than one can be used. Where as at the moment, to emulate 5.x drl, it is hard
coded as the final network node.
Mark
On 11 Sep 2013, at 21:27, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
Unless you are using fireUntilHalt there is now no longer any async
reactivity. As discussed before, we have
SatefulKnowledgeSesssion is thread safe - it just uses a big lock on the
session, so only one thread can interact with it at any one time.
We will need to see your problem to be able to assist. The sample rules, and
how you are bootstrapping and using these 10 threads.
As per previous request,
This is happening in a MVELPredicate, i.e. an eval. The ASM based JIT we do is
not used for predicates (I think, @mario will confirm), so it will use stock
MVEL. MVEL is defaulted to work in reflection mode, hence the reflection
optimizer. It has an ASM optimiser, but there were issues with
Nabble is simply a 3rd party service, that provides web access to mailing
lists, such as this one.
I don't know about Marshut. A quick glance looks like they are trying to build
a simlar service as nabble, but combined with features found at stack exchange.
These are all 3rd party services.
http://blog.athico.com/2013/08/dublin-jboss-brms-drools-event-wed-28th.html
---
Dublin : JBoss BRMS (Drools) event Wed 28th August
Posted by Mark Proctor
Making an updated post. Thanks to Sabeo and IrishDev I'll be doing two
presentations now, one in the morning, and one in the evening. Both
:42 schrieb Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org:
On 12 Aug 2013, at 18:28, Alexander Herwix a...@herwix.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I really love the new wb-apps, but documentation is really pretty sparse
right now, so maybe you guys can help me out :)
Is there any documentation
On 12 Aug 2013, at 18:28, Alexander Herwix a...@herwix.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I really love the new wb-apps, but documentation is really pretty sparse
right now, so maybe you guys can help me out :)
Is there any documentation on the authoring REST-Api? I have already asked on
the jbpm
I'll be giving a JBoss BRMS 6.0 talk in Dublin this month, it's free, so
please help spread the word ;)
http://marketing.interactiveideas.com/acton/fs/blocks/showLandingPage/a/824/p/p-0169/t/page/fm/0
---
JBoss® BRMS Technical Workshop
In this FREE Technical Workshop on Wednesday 28th August at
updated url:
http://tinyurl.com/mfralbu
Mark
On 7 Aug 2013, at 15:39, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
I'll be giving a JBoss BRMS 6.0 talk in Dublin this month, it's free, so
please help spread the word ;)
http://marketing.interactiveideas.com/acton/fs/blocks/showLandingPage/a/824
The agendaFilter is passed to the fireAllRules method, and applied in the outer
loop of that:
if ( filter == null || filter.accept( item ) ) {
// fire it
fireActivation( item);
localFireCount++;
}
The timer is called async, so it has no agendaFilter in scope, and it calls
AlphaNode is for literal constraints, BetaNodes for joins (i.e. involves
variables).
Mark
On 7 Aug 2013, at 19:47, AlesD ales.dole...@nextiraone.eu wrote:
I understand that, but as far as I can say, it is not in the rules or facts.
I have restarted our solution, used same rules and fed them
People had problems with the uploaded slide before, which was an html export
from keynote. I've since exported to PDF and uploaded to slideshare.
http://blog.athico.com/2013/08/whats-new-in-drools-60-london-jbug-2013.html
Mark
On 30 Jul 2013, at 21:42, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote
The 6.x codebase has rewritten the web UI from scratch, with end user
extensibility in mind. Each editor is separate maven module, with defined life
cycles and hooks. You can simply copy one of those editors as a starting point,
and recompile for your custom 6.x web UI.
6.x has lot of other
On 05/11/2013 02:14 PM, Ming Fang wrote:
We did not explicitly enable multithread mode, unless it's on by default.
Also we're only using Drools in a single thread.
