On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Justin C. Walkerjus...@mac.com wrote:
Hi, Minh,
On Jul 12, 2009, at 12:12 , Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Justin C. Walkerjus...@mac.com
wrote:
[snip]
I opened $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/output/html/en/index.html (is
there
a better
Is there anything in Sage that needs gcc 4.3.0 or later, or will the
previous release (4.2.4) be ok?
I've built about 8 versions of gcc on 't2', which is a Sun T5240
http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/t5240/
'coolthreads' machine with a pair of UltraSPARC T2 Plus processors (16
cores
On Jul 13, 8:24 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
As it now stands, the HTML version of the reference manual of Sage
4.1.1 is bit broken. You can build the HTML version. However, if the
docstring for a function or class uses the .. MATH:: tag, then it
won't render in the
davidloeffler wrote:
FWIW: I tried to get around this by using sage -docbuild --jsmath
reference html. This led to a new problem, which this snippet from
sage/rings/polynomial/toy_d_basis shows:
We first form a certain ideal I in [Unknown control sequence '\ZZ'],
and note that the Groebner
Greetings. I have just downloaded and attempted to build from source
sage-4.1 and got the following error message: Error building
ratpoints. Please advise on how to fix the problem. Relevant system
information and portion of install.log are included below.
Also, one other question: I would
I noticed a couple of issues with polybori-0.5rc.p8 on Solaris.
Note how on the first line, polybori uses the GNU C compiler gcc to
compile a C file, but passes an unreconised option '-KPIC'. (That option
would be acceptable to the Sun compiler).
Then on the very next line, it calls the Sun
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some comment below but would like to first make some general
observations.
Certainly I am not the expert on image processing but I have now spent
a week or 2 on
PIL. I know others have spoken in favor of PIL (I
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
What I hate about PIL is the lack of docstrings with example doctests.
But honestly, I hate this about Python standard library too!
Things like this:
In [1]: a = s
In [4]: a.format?
Type:
William Stein wrote:
2009/7/12 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Craig Citrocraigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps this facility exists. If not, do others thinks it would be worth
adding?
Yep, this is very handy -- and indeed
2009/7/13 Peter petersamsim...@hotmail.com:
Greetings. I have just downloaded and attempted to build from source
sage-4.1 and got the following error message: Error building
ratpoints. Please advise on how to fix the problem. Relevant system
information and portion of install.log are
2009/7/13 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
What I hate about PIL is the lack of docstrings with example doctests.
But honestly, I hate this about Python standard library too!
Things like this:
In [1]: a = s
Hi Max,
On 11 Jul., 17:56, Maximilian Nickel max.nic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i've just created a simple script that creates an OS X application
bundle for Sage. The usage is pretty simple, just copy the sage
directory from the .dmg into the directory of the script and run 'make
release'.
I
2009/7/13 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
2009/7/13 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
What I hate about PIL is the lack of docstrings with example doctests.
But honestly, I hate this about Python standard library
2009/7/13 gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com:
Hi Max,
On 11 Jul., 17:56, Maximilian Nickel max.nic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i've just created a simple script that creates an OS X application
bundle for Sage. The usage is pretty simple, just copy the sage
directory from the .dmg into the
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:49 AM, gswgeorgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
To be honest, the OS X fraction of the Sage Development Team is
currently rather inactive, e.g. one of us (Michael Abshoff) is taking
a temporary timeout from Sage development. Although there have been
two or three
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:58 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I posted a binary already for OS X 64-bit:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/binaries/
Minh or Harald should hopefully post that to the sage.mathorg binaries
page (hint hint).
It's really easy to build
Thanks for the answers. I'll see if I can get the system
administrator to install a more current gcc. If I can't get him to,
do you know if it's possible to install a local gcc for my own use?
Thanks again,
--Peter
On Jul 13, 11:47 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/13 Peter
Hi Georg,thanks for your answers, i
didn't know there was already code to generate an application bundle
in sage. I'll take a look at it
As far as I remember, the problems still open
were with moving the app around, or copying it to a different computer
(which in the Apple world is a
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
So what are the arguments against PIL and for VIPS?
Here are two reasons (Why use VIPS?)
Will Sage be represented in this conference?
http://www.osscweb.org/
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
So what are the arguments against PIL and for VIPS?
