Juanjo,
the main ECL developer has made new source release in the last 24 hours.
I've created a new ECL spkg. You can find it in the directory:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/ecl-9.8.3/
I've updated
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6564
which has the title
Hi David,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Juanjo,
the main ECL developer has made new source release in the last 24 hours.
I've created a new ECL spkg. You can find it in the directory:
The docu looks great, but I still like Robert Dodier's proposal of
separating units from quantities, as done in ezunits. It is hard enough
to remember all the internal functions and constants that should not be
over-written by variable definitions (e.g. var('lambda')). If the unit
On Aug 13, 12:59 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Did you find some documentation for the python api? I only found this:
the api seems to be language independent (COM) and well, i never
really looked into it but get the sdk here:
http://dlc.sun.com/virtualbox/vboxsdkdownload.html
and
Running 'make test' I'm seeing a load average of 13 on my dual processor
Sun, which it is not exactly happy about!
Here's the output from prstat
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
16735 drkirkby 30M 25M run 450 0:37:43 11% maxima/1
Hi David,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Running 'make test' I'm seeing a load average of 13 on my dual processor
Sun, which it is not exactly happy about!
Here's the output from prstat
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE
This one installed just fine one an intel macbook running 10.4.11!
I will now test the new maxima spkg you created.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Juanjo,
the main ECL developer has made new source release in the last 24 hours.
I've created
As a physical scientists I am definitely excited about this. I think
the basic plans are sound.
I presently do units as symbolic variable defined in terms of a list
of standard SI units. I also define a list of physical constants with
units. This works quite well, but as mentioned by others
Hi,
While waiting for next Sage final release, I enhanced the
new symbolic diff implementation to support symbolic n-th
derivative. So one can now work with them by calling the new
diff derivative directly (with strict syntax)
sage: f(x) = function('f',x); n,m=var('n,m')
sage: h =
Hi Sage-Devels,
apparently my new boss is very good in TeX: He showed me a draft (or
better: proof of concept) of a book in pdf format, and when you click
the examples, a gap session pops up and lets you compute these
examples. Or, if you click some (static) 3d-picture, an application
pops up,
Just for fun I've written a script that tells me how far Sage has come
when building from scratch:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/sage_progress
I'm not sure if it is counting the spkgs correctly or if it really
ends at 100%, but maybe someone else likes it, too ;)
Also, is there
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Harald Schillyharald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for fun I've written a script that tells me how far Sage has come
when building from scratch:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/sage_progress
I'm not sure if it is counting the spkgs correctly or
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Sage-Devels,
apparently my new boss is very good in TeX: He showed me a draft (or
better: proof of concept) of a book in pdf format, and when you click
the examples, a gap session pops up and lets you compute these
Hi folks,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
sage: So, mvngu. What have you been doing these last few days?
mvngu: Fixing some trivial bugs in Sage.
sage: Were they technical bugs?
mvngu: Not really. Just trivial typos and minor spelling
Jonathan wrote:
As a physical scientists I am definitely excited about this. I think
the basic plans are sound.
I presently do units as symbolic variable defined in terms of a list
of standard SI units. I also define a list of physical constants with
units. This works quite well, but as
Hi William,
On Aug 13, 5:25 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
...
Wow, so when I read a random pdf off the web and click on it, then it
could run a shell command, e.g., rm -rf $HOME?
My boss just gave me some
Jonathan wrote:
To give people an idea how a working physical scientist uses this, I
include a section of the function I use to set up my calculations with
units. One problem with this implementation is that it does not
account the limited number of significant figures in most of the
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Running 'make test' I'm seeing a load average of 13 on my dual processor
Sun, which it is not exactly happy about!
Here's the output from prstat
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS
On Aug 13, 12:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
As a physical scientists I am definitely excited about this. I think
the basic plans are sound.
I presently do units as symbolic variable defined in terms of a list
of standard SI units. I also
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Sage-Devels,
apparently my new boss is very good in TeX: He showed me a draft (or
better: proof of concept) of a book in pdf format, and when you click
the examples, a gap session pops up and lets you compute
On Aug 13, 12:37 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Could the units package could use standard Sage interval arithmetic in
order to automatically propagate errors? Of course, larger errors could
be propagated too, if the numbers were specified as Sage interval objects.
Jonathan wrote:
On Aug 13, 12:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
As a physical scientists I am definitely excited about this. I think
the basic plans are sound.
I presently do units as symbolic variable defined in terms of a list
of standard SI
Just noticed this on the maxima list. It looks like the maxima passes
most tests now on ECL.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hi folks,
We're currently shipping cvxopt 0.9 which is licensed under GPLv3+.
That is a standard spkg. My understanding is that code in the Sage
library should be GPL compatible with at least GPLv2. What about
licensing terms for standard spkg's? Can we accept a package whose
code is under GPLv3
This is my understanding: the (old) version of cvxopt which we use in
Sage is GPLv2+. The current version is 1.1.1, which is GPLV3+.
