Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-27 Thread Joachim Thuau
aHA!

I didn't get a chance to apply the patch, but we figured out a way to
keep the whole history. The only data that wasn't preserved was the
creation time, but the history is there and valid. That was enough for
us. We created a new ticket, and merged the broken one into it. That
transferred all the data (history, requestors, etc) to the new one, but
not the owner. So at this point, we are at a good spot (at least I
think).

I'll work next week on upgrading the setup to the latest and greatest! 
(and I'll report the success...)

Thanks,
Jok

 -Original Message-
 From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com 
 [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf 
 Of Joachim Thuau
 Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:35 AM
 To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice
 
 
 I'm a little on the fence about this. I obviously want to 
 catch up and get up to 3.8.2 (whoohoo!) but I do need to 
 sort out that ticket first (at least it would make sense...) 
 to make sure it's not going to croak on the reload of the DB. 
 I have looked at the nice relational drawing from the 
 RT-Essential book, and from that I know better than just 
 going into the DB like that and mess with the ticket... I can 
 probably work it out, but I'd love to be able to get to keep 
 that ticket  (well, with the fixed bits in it). Would you 
 share that SQL bits? At least, it'll give me a starting point...
 
 Thanks,
 Jok 
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Joachim Thuau
Will this cause issues with the upgrade process, if I update to 3.8.2 now?
(ie: will it just recover or will the DB choke on it)

I guess I could just shred that ticket... But history is important...

Jok 

 -Original Message-
 From: Todd Chapman [mailto:t...@chaka.net] 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:30 PM
 To: Jesse Vincent
 Cc: Joachim Thuau; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice
 
 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Jesse Vincent 
 je...@bestpractical.com wrote:
 
 
 
  On Wed 25.Feb'09 at 12:25:39 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 
  Hello,
 
  I have RT-3.6.1, postgres backend, apache with mod_perl.
 
  Todd Chapman patched this issue in RT quite a while back. I don't 
  remember if it's in 3.6.7, but I believe it is. It's 
 definitely fixed 
  in 3.8.
 
 That was about 4 years ago! I think it was fixed in 3.6.2. It 
 felt good to find and fix that race condition. :)
 
 
  We just stumbled upon a funny situation. I'm hoping one of you is 
  going to be able to help me sort it out.
 
  A few minutes ago, 2 helpdesk techs used the take 
 button, at pretty 
  much the same time. Upon closer inspection, here are the 
 interesting
  bits:
 
  The history, under display, of that ticket shows the following 
  output in the history:
  [create ticket bits here]
  #     Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009         Tom   - Taken
 
  #     Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009         Geoff - Taken
 
  I asked Geoff to give the ticket back to Tom. When Geoff 
 tried to set 
  the owner to Tom, RT threw an error: Could not change 
 owner. Group 
  already has member. So it looks like Owner is a group that, for 
  this ticket, has 2 principals (which, I believe, it 
 shouldn't have). 
  We tried to steal the ticket, give it to nobody, and 
 everytime, we 
  get an error Could not change owner. Group already has member.
 
  So the question is: how do I go about making the ticket 
 behave properly?
  I suppose I need to go into the DB and fix it there. And I suppose 
  some code probably needs to be fixed so that race 
 condition doesn't 
  happen (or is it fixed in newer versions?).
 
  Thank you,
  Jok
 
  ___
  http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
  Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: 
  sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
  Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from 
 O'Reilly Media.
  Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 
 
  --
 
  ___
  http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
  Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: 
  sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
  Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
  Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 
 
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Joachim,


You could do this with SQL directly in the DataBase, but I would only 
do that if Shredder can't handle it. I'm afraid if you shred the ticket, 
it's gone and there won't be a ticket to own. That might make your Audit 
department a little testy about your ticket history. I have some SQL 
that would help you, but you have to know it invloves more than just the 
Ticket Table. There is the Group, Groupmember, ACL, etc. tables. There 
is very little data in RT that does OT relate to other tables. They ALL 
have to be insync.


Kenn
LBNL

On 2/26/2009 11:04 AM, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 Will this cause issues with the upgrade process, if I update to 3.8.2 now?
 (ie: will it just recover or will the DB choke on it)
 
 I guess I could just shred that ticket... But history is important...
 
 Jok 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Todd Chapman [mailto:t...@chaka.net] 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:30 PM
 To: Jesse Vincent
 Cc: Joachim Thuau; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Jesse Vincent 
 je...@bestpractical.com wrote:


 On Wed 25.Feb'09 at 12:25:39 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 Hello,

 I have RT-3.6.1, postgres backend, apache with mod_perl.
 Todd Chapman patched this issue in RT quite a while back. I don't 
 remember if it's in 3.6.7, but I believe it is. It's 
 definitely fixed 
 in 3.8.
 That was about 4 years ago! I think it was fixed in 3.6.2. It 
 felt good to find and fix that race condition. :)

 We just stumbled upon a funny situation. I'm hoping one of you is 
 going to be able to help me sort it out.

