Re: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:37:19AM GMT, BP25 via rsync wrote: > In other words, the recursion did not happen linearly (according to > the tree structure of either the sender or the receiver). This is > very counter-intuitive: I'd expect that every line which lies > between any two lines of the for

Re: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

Also note the SORTED TRANSFER ORDER paragraph in the rsync manual. I don't think this paragraph is relevant to my question because I understand it's only relevant to multiple nonrecursive rsync commands; whereas I have one single recursive rsync command. -- Please use reply-all for most r

Re: [HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

The only explanation I can find for such behaviour is that incremental recursion is being used, which leads me to deduce that the lines with path outside of the directory "A/B/...", can only indicate folder creation. But yet I cannot buy this explanation because why would such "atypical fol

[HELP] rsync recursive jumps across directories

Dear rsync community, I hope that someone can help me with this issue, probably related to my lack of understanding of how rsync recursive works. In the output was displayed something like this (I don't remember in the lines below whether rsync was deleting or creating fil

[Bug 5482] look into a hierarchical checksum algorithm that would help to efficiently transmit really large files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5482 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

leonv12 via rsync wrote: > I don't get why it runs from the command line but not from a scheduled > task. Any suggestions for a fix or a work-around? Check the environment settings, which are often the cause of differences in behavior between running from the command line vs. as scheduled. You

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 19:45:22 -0700 (PDT) leonv12 via rsync wrote: > I don't get why it runs from the command line but not from a > scheduled task. Any suggestions for a fix or a work-around? Talk to someone who knows about task scheduling and its failure modes? Karl Free Software: "You don't

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

I don't get why it runs from the command line but not from a scheduled task. Any suggestions for a fix or a work-around? -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Help-rsync-runs-from-command-line-fails-from-task-scheduler-hangs-at-msg-checking-charset-

Re: Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

.c(195) [sender=3.1.2][sender] _exit_cleanup(code=30, file=io.c, > line=195): about to call exit(30)Help will be much appreciated! Reminds me of previous struggles I've had with MS Windows and byte order marks. (Something about the way it requires UTF-16 but breaks unless you use UTF-8

Help - rsync runs from command line, fails from task scheduler, hangs at msg checking charset: UTF-8

nc_partial . /data/current/systemID/cygdrive/c (18 args)*msg checking charset: UTF-8*[sender] io timeout after 3000 seconds -- exiting[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=30, file=io.c, line=195): enteredrsync error: timeout in data send/receive (code 30) at io.c(195) [sender=3.1.2][sender] _exit_cleanup(

[Bug 12217] New: pogo games @1800-790-9186 support customer service phone number,support help desk phone number

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12217 Bug ID: 12217 Summary: pogo games @1800-790-9186 support customer service phone number,support help desk phone number Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All

help rsync on Cygwin cannot configure --enable-iconv

... no checking for library containing libiconv_open... no ... $ make ... $ ./rsync.exe --help |grep iconv append, no ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, symtimes, prealloc How i can say configure about libiconv? Laboratory of Medical Ultrasound Devices Scientific Department SPbSPU -- Please use

help rsync on Cygwin cannot configure --enable-iconv

... no checking for library containing libiconv_open... no ... $ make ... $ ./rsync.exe --help |grep iconv append, no ACLs, no xattrs, no iconv, symtimes, prealloc How i can say configure about libiconv? -- Best regards, Roman Romanovskiy +79217447768 +78122909636 Laboratory of Medical

Re: Can I help move bug 11521 along?

roducer script and a patch that worked well for me, but as > this is the first time I've looked at the rsync code base I wouldn't be too > surprised if I'd missed some portability implications or the like. > > I was wondering if there's anything further I could d

Can I help move bug 11521 along?

e looked at the rsync code base I wouldn't be too surprised if I'd missed some portability implications or the like. I was wondering if there's anything further I could do to help. Thanks, -mike [1]: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521 -- Please use reply-all for most

[Bug 10389] New: Sort the output of --help into alphabetical order

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10389 Summary: Sort the output of --help into alphabetical order Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Re: need help with an rsync patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chown itself is not insecure. The indiscriminate chowning of all files creates security issues. You can use --fake-super on push backups. In fact that is what - --fake-super is DESIGNED FOR. You just have to make sure that - --fake-super is running

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Thursday 29 August 2013 11:46 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Sherin A > wrote: Hope they will report it as a vulnerability , because this POC has been exploited successfully and it is affected by all software that use rsync

