On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I.e., for Sage we build only the static readline. Can't Python, Gap,
PARI, etc. just link in a static readline?
Well, I tried that and I ended up
On Jan 5, 10:46 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Well, my question is first: does this work?
I would prefer to solve it another way, but it would work.
Oops, right after pressing send I realized why this might be
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I.e., for Sage we build only the static readline. Can't Python, Gap,
PARI,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:03 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:58 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I.e.,
On Jan 5, 11:03 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Yes, that trick was my first idea.
Wait a minute. Just for the record I just tested my OpenSuse 32-bit
build of sage with libreadline.so* deleted, and
2009/1/3 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com:
Built fine and all tests pass on my 32-bit ubuntu laptop. In
And also on a 64-bit Suse
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default (ge...@buildhost) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
John
All tests passed on my 10.4 ppc (g4) mac laptop, except for
calculus.py timing out as usual.
-M. Hampton
On Jan 3, 1:32 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Well, technically the following happened: the
On Jan 2, 2009, at 23:32 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Well, technically the following happened: the first final had some
issues, so it was renamed rc0 and a new final was spun with a number
of fixes.
Most of the
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 2, 2009, at 23:32 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Well, technically the following happened: the first final had some
issues, so it was renamed
On Jan 4, 6:21 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
I built on a CentOS 64-bit system with 1GB RAM, and a test in arith.py
fails due to swapping leading to a timeout. The test in question is a
*massive*
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:21 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
I built on a CentOS 64-bit system with 1GB RAM, and a test in arith.py
fails
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:32 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Well, technically the following happened: the first final had some
issues, so it was renamed rc0 and a new final was spun with a number
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:32 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Well, technically the following happened: the first final had some
On Jan 4, 9:01 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:32 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Your ticket #4934 segfault:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4934
which you were just seeing on cicero is popping up for me on several
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:17 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Cool. The dirty fix is to disable that doctest for now. If I ran the
That is very dirty indeed. I think I prefer at least the hack I've
posted to the ticket, which is to make the variable public.
last doctest by itself
On Jan 4, 9:15 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
OK, I found a temporary workaround. See the patch at #4934.
Ok, I will take a look.
It would also be very nice if we could also fix the openSUSE build
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:24 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 9:15 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:01 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
OK, I found a temporary workaround. See the patch at #4934.
Ok, I will take a
On Jan 4, 10:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:24 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
What about if we just don't install a shared readline at all? That
seems way safer to me than overwriting it with the system readline.
In the
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:52 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:24 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
What about if we just don't install a shared readline at all? That
seems way
On 3 Jan., 08:32, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
Hi Michael,
I had found, downloaded, build and (long-)tested the 3.2.3.rc0 when it
was still named final.
Already rock-stable on MacBook Intel Core2Duo
Hi,
sorry for the Off-Topic BTW question, I moved it to the correct
thread.
Cheers,
gsw
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
In the course of building and installing 3.2.3.final, an empty file /
Users/georgweber/.sage/init.sage was created (I remember having seen
the corresponding output line).
Now trying to start (the older version) Sage 3.2.2, IPython
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.3.final is out, 3.2.3.rc0 was never announced on the list.
[...]
You can download the sources from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.3/
or upgrade to this release via
./sage -upgrade
On Jan 3, 5:47 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
Nope, this is not an issue with 3.2.3, but 3.2.2. And this was done on
purpose to catch exactly this issue since it has slipped by us in
releases twice
On Jan 3, 6:14 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
SNIP
On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
--
All tests passed!
Jaap
Thanks Jaap, this is pretty much what was expected.
Cheers,
Michael
Built fine and all tests pass on my 32-bit ubuntu laptop. In
particular, Atlas built fine and quickly for the first time ever on
this machine (at least, once I realized that setting SAGE_ATLAS_LIB to
the empty string was not the same as unsetting it).
John
2009/1/3 mabshoff
On 3 Jan., 17:56, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 3, 5:47 am, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi, I've got a crash report, which might be a blocker for 3.2.3:
Nope, this is not an issue with 3.2.3, but 3.2.2. And this was done on
purpose to catch
27 matches
Mail list logo