 A few minutes ago, 2 helpdesk techs used the take 
 button, at pretty 
 much the same time. Upon closer inspection, here are the 
 interesting
 bits:

 The history, under display, of that ticket shows the following 
 output in the history:
 [create ticket bits here]
 # Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009 Tom   - Taken

 # Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009 Geoff - Taken

 I asked Geoff to give the ticket back to Tom. When Geoff 
 tried to set 
 the owner to Tom, RT threw an error: Could not change 
 owner. Group 
 already has member. So it looks like Owner is a group that, for 
 this ticket, has 2 principals (which, I believe, it 
 shouldn't have). 
 We tried to steal the ticket, give it to nobody, and 
 everytime, we 
 get an error Could not change owner. Group already has member.

 So the question is: how do I go about making the ticket 
 behave properly?
 I suppose I need to go into the DB and fix it there. And I suppose 
 some code probably needs to be fixed so that race 
 condition doesn't 
 happen (or is it fixed in newer versions?).

 Thank you,
 Jok

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: 
 sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from 
 O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 --

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: 
 sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Jesse Vincent



On Thu 26.Feb'09 at 11:04:08 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 Will this cause issues with the upgrade process, if I update to 3.8.2 now?
 (ie: will it just recover or will the DB choke on it)
 
 I guess I could just shred that ticket... But history is important...
 

It's been a while, but I _believe_ that if someone steals the ticket
from here, RT will self-correct.


pgpzAWJvygt4L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Jesse Vincent



On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:40:02AM -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 Sadly, we already tried that. We can change the owner every which way,
 except for tom (who was the guy that worked on it). 
 

Can you try this patch? It's conceptually right but off the cuff. It's against 
3.8
but applies to recentish 3.6. It may need a tiny bit of massage to apply to 
3.6.1

You'll need to stop and start apache after making the change. 

=== lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm
==
--- lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm(revision 58932)
+++ lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm(local)
@@ -2782,7 +2782,12 @@
 # Delete the owner in the owner group, then add a new one
 # TODO: is this safe? it's not how we really want the API to work
 # for most things, but it's fast.
-my ( $del_id, $del_msg ) = $self-OwnerGroup-MembersObj-First-Delete();
+my ( $del_id, $del_msg );
+for my $owner (@{$self-OwnerGroup-MembersObj-ItemsArrayRef}) {
+($del_id, $del_msg) = $owner-Delete();
+last unless ($del_id);
+}
+
 unless ($del_id) {
 $RT::Handle-Rollback();
 return ( 0, $self-loc(Could not change owner: [_1], $del_msg) );


 Thanks,
 Jok 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:je...@bestpractical.com] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:26 AM
  To: Joachim Thuau
  Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
  Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice
  
  
  
  
  On Thu 26.Feb'09 at 11:04:08 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
   Will this cause issues with the upgrade process, if I 
  update to 3.8.2 now?
   (ie: will it just recover or will the DB choke on it)
   
   I guess I could just shred that ticket... But history is 
  important...
   
  
  It's been a while, but I _believe_ that if someone steals 
  the ticket from here, RT will self-correct.
  
 

-- 
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Jesse Vincent



On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 02:48:19PM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote:
 
 
 
 On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:40:02AM -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
  Sadly, we already tried that. We can change the owner every which way,
  except for tom (who was the guy that worked on it). 
  
 
 Can you try this patch? It's conceptually right but off the cuff. It's 
 against 3.8
 but applies to recentish 3.6. It may need a tiny bit of massage to apply to 
 3.6.1
 

Don't apply this patch. It's making the RT test suite explode. I have no
idea _what_ it would do to your DB.

 You'll need to stop and start apache after making the change. 
 
 === lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm
 ==
 --- lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm  (revision 58932)
 +++ lib/RT/Ticket_Overlay.pm  (local)
 @@ -2782,7 +2782,12 @@
  # Delete the owner in the owner group, then add a new one
  # TODO: is this safe? it's not how we really want the API to work
  # for most things, but it's fast.
 -my ( $del_id, $del_msg ) = 
 $self-OwnerGroup-MembersObj-First-Delete();
 +my ( $del_id, $del_msg );
 +for my $owner (@{$self-OwnerGroup-MembersObj-ItemsArrayRef}) {
 +($del_id, $del_msg) = $owner-Delete();
 +last unless ($del_id);
 +}
 +
  unless ($del_id) {
  $RT::Handle-Rollback();
  return ( 0, $self-loc(Could not change owner: [_1], $del_msg) );
 
 
  Thanks,
  Jok 
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:je...@bestpractical.com] 
   Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:26 AM
   To: Joachim Thuau
   Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
   Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice
   
   
   
   
   On Thu 26.Feb'09 at 11:04:08 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
Will this cause issues with the upgrade process, if I 
   update to 3.8.2 now?
(ie: will it just recover or will the DB choke on it)

I guess I could just shred that ticket... But history is 
   important...

   
   It's been a while, but I _believe_ that if someone steals 
   the ticket from here, RT will self-correct.
   
  
 
 -- 
 

-- 
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Joachim,


I'll do that in a bit. However, I would try Jesse's patch first. You 
could ALSO write down all the info for the ticket and shred it and then 
re-create it properly. Let me know how it goes with Jesse's patch and 
such. In the meantime, I'll put together the SQL and instructions.


Kenn
LBNL

On 2/26/2009 11:34 AM, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 I'm a little on the fence about this. I obviously want to catch up and
 get up to 3.8.2 (whoohoo!) but I do need to sort out that ticket first
 (at least it would make sense...) to make sure it's not going to croak
 on the reload of the DB. I have looked at the nice relational drawing
 from the RT-Essential book, and from that I know better than just going
 into the DB like that and mess with the ticket... I can probably work it
 out, but I'd love to be able to get to keep that ticket  (well, with the
 fixed bits in it). Would you share that SQL bits? At least, it'll give
 me a starting point...
 
 Thanks,
 Jok 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:kfcroc...@lbl.gov] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:22 AM
 To: Joachim Thuau
 Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
 Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

 Joachim,


  You could do this with SQL directly in the DataBase, 
 but I would only do that if Shredder can't handle it. I'm 
 afraid if you shred the ticket, it's gone and there won't be 
 a ticket to own. That might make your Audit department a 
 little testy about your ticket history. I have some SQL that 
 would help you, but you have to know it invloves more than 
 just the Ticket Table. There is the Group, Groupmember, ACL, 
 etc. tables. There is very little data in RT that does OT 
 relate to other tables. They ALL have to be insync.


 Kenn
 LBNL
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Tom Lahti
   I'll do that in a bit. However, I would try Jesse's patch first. You 
 could ALSO write down all the info for the ticket and shred it and then 
 re-create it properly. Let me know how it goes with Jesse's patch and 
 such. In the meantime, I'll put together the SQL and instructions.

Doesn't the shredder make a SQL dump?  You could shred it, edit the SQL
dump, and then reload it to the db.  Just an idea.

Also note that Mr. Vincent said not to use the patch as its broken (in case
you missed that mail).

-- 
-- 
   Tom Lahti
   BIT Statement LLC

   (425)251-0833 x 117
   http://www.bitstatement.net/
-- 
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Kenneth Crocker
Tom,


Yep. I got it after I wrote my last note. If what you say is true, then 
that dump would be an excellant way to determine what records need to be 
updated in the DataBase.


Kenn
LBNL

On 2/26/2009 12:32 PM, Tom Lahti wrote:
  I'll do that in a bit. However, I would try Jesse's patch first. You 
 could ALSO write down all the info for the ticket and shred it and then 
 re-create it properly. Let me know how it goes with Jesse's patch and 
 such. In the meantime, I'll put together the SQL and instructions.
 
 Doesn't the shredder make a SQL dump?  You could shred it, edit the SQL
 dump, and then reload it to the db.  Just an idea.
 
 Also note that Mr. Vincent said not to use the patch as its broken (in case
 you missed that mail).
 

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Jesse Vincent



On Thu 26.Feb'09 at 12:32:46 -0800, Tom Lahti wrote:
  I'll do that in a bit. However, I would try Jesse's patch first. You 
  could ALSO write down all the info for the ticket and shred it and then 
  re-create it properly. Let me know how it goes with Jesse's patch and 
  such. In the meantime, I'll put together the SQL and instructions.
 
 Doesn't the shredder make a SQL dump?  You could shred it, edit the SQL
 dump, and then reload it to the db.  Just an idea.

I _would_ like to caution people against editing raw SQL here. There's a
bunch of nuance to group members and cached group members that is _very_
easy to get wrong.  I expect to have a better patch (or discover that
the test suite failure was a red herring) within an hour or two.

 
 Also note that Mr. Vincent said not to use the patch as its broken (in case
 you missed that mail).

