Re: Ruby 3.2 - Mass rebuild

2023-01-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22. 01. 23 v 17:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/18 23:45: Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13: Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28: Hi everybody, Ruby 3.2 is

Re: Ruby 3.2 - Mass rebuild

2023-01-22 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/18 23:45: Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13: Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28: Hi everybody, Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of

Re: Ruby 3.2 - Mass rebuild

2023-01-18 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13: Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28: Hi everybody, Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to thank to Mamoru for

Re: Ruby 3.2 - Mass rebuild

2023-01-17 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13: Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28: Hi everybody, Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I

Re: Ruby 3.2 - Mass rebuild

2023-01-04 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28: Hi everybody, Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really appreciate that. Due to this, I feel

Re: Ruby 3.2 - Mass rebuild

2023-01-03 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28: Hi everybody, Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really appreciate that. Due to this, I feel we are in better shape then we ever was and we

Re: Ruby 3.2

2023-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi again, So here is the official Ruby 3.2 build (randomly failed on aarch64 it seems): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95722738 The changes are in dist-git as always. Of course there needed to be some last second changes which break stuff:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2023-01-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 26. 12. 22 v 9:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/23 22:30: Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-26 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/23 22:30: Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is here:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 13:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 23. 12. 22 v 11:30 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46: Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030 I am still surprised

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 11:30 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46: Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is here:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, Yet another update. This time to c5eefb7f37. The changes are in dist-git and here is the scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95623134 Nothing particularly interesting on the Ruby side. Nevertheless, I have tried to convert the licenses into SPDX, creating

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-23 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46: Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030 I am still surprised that

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-22 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48: Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030 I am still surprised that this cycle, there are not big breakages. So

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes are in dist-git and the build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030 I am still surprised that this cycle, there are not big breakages. So there is nothing to report from my

Re: Ruby 3.2 - mass-prebuild

2022-12-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13. 12. 22 v 9:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): 1) rubygem-activesupport - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5131908/ Where this might be upstream cure: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/e4140140af5832e045bf8196d1bcbe9e5276a8fb This does not help :/

Re: Ruby 3.2 - mass-prebuild

2022-12-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13. 12. 22 v 10:12 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/13 17:29: 2) webkitgtk - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5132009/ Obviously, the issue is with independent rubygem-json, which was not build by mass-prebuild. This is probably

Re: Ruby 3.2 - mass-prebuild

2022-12-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13. 12. 22 v 9:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Few months ago, I have noticed some rumors about mass-prebuild tool [1]. Since Ruby 3.2 rebuild seems to be nice opportunity to test this out, I gave it a try. This is my config (there is really not much to configure ;)) : ~~~ $ cat mpb.config

Re: Ruby 3.2 - mass-prebuild

2022-12-13 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/13 17:29: 2) webkitgtk - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5132009/ Obviously, the issue is with independent rubygem-json, which was not build by mass-prebuild. This is probably tricky due to rubygem-json being subpackage of ruby

Re: Ruby 3.2 - mass-prebuild

2022-12-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Few months ago, I have noticed some rumors about mass-prebuild tool [1]. Since Ruby 3.2 rebuild seems to be nice opportunity to test this out, I gave it a try. This is my config (there is really not much to configure ;)) : ~~~ $ cat mpb.config archs: x86_64 chroot: fedora-rawhide name:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-12 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi everyone, I have noticed, that my version/release changes were not correct. IRB could not require ruby-default-gems: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5126185/ Therefore I have prepared yet another update. You can grab the scratch build here:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi everyone, I am back with yet another update: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95134506 There is nothing what would catch my eye. Nevertheless, there are disabled the MJIT tests on i686, because they are failing and failing. I turns out that Jarek already reported

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-07 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 06. 12. 22 v 19:12 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Hi again, Ruby 3.2 RC 1 was released today and therefore here is yet another update: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95021656 This was not really good attempt. Here is better one, while the i686 is failed again :/

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-06 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi again, Ruby 3.2 RC 1 was released today and therefore here is yet another update: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95021656 This is like 5th scratch build attempt, where all the previous failed on i686. So not sure if it succeeds. Other then that, except bundled gem

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 02. 12. 22 v 14:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 02. 12. 22 v 13:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02: Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): * Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 02. 12. 22 v 13:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02: Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): * Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde version.   So we can use, say,

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-02 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02: Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): * Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde version.   So we can use, say, ruby-3.2.0~preview2-170.20221021gitabcdefg.fc38, for

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): * Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde version.   So we can use, say, ruby-3.2.0~preview2-170.20221021gitabcdefg.fc38, for example,   without "resetting" release

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-12-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi all, Here is yet another update. This time 0436f1e15a. The changes are in private-ruby-3.2 branch in dist-git and here is the scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94825188 The most interesting change is the PubGrub resolver [1], which is now used in Bundler

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 01. 11. 22 v 14:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 14. 10. 22 v 19:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26: Hi again, I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have opened (not intended to

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-10 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
> >> I don't think that the former would be really valuable. Unless the RPM > >> package Ruby would make it easier in some way. > > I am suggesting that "we should rather not mention WASI, because the > > RPM does not actually support it". That is what we did for our > > document about the MJIT in

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 09. 11. 22 v 12:34 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 04. 11. 22 v 19:13 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): I have put together the change proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2 Please review, although with exception

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-09 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 04. 11. 22 v 19:13 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): > >> I have put together the change proposal: > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2 > >> > >> Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description" > >>

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-07 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 04. 11. 22 v 19:13 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): I have put together the change proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2 Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description" chapter, where the changes are described, it is basically just copy/paste of the

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-04 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
> I have put together the change proposal: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2 > > Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description" > chapter, where the changes are described, it is basically just > copy/paste of the Ruby 3.1 change proposal. > > I have marked the

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-04 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
> Thanks for your input. I will create a pull-request to the private-ruby-3.2 > branch to add the YJIT feature. Here is the PR. WIP: Enable YJIT feature. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/139 I plan to test the YJIT and check the performance on the mock environment.

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi again, Here is yet another test build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93660576 and the associated changes can be seen in the PR [1]. There is nothing of interested apart from enabling one test case resolved upstream (that was the trigger to prepare the update). As

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-11-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 14. 10. 22 v 19:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26: Hi again, I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-27 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 4:14 PM Jarek Prokop wrote: > Hi, > On 10/27/22 15:14, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24: > > Hi again, > > Here is yet

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-27 Thread Jarek Prokop
Hi, On 10/27/22 15:14, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24: Hi again, Here is yet another version from Friday:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-27 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
> Thanks for the work. > I am trying to build on the private-ruby-3.2 branch. > Where is the SRPM file including the ruby-3.2.0-70bc8cc6c2.tar.xz ? > Could you share? I found the ruby-3.2.0-70bc8cc6c2.tar.xz at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720 . You already shared it.

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-27 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24: > >> Hi again, > >> > >> Here is yet another version from Friday: > >> > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738 > >> > >>

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24: Hi again, Here is yet another version from Friday: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738 Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled out-of-source build, as was

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-21 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24: Hi again, Here is yet another version from Friday: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738 Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled out-of-source build, as was previously discussed here:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi again, Here is yet another version from Friday: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738 Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled out-of-source build, as was previously discussed here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/120

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26: Hi again, I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the scratch build is here:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-13 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
Thanks for the work, Mamoru. > * Removal of File.exists? / Object#=~ / "tainted"ness affects several pacakges It seems the method was removed in Ruby 3.2.0. https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v3_2_0_preview2/NEWS.md#removed-methods > The following deprecated methods are removed. > ... > *

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-13 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26: Hi again, I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the scratch build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720 I have not spot

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-12 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi again, I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the scratch build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720 I have not spot anything which would caught my

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-06 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 04. 10. 22 v 16:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Hello, Vít: Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/01 17:10: And I should really update Pry, because I saw Pry related issues on more places. For now, may I just backport the below?

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-04 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Hello, Vít: Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/01 17:10: And I should really update Pry, because I saw Pry related issues on more places. For now, may I just backport the below? https://github.com/pry/pry/commit/b548784b4a31b49026b69849430a9ec9072ae94a At least the above change fixes

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-03 Thread Pavel Valena
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:11 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 29. 09. 22 v 16:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15: > >> > > > >> And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core: > >> > >> > >> ~~~ > >> > >> expected "\nAn error occurred while loading > >>

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-10-01 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 29. 09. 22 v 16:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15: And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core: ~~~ expected "\nAn error occurred while loading ./spec/example_spec.rb.\nFailure/Error:\n  RSpec.describe Fixnum d...files took 0.05699

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-29 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15: And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core: ~~~ expected "\nAn error occurred while loading ./spec/example_spec.rb.\nFailure/Error:\n  RSpec.describe Fixnum d...files took 0.05699 seconds to load)\n0 examples, 0 failures, 1 error

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-29 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27. 09. 22 v 19:28 Pavel Valena napsal(a): On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57: >> >> Which fails due to Racc: >> >>

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-27 Thread Pavel Valena
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57: > >> > >> Which fails due to Racc: > >> > >> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/ > >> > >> > >> The

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57: Which fails due to Racc: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/ The issue seems to be fixed upstream: https://github.com/ruby/racc/pull/191 It is unfortunate

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-26 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57: Which fails due to Racc: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/ The issue seems to be fixed upstream: https://github.com/ruby/racc/pull/191 It is unfortunate that such a minor bug might influence quite lot of

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-26 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 23. 09. 22 v 17:30 Pavel Valena napsal(a): On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:12 PM Pavel Valena wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a): On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-23 Thread Pavel Valena
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:12 PM Pavel Valena wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> >> Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a): >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-23 Thread Pavel Valena
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a): > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >>> >>> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): >>>

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a): On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-22 Thread Pavel Valena
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> >> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): >> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch >> wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> >> >> I think it is the highest time

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-22 Thread Pavel Valena
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Hi everybody, > >> > >> I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here > >> we go. I have just pushed

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a): On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi everybody, I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here we go. I have just pushed the first update to private-ruby-3.2 branch [1] and here is the scratch

Re: Ruby 3.2

2022-09-19 Thread Jun Aruga (he / him)
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here > we go. I have just pushed the first update to private-ruby-3.2 branch > [1] and here is the scratch build: > >