Sent from my iPad
On May 11, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
It's used for indexing in joins
The Drools 6.0 talk I did in london is now online:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fyxXDyNRRU
Slides I've put online before, but can be found here:
http://blog.athico.com/2013/05/whats-coming-in-drools-60-slides.html
___
rules-users mailing list
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/test/java/org/drools/compiler/integrationtests/DynamicRulesTest.java
On 23 Jul 2013, at 17:26, tiahdomoina rabarijaonadomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello :)
How can I manage dynamically rules in KnowledgeBase ? I mean remove,
On 24 Jul 2013, at 11:04, tiahdomoina rabarijaonadomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the link, it definitely helped me
I was wondering about 2 things :
1- With the knowledgeBuilder, you can check if there is an error with the
method getErrors(). So you can remove immediately the
It shouldn't do, and could be a bug. Can you try 5.6.0.SNAPSOT and see if it is
still a problem.
Mark
On 24 Jul 2013, at 18:22, Jeet Singh jeet...@gmail.com wrote:
Alright, I kinda found out the cause of the exception I am getting, however I
am still struggling the reason behind the
Your's is a different issue.
You either have an incorrect class path, with mixed versions. Or your client
and your server are using different versions. Or you didn't tell Guvnor to
recompile all it's packages, when you changed jar versions.
Also your try/catch would result in no actual
Unfortunately not, and in 6.0 that won't be possible as there is stricter class
loader isolation between drl namespace files (limitation of a dynamic system on
the JVM). However functions are just static java methods, and those work fine
too, when defined on a class in the parent class loader.
:46, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Proctor wrote
Unfortunately not, and in 6.0 that won't be possible as there is stricter
class loader isolation between drl namespace files (limitation of a
dynamic system on the JVM). However functions are just static java
methods, and those work
manners is a pretty terrible benchmark, and should probably not be used. Most
vendors cheat it, and it doesn't really tell you much. Also to work it expects
an OPS5 execution order, which we've attempted to emulate in the past, we may
not in the future - which is probably why you have the
I'm going to be in Hawaii for 3 weeks in september, visiting honolulu, kauaui
and maui.
Is there a Drools community on any of those islands, I could be tempted to
attend a user group and do a Drools 6 talk :)
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
If you look at the implementation for the interface, you'll see it can be cast.
org.drools.rule.Rule is considered internal, so you can cast - but beware, it
may change later.
Mark
On 16 Jul 2013, at 08:46, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, right now I am using this
we have little control over nabble, sorry.
People already use stack exchange, so it's a viable place to ask questions. It
just has a smaller outreach size.
Mark
On 9 Jul 2013, at 10:20, rjr201 rich.j.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that a question and answer style approach would definitely be
On 8 Jul 2013, at 08:03, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
It's Rete, not Reto. Being Rete-based is reportedly disappearing with 6.x.
I'm not sure what sort of criterion the graphical representation of rules
should represent. There is a way for displaying the Rete network
On 8 Jul 2013, at 13:38, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/07/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
On 8 Jul 2013, at 08:03, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Some backward chaining functionality is indeed available, although it
cannot be compared
we have a multi-thread test for this use case, so you can see what we are doing:
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.drools/drools-compiler/6.0.0.Alpha6/org/drools/integrationtests/DynamicRulesChangesTest.java
Mark
On 27 Jun 2013, at 05:02, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blog.athico.com/2013/06/judcon-summit-and-misc-presentation.html
---
I've done a number of presentations recently. I've finally got around to
uploading them to SlideShare, with videos in some cases. Here are the links
Drools talks
Drools 6.0 (Red Hat Summit 2013)
Drools 6.0 (Judcon 2013)
That should have been removed, it was an old drools 3 feature.
@mario: can you make sure that's removed from the eclipse content assist.
Mark
On 27 Jun 2013, at 04:46, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont have an example.
I just see it when I get the content assist in Eclipse
without having to use special delineator notation.
Mark
On 27 Jun 2013, at 10:54, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Proctor wrote
That should have been removed, it was an old drools 3 feature.
@mario: can you make sure that's removed from the eclipse content assist.
Mark
Thanks Mark
that has not changed, I think it's probably hard to do via the JPA command
approach.
Shouldn't be too hard for someone to do. Send your pull requests in :) don't
forget the unit tests, we won't accept a pull request that is without tests.
Mark
On 25 Jun 2013, at 15:23, Andynator
would be appreciated.
