An issue I've run into is with a controller using the active_scaffold
plugin, which injects a method that modifies the search path for
partial files. When I try to run a spec on a a_s partial it reports
the file cannot be found.
I think this is the a_s code that does it but I'm not sure
Personally, I dont want to become an expert at the range of possible
testing and mocking tools. I just want a solid framework to get my
work done, recommended by experts like you. And the less different
components I need to install and maintain, the better. So I prefer
the integrated
Here's how I did it
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/2007-May/001818.html
linoj
On Sep 5, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Ingo Weiss wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to assert in rspec that a template is rendered in a
specific layout?
Thanks!
Ingo
___
hi,
I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I'd start
with a dead simple scenario:
The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the
home page, and begin exploring public pages from there.
So, that seems like a good first story to spec out.
And I'd really
] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I'd start
with a dead simple scenario:
The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the
home page, and begin exploring public pages from there.
So
Scott,
Thanks for the plug-in, http://thmadb.com/public_svn/plugins/
fixture_replacement
I've started using it, replacing my ad hoc factory methods
And I like the idea of putting the factory in db/
btw, for the record, while the Dan Manges blog was posted Aug 07, the
first time I saw this
, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Sep 28, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
Scott,
Thanks for the plug-in, http://thmadb.com/public_svn/plugins/
fixture_replacement
I've started using it, replacing my ad hoc factory methods
And I like the idea of putting the factory in db
hi,
is there a way to assert a flash message directly in story runner? Or
do I have to go through the response text instead.
Then flash message should say success do
#flash[:notice].should == User successfully invited
response.should have_text(/User successfully
), and the
remaining unexecuted ones in grey.
On 10/1/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you add the pending statement before other non-pending ones, it
stops at the first pending one. That forces me to implement them in
the order specified, a rough example:
Then user was authorized
does story runner have commandline options ,eg to add color to output?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
!
On 10/2/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does story runner have commandline options ,eg to add color to
output?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
:
On 9/25/07, David Chelimsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I just started fooling around with story runner, thought I'd start
with a dead simple scenario:
The first thing I do when describing a site to someone is go to the
home page
fyi, In the meantime I've written a little helper
def skip_pending(text='')
puts SKIP PENDING #{text}
end
so I can do
And foo foo bar bar do
skip_pending Implement foo bar
end
On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
The way I've started using story runner is to write
hiya, in specing a partial, how can i assign a local var that is
normally passed via :locals ? i tried adding :locals = to the render
call but that doesnt seem to take
linoj
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Not to beat an already beaten horse, but...
I see email more as a dynamic information flow than a static page,
especially active conversations like this,
so I like to see the current response at the top,
immediately accessible, and visible in my preview pane.
Or, maybe I should look for a mail
btw I just noticed the text of the example is a typo, it -is- a GET
called in the spec with
get :accept, :project_id = @project.id, :id = @mem.id
On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
Hi,
This is weird
All my current spec examples are passing (about 750 of 'em
On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:26 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 10/17/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is weird
All my current spec examples are passing (about 750 of 'em) except a
set of 6 in a specific controller spec. I get the following failure
on each 6 when I run it via
On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:41 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
This is mostly theoretical, but ...
I'm starting to use lighthouse (http://llighthouseapp.com) for my
projects at work. I'm organizing iterations as milestones and stories
as tickets tagged to a milestone.
Lighthouse offers an API so
On Oct 19, 2007, at 1:54 PM, s.ross wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Daniel N wrote:
On 9/11/07, s.ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a story where the user resets the password [hey, this story
thing really rocks!]. It is expected that the password will change
and that the user will be
On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
snip
yes, upon closer inspection,
(as in http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/
Rspec_1.0_and_Restful_Authentication)
in spec_helper.rb
def set_mailer_in_test
ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :test
ActionMailer::Base.perform_deliveries =
But dont you really just want to test the behavior of the class?