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Sherin A wrote: > Hope they will report it as a vulnerability , because this POC has been > exploited successfully and it is affected by all software that use rsync > as a backup and restore tool. This is totally false. The vulnerability is your insecure u

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Wednesday 28 August 2013 08:36 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Only when you choose to force a completely unnecessary chown between the backup and restore process. On 08/27/13 23:03, Sherin A wrote: On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote:

Re: need help with an rsync patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Only when you choose to force a completely unnecessary chown between the backup and restore process. On 08/27/13 23:03, Sherin A wrote: > On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: My opinion > on backups is pretty simplistic. If a resto

Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Wednesday 28 August 2013 04:14 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My opinion on backups is pretty simplistic. If a restore of my backup doesn't bring me back to what I had when I backed up then I don't have a backup. If I have to restore something and the re

Re: need help with an rsync patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My opinion on backups is pretty simplistic. If a restore of my backup doesn't bring me back to what I had when I backed up then I don't have a backup. If I have to restore something and the relationship between files that were hard linked in the past

Re: need help with an rsync patch

> The solution is not to refuse to backup any file that is a hard link. > There are legitimate reasons to have hard links and ignoring them > means you aren't backing up everything. I agree that preserving hard links may be important in some situation. There are certainly legitimate reasons to p

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

er) >>>>>>> This won't work , >>>>>>> >>>>>>> root@source [~]# id dom2inho uid=507(dom2inho) >>>>>>> gid=508(dom2inho) groups=508(dom2inho) root@source[~]# >>>>>>> rsync -avp -e 'ssh &#

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

erving uids or gids [root@da dom2inho]# If I am doing something wrong please let me know. B) backing up each user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

r) >>>>>>> This won't work , >>>>>>> >>>>>>> root@source [~]# id dom2inho uid=507(dom2inho) >>>>>>> gid=508(dom2inho) groups=508(dom2inho) root@source[~]# >>>>>>> rsync -avp -e 'ssh

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

; not preserving uids or gids [root@da dom2inho]# If I am doing something wrong please let me know. B) backing up each user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please poi

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

[root@dest dom2inho]# ll -d >>>> /home/backup/dom2inho/shadow --w--- 1 backup backup 1344 >>>> Aug 13 12:52 /home/backup/dom2inho/shadow => not preserving >>>> uids or gids [root@da dom2inho]# >>>> >>>> If I am doing somethi

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

mething wrong please let me know. B) backing up each user's files and only their files. I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users files , can you please point me to that option Thanki

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

>> B) backing up each user's files and only their files. > > I don't see an option in the rsync man to copy only each users > files , can you please point me to that option > > > Thanking you for your valuable time and help . > - -- ~*-,._.,-*~&#

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

rs files , can you please point me to that option Thanking you for your valuable time and help . -- -- Regards Sherin A http://www.sherin.co.in/ -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change option

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

th an >>>>> additional option for rsync for excluding hardlinks with >>>>> -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the >>>>> file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible >>>>> to get a developer documentation for

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

-links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think about the implications of that. Your users could make hardlinks

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

nal option for rsync for excluding hardlinks with -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

on is involved). That way you get proper, original-owner restores. PS : if any one interested in making a patch with an additional option for > rsync for excluding hardlinks with -links +1 links , please help me This is not something I'll be looking into, FYI. ..wayne.. -- Please u

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

ardlinks with -links +1 links , > please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat > system call. Or is it possible to get a developer documentation for > rsync with the detailed info ? You could do that with --exclude, but first, think about the implications of that.

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

tories and having kernel 3.6+ or higher ? PS : if any one interested in making a patch with an additional option for rsync for excluding hardlinks with -links +1 links , please help me , it is easy to check the file with an lstat / stat system call. Or is it possible to get a developer d

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 21:04, Sherin A wrote: > On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:56 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > >On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote: > >>On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: > >>>On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > BUT there is no direct vulnera

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:43:06PM +0530, Sherin A wrote: > If linux user foo , with home /home/foo , what ownership we need > to give the files under his home folder , it must be "foo" and not > root. Why? The user created the hardlink themselves, and it had root ownership, why should the ba

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

file instead of waiting the OS vendors for updating there kernel to 3.6 Matthias already pointed out that the changed default behavior in new kernel is meant to help users avoid shooting themselves in the foot, but doesn't implement added security. In particular, it doesn't fix pr

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

ar file instead of waiting the OS vendors for updating there > kernel to 3.6 Matthias already pointed out that the changed default behavior in new kernel is meant to help users avoid shooting themselves in the foot, but doesn't implement added security. In particular, it doesn't fix

