Re: [rrg] Fwd: RRG Recommendation = RRG Report

2010-10-04 Thread Marshall Eubanks
on For from me Marshall Eubanks Explicitly stated their opinion against: John E Drake Wesley E George IV Did something else: Brian E Carpenter Joel M. Halpern Sampo Syreeni Scott Brim Tony Li Have a nice evening when you get one. ___ rrg

Re: [rrg] Odd BGP AS Path

2010-09-22 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Heath Jones wrote: Hi all, Probably a silly question, but can anyone explain to me this: 3561 3356 9031 {35821,35821,35821,35821} i Isn't this just AS prepending ? http://home.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/~dmchiu/tnsm.pdf (You can easily find info on this for your router

[rrg] Fwd: Sustaining the Internet with hyperbolic mapping

2010-09-09 Thread Marshall Eubanks
This seems like it would be of interest to RRG members. Regards Marshall Begin forwarded message: From: Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org Date: September 9, 2010 6:23:26 AM EDT To: NANOG list na...@nanog.org Cc: t...@postbiota.org, forkit! f...@xent.com Subject: Sustaining the Internet with

Re: [rrg] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2010-07-21 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Jul 21, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Toni Stoev wrote: I am constantly receiving messages like the one following. Does anyone else get such messages too? I am not (none in July). Could this be spam backscatter ? What are the non-delivered messages ? Mashall -- Forwarded message

Re: [rrg] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2010-07-21 Thread Marshall Eubanks
Well, if you sent the message, you are being properly notified that it did not get delivered. Regards Marshall On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Toni Stoev wrote: On Wednesday 21 July 2010 at 14:09:55 Marshall Eubanks sent: On Jul 21, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Toni Stoev wrote: I am constantly

Re: [rrg] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2010-07-21 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 at 18:13:05 Marshall Eubanks sent: Well, if you sent the message, you are being properly notified that it did not get delivered. Regards Marshall On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Toni Stoev wrote: On Wednesday 21 July 2010 at 14:09:55 Marshall Eubanks sent: On Jul 21, 2010

Re: [rrg] Terminology straw poll

2010-07-08 Thread Marshall Eubanks
Hi; Did you ever send to the list a summary of the results of your various straw polls ? If not, I think you should, both for our benefit, and to get it on the record. Regards Marshall On Jun 10, 2010, at 5:18 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote: Hi, Here is a terminology straw poll for the Routing

Re: [rrg] Service restored

2010-06-07 Thread Marshall Eubanks
I think that the backlog is still being worked through. Marshall Message sent at Mon Jun 7 14:42:08 EDT 2010 On Jun 7, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Robin Whittle wrote: Hi Tony, Responding to Toni Stoev, you wrote: I see posting to RRG list is re-enabled. Good. It wasn't ever disabled. The

Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll

2010-05-22 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On May 21, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Tony Li wrote: OK. So I will see the intention of this straw poll more relaxed: You just wanted to keep the ball rolling :-) No. Let me say it again: this poll grew out of a desire from some folks to ensure that we recorded an explicit consensus of

Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll

2010-05-21 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On May 20, 2010, at 7:20 PM, heinerhum...@aol.com wrote: In einer eMail vom 17.05.2010 20:39:49 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt rja.li...@gmail.com: I will NOT be modifying the statement wording during this poll. (1) The Internet continuing down the current architectural path,

Re: [rrg] Another Routing RG Straw Poll

2010-05-17 Thread Marshall Eubanks
Hello; On May 17, 2010, at 2:39 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote: This is another straw poll for the IRTF Routing RG. There are 4 statements below. IRTF Routing RG members are free to vote on each. This poll ends 7 days from the date/time stamp on this email. Votes are EITHER Yes which means I can

Re: [rrg] Geoff Huston's BGP/DFZ research - 300k DFZ prefixes are the tip of the iceberg

2010-03-15 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Mar 15, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Paul Jakma wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Tony Li wrote: Actually, no growth in prefixes does not imply that there is no growth in the Internet. You can still add customers within existing prefix allocations and improve your addressing efficiency. Hehe, My

Re: [rrg] moving towards recommendation: the current plan

2009-11-16 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Tony Li wrote: Dino Farinacci wrote: Can you post the current active list? Sorry, digging all of that up is a bit of work. Again, it's pretty straightforward from the Wiki. What's the question behind the question? If it is a fair amount of work, it

Re: [rrg] Next topic: properties of identifiers

2009-07-09 Thread Marshall Eubanks
___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg Regards Marshall Eubanks email : t...@americafree.tv twitter : @TMEubanks Cut the Cord with AmericaFree.TV ___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman

Re: [rrg] The Pouzin Society

2009-04-30 Thread Marshall Eubanks
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/24655/1231/ New society aims to 'save' the Internet ___ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg Regards Marshall Eubanks CEO / AmericaFree.TV

Re: [rrg] Apropos whether Moore's law can keep ahead of routing system growth

2009-01-16 Thread Marshall Eubanks
Here is the PDF http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/10/12/123027/njp8_12_123027.pdf?request-id=0ed0b145-57ee-42d3-9d51-1805624f410f Marshall On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:09 PM, David Conrad wrote: http://www.physorg.com/print151162452.html Haven't read the actual paper this article