[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) Because then you can use the syntax: integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue. When I commended Sage's syntax I was assuming you

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread William Stein
On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) Because then you can use the syntax: integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 20, 2007 8:17 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) Because then you can use the syntax: integrate(cos(x*y),

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread Stephen Forrest
On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Because then you can use the syntax: integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue. When I commended Sage's syntax I was assuming you were

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 20, 2007 11:44 PM, Stephen Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Because then you can use the syntax: integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-19 Thread William Stein
On Nov 19, 2007 10:44 AM, wrote: I wanted to commend you for leading Sage. I think it is a great idea to combine all the open source math apps out there into a unified whole. Thanks! I'm curious about your integration component. I believe I read you were using Maxima but were interested

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-19 Thread William Stein
On Nov 19, 2007 11:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:49:52AM -0800, William Stein wrote: Perhaps making a syntax compatible with Mathematica's?? No, that's definitely not planned. William I've been thinking about this myself for a while. Sage could

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
How are you planning to change the interface? We haven't exactly decided yet. For starters we at least want to make sure Sage can compute many integrals that Maxima can't (but say Maple and/or Mathematica can compute).I've cc'd this email to sage-devel, so maybe people there (e.g.,