(whereas the validator call is an implementation)
such as
it should require digits do
p = PhoneNumber.new( :digits = nil )
p.should_not be_valid
p.errors.on(:digits).should == can't be blank
end
On Oct 19,
http://www.georgeglazer.com/prints/illus/wein-monkeydress.JPG
On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Dan North wrote:
Of course when I said Pat, I in fact meant David and his monkey :)
On 10/22/07, Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/07, Dan North [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haha -
app is short for application,
lib is short for library
so why not shorten behavior to something like beh or behav
(also avoids the 2 english spellings)
/beh/specs
/beh/stories
On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:55 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:32 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On 10/23/07, Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
app is short for application,
lib is short for library
so why not shorten behavior to something like beh or behav
(also avoids the 2 english spellings)
/beh/specs
/beh/stories
beh
Hi,
has anyone here written a capistrano task for rspec to run through my
specs on the deployed server? I'd appreciate a snippet or two to get
me started.
Thx
linoj
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
hi,
When I run rake spec , it seems to be starting with my default
environment (development or production) and connects to that
database, before actually connecting to the test one and proceeding
with the tests. When I remove the development database, the specs
wont run. How do i
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Oct 29, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
hi,
When I run rake spec , it seems to be starting with my default
environment (development or production) and connects to that
database, before actually connecting to the test one
On Oct 29, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
hi,
When I run rake spec , it seems to be starting with my default
environment (development or production) and connects to that
database, before actually connecting to the test one and proceeding
with the tests. When I remove
personally I find this to be one of the most frustrating things about
rspec, well, rspec's stubs
and wish the error messages could be much more helpful,
rather than just telling that an expected method was not called, tell
me if/when it was called with some other args instead
(if this causes
18, 2007, at 11:16 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 10:10 AM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
personally I find this to be one of the most frustrating things about
rspec, well, rspec's stubs
and wish the error messages could be much more helpful,
rather than just telling
# for readability
alias :running :lambda
Q.E.D.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Shane Mingins wrote:
On 18/11/2007, at 1:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
We're still writing Ruby here, aren't we!!!
Cheers,
David
Wanted to share my initial reaction to your Ruby statement.
Are we writing
fails
Is there a way to force the rake task to copy the schema from
production rather than development?
linoj
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Oct 29, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
hi,
When I run rake spec , it seems to be starting with my default
environment
fyi, I just posted this
http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/Running_rspec_after_you_deploy
- linoj
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
didnt mean to confuse, i'm asking about the code in the body of the
email. The pastie was just for background reference.
--J
On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
I want to isolate and spec methods that are shared by controllers,
and live in application.rb.
Whereas I usually
This should be:
@user.should_receive(:password_confirmation=)
Lots of beginners make this mistake. Maybe RSpec's mock framework
should be smart enough to suggest this fix by itself.
Patch anyone?
Aslak
perhaps be even more explicit that it's an accessor, like
err, that suggestion was supposed to read @user.should_set...
etc
On Dec 4, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
This should be:
@user.should_receive(:password_confirmation=)
Lots of beginners make this mistake. Maybe RSpec's mock framework
should be smart enough to suggest
damn, looks like I'm going to have to come up with 997 more good
ideas just to break even
:)
On Dec 4, 2007, at 4:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
-1000
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
Hi,
i recently added a def default_url_options to application.rb (used by
url_for , *_path etc). My method references request (eg
request.domain) . But when I spec a controller, its dies in
default_url_options with nil.domain, Is there a way for it to see
request?
I prefer to not have to
On Dec 13, 2007, at 2:06 AM, Jarkko Laine wrote:
On 13.12.2007, at 9.00, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
is there a way to stub a method that sets an instance variable, so
the stub sets it too?
def find_foo
@foo = Foo.find(params[:id]
end
...
controller.stub!(:find_foo).and_assigns(:foo
personally I've broken with convention and put all my route specs
into a routes_spec.rb file
in part because they're in one file in rails, and when i edit that
file I want to make sure other routes didn't break.
Your question about a catchall is another reason.
I also like to spec named
hi, i want to make a behavior shared between models, the examples
need to create new instances etc. Is there a way to pass the model
class to the shared behavior?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
fyi, there doesnt seem to be a link to rspec.lighthouse.com from the
new web site (unless I missed it). I guess I expected it under
Community
linoj
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
I just went through this myself yesterday, and was considering
posting an article on my blog, but figured it'd be too short lived,
once the doc page is up on the rspec site. So I'll post here what
I've cobbled together from various other articles, emails, and
generous help on #rspec.