Is that incorrect?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We're currently shipping cvxopt 0.9 which is licensed
Hi all,
Version 0.13 of mpmath is now available from the website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.13
Mpmath is a pure-Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point
arithmetic that implements
Hi David,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:40 AM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my understanding: the (old) version of cvxopt which we use in
Sage is GPLv2+. The current version is 1.1.1, which is GPLV3+.
Is that incorrect?
The current version we're shipping is cvxopt cvxopt-0.9
Hi Fredrik,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Fredrik
Johanssonfredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Version 0.13 of mpmath is now available from the website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
Upgrading to mpmath 0.13 is now tracked at ticket #6740
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fredrik,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Fredrik
Johanssonfredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Version 0.13 of mpmath is now available from the website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
Upgrading to
You're right.
I think sage-2.7.2 had a cvxopt-0.8.2.spkg which might have been GPLv2+,
but I can't find it using google. It has been removed from the cvxopt website.
I wonder if we should just upgrade to 1.1.1 and change the part in
SAGE_ROOT/COPYING.txt which says
Every component of Sage
On 2009-Aug-11 15:29:29 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to let people know that David Ackerman -- a UW student who
took my course on Sage last quarter -- is working (funded by NSF) on
creating a units package for Sage right _now_.
Since no-one else has mentioned it, I
Of course, you should ask William before doing anything.
Also, I'm not sure how cvxopt interacts with Sage. If only
via pexpect, I think you can distribute such GPLv2 and GPLv3
software together but I'd have to check the FSF FAQ again to
be sure.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:50 PM, David
CVXOPT 1.1 is much improved compared to version 0.9, so it would be
great if you updated the version shipped with SAGE.
Joachim
On Aug 13, 11:01 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, you should ask William before doing anything.
Also, I'm not sure how cvxopt interacts with
Hi Joachim,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Joachim Dahldahl.joac...@gmail.com wrote:
CVXOPT 1.1 is much improved compared to version 0.9, so it would be
great if you updated the version shipped with SAGE.
Upgrading cvxopt to version 1.1.1 is tracked at ticket #6456
Hi:
I'd like to suggest that PIL be made standard. This requires a vote.
Though PIL is written in Python, the trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6741
adds some functions which make the interface even easier to use in many cases.
Thanks, David Joyner
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We're currently shipping cvxopt 0.9 which is licensed under GPLv3+.
That is a standard spkg. My understanding is that code in the Sage
library should be GPL compatible with at least GPLv2. What about
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'd like to suggest that PIL be made standard. This requires a vote.
Though PIL is written in Python, the trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6741
adds some functions which make the interface even
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:41 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Regarding cvxopt, we should definitely upgrade the spkg. It's just a
I agree.
standard Python library, by the way (not pexpect).
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Robert Kernrobert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2009-08-13 16:25 PM, Kurt Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Kurt Smithkwmsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Dag Sverre
Seljebotnda...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Peter
Jeremypeterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Aug-11 15:29:29 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to let people know that David Ackerman -- a UW student who
took my course on Sage last quarter -- is working (funded by NSF) on
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Fredrik
Johanssonfredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fredrik,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Fredrik
Johanssonfredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Version 0.13 of mpmath
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi William,
On Aug 13, 5:25 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
...
Wow, so when I read a random pdf off the web and click on it, then
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:41 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We're currently shipping cvxopt 0.9 which is licensed under GPLv3+.
That is a standard spkg. My understanding is that code in the Sage
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just curious. Why does the PSF reject BSD-licensed code, but
accept Apache-licensed code, given that the Apache license is vastly
more restrictive than BSD? I can understand this, but find it
surprising.
I'm also
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:41 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We're currently shipping cvxopt 0.9 which is licensed under
This seems a good enough time to ask: I'd like to use Notebook where
instead of using FCKEditor to typeset inter-cell rich text, one could
type latex in-browser. A latex2html converter would then operate on
those HTML cells. This way, one could imagine writing an entire thesis
or book chapter in
I'm all in favor of PIL as standard. Does it install OK on Solaris?
I can't think of any other objection.
-Marshall
On Aug 13, 6:32 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'd like to suggest that PIL be made standard. This requires a vote.
Though PIL is written in Python, the trac
On Aug 13, 2:11 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
On Aug 13, 12:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
As a physical scientists I am definitely excited about this. I think
the basic plans are sound.
I presently do
William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'd like to suggest that PIL be made standard. This requires a vote.
+1
Though PIL is written in Python, the trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6741
adds some functions
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm just curious. Why does the PSF reject BSD-licensed code, but
accept Apache-licensed code, given that the Apache license is vastly
more restrictive than BSD? I can
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:53 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I'd like to suggest that PIL be made standard. This requires a vote.
+1
Last week I went to a talk/infomercial on Mathematica at the
University
51 matches
Mail list logo
