Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-19 Thread CLOSE Dave
I wrote: So now I have what should be a working RT. But no... Apache says, [14455] [Wed Feb 19 01:11:15 2014] [error]: Not a HASH reference at /opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Principal.pm line 385. Stack: [/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Principal.pm:385] [/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:660]

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-19 Thread CLOSE Dave
Now that I have RT running enough to get a login page, I can't get /any/ login to work, not even root. The Apache log reports, Unknown password form (/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/RT/User_Overlay.pm:1094), and the RT log is still empty. Users and passwords are stored in MySQL (actually

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-19 Thread Jok Thuau
Dave, Now that I have RT running enough to get a login page, I can't get /any/ login to work, not even root. The Apache log reports, Unknown password form (/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/RT/User_Overlay.pm:1094), and the RT log is still empty. you can look at this page:

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-19 Thread CLOSE Dave
On 02/19/2014 04:36 PM, Alex Vandiver wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:38 -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote: Now that I have RT running enough to get a login page, I can't get /any/ login to work, not even root. The Apache log reports, Unknown password form

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-19 Thread Alex Vandiver
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 16:47 -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote: Anyway, Jok's solution did not solve the problem. But it did give me some more error messages to investigate. I discovered that the vendor_perl/RT directory content was quite old. I replaced it entirely with the files from the

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread CLOSE Dave
I wrote: After upgrading my RT server (4.2.1) from Fedora 19 / Perl 5.16 to Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18, Apache is no longer willing to start RT. It complains about attempting to require packages twice. And this message appears in the Apache log: Error while loading /opt/rt4/sbin/rt-server: Perl

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:11:39AM -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote: Good thought but both perl and mod_perl were upgraded at the same time and both are version 5.18. It appears to be RT which is compiled against the wrong version. RT is not a compiled application. It runs under the perl that you

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread CLOSE Dave
Kevin Falcone wrote: RT is not a compiled application. It runs under the perl that you tell Apache to use. Indeed. But my phrase was taken directly from Jeremy Mates's suggestion. The most common type of error is the wrong version of mdo_perl Both perl and mod_perl come from Fedora

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:08:45AM -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote: The most common type of error is the wrong version of mdo_perl Both perl and mod_perl come from Fedora packages and both are the same version. If that were my problem, everyone using F20 and perl would be complaining. Since you

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread CLOSE Dave
Kevin Falcone wrote: Since you failed to indicate your deployment method in your original email, you forced us to guess and grasp at straws. But I wrote, After upgrading my RT server (4.2.1) from Fedora 19 / Perl 5.16 to Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18 In the Fedora world, an upgrade is a specific

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread Jeremy Mates
* CLOSE Dave dave.cl...@us.thalesgroup.com But I wrote, After upgrading my RT server (4.2.1) from Fedora 19 / Perl 5.16 to Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18 In the Fedora world, an upgrade is a specific YUM operation. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Either the upgrade left 5.16 bits behind (packages buggy

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread CLOSE Dave
Jeremy Mates wrote: Either the upgrade left 5.16 bits behind (packages buggy somehow), or a manual install was improperly made to the vendor space and has left 5.16 bits behind (rpm would be ignorant of these). The 5.16 bits will need to be located and removed, probably by looking for *.so,

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread CLOSE Dave
Jeremy Mates wrote: Either the upgrade left 5.16 bits behind (packages buggy somehow), or a manual install was improperly made to the vendor space and has left 5.16 bits behind (rpm would be ignorant of these). The 5.16 bits will need to be located and removed, probably by looking for *.so,

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-18 Thread Paul Gampe
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:17:46 PM CLOSE Dave wrote: Jeremy Mates wrote: Either the upgrade left 5.16 bits behind (packages buggy somehow), or a manual install was improperly made to the vendor space and has left 5.16 bits behind (rpm would be ignorant of these). The 5.16 bits will need

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-15 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:15:51PM -0800, CLOSE Dave wrote: After upgrading my RT server (4.2.1) from Fedora 19 / Perl 5.16 to Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18, Apache is no longer willing to start RT. It complains about attempting to require packages twice. And this message appears in the Apache log:

[rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-14 Thread CLOSE Dave
After upgrading my RT server (4.2.1) from Fedora 19 / Perl 5.16 to Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18, Apache is no longer willing to start RT. It complains about attempting to require packages twice. And this message appears in the Apache log: Error while loading /opt/rt4/sbin/rt-server: Perl API version

Re: [rt-users] Fedora 20 / Perl 5.18

2014-02-14 Thread Jeremy Mates
* CLOSE Dave dave.cl...@us.thalesgroup.com Is there a straight-forward solution or must I try to downgrade perl? Everything must agree. a) downgrade perl (and everything else tied to that) b) recompile RT and so forth to all use the new Perl 5.18 -- RT Training London, March 19-20 and Dallas