Here are two
Jaap Spies wrote:
William Stein wrote:
[...]
I've also fixed this in the official upgrade server, so it shouldn't
cause trouble to anybody else.
Thanks again for reporting this.
So it is save to do upgrade #81 to my systemwide sage install starting
with sage-1.5.1,2? Latest install is
Hi Jaap,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
So it is save to do upgrade #81 to my systemwide sage install starting
with sage-1.5.1,2? Latest install is sage-4.0.2.
Replying to myself: I gambled and:
[j...@paix ~]$ sage
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Jaap,
Hi Minh,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
So it is save to do upgrade #81 to my systemwide sage install starting
with sage-1.5.1,2? Latest install is sage-4.0.2.
Replying to myself: I gambled and:
[j...@paix ~]$
Craig Citro wrote:
Perhaps this facility exists. If not, do others thinks it would be worth
adding?
Yep, this is very handy -- and indeed already exists. Try sage -f -m
foo.spkg. (I have no idea what m stands for ... maybe William does?)
This will leave everything in $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/build
I think the answer is probably no, since the (extended) submission
deadline is over, but they don't have a posted schedule yet.
It appears to be very Scilab-focused.
-M.Hampton
On Jul 13, 3:07 pm, Hazem hazem.biqa...@gmail.com wrote:
Will Sage be represented in this conference?
Interesting, but I'm especially impressed by how well PIL stands up
to VIPS. It looks like vips was primarily designed to have a small
memory
imprint, especially for image files that are larger than physical
memory. PIL
takes only about 1.5 times as long as vips on a dual core processor,
so I
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 at 05:38PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I noticed a couple of issues with polybori-0.5rc.p8 on Solaris.
Note how on the first line, polybori uses the GNU C compiler gcc to
compile a C file, but passes an unreconised option '-KPIC'. (That
option would be acceptable to
Hi, Minh,
On Jul 12, 2009, at 13:17 , Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Justin C. Walkerjus...@mac.com
wrote:
On Jul 12, 2009, at 12:12 , Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Justin C. Walkerjus...@mac.com
wrote:
[snip]
I think you need to build the
I have several Solaris fixed I'd like to get integrated. Most are based
around the fact that the Sun linker takes different options to the GNU
linker, and some packages make assumptions about the linker being the
GNU one.
If you try to build Sage on t2, you will find it will fail in several
Dan Drake wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 at 05:38PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I noticed a couple of issues with polybori-0.5rc.p8 on Solaris.
Note how on the first line, polybori uses the GNU C compiler gcc to
compile a C file, but passes an unreconised option '-KPIC'. (That
option would
There is a ticket about updating PolyBoRi (Polynomials over Boolean
Rings, which means nothing at all to me).
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6177
but no decision seems to have been made.
I've got 2 patches I would like to apply to the current code, but are
reluctant to submit them if
Jason Grout wrote:
Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Pat LeSmitheqed...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Apparently, the jsMath library hides all display equations, even if they
are images.
I find this funny: I can view the rendered equations. It's just that I
have to refresh my
David Joyner wrote:
I have some comment below but would like to first make some general
observations.
Certainly I am not the expert on image processing but I have now spent
a week or 2 on
PIL. I know others have spoken in favor of PIL (I think Jason Grout
and maybe some others)
and that
Hi Ondrej,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
I forgot my trac login, could someone please forward this to the trac? Thanks.
SNIP
Done. See ticket #6424
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6424
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
Hi David,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I have several Solaris fixed I'd like to get integrated. Most are based
around the fact that the Sun linker takes different options to the GNU
linker, and some packages make assumptions about the linker
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Justin C. Walkerjus...@mac.com wrote:
SNIP
Ah... I think I see what has been causing you and everyone (including
me) problems. The HTML version of the standard documentation has a
main page that links to all the individual documents (tutorial,
reference
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi,
I forgot my trac login, could someone please forward this to the trac?
Thanks.
SNIP
Done. See ticket #6424
Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Justin C. Walkerjus...@mac.com wrote:
then it can be frustrating and at times confusing why things don't
work. If anyone is interested in helping out with making the standard
documentation better, the following tickets already have patches.
39 matches
Mail list logo