Mark
On 25 Jun 2013, at 15:36, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
...it's probably hard to do... vs. Shouldn't be too hard ... to do
Make up your mind?
-W
On 25/06/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
that has not changed, I think it's probably
the 6.0 stuff is not really ready for production use, many aspects do not work
yet - such as serialisation of rules.
Mark
On 24 Jun 2013, at 11:01, didierC didier.chevr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We want to use the external storage API for our Fusion project (Drools 6.0 -
beta2).
We have
20.06.13 17:28, schrieb Mark Proctor:
There are bugs with loadClass and serialisation :(
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/2011-November/003681.html
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6500212
Thus, we highly recommend replacement of this
code
Can you submit a pull request against master, 6.x, with the test. Put it in
BackwardChainingTest. We'll back port the test and fix to 5.x.
thanks
Mark
On 21 Jun 2013, at 16:00, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to use eval in a query for backward chaining causes a runtime
() for issues that
exclude array-types by classloader.loadClass().
WDYT?
Best Florian
Am 20.06.13 17:28, schrieb Mark Proctor:
There are bugs with loadClass and serialisation :(
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/2011-November/003681.html
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase
In 6.0 we will not allow function re-use across namespaces. It wasn't supported
in the syntax anyway, but people found ways around that, via the class
generation conventions we used. In 5.0 we used a composite class loader, which
made this possible. But it also has poor performance, and creates
We'll update the documentation, that was probably the behaviour in an older
version. The behaviour should not have rules async firing, unless there is
proper async controls, as with fireUntilHalt, otherwise the firings must be
constrained within fireAllRules.
Mark
On 20 Jun 2013, at 12:04,
There are bugs with loadClass and serialisation :(
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/2011-November/003681.html
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6500212
Thus, we highly recommend replacement of this code:
myClassLoader.loadClass(className);
With this code:
try fireUntilHalt, or it won't be able to fire the events as they happen.
Mark
On 20 Jun 2013, at 02:04, Andy reliable.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
*Issue 1*
Steps:
1. Add a Rule with cron + when condition always true.
2. FireAllRules
Expected: Cron to fire every 15 seconds
Rule:
with fireUntilHalt.
-W
On 20/06/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
try fireUntilHalt, or it won't be able to fire the events as they happen.
Mark
On 20 Jun 2013, at 02:04, Andy reliable.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
*Issue 1*
Steps:
1. Add a Rule with cron + when condition always
Is it better to use an older version?
best regards
Stefan
2013/4/18 Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
There are a lot of fixes in the 5.x master. Anyone verified their bugs
against this? I suspect this is fixed in that.
Mark
On 18 Apr 2013, at 16:21, Wolfgang
things are still raw in the beta's, and we've not checked the eclipse tooling.
It's really only for developers, not end users. Best to stick with 5.5
Mark
On 18 Jun 2013, at 16:46, harald.loes...@bluemail.ch wrote:
Hi,
today I started using drools using eclipse Kepler version where I added
we use a custom parser, based on an antlr lexer.
On 10 Jun 2013, at 22:24, Florian.Pirchner florian.pirch...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i am looking for the grammar of rules to get some insights of all the
semantic elements available. i found parts of it at github.
can anyone point me to a
We don't support decision tree's. But many simple decision trees, like the one
you have linked, can be translated to decision tables.
Mark
On 7 Jun 2013, at 06:33, atif007 atif.ta...@tcs.com wrote:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4024193/SingleQuestionTrigger_Sample.jpg
--
You could also just model this with jBPM.
Mark
On 7 Jun 2013, at 10:43, rjr201 rich.j.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it'd be too hard to model a decision tree in a .drl file.
You'd need a rule for each node/transition in your graph. Something like:
WHEN
$cn : CurrentNode(
On 6 Jun 2013, at 17:17, Wierdbeard65 wierdbear...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I came across the OptaPlanner site / product as part of researching
solutions to a project I am working on for my employer.