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 08:56 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote: On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like back

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 20:44, Sherin A wrote: > On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: > >On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > >>BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that > >>(like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. > >... which

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 07:51 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 13.08.2013 15:51, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: I read your sentence differently: If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already read it - and worse. My underst

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:50 PM, Paul Slootman wrote: On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. ... which is what I already wrote. Paul So the solutions

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 15:51, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > > > I read your sentence differently: > > > > > If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already > > > read it - and worse. > > > > My understanding of your sentence says: > > Th

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > I read your sentence differently: > > > If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already > > read it - and worse. > > My understanding of your sentence says: > The ability to hardlink, means that anyone can read any file t

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 14:20, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > > > BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that > > (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. > > ... which is what I already wrote. I read your sentence

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 14:18, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > > > > > > Hardlinking a file doesn't change it's owner/group/permission > > > > (All Hardlinks have the same user/group/permissions). > > > > > > I never said that. > > > > You implied that by you

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > BUT there is no direct vulnerability in that, only processes after that > (like backup/rsync) can make a vulnerability out of it. ... which is what I already wrote. Paul -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the maili

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > > > > Hardlinking a file doesn't change it's owner/group/permission > > > (All Hardlinks have the same user/group/permissions). > > > > I never said that. > > You implied that by your assertion that you suddenly can read a file > after har

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 12:29, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > On 13.08.2013 09:52, Paul Slootman wrote: > > My mistake for assuming that people run current linux kernels... > > /proc/sys/fs/protected_hardlinks (since Linux 3.6) > When the value in t

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 13:17, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > > That aside that's not what i meant. > > That's the problem with one-word answers, people have to guess what you > mean. > > > > Hardlinking a file doesn't change it's owner/group/permission > >

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > That aside that's not what i meant. That's the problem with one-word answers, people have to guess what you mean. > Hardlinking a file doesn't change it's owner/group/permission > (All Hardlinks have the same user/group/permissions). I neve

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 12:29, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > > On 13.08.2013 09:52, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: > > > > > > > But if a user create a > > > > hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > On 13.08.2013 09:52, Paul Slootman wrote: > > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: > > > > > But if a user create a > > > hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore , > > > then he can read the shadow files and decrypt

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On 13.08.2013 09:52, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: > > > But if a user create a > > hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore , > > then he can read the shadow files and decrypt it . > > If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then

Re: need help with an rsync patch

Hello Joe, Thanks for your reply . But think about the real world users. There is not always necessary the /home will be in separate disk partition or /tmp , /var/tmp , /usr/tmp. Think about an openvz vps or disk with everything on / (most of the cloud servers) . Rsync is using in a

Re: Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tue 13 Aug 2013, Sherin A wrote: > But if a user create a > hard link to /etc/shadow from his home dir , and he request a restore , > then he can read the shadow files and decrypt it . If he can make a HARD link to the shadow file, then he can already read it - and worse. Paul -- Please us

Re: need help with an rsync patch

I'm going to give this one more shot and then wait for the experts to weigh in. I'll stick with your example of /etc/shadow, but this applies to any secured file on the system. On my system /etc/shadow is 640 (by default), so, as a normal user, I can't even see it (other than to see that it exist

Fwd: Re: need help with an rsync patch

On Tuesday 13 August 2013 12:23 PM, Joe wrote: Is there any way at all to say which is the original file and which is the hard link? I'll bet there isn't, although I' m not an internals guy at all. If so, this would be impossible to do. The inode is the "original", but all the file table entri

need help with an rsync patch

Can some one create a patch for excluding "hard link regular file" from copying ?. May be like a command flag , rsync --no-hardlink-copy -- -- Regards Sherin A http://www.sherin.co.in/ -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the m

Re: command not working.. help

On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Garvit Sharma wrote: > *rsync -av --files-from=FILE --delete-before src/ dest/* > For rsync's --delete to do anything, you must send an entire directory of files, e.g. if you added -r to that command and specified a directory in the files-from list. If you know

Re: command not working.. help

FYI: In my email program (Thunderbird), the original rsync command in this post shows up in bold (from * command *) and the asterisks are not shown. They are not part of the command itself. Joe On 07/07/2013 02:41 AM, Kevin Korb wrote: > --delete and --files-from don't work together. > > --files

Re: command not working.. help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, I didn't notice the * at the beginning of the command. Yes, when I look at your original message I see a bolded command. I got the stars when I replied because my thunderbird is configured to always compose in plain text unless I tell it otherwis