1.
Hi,
I have a need for the StepGroup feature in stories but not clear
what's the current api. Could you provide an example?
In my case I have several scenarios which vary in the Givens, but not
the results. Ideally I'm hoping to achieve something like: (but
anything will do for now :)
Sorry, I guess stepgroup is the steps_for framework, and not what I'm
asking about.
Is there a way to hierarchically combine steps under a single step to
achieve?
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
Hi,
I have a need for the StepGroup feature in stories but not clear
On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:50 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Apparently, Pat and I are twins separated at birth.
Would it then be correct to refactor and eliminate one of them??
:))
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
similarly, here's my write up:
http://www.vaporbase.com/postings/Getting_Started_with_Story_Runner
linoj
On Jan 15, 2008, at 8:18 PM, James Byrne wrote:
I can get to the RSpec list through ruby-forum. Yes! The things you
discover googling for help!
I followed the advice to go to
cool
thx
:)
On Jan 23, 2008, at 12:02 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 10:49 PM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've spec'd a class and they pass.
Now I'd like to assure that any subclass of this class also passes
the same specs.
Any suggestions for a clever
Note, named routes cannot be accessed unless you have a response (eg
after you've run a controller action)
See http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/201-enable-
named-urls-before-response
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:26 PM, Matt Darby wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 8:05 PM, David
Hi
I have a couple of questions
1)
how do you test the response inside a content_for block
I see reference to it in the release notes but dont know where to
find it (tried http://rspec.info/rdoc-rails/ )
2)
I dont seem to be able to stub partials in a different directory eg
%= render
Has anyone come up with a solution for stubbing partials and passing
form builders to it?
i have a complex form with many parts, and those are rendered in
partials
On Oct 21, 2007, at 8:46 AM, rupert wrote:
i'm having problem with a form_for situation where i'm trying to DRY
out the
instead of passing the form builder around, anyone?
On Mar 13, 2008, at 5:05 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 5:47 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Zach Dennis
[EMAIL PROTECTED
seems like it'd make sense to just add this to http://code.google.com/
p/rspec-on-rails-matchers/
linoj
On Mar 14, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Brandon Keepers wrote:
Zach,
On 3/14/08, Zach Moazeni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This hints at another extension I've wanted to write for us for a
while.
yep, that did it :)
thx
On Mar 18, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:13 PM, linojon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, whats the correct way to spec a rescue? This will raise it but
doesnt
test my code's response
# controller
def edit
@foo =
for associations, among other things, i've been using http://rspec-on-
rails-matchers.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README
linoj
On Mar 31, 2008, at 8:33 PM, Anthony Broad-Crawford wrote:
I have been using the following approach. Looking forward to see
if anyone else does something better to
You might try here
http://www.google.com.au/intl/en/gday/index.html
Jonathan
On Apr 16, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
Actually, if you updated the repo after 4/16, please send it to me.
Also include any winning lotto numbers for the date of your last pull.
In fact, screw the repo, I
I'm not sure this answers your questions, but you prompted me to
share my experience.
Personally i consider BDD just one tool in my toolbox. And I consider
rspec to be as much a testing tool as a (BD)Development one. So I
often find myself just taking the path of least resistance. And
On May 13, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote:
I'm not actually trying to test its behavior,
quick! Duck! INCOMING...!
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Ian, sounds like your espresso machine needs some gui testing...
:)
On Aug 6, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
Hi, all.
The publishers have just thrown the switch to make my new book,
Scripted GUI Testing With Ruby, available for purchase in both PDF
and analog.
perhaps verbose but how about
foo.should equal_in_any_order [1, 3, 1, 4, 2]
On Aug 6, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I've had a matcher in my head for a couple months, that I frequently
want but never get around to writing because I can't think of the name
for it. Here's how it
.should be_bag_of( [1, 3, 1, 4, 2] )
On Aug 6, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Steve Schafer wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:50:27 -0400, you wrote:
I've had a matcher in my head for a couple months, that I frequently
want but never get around to writing because I can't think of the
name
for it. Here's
Hi,
Anyone have code you could share that lets you pass a hash in plain
text stories,
for example
Then I fill out form with name: Jon, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], age: 9
passes in a hash { 'name' = 'Jon', 'emal' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', 'age'
= '9' }
On Aug 8, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Jonathan Linowes wrote:
Hi,
Anyone have code you could share that lets you pass a hash in
plain text stories,
for example
Then I fill out form with name: Jon, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], age: 9
passes in a hash { 'name' = 'Jon', 'emal' = '[EMAIL
Don't stub out callbacks, rather spec the behavior of the model,
which might mean stubbing out methods (in a different model?) called
by the callback.
