Re: (no subject)

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/5/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems to me the best way to accomplish this is to be sure that the parent directory is not a directory that someone can rename... ie, when I rsync our home directories, there is no danger of anyone ever renaming the 'home' directory... So,

Re: Renaming a directory results in an expensive retransmission

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/5/07, N.J. van der Horn (Nico) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is a tricky problem to deal with i think, it is tempting to keep a checksum'd file/directory list on both sides with information like: * a fingerprint/signature/checksum to identify each file or directory * inode number *

Re: Any ide why it take long time to run from WinXP to Linux?

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/3/07, Thiep Duong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know why it take this long? Well, the simplest explanation is that more source data had changed than usual or someone renamed a large directory (which looks like a deletion + creation to rsync). There could be something else going on, but

Unexplained error (code 24)

2007-10-06 Thread Peter de Solla
I am running windows xp and I suddenly have no sound, maybe there is a simply explanation? Can you give a long distance diagnosis? Thanks in advance peter -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read:

non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Erik Jan Tromp
It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as one would expect, only non-directories (with the

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/6/07, Erik Jan Tromp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Erik Jan Tromp wrote: It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. This was a simple problem with the code that was trying to skip implied directories failing to check if

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:50:41PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: There's a flip side to this. An rsync 3.0.0 sender *does* set FLAG_XFER_DIR on dirs like D, so if deletion is enabled, the generator incorrectly deletes all their contents! Yeah, that's bad. I'm looking into a fix. ..wayne.. --

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was a simple problem with the code that was trying to skip implied directories failing to check if the relative flag was set. The latest CVS version has this fixed. That fix misses the point. If I pass --relative --no-implied-dirs, the

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:18:46AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: That fix misses the point. No, it's just incomplete. Patience. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
In the process of investigating this, I ran across another oddity with --dirs and --relative that appears to be present in both rsync 2.6.9 and the current CVS rsync. When a source argument ends in a ./ but isn't ./ itself, rsync skips the subdirectories. Continuing the previous example: $

Re: non-recursive remote listing breakage in 3.0.0pre1

2007-10-06 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:18:46AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: That fix misses the point. No, it's just incomplete. Patience. Sorry. What I meant was that, once impliedness of directories is represented properly (which is necessary to

CVS update: rsync

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Sun Oct 7 03:29:04 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5573 Modified Files: generator.c Log Message: Fix list-only output of dirs in non inc_recurse mode w/o --relative. Revisions: generator.c 1.362 = 1.363

CVS update: rsync

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Sun Oct 7 03:52:20 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11466 Modified Files: exclude.c Log Message: Got rid of some old exclude trickery for --list-only w/o -r. Revisions: exclude.c 1.151 = 1.152

CVS update: rsync

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Sun Oct 7 03:52:24 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11496 Modified Files: main.c Log Message: Set xfer_dirs when we set list_only. Revisions: main.c 1.348 = 1.349

CVS update: rsync

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Sun Oct 7 03:52:28 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11522 Modified Files: options.c Log Message: We now send -d to the server for a list-only transfer w/o -r (rather than sending -r with a kludged exclude). Revisions:

CVS update: rsync

2007-10-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Sun Oct 7 04:04:57 2007 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15880 Modified Files: NEWS Log Message: Mention how --list-only w/o -r abandon's old kluge. Revisions: NEWS1.463 = 1.464