On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
William,
This works great for me and completes the full 'sage -upgrade' cycle
with no errors.
But I got a gcc Internal Error when trying to install clisp. Could
you confirm this? I have an apparently similar
An error happens while compiling clmacs:
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-SYMM.
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-ASYM.
;;; Internal error: #a floating-point-overflow
; - Binary file binary-ecl/clmacs.fas is old or does not exist.
;Compile (and load) source file
Hi!
At
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/38dfa72aff118470
David Madore asked a question about substitution.
While I tried to answer it, I found the following behaviour of subs()
that, to my knowledge, is technically impossible, given how keyword
arguments are
Isn't it the case that actually p.subs(x2=x2) is *equivalent* to p.subs
({'x2':x2}) in Python?
No, this isn't the same in Python. You are looking for:
sage: R.x0,x1,x2=QQ[]
sage: S = QQ['x0,x1,x2,x3']
sage: p=S.random_element()
sage: p.subs(x2=x2)
and
sage: p.subs(**{'x2':x2})
-7/2*x1*x2 +
I have been wondering whether we should start over and create a
(fairly minimal) ubuntu 9.10 install using squashfs and unionfs? What
do you think? There are a lot of good ideas in the approach of Puppy
Linux... but that doesn't mean we actually have to use it in the long
run.
I wonder
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2009-Oct-23 00:45:00 +0100, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
I had changed the wording somewhat anyway, but I would admit I had not
considered other applications.
I suspect that most potential users won't be able to dedicate a host to
Sage -
Hi Martin!
On Oct 24, 9:52 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
sage: p.subs(**{'x2':x2})
-7/2*x1*x2 + 1/2*x2^2 - x0*x3 + 1/165*x1 + 3
Note the two stars. The reason why the subs function accepts a dictionary is
that its signature is:
p.subs(self, fixed, **kw=None)
On Oct 24, 11:38 am, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been wondering whether we should start over and create a
(fairly minimal) ubuntu 9.10 install using squashfs and unionfs? What
do you think? There are a lot of good ideas in the approach of Puppy
Linux... but that
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the comments. The Quaternion Group Wikipedia page seems
to differ substantially with the Dicyclic Group page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dicyclic_group
which says:
More generally, when n
Something Peter Jeremy said on sage-devel cause me to check what libraries the
libraries in Sage where opening.
My LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set to /usr/local/lib before running Sage.
drkir...@swan:[~] $ cd /export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.1.2.rc2
Set up the Sage environment:
Maurizio wrote:
I have been wondering whether we should start over and create a
(fairly minimal) ubuntu 9.10 install using squashfs and unionfs? What
do you think? There are a lot of good ideas in the approach of Puppy
Linux... but that doesn't mean we actually have to use it in the long
The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
Ubuntu. We all know it would be a massive amount of work to update
things, which almost no one knows how to do.
@debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
launchpad?
We tell people it's
On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Georg S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
for the record, the (above mentioned) Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29
seems to be quite close to the truth;
on MacPPC OS X 10.4.11 uname -r gives me:
8.11.0
on
On Sep 22, 6:25 pm, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
I spent a while thinking that I was going to be a mechanical engineer,
and took a few of the ME intro courses. Engineering statics and
dynamics can be phrased entirely in terms of linear algebra, though
the courses I took
On Oct 24, 5:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Georg S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
for the record, the (above mentioned) Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29
seems to be
On 10/24/09, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't get Maxima--5.19.1 to build on Itanium on top of ECL. The
build fails with:
...
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-SYMM.
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-ASYM.
;;; Internal error: #a floating-point-overflow
;
Hi
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
@debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
launchpad?
@debian experts:
Does a PPA package have to follow debian rules, or can it be something
like a binary deb from checkinstall which prepares the
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
@debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
launchpad?
@debian experts:
Does a PPA package have to follow debian rules, or
All tests passed on my somewhat flaky AMD Turion TL-50 laptop, on
Ubuntu 9.04.
-Marshall
On Oct 23, 5:14 am, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Sage 4.2.alpha1 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Interesting. Do you have some notes about your KVM setup? I want to
try it as well, as the ubuntu guys seem to prefer it over virtualbox:
I'm using
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Georg S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
for the record, the (above mentioned) Wikipedia article:
Instead of stripping Ubuntu, what about building up a minimal Debian?
Any command-line skills used in development work would transfer over
to a more-desktop oriented distribution based in Debian, such as
Ubuntu. The testing distribution of Debian, despite the name, has
always worked well for me,
Hi,
I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to try
again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
(see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743 for links to
tickets and patches needed to get this to build), and was able to get
it start up
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
Personally, I can not see anything wrong with adding it to the
configure script. One could add
If you only intend building Sage for use on your own computer, you
can safely ignore this warning.
Irrelevant
Hi all,
let me share with you some thoughts.
I know that this community likes a lot the strategy release soon,
release often; I tend to like this as well. What I don't like,
altogether, is the chance to have once in a while a quite buggy
release on our way, which is, in my opinion, not unlikely
On 2009-Oct-20 20:42:40 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
My remark about not hosting a FreeBSD virtual machine was inspired by
Peter's remark that Unfortunately, FreeBSD support in VirtualBox
is still a work-in-progress and isn't production-ready. I don't know
if that is really true
I gave it a positive review.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
There's an implementation of the dicyclic groups up now at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7244
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 at 11:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
I don't know what PPA package means, but if we provide our own
repository, then certainly we can make a monolithic package as
described above. Moreover, there are genuine advantages, in that the
Debian package system will search
I agree. I think there are a number of people who feel this way and
to some extent have been ignored. Of course this is partly because of
the volunteer effort issue - if this is important than people need to
volunteer to work on it.
One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the
mhampton wrote:
One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the version
number for sage-4.1.2 was quite misleading. It would help a lot if
the version numbers were more grounded in reality. One simple change
might be to not pick the version number until a final release has
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to try
again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
(see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743 for links to
tickets and
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Robert Dodier robert.dod...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/24/09, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't get Maxima--5.19.1 to build on Itanium on top of ECL. The
build fails with:
...
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-SYMM.
;;;
+1 this is a very good idea
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mhampton wrote:
One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the version
number for sage-4.1.2 was quite misleading. It would help a lot if
the version numbers were more
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to
try
again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
(see
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
mhampton wrote:
One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the version
number for sage-4.1.2 was quite misleading. It would help a lot if
the version numbers were more grounded in reality. One simple change
might be to not pick
On Oct 24, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 at 11:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
I don't know what PPA package means, but if we provide our own
repository, then certainly we can make a monolithic package as
described above. Moreover, there are genuine advantages, in
36 matches
Mail list logo