As a completely unimportant note on formality: Mr Vincent is my
grandfather. I'm Jesse. ;) 

Best,
Jesse


pgp7zC1mrWBrC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-26 Thread Jesse Vincent


 Don't apply this patch. It's making the RT test suite explode. I have no
 idea _what_ it would do to your DB.

It was a false alarm. The test suite is now happy. Give it a shot?


pgpTDMV8gDH9v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

[rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-25 Thread Joachim Thuau

Hello,

I have RT-3.6.1, postgres backend, apache with mod_perl.

We just stumbled upon a funny situation. I'm hoping one of you is going
to be able to help me sort it out.

A few minutes ago, 2 helpdesk techs used the take button, at pretty
much the same time. Upon closer inspection, here are the interesting
bits:

The history, under display, of that ticket shows the following output
in the history:
[create ticket bits here]
#   Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009 Tom   - Taken

#   Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009 Geoff - Taken 

I asked Geoff to give the ticket back to Tom. When Geoff tried to set
the owner to Tom, RT threw an error: Could not change owner. Group
already has member. So it looks like Owner is a group that, for this
ticket, has 2 principals (which, I believe, it shouldn't have). We tried
to steal the ticket, give it to nobody, and everytime, we get an error
Could not change owner. Group already has member.

So the question is: how do I go about making the ticket behave properly?
I suppose I need to go into the DB and fix it there. And I suppose some
code probably needs to be fixed so that race condition doesn't happen
(or is it fixed in newer versions?).

Thank you,
Jok

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-25 Thread Jesse Vincent



On Wed 25.Feb'09 at 12:25:39 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I have RT-3.6.1, postgres backend, apache with mod_perl.

Todd Chapman patched this issue in RT quite a while back. I don't
remember if it's in 3.6.7, but I believe it is. It's definitely fixed in
3.8.
 
 We just stumbled upon a funny situation. I'm hoping one of you is going
 to be able to help me sort it out.
 
 A few minutes ago, 2 helpdesk techs used the take button, at pretty
 much the same time. Upon closer inspection, here are the interesting
 bits:
 
 The history, under display, of that ticket shows the following output
 in the history:
 [create ticket bits here]
 # Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009 Tom   - Taken
 
 # Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009 Geoff - Taken 
 
 I asked Geoff to give the ticket back to Tom. When Geoff tried to set
 the owner to Tom, RT threw an error: Could not change owner. Group
 already has member. So it looks like Owner is a group that, for this
 ticket, has 2 principals (which, I believe, it shouldn't have). We tried
 to steal the ticket, give it to nobody, and everytime, we get an error
 Could not change owner. Group already has member.
 
 So the question is: how do I go about making the ticket behave properly?
 I suppose I need to go into the DB and fix it there. And I suppose some
 code probably needs to be fixed so that race condition doesn't happen
 (or is it fixed in newer versions?).
 
 Thank you,
 Jok
 
 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
 
 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
 
 
 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
 

-- 


pgplJM1QQKonG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Re: [rt-users] Ticket taken twice

2009-02-25 Thread Todd Chapman
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Jesse Vincent je...@bestpractical.com wrote:



 On Wed 25.Feb'09 at 12:25:39 -0800, Joachim Thuau wrote:

 Hello,

 I have RT-3.6.1, postgres backend, apache with mod_perl.

 Todd Chapman patched this issue in RT quite a while back. I don't
 remember if it's in 3.6.7, but I believe it is. It's definitely fixed in
 3.8.

That was about 4 years ago! I think it was fixed in 3.6.2. It felt
good to find and fix that race condition. :)


 We just stumbled upon a funny situation. I'm hoping one of you is going
 to be able to help me sort it out.

 A few minutes ago, 2 helpdesk techs used the take button, at pretty
 much the same time. Upon closer inspection, here are the interesting
 bits:

 The history, under display, of that ticket shows the following output
 in the history:
 [create ticket bits here]
 #     Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009         Tom   - Taken

 #     Wed Feb 25 11:35:50 2009         Geoff - Taken

 I asked Geoff to give the ticket back to Tom. When Geoff tried to set
 the owner to Tom, RT threw an error: Could not change owner. Group
 already has member. So it looks like Owner is a group that, for this
 ticket, has 2 principals (which, I believe, it shouldn't have). We tried
 to steal the ticket, give it to nobody, and everytime, we get an error
 Could not change owner. Group already has member.

 So the question is: how do I go about making the ticket behave properly?
 I suppose I need to go into the DB and fix it there. And I suppose some
 code probably needs to be fixed so that race condition doesn't happen
 (or is it fixed in newer versions?).

 Thank you,
 Jok

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


 --

 ___
 http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

 Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
 Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


 Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
 Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com