On 20 Mar 2001, Rusty Carruth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, there IS this silliness (this won't compile, its just
> pseudo-code, as its been a while since I've had to do this):
>
> union hacko_union
> {
> off_t foo;
> long foolongs[2];
> };
Well, we do already have our own publ
Andrew Tridgell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Speaking of this, does anyone know a portable way to get printf to
> > handle off_t values when they may be larger that a long? Is there
> > none?
>
> The best way I know of is what I used in other places in rsync, which
> is this:
>
> off_t foo
On 17 Mar 2001, Christopher Yeoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm. The following
>
> printf("seek to %jd\n", (intmax_t) foo);
>
> might do what you want. Its not in SUSv2 but is in the Austin drafts
> so I'm not sure how widely implemented it is.
That's neat. Thankyou.
Sadly gcc 2.95.3 does
> Speaking of this, does anyone know a portable way to get printf to
> handle off_t values when they may be larger that a long? Is there
> none?
The best way I know of is what I used in other places in rsync, which
is this:
off_t foo = ;
printf("seek to %.0f\n", (double)foo);
I know us
Martin Pool writes:
>
> I normally write
>
> off_t foo = ;
> printf("seek to %ld\n", (long) foo);
>
> accepting that for long values on some platforms it will just be
> wrong. Is there a better solution that's not gcc or glibc-specific?
> >From what I've seen of the standards, there is
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 11:22:31AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ICK! Please undo your change. Defining _LARGE_FILES as is done in
> > rsync.h means everyone will be impacted (Solaris, HP-UX, IRIX, Linux,
> > FreeBSD, Tru64 UNIX, ...). Discussion has a
Speaking of this, does anyone know a portable way to get printf to
handle off_t values when they may be larger that a long? Is there
none?
I normally write
off_t foo = ;
printf("seek to %ld\n", (long) foo);
accepting that for long values on some platforms it will just be
wrong. Is the
On 16 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ICK! Please undo your change. Defining _LARGE_FILES as is done in
> rsync.h means everyone will be impacted (Solaris, HP-UX, IRIX, Linux,
> FreeBSD, Tru64 UNIX, ...). Discussion has already occurred on this
> list about LFS support:
OK, I'll take it out
ECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LFS support on AIX 4.3.3
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:39:18PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2001, "Willeat, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/prg_
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:39:18PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2001, "Willeat, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/prg_lr_files.htm
> > explains how to enable large file support on AIX. The fillowing line
> > was
artin Pool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:39 PM
To: Willeat, Todd
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: LFS support on AIX 4.3.3
On 15 Mar 2001, "Willeat, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_
On 15 Mar 2001, "Willeat, Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/prg_lr_files.htm
> explains how to enable large file support on AIX. The fillowing line
> was added to the config.h file:
>
> #define _LARGE_FILES 1
I committed this
http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/doc_link/en_US/a_doc_lib/aixprggd/genprogc/prg_lrg
_files.htm explains how to enable large file support on AIX. The fillowing
line was added to the config.h file:
#define _LARGE_FILES 1
Todd Willeat
UNIX Administrator
<<...OLE_Obj...>>
40 Corporate Center
425 South
I've installed rsync 2.4.6 on 2 DEC Alphas and 1 IBM RS/6000. I need to
transfer some files that are > 2.5GB. Everything works find between the
DECs, but not with the IBM. On the IBM, I have a problem with files over
2GB. I have successfully concatenated several files into 1 file approx
2.5GB, so
14 matches
Mail list logo
