This looks beautiful. It looks fine to me. Some grammatical ideas:
(a) I think you can say open source instead of open-source, even though
what you have is correct.
(b) Possibly Python based should be Python-based.
(c) Numerous methods ... Could be worded Use the numerous software packages
For a source tarball and a sage.math only
tarball see
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 3.2.alpha0:
#1323: Robert Miller: generate all subspaces of a vector space/
projective space [Reviewed by David Joyner]
#3872: William Stein
Thanks Harald for adding the link to
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main?cmd=manifest;manifest=-1;path=/sage/
But the changeset indicates this is almost a month old. Is
there a way to get the more recent version?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So, do you vote
[X ] Yes, include TinyMCE as a standard package
[ ] Yes, include TinyMCE as an optional package
[ ] No, do not include TinyMCE as a package
Also, if this is added I hope that somewhere the text
What is wrong with using the piecewise defined functions for the unit
step function?
You are right though, delta functions are not implemented yet. Of
course, they are not
really functions either, so how they should be implemented is an issue as well.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Ronan
My copy of 31.3.rc0 got hosed somehow using sage -upgrade.
I have no idea what I did wrong.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
#4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:04 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
here are the minimal fixes for the final 3.1.3:
#4271: Paul Zimmermann: improve coverage test of ell_generic.py to
100%, and fix typos [Reviewed by John Cremona]
#4272: Michael Abshoff: add the files from new
I wonder if any of this code sponsored by NAG is truely FOSS.
I didn't see any licensing statements though I didn't dig very deep.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Hazem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just came across this code which may be of relevance:
All tests passed on amd64 hardy heron.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
the is finally (and hopefully) the last release before 3.1.3. Unless
something major is broken this tarball will be identical (modulo
version string and some potential
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all, here is a short update about the sagemath.org website.
First, when i started to monitor the access, the usual number of
visits per day was 800-1000. It still varies, but you can think of
2000 visits per day
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:58 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 11, 6:54 am, Matthias Meulien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Matthias,
I successfully compiled Sage 3.1.2 from source. But I had troubles
with many commands... I finaly realized that all functions using a GAP
Makes sense, no objections to your Sage suggestion.
The reason I am emailing is that you webpage
http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/preprints.html
points to Lifting and base change for automorphic forms, 2008
but there is no link. I was just curious to flip through it that's all.
No hurry or
]
#3659: Mike Hansen: Upgrade IPython to 0.8.4 [Reviewed by Michael
Abshoff]
#3799: Emily Kirkman: degree sequence should not be a single integer
in graph_database [Reviewed by Robert Miller]
#3943: David Joyner: block designs patch [Reviewed by Robert Miller]
#4021: Martin Albrecht
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
As part of the conversion of the Sage documentation to Sphinx, I
propose that Sphinx and its dependencies (Docutils, Pygments, and
Jinja) be added to Sage. Here are brief descriptions for what each of
the
for details.
At the moment, the plan is for the tree to look like
combinat
|-- crystals
|-- designs
|-- matrices
|-- posets
|-- root_system
|-- sf
and
designs
|-- __init__.py
|-- all.py
|-- block_design.py
|-- incidence_structures.py
Any comments or suggestions?
- David Joyner
, meanwhile Magma does it in
almost 0 seconds).
I assume this is a typo?
David Joyner have checked the results of this program compared to
Magma's and the construction is almost similar:
sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0
Builds and passed sage -testall on amd64 hardy heron.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:42 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
this is alpha1, a couple hours later than I wanted, but than a bunch
of things got in the way during the day. Sources are in the usual
place at
[Reviewed by John Cremona]
#4103: Jason Grout: Delete the cmap option for vector field plots
[Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
#4104: Jason Grout: Create plot_slope_field function [Reviewed by
David Joyner]
#4115: Robert Miller: Double coset problems [Reviewed by David Joyner]
#4127: David Philp
I second Martin's congratulations!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:20 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It can be done:
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.0 sage-PC 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34 i686 Cygwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/sage312
$ ./sage
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I did a little advertisement for Sage on one Czech linux journal here:
http://www.root.cz/clanky/softwarova-sklizen-17-9-2008/#sage
But they wrongly read from the Sage webpages, that Sage is using the
Creative
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:57 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I'd mention that using ffmpeg and Sage/singular/gfan/tachyon
I was able to finish the little pilot project I had in mind: taking a
5d Groebner fan, intersecting it with a hyperplane, rotating it in 4d,
and animating
Thank you for starting this!
