Werner Schuster (murphee) wrote:
> Christopher Williams wrote:
>> We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
>> contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
>> right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/local.
>
> This'll be a usability proble
On 1/26/07, Werner Schuster (murphee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christopher Williams wrote:
> We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
> contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
> right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/local.
Thi
murphee,
On 1/26/07, Werner Schuster (murphee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christopher Williams wrote:
> We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
> contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
> right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/l
Christopher Williams wrote:
> We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
> contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
> right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/local.
This'll be a usability problem, so how about this:
Windows: No problem
Lane,
We're having a few people trip over this. We expect the directory which
contains bin/ruby and lib underneath it. So for most unix installs, the
right directory to choose is /usr or /usr/local.
The dialog should give text at the top which illuminates this a little...
Thanks,
Chris
On 1/26
Lane Schwartz wrote:
> I go to the Add RubyVM dialog in the preferences, and try to put
> /usr/bin in
> the RubyVM home directory field. The only option under RubyVM type is
> Standard VM.
Try using /usr for Ruby VM home dir.
If that doesn't work, check where your Ruby installation is located
(f
