On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 03:45:17PM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >> On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
> >>>
> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether
On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>>
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling
On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
>>> [...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or
are just late.
> SVN
On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or
are just late.
SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
New masscheck submission
On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are
just late.
SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
1831759 (Yes)
On 05/22/2018 04:17 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are
just late.
SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
1831759 (Ye
On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
[...]
> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are
> just late.
>
>> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
>>
>> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
>> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17
On 05/17/18 23:09, John Hardin wrote:
>
> I notice from the RuleQA website that the masschecks from giovanni and llanga
> are consistently reported separately from everybody else's.
>
> I wonder whether this is affecting the quality of masscheck - is this perhaps
> causing it to bounce back and
On Thu, 17 May 2018, Dave Jones wrote:
On 05/17/2018 04:09 PM, John Hardin wrote:
I notice from the RuleQA website that the masschecks from giovanni and
llanga are consistently reported separately from everybody else's.
I wonder whether this is affecting the quality of masscheck - is this
On 05/17/2018 04:09 PM, John Hardin wrote:
I notice from the RuleQA website that the masschecks from giovanni and
llanga are consistently reported separately from everybody else's.
I wonder whether this is affecting the quality of masscheck - is this
perhaps causing it to bounce back and for
11 matches
Mail list logo