Re: [s3ql] Recovery using local cache and s3ql_data_ only

On Oct 12 2016, Nikhil Choudhary wrote: >> The s3ql_passphrase object can be recovered from the master key, but >> currently there is no code to do that. > > Not so good to hear, if this is the roadblock that it sounds like, I’m > in for a restoration from scratch. Try the

Re: [s3ql] Recovery using local cache and s3ql_data_ only

On Oct 12 2016, Nikhil Choudhary wrote: >> On Oct 12, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> >> So the only objects that are lost are s3ql_metadata, s3ql_passphrase >> s3ql_seq_no no? > > Hello Nikolaus, thanks for the quick response! This is

Re: [s3ql] Recovery using local cache and s3ql_data_ only

Hello Nikolaus, thanks for the quick response! > So the only objects that are lost are s3ql_metadata, s3ql_passphrase > s3ql_seq_no no? Correct. > As long as at least one s3ql_seq_no object is present, this should not > pose a problem. Does the particular object matter or is any one

Re: [s3ql] Recovery using local cache and s3ql_data_ only

Hello Nikolaus, thanks for the quick response! Apologies if this is a duplicate, replying directly to s3ql@googlegroups only didn’t show up in the web UI. > So the only objects that are lost are s3ql_metadata, s3ql_passphrase > s3ql_seq_no no? Correct. > As long as at least one s3ql_seq_no

Re: [s3ql] Recovery using local cache and s3ql_data_ only

On Oct 12 2016, Nikhil Choudhary wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is it possible to recover a filesystem with an up-to-date local cache > (.db and .params files), s3ql_data_ files, and the encryption master > key? That depends on what you want to recover from. > I’m using s3ql with