On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:22 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Dag Sverre
Seljebotnda...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic
So, here's the thing... and this is entirely IMHO (some may question
whether the H applies :-) There's been some off-and-on sidebar
chatter on this subject for a while and this thread seems a place to
insert it publicly.
Sage has a HUGE amount of functionality built in that is very useful
to
On Jul 1, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
least for the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
feedback from everyone on topics of interest.
rather than rehash much here, where
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results...
I don't know if I should interpret this as:
my interpretation is, that people simply want to learn more about
those tools which they already know about. sage
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Harald Schillyharald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results...
I don't know if I should interpret this as:
my interpretation is, that people
Note that there was already a Python+Sage talk at a recent SIAM conference
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2008/07/python-tools-for-science-go-to-siam.html
http://www.ams.org/ams/siam-2008.html#python
which was apparently very popular. It may be that those who attended the SIAM
conference and who
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
got the *most* no votes from the 30 people who actually voted (tying
only with Networkx), according to the table here:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
I sort of doubt that most people would make their decisions on what
tools to learn based on licenses, or at least I hope that's the case.
To be precise: amongst open source tools. I do use licenses as a
criterion: if
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
got the *most* no votes from the 30 people who actually voted (tying
William Stein wrote:
The best conclusion I can draw from all this is that for now at least
I'm going to focus on symbolic/algebraic computation, and let
Enthought continue to do a great job building the Python numerical
stack.
I think that the survey results are at least in part a reflection
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
least for the time being.I don't have a problem with that
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Dag Sverre
Seljebotnda...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:20 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Anyway, +1 to their being a BSD'd build system. Most code in Sage
is GPL'd because either (1) it is derived from code GPL'd a decade
ago, or (2) we'll get ripped off by the Ma's. The build system
doesn't fall
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:20 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Anyway, +1 to their being a BSD'd build system. Most code in Sage
is GPL'd because either (1) it is derived from code GPL'd a decade
ago, or
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
couple of minutes to fill out (no password or registration required):
http://doodle.com/hb5bea6fivm3b5bk
So please let us know which topics you are
Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
Does you mean people attending scipy09, or does it mean sage
developers, whether or not you are attending scipy09?
Thanks,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
Does you mean people attending scipy09, or
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
feedback from everyone on topics of interest.
I hope the above isn't
28 matches
Mail list logo