I corrected a minor typo or 2 and added stuff for the meataxe section.
If Michael accepts the latest patch by Robert Miller then that should be added.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Martin Albrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the 3.1.2.final is near, I started
On amd64 hardy heron, builds finds and all tests passed.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:59 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
we are getting very close now. We fixed a bunch of blocker doctest
issues and also fixed a long standing memleak in the number field
code. Another
I agree with everything Jason said. It would be useful if you could
find one of the
lead developers who would be willing to review your code, once written, and
you could ask them about how to implement ideas. Bobby Moretti used to be
great for that but I don't know if he is still doing Sage
built fine on amd64 hardy heron but this test failed:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module.py
Total time for all tests: 5285.8 seconds
Please see /home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-3.1.2.rc2/tmp/test.log for the
complete log from this test.
[EMAIL
interface
[Reviewed by Martin Albrecht]
#4073: Martin Albrecht: disable colors in sage0 [Reviewed by Mike
Hansen]
#4074: Mike Hansen: the notebook is totally broken in secure mode with
the new twisted spkg [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
#4075: David Joyner: fix bug in BCHCode [Reviewed by Robert
This is on amd64 gutsy gibbon:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/bernoulli_mod_p.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/lisp.py
Total time for all tests: 4005.5 seconds
Please see
This could make it harder for Timothy Abbott to create debian versions.
Based on some posted to debian-science, it appears that certain
debian maintainers have a negative view of the GNU FDL, which some
documentation is licensed under. Pushing FDL docs into a GPL's package
might make the entire
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:30 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:27 AM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could make it harder for Timothy Abbott to create debian versions.
Based on some posted to debian-science, it appears that certain
debian
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, chris75de [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the following code
b=matrix(3,1,[random() for i in [1..3]])
B=b*b.transpose()
lb,Sb=B.right_eigenvectors()
print lb
print
print Sb.transpose()*B*Sb
print
print Sb.transpose()*Sb
give's in my sage version 3.0.6
(20080901) [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
#4025: Michael Abshoff, Mike Hansen: Sage 3.1.2.alpha3: benchmark.py
runs Maple tests that should be optional [Reviewed by David Joyner]
#4027: Martin Albrecht: Sage 3.1.2.alpha3: matrix_mod2_dense.pyx
doctest failure on 32 bits [Reviewed by Michael
Built fine on amd64 hardy heron but the test for benchmark.py failed.
Do you want me to post it? It was similar to the output John posted.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 6:28 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Doc Day 3 went well and we barely missed the goal of 60% coverage with
I agree AbelianGroups needs rewriting and has odd behavior in
some cases.
Incidently, here is what GAP does:
gap A := AbelianGroup([1,2,3]);
pc group of size 6 with 3 generators
gap GeneratorsOfGroup(A);
[ identity of ..., f1, f2 ]
gap A := AbelianGroup([2,1,3]);
pc group of size 6 with 3
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi group,
At the URL
http://wiki.sagemath.org/Teaching_with_SAGE
the first dot point _appears_ to give a link to David Kohel's notes on
cryptography. The link is
http://www.sagemath.org/pub/crypto.pdf
This link is
Hansen]
#3655: C. Boncelet, David Joyner: left multiplication in piecewise
does not work [Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
#3719: David Joyner: bug in group cohomology [Reviewed by Alex Ghitza]
#3724: Martin Albrecht: faster hashs for Matrix_mod2_dense [Reviewed
by Simon King]
#3792: Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a strong possibility that for the next semester I will be
working on the graphics area of sage. I would working more on the
visible side than the innards but that does not mean I will not touch
the innards
Since no one has emailed intelligent comments yet, I'll add my own
not-so-intelligent but hopefully encouraging ones below:-)
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently in Sage, AbelianGroups are all multiplicative. There's a
TODO in abelian_groups.py
defined function with 2 parts, [[(0, 1), x |-- 2], [(1, 2),
x |-- 2*(1 - x)]]
If you think this will help with your problem, see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3655
John
2008/8/28 David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since no one has emailed intelligent comments yet, I'll add my own
My students are finding this very useful. Thank you Alfredo!