In essance, it's a timetabling system, however all of the solutions I have
found so far
http://blog.athico.com/2013/06/walkin-clinic-for-drools-jbpm-red-hat.htmlRed Hat Summit, BostonJune 11th to 14thWe have a dedicated room for community members to come and chat and hang out with core Drools jBPM developers. The room should be open to all, not just those with summit passes,
On 31 May 2013, at 07:43, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/05/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
On 30 May 2013, at 23:36, Stadin, Benjamin
benjamin.sta...@heidelberg-mobil.com wrote:
I'd be willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only
There was some work done in trunk, to fix VFS, we added pluggable discovery. It
defaults to File, but if the vfs jar is on the claspath it uses that. We setup
a container test
On 30 May 2013, at 21:26, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
At the moment 6.0 authenticates users from a properties file (drools-wb) or
with JACC (kie-drools-wb and kie-wb).
Uberfire, the underlying workbench library, supports a finer grained
permissions model however we are
drools-clips was both a parser and a shell. The parser basically converted clp
fr drl, to then be executed in a shell. There was however no interested in the
project at all, so we discontinued it.
The parser and converter might be salvageable, if the project is rescoped
simply at a clp to drl
and CLP?
Mark
Ben
Von: Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
Antworten an: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Datum: Freitag, 31. Mai 2013 00:16
An: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules
drools-clips was both a parser
support it.. I started down the road of unpicking the
FactoryBeans's (on v6) but backed out when I found they didn't match
just a thought
Ramon
Ramon Buckland
ra...@thebuckland.com
On 28 May 2013, at 16:49, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
The spring stuff hasn't been
http://blog.athico.com/2013/05/whats-coming-in-drools-60-slides.html
---
Recently I gave a talk at the London JBUG, on what's coming in Drools 6.0.
Those slides are now available online.
HTML export from Keynote (apparently some firefox issues, but fine in Safari
and Chrome):
it already works that way, eval cond2 will only be evaluated after cond1.
Mark
On 27 May 2013, at 08:55, ronan.quintin ronan.quin...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to force a rule evaluation from left to right? For example if
i have :
eval(cond1) | eval(cond2)
I wan't that cond2 is evaluate
Here are some slides from the other night, I can't put them up on slideshare,
as it has some video's in it. The URL is temporary, until i find a permanent
location for them.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4hxfxb2ho44f0el/10ASoNbCB9
Mark
___
rules-users
G+ now supports hashtags.
https://marketingland.com/up-close-with-the-new-google-related-hashtags-44035
This means anyone can write a small Drools or jBPM article, and get association
via the use of a hashtag. So if you write anything about Drools, jBPM,
OptaPlanner, Uberfire etc, please do
I made this last night, it's just a quick thing, but gives an idea of the
flexibility we have in the new Workbench.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckAznbOOV-4
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
made this video, hope it helps in understanding backward chaining.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCjIRVSRFvA
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
On 24 May 2013, at 08:51, ronan.quintin ronan.quin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
First of all i have to appologise for this horrible joke, but i think you
understand that i'm interrested in shadow facts.
I read that theses lazy facts proxy were introduced in Drools 4 in order to
make the
On 24 May 2013, at 09:50, ronan.quintin ronan.quin...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok i understand that the need to have proxies no longer exits due to new
asymetric rete algorithm. I but i'm a little bit desapointed. It seem that
when a fact is introduced into the working memory, all it's fields are
On 24 May 2013, at 15:35, ronan.quintin ronan.quin...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, thank you for this explaination. I know that the salience can build a
priority between rules into a single excel file. But it there a priority
criteria between column? For exemple from left column to right.
no
If you are referring to the BRMS product, that comes with paid support, then
please ask this question in the customer support forum. Your question will be
tracked under SLA, ensuring you get an answer.
Mark
On 17 May 2013, at 13:05, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
The
On 16 May 2013, at 14:20, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
you mean to say, if i switch the api, I ll have to rewrite all my DRL files/
the rules i have in guvnor ?
Nothing you author in DRL or Guvnor will be usable in another vendors product -
making using JSR94 kinda
Up to date examples can be found here:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/tree/master/drools-examples-api
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/tree/master/drools-examples-cdi
Mark
On 15 May 2013, at 17:48, 445511 cont...@silvernine.com wrote:
I'm trying to use Drools 6.0.0.Beta2 but none of
you set the wrong ResourceType:
urlResource.setResourceType(ResourceType.PKG);
Try CHANGE_SET, as you are loading a change set xml.
urlResource.setResourceType(ResourceType.CHANGE_SET);
Mark
On 14 May 2013, at 12:34, abhinay_agarwal abhinay_agar...@infosys.com wrote:
M still stuck at this.