Re: command not working.. help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --delete and --files-from don't work together. - --files-from is for specifying an exact list of what to copy. Therefore there can't be anything to delete because there is nothing it looks at other than the specified list. Also, never ever use "des

command not working.. help

Hello All, *rsync -av --files-from=FILE --delete-before src/ dest/* the above mentioned command not working. I want to delete extra files on the dest that are not on the source and transferring the selected files from FILE simultaneously. Please suggest me how to do that ?? -- Regards Garvit S

[Bug 9211] Inconsistency between man page and help

||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison 2013-06-02 20:16:45 UTC --- There is no such option as --copy-devices currently in rsync (there is a patch for that, but it's a crude patch that doesn't update docs in any way). The --checksum-seed option hasn't been in --

Re: Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 rsync -vai --exclude=ccc/ --delete /valut/test[12] dest:/store/ On 02/10/13 11:19, Lee Eric wrote: > Hi mate, > > Thanks for your reply. However, I think there's more common > scenario I will encounter. > > SRC: > > dir: /vault/test1 file: /vault/t

Re: Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

Hi mate, Thanks for your reply. However, I think there's more common scenario I will encounter. SRC: dir: /vault/test1 file: /vault/test1/aaa file: /vault/test1/bbb file: /vault/test1/ccc dir: /vault/test2 dir: /vault/test3 dir: /vault/test4 dir: ... file: ... DEST: dir: /store file: /store/xx

Re: Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

If you really want to exclude /vault/test1/ccc, and for /vault/test2 to end up at /store/test2, then I would suggest: rsync -avz --exclude /test1/ccc src:/vault/ dest:/store rsync -avz src:/vault/test2 dest:/store that runs rsync over ssh. Note that the trailing slash on the "src" argument in th

Help: Make 2 Dirs Identical

Hi, I have 2 servers. One is data source I call is SRC and another one is for DEST data receive, DEST. Here's what I need to accomplish: SRC: dir: /vault/test1 file: /vault/test1/aaa file: /vault/test1/bbb file: /vault/test1/ccc dir: /vault/test2 DEST: dir: /store file: /store/xxx ==> Fi

[Bug 9211] Inconsistency between man page and help

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 --- Comment #1 from mlus...@redhat.com 2012-10-02 09:01:22 UTC --- Created attachment 7976 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=7976 patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiv

[Bug 9211] New: Inconsistency between man page and help

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 Summary: Inconsistency between man page and help Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

> > When a new release of rsync is out, simply install it with the same step: > ./configure > make > sudo make install > > ciao! > Banana > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks. I appreciate the help. I'd never have figured ou

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

install ciao! Banana On May 8, 2012, at 4:25 PM, s.no...@free.fr wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks. I appreciate the help. I'd never have figured out those steps > on my own (not a guru yet...). I was hoping to avoid completely anything from > Apple's Developer Tools, but

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

Hello, Thanks. I appreciate the help. I'd never have figured out those steps on my own (not a guru yet...). I was hoping to avoid completely anything from Apple's Developer Tools, but, apparently, this is not possible. Just to verify two things: (1) Once your instructions have bee

Re: Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

rg, would appear to require this, as far as I can understand), > and > I would just like a simple way of getting the latest version of rsync up and > running. > > Any help anyone would be kind enough to provide would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > S.N. >

Help for Beginners: A Simple Way of Installing the Latest Version of Rsync?

way of getting the latest version of rsync up and running. Any help anyone would be kind enough to provide would be much appreciated. Thanks, S.N. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman

Re: Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:48:44 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > --fuzzy aside, I'm a great believer of logrotate's "dateext" option. So am I, and not just for backups. It's easier to find the log file one needs with datestamps. Unfortunately, that machine not using it isn't my machine to administer

Re: Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

On Thu 22 Mar 2012, Andrew Gideon wrote: > > Note that the source ads_live_error.log.9.gz would not match the > destination "HOLD.ads_live_error.log.9.gz". Instead, it should have > matched the destination ads_live_error.log.10.gz. I mention this in case > that plays a role in this "failure".

