[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-05-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet --- btw if anyone at mixxx can have a look on https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4848 I don't know why parsing mixxx.png failed on the infra side to fetch the icon. -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-05-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-10 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #14 from Uwe Klotz --- I have fixed the open issues in the .spec file and updated both master and f28 branch to 2.1.0-rc1. Build tasks have succeeded. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug._

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-06 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #13 from Uwe Klotz --- Thanks for the hint. I'll remove the separate definition of the package release version in pkgrel with the next update when 2.1.0-rc1 is available. As a software developer I'm used to replace "magic numbers" w

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-06 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #12 from Sérgio Basto --- Created attachment 1892 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1892&action=edit mixxx.spec.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug._

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-06 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #11 from Uwe Klotz --- That was my primary intention for introducing the new and rewritten FFmpeg decoder. As a fallback and potential replacement for legacy or otherwise problematic decoders like libMAD and FAAD2. Unfortunately it i

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-06 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Uwe Klotz from comment #9) BTW Would you consider to use the aac decoder/encoder builtin ffmpeg or do you still want to use faad2 for decoding in the long run ? Using other AAC encoders are

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-06 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #9 from Uwe Klotz --- Falling back to compat-ffmpeg28 would require to modify the Mixxx build. Otherwise the wrong (= newer) header files are included. I suppose it is already too late for inclusion in release 2.1 after a release can

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-04-05 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #8 from Sérgio Basto --- why disable ffmpeg ? If it is a build problem we may try switch to compat-ffmpeg28 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug._

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Uwe Klotz from comment #6) > Sorry for the late reply. I've registered using my mixxx.org e-mail address > and my RPM Fusion account name is 'uklotzde'. ACL granted, please forward any questi

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #6 from Uwe Klotz --- Sorry for the late reply. I've registered using my mixxx.org e-mail address and my RPM Fusion account name is 'uklotzde'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-26 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|ulat...@y

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-24 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto --- Steve (owner of this package) just did one commit in 2013 and also just own this package in RPMFusion. I guess we need a new owner to this package since Steve may be consider unresponsive , isn't it ? -- Yo

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #2 from Uwe Klotz --- We are already working on a new FFmpeg integration for decoding that is not yet finished: https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/1356 This hopefully will solve many issues caused by the bundled plugins which ar

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Uwe Klotz from comment #0) ... > 2 Remarks: > - I noticed that Mixxx is currently part of the free repository, although > with inclusion of the FAAD2 plugin it should actually be placed in the

[Bug 4826] Update build requirements and options for Mixxx 2.1

2018-03-13 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4826 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Review Request |mixxx Version|Current