The code examples of what you are proposing did not make it to the list.
Mark
On 12 May 2013, at 12:29, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I am using 5.5.0.final on jdk7(64bit). To repeat the test, simply create
a new Drools project in Eclipse. Tick the option to create a default Hello
On 9 May 2013, at 14:47, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I just noticed that even I have different agenda-groups, all groups are
evaluated during fact inset time.
In an extreme case, if I have 1000 rules in agenda-group A, and 1 rule in
agenda-group B
even though I just want to
On 11 May 2013, at 16:23, Sonata plz.write...@gmail.com wrote:
After a few testing, it seems that this rule extends rule feature is not
exactly what I want.
Say rule B extends A
rule A will be evaluated. This is OK.
when it comes to rule B, first, conditions in rule A will be
It's used for indexing in joins.
It looks like you are using the experimental multi-threading mode, I'd
recommend you disable that, and try the latest 5.6.0.SNAPSHOT builds if you
have problems.
Mark
On 11 May 2013, at 17:01, Ming Fang mingf...@mac.com wrote:
What is the purpose of
London JBUG May Event - What's new in Drools 6.0 (22nd May 2013)
http://www.c2b2.co.uk/london_jbug_may_2013
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
It was deprecated to kcontext some releases ago. The interface name is
RuleContext.
http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.2/javadocs/org/drools/runtime/rule/RuleContext.html
Mark
On 3 May 2013, at 10:14, rjr201 rich.j.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking for a way to get a rule's name within the
Errai has recently added OTEC support, which is a web based system for
collaborative editing. I thought this would be really interesting project,
working on cutting edge web technologies for anyone doing a GSOC submission. Or
actually anyone looking for an engaging task :)
There is not. Why not just increase perm gen?
Mark
On 2 May 2013, at 05:28, jalex jaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that each row in the decision table speadsheet is converted to a
separate java file during runtime (ex:
Rule_Pricing_bracket_352_941a618e0e72407d89d04664d5809e7f.java) .
On 25 Apr 2013, at 16:35, ciberg2 joaoguerr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My Drools project is going well and now it's time for some people starting
creating and deploying new Excel decision tables onto the repository.
For that we are using the Eclipse plugin, I've created a general project
The is a complet api change in 6.0. We've moved from a pure api approach, to
something convention and configuration based.
We've done a number of examples for this, but unfortunately not had time to
document them :(
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/tree/master/drools-examples-api
Mark
On 19
There are a lot of fixes in the 5.x master. Anyone verified their bugs against
this? I suspect this is fixed in that.
Mark
On 18 Apr 2013, at 16:21, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, my memory :-)
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/2013-January/004338.html
Mark
...@acm.org wrote:
Who are the primary researchers of expert-systems today?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
Actually Pamela is one of the papers I've been trying to track down, can't
get it on the internet any more. As I first saw it referenced
In theory it shouldn't be threading, as all working memory actions go through a
lock. The downside is it could be anything….
Could you try out 5.5.1 snapshot, lots of fixes in there - we'll release that
as 5.6 soon.
Mark
On 13 Mar 2013, at 08:53, erolagnab trung@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
poor is a relative word. It might be fast enough for many people.
If we were to implement this in the core of the code, we could avoid a fair bit
of the work you are doing. As we implement modify in place all we need to do
is ignore any activations that are re-actives via a modify. We wouldn't
On 12 Mar 2013, at 02:10, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
For instance here is an idea I've been mulling over recently (note just
random ideas, not roadmap). We don't have
the resources to completely compete
and that it's
evaluation is atomic, and can have cleanup work done.
Mark
On 12 Mar 2013, at 06:04, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, this thesis mentions a few features of the system I was
talking about :-)
([13])
-W
On 11/03/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote
a call back during the activation created event. You'll
need to cast to an internal concrete class first, AgendaItem. Remember these
interfaces and classes will change over time.