On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Rob Lacey wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to write a spec for and existing model. It has an
after_create
and, is it SetupController or SetupsController ?
On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:47 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I got an error when I run my spec test of a controlleur :
the get
and post methodes are unknown. here is my test file :
On Aug 19, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Satish Gunnu wrote:
Hi,
I am new to rspec and started implementing it on my project
yesterday.
I have followed the instructions and installed rspec gem and rspec
plugin into my project. I created couple of sample stories and tried
running the specs using spec
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Satish Gunnu wrote:
Yes I think that is what's happening in my case. is this how it is
supposed to work? or can we have rspec ignore the step to look at
development environment. thanks so much for all your
On Aug 20, 2008, at 2:20 AM, Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
(In Cucumber it's Feature, not Story)
no offense, but while you're being picky about names, I dont see too
much difference between 'story' and 'feature'
but 'cucumber' is a really random meaningless name
On Aug 20, 2008, at 10:20 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
I see them as very different.
User Stories are inputs to a development process and Features are
the outputs.
I decided to churn on this for a few days before responding. Actually
I was going to let it drop, but kept thinking about it.
On Aug 24, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Jay Levitt wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
Agreed. Tools is tools. Process is process. (boat is boat )
And parts is parts. Let's not forget that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTzLVIc-O5E
Jay
OT, reminds me of when, a while back, I was developing CAD
On Aug 24, 2008, at 12:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
In terms of the feature (which is the report), I see this as just
another scenario.
In terms of driving development and estimating effort, I see this as a
new User Story.
Does this clarify or further confuse?
I see your scenario of
On Aug 25, 2008, at 11:19 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 24, 2008, at 12:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
In terms of the feature (which is the report), I see this as just
another scenario.
In terms of driving
I've read through the messages on this list, and have file upload
specs working in my model and controller tests, using :file =
ActionController::TestUploadedFile.new(filepath)
But its not working in stories using webrat. I've tried
fills_in foo[file], :with = filepath
and
fills_in
On Aug 29, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Jonathan Linowes wrote:
I've read through the messages on this list, and have file upload
specs working in my model and controller tests, using :file =
ActionController::TestUploadedFile.new(filepath)
But its not working in stories using webrat
On Aug 29, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
i am trying that too, but at this point in my story i dont actually
have the current record object to generate the form action path.
How would i extract the :action = path from the form in the
current response.body ?
got
On Aug 29, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Christopher Bailey wrote:
I too would suggest trying attaches_file. I use it in a few
different stories I have, and it works fine for me. I don't
believe I'm doing anything nonstandard. Here's the basics of what
yep, works for me :)
On Aug 31, 2008, at 7:56 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 30 Aug 2008, at 19:31, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Aug 30, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Tero Tilus wrote:
2008-08-30 17:02, Matt Wynne:
RuBehave
Now _that's_ cool! I love it!
Personally, I always liked the rbehave / rspec combo, of Mike
Myers Ali
On Aug 31, 2008, at 9:39 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
Agreed. Stories and/or Features seem to be more about organization and
communication. Scenarios drive code development.
+1
I also like to organize them into workflows, tasks, goals
Which makes me think maybe the scenario should be a more
Given I am running an rspec story
And it uses webrat
And I am using rdebug
When I am at a breakpoint (eg after a 'visits' in a step)
Then how can I open the current response in a browser to see what the
page actually looks like at that point?
___
response.body }
And then in terminal I go to my project root and type open
public/duh.html. Although you may be able to get away with doing this
in your debugging session:
system open #{RAILS_ROOT}/public/duh.html
HTH,
Zach
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Sep 3, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
On Sep 3, 2008, at 10:40 AM, MaurÃcio Linhares wrote:
You don't need to set the instance variable, you can stub the find
call:
Or you could also stub the call to User::find.
