Hello!
I was just upgrading from RT 3.4.3 to 3.6.1 and the
look'n'feel is messed up.
I have verified that i can obtain the
css.
Images are not being parsed by Mason.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Any ideas?
There is an image of this at:
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL
Looks like, the css is not loaded. do you have more infos? How does your apache conf looks like?2006/10/18, Hermann Ronaldsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Hello!
I was just upgrading from RT 3.4.3 to 3.6.1 and the
look'n'feel is messed up.
I have verified that i can obtain the
css.
Images are
Hermann Ronaldsson wrote:
Hello!
I was just upgrading from RT 3.4.3 to 3.6.1 and the look'n'feel is
messed up.
I have verified that i can obtain the css.
Images are not being parsed by Mason.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Any ideas?
There is an image of this at:
Make sure you moved your OLD customized css file out of
local/html/NoAuth? That bit me on first upgrade.
Hermann Ronaldsson wrote:
Hello!
I was just upgrading from RT 3.4.3 to 3.6.1 and the look'n'feel is
messed up.
I have verified that i can obtain the css.
Images are not being parsed
I had same problem, it was a path mismatch
Humberto Junior
Mathew Snyder escreveu:
Hermann Ronaldsson wrote:
Hello!
I was just upgrading from RT 3.4.3 to 3.6.1 and the look'n'feel is
messed up.
I have verified that i can obtain the css.
Images are not being parsed by Mason.
Has
I am running the .deb version of RT 3.2 and cannot query custom transaction fieldsIs there a fix for this that anyone can suggest - i've checked the permissions and all seems to be fine so it may be a bug :/When i go into
Modify Custom Fields which apply to transactions for all queues the custom
Humberto, could you please elaborate? FWIW, I too am having the same
problem. I can put in the URL straight to the CSS files, and the CSS
source will load just fine. If I go to the main index page, I get the
image Hermann posted to flickr. I view-source'd the index page, found
where the
Hi some users have attached us forms in doc or open-document format with
no success..
it shows up in the ticket but it just mentions it no link to download
the file.
I notes that txt files works but RT thinks they are binaries.
Any thought?
Thanks.
begin:vcard
fn:Christian Fernandez
David,
What groups have permission to update the Custom Field? That set
of privileges is separate than Queue/ticket privileges.
Kenn
LBNL
David Lane wrote:
I am running the .deb version of RT 3.2 and cannot query custom
transaction fields
Is there a fix for this that anyone can
Well I have all permissions
Privileged users have full control
Current rights
(Check box to revoke right)
AdminCustomField
ModifyCustomField
SeeCustomField
New rightsI'm guessing its a bug but I can't figure out where the bugtracker is nowdays and I need to get this working
Hi there,
I've got RT set up and working fine on Ubuntu 6.06 Server, but we use AD
here (2003 SBS) and I'd like to get user accounts to be created
automatically. I've applied the LDAP overlay and made the changes to the
RT_SiteConfig.pm file (reproduced below), along with the auto-creation
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Christian Fernandez wrote:
Hi some users have attached us forms in doc or open-document format with
no success.. it shows up in the ticket but it just mentions it no link
to download the file. I notes that txt files works but RT thinks they
are binaries.
I had this
Request Tracker 3.6.1 is in Debian Unstable.
I had this happen yesterday because I accidentally uninstalled
some perl libraries. (debian packaging is great, but hard when you
want
to use a version not in debian, ie. 3.6.1)
As soon as I installed the things listed as
Hi thanks for the response, I use Gentoo do and everything is compiled..
so is difficult to get into package problems.. :-) what are this
packages you mention? can I have a list?
thanks!
Chris
Jacob Helwig wrote:
Request Tracker 3.6.1 is in Debian Unstable.
I had this happen
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/request-tracker3.6 is the
list of packages for RT 3.6 in Debian Unstable. On a Debian box you can
just apt-get install request-tracker3.6 to get it installed, if you
have the unstable sources in your sources.list with minor hastle. Don't
know how they
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Jacob Helwig wrote:
Request Tracker 3.6.1 is in Debian Unstable.
Ah, thanks. I think I checked when I installed it manually, I
guess I wasn't patient enough.
___
In /etc/apt/sources.list you need something like:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
Thought this is more of a question for a Debian Users list, on how to
add unstable sources to your apt
So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from
3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not the
best method *at all*, but it worked) However, now that I'm able to log
into my shiny new 3.6.1 system and looking around, the look and feel is
*vastly*
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:19:02PM -0400, Lee Whalen wrote:
So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from
3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not the
best method *at all*, but it worked) However, now that I'm able to log
into my shiny
into my shiny new 3.6.1 system and looking around, the look and feel
is
*vastly* different from 3.4.5. Has anyone else had this same problem,
I installed v3.6.1 recently and it worked fine, everything came up on
the screen OK but ewww, I definitely did not like the new look.
You can
Running RT-3.6.1 on Debian 3.1
I have the following scrip that is trying to print information on the ticket
but when I try to create the ticket it does not create the ticket and it
does not print anything
Description: onCreatePrint
Condition: User defined
Action: User defined
Template: blank
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:19 -0400, Lee Whalen wrote:
or could I not have gotten out of the woods yet on this CSS issue? Does
anyone have any screenshots of a good working 3.6.1 install?
Hello,
I have not had any issue with the new appearence, but I think the new
face of RT is sometimes not
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 23:10 +0200, Luca Corti wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:19 -0400, Lee Whalen wrote:
or could I not have gotten out of the woods yet on this CSS issue? Does
anyone have any screenshots of a good working 3.6.1 install?
Hello,
I have not had any issue with the new
hmm ok this is what I ahve done..
I have go to the rt- wiki and check the gentoo install guide..
there is a list of dependencies that I need to install..
I made sure all this was installed and it was.. some needed an update
but thats it.. I updated them just in case..
I also did:
* On 17/10/06 13:56 -0400, Lee Whalen wrote:
| Hello all, so I'm in a bit of a pickle. I rolled out RT 3.4.5 on a
| testing-only basis to a low-end desktop server running Debian Etch
| called, cleverly enough, 'betart', fully intending to purchase better
| server-grade hardware and migrate
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:19:02 -0400
Lee Whalen [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
So after much putzing, I finally was able to get all my data from
3.4.5 over to 3.6.1, *and* fix the weird CSS issue (long story, not the
best method *at all*, but it worked) However, now that I'm able to log
into
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 16:27 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
I prefer the new look, no complaints or 'ewww's from the users when
I installed the new version.
OK, let me see... I'm going to switch to the 3.4-compat theme overnight.
Let's see what kind of reactions users will have tomorrow. :D
27 matches
Mail list logo