Re: Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:23:13 +, Andrew Gideon wrote: > Assuming my expectation is correct, and that --fuzzy should have an > effect in this case, I'm wondering how best to test what's occurring. > I've tried using --itemize-changes in a --dry-run, but all it tells me > is ">f.st.." which i

Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest

I've identified a situation where the combination of --fuzzy --fuzzy (yes: two of them) and --link-dest is not behaving as I'd expect. I'm first wondering if my expectation is wrong. Assuming that it is not, then I'm wondering how best to figure out the problem. The double use of --fuzzy is

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 20:20 -0500, Kevin Korb wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - --exclude Movies/ --exclude Music/ > > Or put them in a text file list and use --exlcude-from Many thanks. Happy holidays... Cheers, Phil. -- Please use reply-all for most replies

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

x27;ll start anew), I'm trying > my first attempt at excludes. > > e.g. > > $ rsync -zav $HOME/phildobbin/ --exclude 'foo/' > /destination/backup/ > > which works perfectly well but I'm struggling to find the right &g

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

ad. Please let me know; if it is I'll start anew), I'm trying my first attempt at excludes. e.g. $ rsync -zav $HOME/phildobbin/ --exclude 'foo/' /destination/backup/ which works perfectly well but I'm struggling to find the right syntax to add about another half a doze

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

> 2. Mistaking the fact that the files are in the target because they > were already in the target for rsync actually transferring them.  If > they were there before you ran rsync they will still be there after > unless you use --delete-excluded Whoops! I thought that was the default. Thank you.

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The two most common problems with excludes are: 1. Excluded paths are relative to the source path. So if you are rsyncing /home/username and you want to exclude /home/username/Trash the path to exclude is actually /Trash. 2. Mistaking the fact that

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

> You want --exclude-from=file > You can cut-and-paste those path patterns into that file just as they are. Sadly, I'm still getting the files on the destination. Any ideas? 3.0.7 on windows, 3.0.8 on mac. -- Political and economic blog of a strict constitutionalist http://StrictConstitution.Blo

Re: Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You want --exclude-from=file You can cut-and-paste those path patterns into that file just as they are. For the ACL errors you are probably writing to a filesystem that doesn't support those ACLs. On 12/18/11 13:58, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote

Beginner help: Excluding directories by pattern

I apologize in advance for asking a beginner question, but I really could not figure this from the manual page. I want to copy some files with rsync, and not copy others. The stuff that I do not want to copy looks like this: System Volume Information/_restore*/RP* WINDOWS/Prefetch/* Documents an

Re: Help needed getting rsync to copy from windows to mac

Hi, rsync -A -X -a --delete --rsync-path="/opt/local/bin/rsync --fake-super --log-file=/tmp/rlog.txt" /cygdrive/c/DRIVERS "rsync@kleiman-ibook:/Volumes/Windows rsync/rsync" You command if fine, but -X will NOT copy both windows long and shot file name. I don't think it possible. So at the

Help needed getting rsync to copy from windows to mac

I'm trying to use rsync to copy files from a Microsoft Windows machine (XP, with cygwin) to a macintosh (10.5.8, PPC). After a lot of playing with options, manual page reading, etc, I have the following command, executed on the windows machine: rsync -A -X -a --delete --rsync-path="/opt/local/bin

回覆: hello,this question,Request help

Thank you very much ! 寄件者: Mac User FR [mailto:macuse...@free.fr] 寄件日期: 2010年11月16日 15:52 收件者: (New Plaza F9) Lee, Sam 副本: rsync@lists.samba.org 主旨: Re: hello,this question,Request help Hi, This error could probably come from the drop of an unstable network connection. Check my recent post

Re: hello,this question,Request help

Hi, This error could probably come from the drop of an unstable network connection. Check my recent post about it: http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg26280.html In my case, the solution was to use rsync over a ssh tunnel. The ssh tunnel is more robust about network problems t

hello,this question,Request help

Hello, 2010/11/15 17:40:32 [3200] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 8 bytes [generator]: Broken pipe (32) 2010/11/15 17:40:32 [3200] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1550) [generator=3.0.4] What's mean this log ?? Thanks! -- Please use reply-all for mo

Re: Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

Yan, I might be tired from repeated tries. It still fail. m...@fmv:~$ rsync -rvt --include-from=rsyncfinal /home /home/rsynctest sending incremental file list [sender] hiding directory home because of pattern ** delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file total: matches=

Re: Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

I can not get it to work http://pastebin.com/f432bf596 On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 18:05 +0900, nomnex wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 09:55 +0200, Yan Valuyskiy wrote: > > > I believe for this you'll have to provide a kind of next include file > > with --files-include option: > > Thank you. What is

Re: Help with correct text file syntax EXCLUDE/INCLUDE + OPTION

On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 09:55 +0200, Yan Valuyskiy wrote: > I believe for this you'll have to provide a kind of next include file > with --files-include option: Thank you. What is the full string for the [OPTION "--file-include option"], saying the file name below is "rsync.list". My understanding

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >