Dne 22. 01. 23 v 17:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/18 23:45:
Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13:
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/18 23:45:
Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13:
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of
Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13:
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all,
I'd like to thank to Mamoru for
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13:
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all,
I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all
around. I really appreciate that. Due to this, I feel
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate that. Due to this, I feel we are in better shape then we ever was
and we
Hi again,
So here is the official Ruby 3.2 build (randomly failed on aarch64 it
seems):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95722738
The changes are in dist-git as always.
Of course there needed to be some last second changes which break stuff:
Dne 26. 12. 22 v 9:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/23 22:30:
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf.
The changes are in dist-git and the build is
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/23 22:30:
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes
are in dist-git and the build is here:
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 13:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 11:30 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf.
The changes are in dist-git and the build is
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The
changes are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030
I am still surprised
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 11:30 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf.
The changes are in dist-git and the build is here:
Hi,
Yet another update. This time to c5eefb7f37. The changes are in dist-git
and here is the scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95623134
Nothing particularly interesting on the Ruby side. Nevertheless, I have
tried to convert the licenses into SPDX, creating
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes
are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030
I am still surprised that
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes
are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030
I am still surprised that this cycle, there are not big breakages. So
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The
changes are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030
I am still surprised that this cycle, there are not big breakages. So
there is nothing to report from my
Dne 13. 12. 22 v 9:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
1) rubygem-activesupport -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5131908/
Where this might be upstream cure:
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/e4140140af5832e045bf8196d1bcbe9e5276a8fb
This does not help :/
Dne 13. 12. 22 v 10:12 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/13 17:29:
2) webkitgtk -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5132009/
Obviously, the issue is with independent rubygem-json, which was not
build by mass-prebuild. This is probably
Dne 13. 12. 22 v 9:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Few months ago, I have noticed some rumors about mass-prebuild tool
[1]. Since Ruby 3.2 rebuild seems to be nice opportunity to test this
out, I gave it a try. This is my config (there is really not much to
configure ;)) :
~~~
$ cat mpb.config
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/13 17:29:
2) webkitgtk -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5132009/
Obviously, the issue is with independent rubygem-json, which was not build by
mass-prebuild. This is probably tricky due to rubygem-json being subpackage of
ruby
Few months ago, I have noticed some rumors about mass-prebuild tool [1].
Since Ruby 3.2 rebuild seems to be nice opportunity to test this out, I
gave it a try. This is my config (there is really not much to configure
;)) :
~~~
$ cat mpb.config
archs: x86_64
chroot: fedora-rawhide
name:
Hi everyone,
I have noticed, that my version/release changes were not correct. IRB
could not require ruby-default-gems:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5126185/
Therefore I have prepared yet another update. You can grab the scratch
build here:
Hi everyone,
I am back with yet another update:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95134506
There is nothing what would catch my eye. Nevertheless, there are
disabled the MJIT tests on i686, because they are failing and failing. I
turns out that Jarek already reported
Dne 06. 12. 22 v 19:12 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi again,
Ruby 3.2 RC 1 was released today and therefore here is yet another
update:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95021656
This was not really good attempt. Here is better one, while the i686 is
failed again :/
Hi again,
Ruby 3.2 RC 1 was released today and therefore here is yet another update:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95021656
This is like 5th scratch build attempt, where all the previous failed on
i686. So not sure if it succeeds. Other then that, except bundled gem
Dne 02. 12. 22 v 14:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 02. 12. 22 v 13:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02:
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
* Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than
Dne 02. 12. 22 v 13:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02:
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
* Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde
version.
So we can use, say,
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02:
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
* Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde version.
So we can use, say, ruby-3.2.0~preview2-170.20221021gitabcdefg.fc38, for
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
* Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde
version.
So we can use, say,
ruby-3.2.0~preview2-170.20221021gitabcdefg.fc38, for example,
without "resetting" release
Hi all,
Here is yet another update. This time 0436f1e15a. The changes are in
private-ruby-3.2 branch in dist-git and here is the scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=94825188
The most interesting change is the PubGrub resolver [1], which is now
used in Bundler
Dne 01. 11. 22 v 14:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 10. 22 v 19:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26:
Hi again,
I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1]
I have opened (not intended to
> >> I don't think that the former would be really valuable. Unless the RPM
> >> package Ruby would make it easier in some way.
> > I am suggesting that "we should rather not mention WASI, because the
> > RPM does not actually support it". That is what we did for our
> > document about the MJIT in
Dne 09. 11. 22 v 12:34 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 04. 11. 22 v 19:13 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
I have put together the change proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2
Please review, although with exception
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 04. 11. 22 v 19:13 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
> >> I have put together the change proposal:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2
> >>
> >> Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description"
> >>
Dne 04. 11. 22 v 19:13 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
I have put together the change proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2
Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description"
chapter, where the changes are described, it is basically just
copy/paste of the
> I have put together the change proposal:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.2
>
> Please review, although with exception of "Detailed Description"
> chapter, where the changes are described, it is basically just
> copy/paste of the Ruby 3.1 change proposal.
>
> I have marked the
> Thanks for your input. I will create a pull-request to the private-ruby-3.2
> branch to add the YJIT feature.
Here is the PR.
WIP: Enable YJIT feature.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/139
I plan to test the YJIT and check the performance on the mock environment.
Hi again,
Here is yet another test build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93660576
and the associated changes can be seen in the PR [1]. There is nothing
of interested apart from enabling one test case resolved upstream (that
was the trigger to prepare the update).
As
Dne 14. 10. 22 v 19:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26:
Hi again,
I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1]
I have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and
the
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 4:14 PM Jarek Prokop wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10/27/22 15:14, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
>
> Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Here is yet
Hi,
On 10/27/22 15:14, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24:
Hi again,
Here is yet another version from Friday:
> Thanks for the work.
> I am trying to build on the private-ruby-3.2 branch.
> Where is the SRPM file including the ruby-3.2.0-70bc8cc6c2.tar.xz ?
> Could you share?
I found the ruby-3.2.0-70bc8cc6c2.tar.xz at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720 . You
already shared it.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 3:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> Here is yet another version from Friday:
> >>
> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738
> >>
> >>
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24:
Hi again,
Here is yet another version from Friday:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738
Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled
out-of-source build, as was
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24:
Hi again,
Here is yet another version from Friday:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738
Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled out-of-source build,
as was previously discussed here:
Hi again,
Here is yet another version from Friday:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738
Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled out-of-source
build, as was previously discussed here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/120
Dne 13. 10. 22 v 13:49 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26:
Hi again,
I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I
have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and
the scratch build is here:
Thanks for the work, Mamoru.
> * Removal of File.exists? / Object#=~ / "tainted"ness affects several pacakges
It seems the method was removed in Ruby 3.2.0.
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v3_2_0_preview2/NEWS.md#removed-methods
> The following deprecated methods are removed.
> ...
> *
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26:
Hi again,
I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have
opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the scratch build
is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720
I have not spot
Hi again,
I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I
have opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the
scratch build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720
I have not spot anything which would caught my
Dne 04. 10. 22 v 16:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/01 17:10:
And I should really update Pry, because I saw Pry related issues on
more places.
For now, may I just backport the below?
Hello, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/01 17:10:
And I should really update Pry, because I saw Pry related issues on more places.
For now, may I just backport the below?
https://github.com/pry/pry/commit/b548784b4a31b49026b69849430a9ec9072ae94a
At least the above change fixes
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:11 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 29. 09. 22 v 16:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15:
> >>
> >
> >> And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core:
> >>
> >>
> >> ~~~
> >>
> >> expected "\nAn error occurred while loading
> >>
Dne 29. 09. 22 v 16:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15:
And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core:
~~~
expected "\nAn error occurred while loading
./spec/example_spec.rb.\nFailure/Error:\n RSpec.describe Fixnum
d...files took 0.05699
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15:
And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core:
~~~
expected "\nAn error occurred while loading ./spec/example_spec.rb.\nFailure/Error:\n
RSpec.describe Fixnum d...files took 0.05699 seconds to load)\n0 examples, 0 failures, 1 error
Dne 27. 09. 22 v 19:28 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57:
>>
>> Which fails due to Racc:
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57:
> >>
> >> Which fails due to Racc:
> >>
> >>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/
> >>
> >>
> >> The
Dne 26. 09. 22 v 15:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57:
Which fails due to Racc:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/
The issue seems to be fixed upstream:
https://github.com/ruby/racc/pull/191
It is unfortunate
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57:
Which fails due to Racc:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/
The issue seems to be fixed upstream:
https://github.com/ruby/racc/pull/191
It is unfortunate that such a minor bug might influence quite lot of
Dne 23. 09. 22 v 17:30 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:12 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:12 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:02 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>>>
Dne 22. 09. 22 v 23:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:41 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi everybody,
>> >>
>> >> I think it is the highest time
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:42 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here
> >> we go. I have just pushed
Dne 19. 09. 22 v 18:22 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody,
I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here
we go. I have just pushed the first update to private-ruby-3.2 branch
[1] and here is the scratch
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 7:03 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I think it is the highest time to kick of the Ruby 3.2 thread. So here
> we go. I have just pushed the first update to private-ruby-3.2 branch
> [1] and here is the scratch build:
>
>
67 matches
Mail list logo