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Alfredo Portes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a LiveCD (Ubuntu based) of 3.1.1, if anybody
wants to try it. A vmware image that runs the livecd
is included.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:59 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I propose that pynac be included in Sage.
Pynac is a rewrite of Ginac to seamlessly use native Python objects instead
of CLN -- for inclusion in Sage. Pynac is a C++ library plus extensive
Cython bindings.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'am testing a Python module i wrote and placed it in one of the
pathes visited by Sage's Python while importing.
I try to do the necessary imports at the beginning of my module but it
seem's to be an endless
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, parisse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still do not understand why giac is not even mentionned in the
symbolic discussion considering the fact that like ginac, it is a C++
library, but unlike ginac (Ginac Is Not A Cas), giac (Giac Is A Cas)
has much more
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:41 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nybody give me a hint ?
Did you add it to devel/sage/setup.py
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:45 PM, iSAGE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am really looking for the day when I will do apt-get install sage,
which is number 1 on my wish-list.
That day should be very soon, I hope. (Tim Abbott -- any updates on the
status of this?)
-- William
This is
I know it may be a long shot, but I would like to ask this group for
its recommendations regarding the nomination of William Stein and/or
Sage for the Advancement of FS and/or Award for Projects of Social Benefit,
resp..
Previous winners of the Advancement of FS include
Lawrence Lessig (of
Installed fine and passed sage -testall on amd64 hardy heron, phenom chip.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
this is 3.0.6.rc0 which should be the last release before the ISSAC
2008 special 3.0.6 release for Wednesday. We fixed a bunch of issues
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:14 PM, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have looked around to see what Maple and Mathematica have in
the way of units, but from what I have seen, there is nothing very
exciting. Which is OK --- something boring which just works right
would be very useful.
Frink is the
I think it's great that you are doing this. Does a patch exist yet?
I'd like to try it out.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on writing eigenvalue/eigenvector functions, as
mentioned here:
have kernel_left?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Joyner wrote:
I think it's great that you are doing this. Does a patch exist yet?
I'd like to try it out.
I put up a preliminary patch at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2816
The patch
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:10 PM, q10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
It has come to my attention that SAGE does not have a units-conversion
program component (maybe it has; if it does, please show me). I
recommend adding the GPLed unit conversion program called ConvertAll
Installed fine and all tests passed on amd64 hardy heron.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:48 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
this is 3.0.6.alpha0. This release is a mix of bug fixes and new
features. Nothing crazy has been merged so far and it is unclear at
the moment how
Wow. This is amazing and great that you did this!
Thanks very much Mike.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importing
Done. It's 3655.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:38 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 14, 6:34 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, thanks! I'll make up a patch right now.
I am not so sure this is the proper fix, but you ought to open a
ticket for the issue anyway
with 1 parts, [[(0, 1), 2]]
Hope this helps,
--CGB
On Jul 12, 4:17 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly, this is not a bug in Ring. For the class of Piecewise functions,
__mul__ is implemented in a way that allows you to multiply
two elements in that class. If you try to multiply
Possibly, this is not a bug in Ring. For the class of Piecewise functions,
__mul__ is implemented in a way that allows you to multiply
two elements in that class. If you try to multiply a piecewise times a rational
(in that order) then it detects this and creats on the fly a piecewise function
This is strange. Can you tell me exactly where you found that? The
docstring for orthogonal_polys
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main/file/e2481e70f7f6/sage/functions/orthogonal_polys.py
says 2nd kind and the reference manual (I think) comes from the docstrings...
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:28
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:27 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
obvious way. There is a tarball at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/cookbook2008-07-09.tar.gz
so you can test out the latexing on you own machine first.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:45 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:12 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED
This looks really excellent. A few extremely minor comments.
(1) You have 2 photos of Lenstra, p133+p137. I'm not sure if that
was intended. (Also, one is Lenstra and the other is Hendrik
Lenstra, yet the
references have papers by both H Lenstra and A Lenstra.)