Also - you don't *WANT* to set the instance variable - it's an
noting my own typo
def negeative_failure_message
should be
def negative_failure_message
:)
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
Thanks David.
I really struggled to get that to catch anything. My colleague Dan
found this, which is working well for me:
I'm just thinking out loud here...
It could be useful to have a way to run scenarios on a copy of a
fully populated production database, as an alternative to normal use.
Not sure how that'd work, maybe replace the Given's but leave the
Whens and Thens?
linoj
On Sep 5, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On 4 Sep 2008, at 18:55, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
I'm just thinking out loud here...
It could be useful to have a way to run scenarios on a copy of a
fully populated production database, as an alternative to normal use.
Not sure how that'd
On Sep 5, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is, if my stories run with my well controlled, relatively
small setups, I'd like to ensure they run on a large, fully
populated, somewhat 'random' set of real
On Sep 5, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
Property.stub!(:find).and_return mock_property1, mock_property2
try
Property.stub!(:find).and_return( [mock_property1, mock_property2] )
Want to help others? Become a certified
On Sep 7, 2008, at 7:58 PM, Sam Stokes wrote:
What approaches do people use to achieve this?
Perhaps I'm bucking what others have advised against, so take it for
what it's worth.
I make some limited use of global (instance) variables that
correspond to english language pronouns. I have
On Sep 8, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Dan North wrote:
2008/9/8 Jonathan Linowes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4 Sep 2008, at 18:55, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
I'm just thinking out loud here...
It could be useful to have a way to run scenarios on a copy of a
fully populated production database
On Sep 8, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Eric Harris-Braun wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm hoping for a bit of help on best-practices for skipping a
before_filter when running a particular step. Specifically the
authentication filter. What happens is that the post (see code below)
returns a redirect response to
=
'secret')
post_via_redirect /sessions, :login = 'user', :password =
secret,
response.should be_success
session[:user].should == user.id
end
On Sep 8, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
On Sep 8, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Eric Harris-Braun wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm hoping
of course, there's one 'global' shared between steps that we cant
live without: response
:)
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
hi,
I'm specing a view that contains
% form_for @page, :url = { :action = :update },...
and get the error
No route matches {:action=update}
In the spec, I've tried several things, including
it should work do
assigns[:page] = mock_model(Page)
request.env[HTTP_REFERER] =
Hi,
suggestions how to add w3 validation to a story step?
eg
Then the page should be valid
tia
linoj
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Sep 15, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Jonathan Linowes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
suggestions how to add w3 validation to a story step?
eg
Then the page should be valid
You could write a then step that takes the current response.body,
uploads
On Sep 12, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Joseph Wilk wrote:
Evan David Light wrote:
On Sep 12, 2008, at 12:26 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
I believe that binding the table to the phrasing would be
immensely
useful and perhaps even crucial to Scenario authors.
Can you give an example of how this
sometimes i do
story = code = spec = (re)code = story step = (re)code = spec
= (re)code
or whatever, but hey, thats just me...
:)
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hi, sorry if this isnt directly an rspec question but maybe someone
can help
lets say a page contains a list setup like this
ul id=list
li id=item_1a href=#Item One/a/li
li id=item_2a href=#Item Two/a/li
li id=item_3a href=#Item Three/a/li
/ul
in my story i want to refer to first item,
nevermind, hpricot to the rescue
:)
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
Hi, sorry if this isnt directly an rspec question but maybe someone
can help
lets say a page contains a list setup like this
ul id=list
li id=item_1a href=#Item One/a/li
li id=item_2a href=#Item Two
On Sep 26, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
FWIW, I think it's rather nice. We went through a fad of using @it
for a while, and now we have a stuff[] hash. Both similar ideas -
there must be something in this.
I'm doing the same thing. I had @current_project, @current_page etc
(
On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Tero Tilus wrote:
I was experiencing the weirdest behavior (rake spec running fine
without a test database) the other day. Turned out that actually rake
spec was (and has been for heavens know how long for me) running in
development environment. However
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
