>>
>>> It is about the time to start with mass rebuild of packages for Ruby
>>> 2.6, since the change proposal was already accepted in advance.
>>> Finally,
>>> after more then week of waiting, I was also able to obtain side-tag
>>> [2],
>>
Thank you for the patches, Víťa and Mamoru - I'll check the ruby upstream
ticket for their opinion on the issue. If the issue will need the fix in Vim,
I'll coordinate it with Vim upstream.
Have a nice day,
Zdenek
___
ruby-sig mailing list --
Dne 29. 01. 19 v 13:06 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/01/29 20:58:
>>
>> Dne 29. 01. 19 v 12:29 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>>> Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2019/01/29 18:07:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm just adding my 'cent' to
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/01/29 20:58:
Dne 29. 01. 19 v 12:29 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2019/01/29 18:07:
Hi,
I'm just adding my 'cent' to ruby 2.6 mass rebuild - Vim started to
fail after ruby-2.6 was introduced to rawhide, but it fails only on
i686 and armv7hl:
i686
Dne 29. 01. 19 v 12:29 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2019/01/29 18:07:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm just adding my 'cent' to ruby 2.6 mass rebuild - Vim started to
>> fail after ruby-2.6 was introduced to rawhide, but it fails only on
>> i686 and ar
Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2019/01/29 18:07:
Hi,
I'm just adding my 'cent' to ruby 2.6 mass rebuild - Vim started to fail after
ruby-2.6 was introduced to rawhide, but it fails only on i686 and armv7hl:
i686:
task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32309685
log: https
Hi,
I'm just adding my 'cent' to ruby 2.6 mass rebuild - Vim started to fail after
ruby-2.6 was introduced to rawhide, but it fails only on i686 and armv7hl:
i686:
task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32309685
log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9685
for Ruby
> 2.6, since the change proposal was already accepted in advance. Finally,
> after more then week of waiting, I was also able to obtain side-tag [2],
> so we won't disrupt Rawhide a lot. The Ruby 2.6 is already build there
> as well as a few other packages. Now it
.org
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:26:13 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild - postgresql-plruby
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>>
Dne 22. 01. 19 v 21:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Pavel Valena wrote on 2019/01/23 4:32:
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Vít Ondruch"
>>> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:26:13 PM
>>> S
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:17:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild
>
>
> Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Hello, ruby-sig folks:
&
Pavel Valena wrote on 2019/01/23 4:32:
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:26:13 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild - postgresql-plruby
Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
3
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:26:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.6 - Mass rebuild - postgresql-plruby
>
>
>
>
> Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
&
s interesting issue. It fails at this line:
https://github.com/devrimgunduz/postgresql-plruby/blame/master/extconf.rb#L170
Similar reproducer IMO could be:
~~~
$ ruby -e '$SAFE=1; Dir.foreach(".") {|d| File.directory?(d)}'
~~~
This fails on Ruby 2.5 as well as Ruby 2.6, what is som
Dne 22. 01. 19 v 9:59 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Hello, ruby-sig folks:
>
> Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/01/22 0:34:
>> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/01/17 20:49:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It is about the time to start with mass rebuild of packages for Ruby
>
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/01/22 0:34:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/01/17 20:49:
Hi all,
It is about the time to start with mass rebuild of packages for Ruby
2.6, since the change proposal was already accepted in advance. Finally,
after more then week of waiting, I
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/01/17 20:49:
Hi all,
It is about the time to start with mass rebuild of packages for Ruby
2.6, since the change proposal was already accepted in advance. Finally,
after more then week of waiting, I was also able to obtain side-tag [2],
so we won't disrupt Rawhide a lot
Hi all,
It is about the time to start with mass rebuild of packages for Ruby
2.6, since the change proposal was already accepted in advance. Finally,
after more then week of waiting, I was also able to obtain side-tag [2],
so we won't disrupt Rawhide a lot. The Ruby 2.6 is already build
ít Ondruch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As planned, Ruby 2.6 was released during Christmas. So I updated my PR
>> with the changes required for the official build. There are things which
>> could be improved, but there is no blocker IMO (but I have not tested
>> t
Hi Vit,
Thanks for that.
I will look at your PR.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/32
Jun
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:18 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As planned, Ruby 2.6 was released during Christmas. So I updated my PR
> with the changes required for the
Hi,
As planned, Ruby 2.6 was released during Christmas. So I updated my PR
with the changes required for the official build. There are things which
could be improved, but there is no blocker IMO (but I have not tested
the package extensively). So please take look at the PR, here is the
Koji build
Dne 07. 12. 18 v 19:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
>
> Dne 07. 12. 18 v 11:37 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
>> Ruby 2.6.0.rc1 released yesterday!
>> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/12/06/ruby-2-6-0-rc1-released/
>>
>
> I did scratch build of r66252 yesterday
>
I found the link to the build in my
Ruby 2.6.0.rc1 released yesterday!
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/12/06/ruby-2-6-0-rc1-released/
--
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi rubyists,
The release of Ruby 2.6 is coming close, so it is right about the time
to submit change proposal for Fedora 30, so we can get it in into Fedora
soon after Christmas. Therefore I put together Ruby 2.6 change proposal
[1]. I don't think there is going to be too much controversy
Dne 16. 11. 18 v 17:43 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just created PR with .spec file updated to build Ruby 2.6.0.preview3:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/32
>
> It is very much WIP, but it builds at least. I have even not tried to
> install or run the
Hi everybody,
I just created PR with .spec file updated to build Ruby 2.6.0.preview3:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/32
It is very much WIP, but it builds at least. I have even not tried to
install or run the package. Pagure is so nice, that it should provide
the recent
>> If you have free cycles, please go forward and update all Fedoras
>> shipping Ruby 2.5.
>
>
> Actually, F27 with Ruby 2.4 should be updated as well.
Alright. I will take a look for the Ruby 2.5.2.
--
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
___
ruby-sig mailing
Dne 18. 10. 18 v 12:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Thx for the heads up.
>
>
> Dne 18. 10. 18 v 12:13 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
>> Ruby 2.5.2 was released yesterday.
>> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released/
>
> If you have free cycles, please go forward and update all Fedoras
Thx for the heads up.
Dne 18. 10. 18 v 12:13 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> Ruby 2.5.2 was released yesterday.
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released/
If you have free cycles, please go forward and update all Fedoras
shipping Ruby 2.5.
>
> Ruby 2.6.0 preview2 was released
Ruby 2.5.2 was released yesterday.
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released/
Ruby 2.6.0 preview2 was released 5 months ago, as you may know.
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/05/31/ruby-2-6-0-preview2-released/
Is someone working for the RPM packages: rpms/ruby of
30 matches
Mail list logo