(2) The Juno Reactor cover art on
Builds fine and all tests passed on amd64 hardy heron, phenom chip.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:16 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0.4.rc0 is out. We merged only bug fixes and hope that this
will be identical to the final release. This time we have a source
tarball
Hi:
The bugs in the constructions document pop up every once in awhile on
the email lists. My understanding was that it would be replaced by a
cookbook,
which covered a superset of the material but had chapters written (or
co-written) by
different experts.
I have a chapter draft (co-written with
]
#3399: Gary Furnish: sage pbuild extcode files should be moved to
devel [Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
#3410: Burcin Erocal: conversion of matrices over polynomial rings to
magma is broken [Reviewed by William Stein]
#3442: David Joyner, Willem Jan Palenstijn: is_normal for permutation
groups
If I understand your question correctly, you might find the interface examples
in sage/interfaces
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main/file/c25e04ebfb67/sage/interfaces/
helpful.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:26 PM, anbdoulwahaab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Need some help to write an
.
2008/6/25 abu anbdoulhaaq anbdoulwahaab [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to know how to write my own interface for programs I have.
2008/6/25 David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If I understand your question correctly, you might find the interface
examples
in sage/interfaces
http
I'm with William. I was pretty happy when Francois reported (or more
precisely reminded me, since I think I knew and forgot) that xmaxima was
available. This means that openmath plotter (like jmol, but using tcl.tk
instead of java) is available too, whenever tcl/tk is installed.
On Tue, Jun 24,
Installed fine and all tests passed on hardy heron amd 64, phenom chip.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:33 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes Sage 3.0.4.alpha0. This is supposed to be a quick release,
so let's try to keep this simple. We do have quite a number of
+1
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:00 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose adding pyprocessing as a standard spkg to Sage.
http://pyprocessing.berlios.de/
This is *by far* the best tool I've ever seen for making use of multiple
processors on a single
Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So we're going to switch
I think the person involved with coordinating the
modular q-expansion code is William Stein himself,
so I'm cc'ing the sage-devel list for others interested
in this info. My guess is that, if William doesn't
know about this Pari code already then he will want
to know what license it is released
Built fine and all tests passed (hardy heon amd64, phenom processor).
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:12 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops, pressed return by accident.
This is 3.0.3.alpha1 and it was never meant to see the light of day
since I wanted to use it internally to test rebuild
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Boltzmann_methods
the packages
http://www.lbmethod.org/openlb/
and
http://www.physics.ndsu.nodak.edu/people/wagner/LB.html
are GPL'd. The first is GPLv2 but SAGE is licensed GPLv2+,
and the second is licenced under the GPL but doesn't say which
I would like to learn a bit about Blender too. If you have a book you'd
recommend, please let me know.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Marshall Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a small grant this summer to work on 3D visualization of
geometric-algebraic objects (e.g. Groebner fans),
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on rewriting the tutorial. Section 2.5.1 of the tutorial
is about Dirichlet characters, and I have some questions:
The introductory sentence discusses Dirichlet characters, and then
the first example uses
At first, sage -testall repoted a failure, in twist.py, but on
retesting it passed:
...
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/server/simple/twist.py
Total time for all tests: 5024.1 seconds
Please see /home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/tmp/test.log for the
complete
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surely the problem is (and it will get worse not better as Sage
improves ;)) that users just may not know which constituents
(3rd-party packages, i.e.spkgs) their Sage session has used. Are we
asking that our users
issue fix that Jaap encountered
and that in the past was also hit by David Joyner. Sources are
at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0.2/sage-3.0.2.rc3.tar
Unless something goes horribly wrong this will be identical to
the final 3.0.2 release. If you added some
]
--
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 9.6 seconds
A bit odd, but I guess this is good news.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2:17 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On an amd phenom hardy heron, built fine but sage -testall
Builds fine on an amd phenom machine running hardy heron but sage -testall
freezes at
sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/__init__.py (skipping) -- nodoctest.py
file in directory
sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py
+
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at
Wow!
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Joshua Kantor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The author of this
http://www.davidson.edu/math/chartier/Starwars/
project wanted code to render a 3d model of yoda for a demonstration
of rotation matrices.
