matrix_df hotmail wrote:
> Hello
>
>> Both lines above are essential. The first one makes sure your
>> application's memory will remain physically present and not swapped away
>> e.g. The second one turns the main thread of this program into a Xenomai
>> thread, and this is required to block on an
RE) in main()
and
rt_task_shadow(&task, "waitonsync", 1, 0) in xmit_msg(void *arg)
?
Jochen
>From: Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: rtnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [RTnet-users] WAITONCYCLE_EX cycle number problem
matrix_df hotmail wrote:
> Hello
>
>> Your build must have become inconsistent in some way. Are you sure that
>> the latest RTnet modules are installed on the master, not accidentally
>> some older ones?
>
> I am sure, but I will double check.
>
> When I use your test program it works:
>
>
---
BUT when I remove the lines with
mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
and
rt_task_shadow(&task, "waitonsync", 1, 0);
it FAILS with error=-13:
Jochen
>From: Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
matrix_df hotmail wrote:
> Hello
>
> I recompiled. (make clean, make)
> But I have installed the new svn-version only on master. Is that a problem?
Nope.
>
> Now I removed some lines and I can say that neither WAITONCYCLE nor
> WAITONCYCLE_EX return. They just wait and hang.
>
>//ret = rt_
Hello
I recompiled. (make clean, make)
But I have installed the new svn-version only on master. Is that a problem?
Now I removed some lines and I can say that neither WAITONCYCLE nor
WAITONCYCLE_EX return. They just wait and hang.
//ret = rt_dev_ioctl(fdtdma, RTMAC_RTIOC_WAITONCYCLE,
TDMA_W
matrix_df hotmail wrote:
> Hello
>
> With new rtnet-0.9.4-svn (10.8)
> neither WAITONCYCLE nor WAITONCYCLE_EX waits on the cycle and just
> return !!
> (tested on master)
>
> RTMAC_RTIOC_WAITONCYCLE, TDMA_WAIT_ON_SYNC
>
As I said, I broke the ABI by redefining the numeric value of
TDMA_WAIT_ON
Hello
With new rtnet-0.9.4-svn (10.8)
neither WAITONCYCLE nor WAITONCYCLE_EX waits on the cycle and just return
!!
(tested on master)
RTMAC_RTIOC_WAITONCYCLE, TDMA_WAIT_ON_SYNC
Jochen
>From: Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: rtnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subjec
Hello
With new rtnet-0.9.4-svn (10.8)
neither WAITONCYCLE nor WAITONCYCLE_EX waits on the cycle and just return
!!
(tested on master)
Jochen
>From: Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: rtnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: WAITONCYCLE_EX cycle number problem
>
matrix_df hotmail wrote:
> Hallo Jan
>
> rtnet-0.9.4-svn + xenomai 2.2.0
>
> WAITONCYCLE seems to work now on master.
>
> Now I have a problem with WAITONCYCLE_EX.
> I always get cycle number 0 returned after executing the ioctl function.
Yep, you managed to find another piece of yet-unused RTn
Hallo Jan
rtnet-0.9.4-svn + xenomai 2.2.0
WAITONCYCLE seems to work now on master.
Now I have a problem with WAITONCYCLE_EX.
I always get cycle number 0 returned after executing the ioctl function.
waitinfo.type = TDMA_WAIT_ON_SYNC;
waitinfo.ext_size = 0;
ret = rt_dev_i
11 matches
Mail list logo
