 18:49, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Note, nearly all of livna's
On 15.10.2008 00:19, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2008 at 19:05, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Brought over there from fedora-devel; see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg01408.html
for details.
On 14.10.2008 18:49, Dmitry Butskoy
those users that have
livna properly installed will get rpmfusion automatically enabled. Once
we have everything in place we'll later let rpmfusion-release obsolete
livna-release and then the transition is done.
Does that sound like a plan? Is everyone (especially the livna
contributers) fine
packages in. That way those users
that have livna properly installed will get rpmfusion automatically
enabled. Once we have everything in place we'll later let
rpmfusion-release obsolete livna-release and then the transition is done.
Does that sound like a plan? Is everyone (especially the livna
with tracks the rpmfusion-release packages in. That way those users
that have livna properly installed will get rpmfusion automatically
enabled. Once we have everything in place we'll later let
rpmfusion-release obsolete livna-release and then the transition is done.
Does that sound like a plan
those users that have
livna properly installed will get rpmfusion automatically enabled. Once
we have everything in place we'll later let rpmfusion-release obsolete
livna-release and then the transition is done.
Does that sound like a plan? Is everyone (especially the livna
contributers) fine
livna-release package
with tracks the rpmfusion-release packages in. That way those users
that have livna properly installed will get rpmfusion automatically
enabled. Once we have everything in place we'll later let
rpmfusion-release obsolete livna-release and then the transition is
done
51 matches
Mail list logo