A worksheet that does this can be found at
: David Joyner: version option returning clone branch name
#3150: Carlo Hamalainen: Memory leak in dancing_links.pyx
#3157: Gary Furnish: Executable target for pbuild
#3158: Michael Abshoff: singular-3-0-4-2-20080405.p1 requires
flex
#3159: Tim Abbott, Francois Bissey, Michael Abshoff: Patch
, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the brave of heart, I have my current effort up on trac as ticket
#2716.
I hope to add a number of other things and make the polyhedral classes
more intelligent. Again
I'm not disagreeing but want to point out one difference.
RR is an ordered field and this fact is used to differentiate between
i and -i. However, a finite field such as GF(5) is not, so there is
some ambiguity to i. It seems to me that this should be resolved somehow.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at
I cannot find the code browser or wiki links, both of which I use a lot.
Maybe that is because it is so slow, I give up looking. For me, each page takes
30 seconds. I guess sagemath.org is just slow this morning
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(sceduled for on Jan 2nd, in the
afternoon). Possibly there will be a booth as well, as there was last year.
If you are a SAGE developer, could you please reply to this list (or just
to me, if you prefer) if you are thinking of attending this meeting?
- David Joyner
inotebook()
#3138: Bjarke Roune: Singular multivariate polynomial ring has
redundant _repr_ method
#3142: Martin Albrecht: MPolynomialIdeal.homogenize bugfix
#3143: Martin Albrecht: remove references to /home/was
#3046: David Joyner: version option returning clone branch name
#3150
.
- David Joyner
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http
Possibly strange results on an ubuntu 7.10amd64 machine. (It is a
rather old machine
though, so many this is not something to worry about.)
export SAGE_PBUILD=yes
export SAGE_BUILD_THREADS=2
make
Build went fine. However, sage -testall started messing up almost immediately.
Here is some of it:
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:19 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 3, 7:14 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:55 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi David,
Can you post a link to the build log? This is very likely related
I think this is interesting too but was unable to compile it nor get
the binary to work.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Hector Villafuerte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Very interestingly, somebody posted that the
Very good!
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:51 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a new version of my ISSAC talk abstract. What do you think:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract.pdf
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of
2.3 based binary of Sage to the default
build platforms
#2325: David Roe, Kiran Kedlaya: segfault in p-adic extension()
method
#2821: Alex Ghitza: get rid of anything about this document
sections of any sage docs that say send email to stein
#2939: David Joyner
Looks good to me. I think Python is actually in the top 5 languages
now, isn't it?
Maybe Perl is 5 and Python is 6?
In any case, my only suggestion is to emphasize the point that *you*
needed an alternative
to the M's by pointing out somehow that (a) the others are propritary
and therefore not
I like it but perhaps I am prejudiced:-) IMHO, SAGE would be dead (or at least
a very lonely research project) if it weren't for the fact that it is
free and open source.
But also, design is an important factor.
Some ideas (I hesitate to call them suggestions since it seems fine as is):
1.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,
On Apr 30, 12:15 pm, Michael Brickenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested in real word use cases, which demonstrate, why
such a system is needed.
E.g., I think Simon king did some
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Martin Albrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if that is of any interest but someone around here might care
about the fact that Sage was probably the most mentioned (and cited)
mathematics software at the First Conference for Symbolic
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:35 PM, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if that is of any interest but someone around here might
care
about the fact that Sage was probably the most mentioned (and cited)
mathematics software at the First Conference for Symbolic Computation
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Robert Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SEP
Implement Lattices over ZZ, with pairings into QQ or ZZ
0. (Maybe) Implement a FreeModule_ZZ_quotient class. This would also
allow for constructing abelian groups in the sort of canonical way
(something
I'm going. Robert Miller and I are doing a poster on SAGE and coding theory.
I'll submit it tomorrow or Monday.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:49 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Emil Volcheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, William,
Do you
This looks really awesome Dan. It's really great you are working on this.
Is there any functionality planned for products of GL(1)'s (for example)?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Bump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have implemented some tools for working with characters of Lie
groups
701 - 800 of 1114 matches
Mail list logo