Mark
On 12 Mar 2013, at 18:53, Jim Hahn j...@att.com wrote:
Mark Proctor mproctor at codehaus.org writes
Have you tried just using the 2.6.1 janino jar? It may just work.
Mark
On 12 Mar 2013, at 19:06, Felix fe...@bluekai.com wrote:
I am using the cascading 2.1 which bundles a newer version of the janino
2.6.1. I'd like to see the next version of drools updated with the newer
janino.
--
The code looks ok to me. If an activation has fired, then you cannot cancel
it. Cancelled events are only for activations that are true and have not yet
fired.
Read my previous email about how to use the unmatch listener, that will do what
you want.
Mark
On 12 Mar 2013, at 20:49, jrh3
-internet days way back then :-)
If you could produce an RBS ranking based on rules fired in
production, I think that PAMELA would be in an excellent position.
There's a three-digit number of installations by now, but they're
running 24/7.
-W
On 12/03/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
There is, but you have to look at things slightly differently - and we have to
really work on a new DRL to better support it, so it's all very experimental
and bleeding edge. It's also probably more lambdas and closures than pure
functions.
Where I see lambdas helping is in creating meta
On 11 Mar 2013, at 03:10, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Matteo Mortari matteo.mort...@gmail.com
wrote:
The Question I'm asking myself: is there a specific, or few, areas where
Functional Programming could actually benefit Expert Systems so much to
=rep1type=pdf
Mark
On 11 Mar 2013, at 18:03, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 March 2013 16:19, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
So thinking really long term here. Can we build a java layer that provide
all the rule functionality we need - but fit ontop of the java
I replied to this on the DEV mailing list, this is the USER mailing list.
Please see the web archives.
Mark
On 11 Mar 2013, at 00:36, Mallory gmalathi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to change the source code of DefaultAgenda.Java by adding the
code below:
//drools orginial
Try out the latest 5.5.1.SNAPSHOT (which will be the 5.6 release). It has a lot
of fixes.
1. How big?
This is a relative question, not really sure how to answer it. Probably
easiest for you to review the original work, and make up your own mind.
2. See if the issue exists in 5.5.1.SNAPSHOT,
The jira you reference, JBRULES-3713, has marked itself as a duplicate of
/JBRULES-3632. The later was fixed for the upcoming 5.6 release, again try the
5.5.1.SNAPSHOT to be sure.
The problem is due to the LeftTuple factory method. Each node builds and
returns it's own LeftTuple. If some how a
Did you rebuild the pkg files you are loading? Have you made sure all your
dependency versions are correct?
Mark
On 5 Mar 2013, at 18:04, mani koduri kodur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Initially I am using jboss-drool 5.0.1 version in our project and I updated
to jboss-drools 5.4.0 version in
Can you please try the snapshots marked as 5.5.1 (which is actually for the 5.6
release) and let us know if you still have problems:
http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/drools/drools-core/
We will also need some sort of test case to reproduce the issue.
Mark
On 5 Mar 2013, at 04:12, Smita S.
6.0 stuff is still raw, there are alphas, but they are not really got general
use. We'll put out a beta shortly, I'd recommend you wait until then.
Also a lot has changed in 6.0, especially around deployment, so it won't be an
easy switch.
Mark
On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:50, Stephen Masters
I would hope before end of this year.
Mark
On 28 Feb 2013, at 22:39, kurrent93 kurren...@gmail.com wrote:
When can expect Drools 6 to make it into Enterprise support?
I understand this is a long way off, but generally, is this 1 year,
18months, or longer?
--
View this message in
On 25 Feb 2013, at 06:46, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/02/2013, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
when
$sv1 : SiteVisit( yearRecorded == durationCycleYear, !annualVisit )
FaultCode( $sv1.ID==svID, code matches 366.\\d+|743.3\\d? )
$inspector
at 1:25 AM, Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org wrote:
You also need to give us some indication of what your rules look like. Are
you using just patterns, what conditional elements are you using, are you
using any temporal operators, scheduling, tms?
Mark
On 24 Feb 2013, at 06:12, Wolfgang
301 - 400 of 1761 matches
Mail list logo
