Le lundi 8 juillet 2013 13:32:11 UTC+1, Jan Groenewald a écrit :
notebook() launches in firefox (my preferred browser on ubuntu 12.04).
tutorial() launches in chromium, why is that? Trying to do a from-source
install
so that I can look at the code.
You do not need to install from source to
sage: tutorial??
Type: instancemethod
String Form:bound method _sage_doc.tutorial of
sage.misc.sagedoc._sage_doc instance at 0x1418758
File:
/usr/lib/sagemath/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/misc/sagedoc.py
Definition: tutorial(self)
Source:
def tutorial(self):
On Dec 15, 4:34 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I was looking for svd, lower-case,
and missed it.
actually, me too. Is there a reason why it is uppercase? I'm for
renaming it to lowercase and adding an uppercase synonym for backwards
compatibility.
h
--
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Dec 15, 4:34 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I was looking for svd, lower-case,
and missed it.
actually, me too. Is there a reason why it is uppercase? I'm for
renaming it to lowercase and adding an uppercase synonym for
With respect to some of this discussion, see also the following sage-
support request:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/9e6475494f85cd53
- kcrisman
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
mhampton wrote:
If you convert to numpy matrices, then Sage is pretty competitive with
matlab. We still have some room for improvement in making it easy
though - despite Jason Grout's improvements, a matrix over RDF is
missing some methods I'd like, such as the singular value
decomposition.
Jason Grout wrote:
Use .SVD():
I should mention that .SVD just calls numpy/scipy for the actual
computation.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Thanks for pointing that out. I was looking for svd, lower-case,
and missed it.
-Marshall
On Dec 14, 6:33 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
Use .SVD():
I should mention that .SVD just calls numpy/scipy for the actual
computation.
Jason
--
To post
If you convert to numpy matrices, then Sage is pretty competitive with
matlab. We still have some room for improvement in making it easy
though - despite Jason Grout's improvements, a matrix over RDF is
missing some methods I'd like, such as the singular value
decomposition. As an example, to
On Dec 13, 1:02 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have written a draft of a tutorial on functional programming for
mathematicians.
Very nice, i added a comment and I just repeat it here. I think you
should also point to the operator python package, since defining add
in a function
Thanks a lot for this tutorial. I think it would be great to have it
included in the documentation.
I did not know anything about functional programming before using
sage. To a new mathematical user without python knowledge things like
lambda = 4
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
lambda?
No object
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
I have written a draft of a tutorial on functional programming for
mathematicians. The tutorial is available on the Sage wiki [1], but
you could also find it at Wordpress [2]. This is a redundancy measure
in case the wiki is down. I invite you to comments on it
On Dec 12, 4:24 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
[f(x) for x in [1..10] if f(x)0]
This is actually bad style. It means that f gets evaluated twice for
all the values that end up in the list.
The magma language solves this with modified semantics for the where
clause. One would
Nils Bruin wrote:
On Dec 12, 4:24 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
[f(x) for x in [1..10] if f(x)0]
This is actually bad style. It means that f gets evaluated twice for
all the values that end up in the list.
Good point.
The magma language solves this with modified
Hi Jason,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
SNIP
Do you think you could add a sentence or two in the filter section about
using list comprehensions to do filters, like you did above in the map
section?
The tutorial is updated with such an
[This is getting a bit dated but I am endeavouring to post it simply
to get my work out what is wrong with my subscription]
I don't think this is as impossible as some people have suggested.
Since there is a fairly heavy academic involvement in Sage: Maybe an
expedition to the local School of
If there is an easy way ( = passive way. Translators are being kept
aware of modifications ) to know when some modification is done, and
if you do not expect it for the following morning. This should not be
a problem at all to keep all the french tutorials up to date.
The best way, perhaps, to
Hi,
I have not been very active last year on this list because of job
changes but now Sage is one thing i will involve in with a more
regular pace.
I can help for the translation of Sage's tutorial in french.
I would like to volunteer for the incorporation of new docs in french
on the
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
How important is it that these documents stay synchronized? If it's
important, how should this be managed? Are there any francophones who
would like to volunteer to make a translation whenever the English
Hi Philippe,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Philippe Saadepsa...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I can help for the translation of Sage's tutorial in french.
I would like to volunteer for the incorporation of new docs in french
on the sagemath.org/fr part of the official site.
For each Sage
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Burcin Erocalbur...@erocal.org wrote:
SNIP
BTW, it seems that #4318 and #5337 should be closed.
Ticket #5337 is now closed. I'm not sure about #4318; someone who
knows French should look into that ticket.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
To keep you and Nathann posted on changes to the Sage tutorial, both
of you can be CC'd on tickets that change the tutorial. That's one way
to keep up to date.
Excellent !
Nathann
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to
Hi all
would you please consider updating this page
http://wiki.sagemath.org/i18n
or any other?
I think it is very important to have a well defined and commonly
accepted process to manage translations.
I don't know how, but probably there should be an automatic
notification somewhere if the
John H Palmieri wrote:
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just kidding. Actually, some paragraphs have been added to
the English version without corresponding changes to
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just kidding. Actually, some
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
I just noticed that there are some differences between the English and
French tutorials: first, they're written in totally different
languages.
No, sorry, just
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, casboncas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 11, 6:59 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/11 casbon cas...@gmail.com:
Any chance you could try out http://sagenb.org and give similar feedback?
[to what you gave for codenode]
This seems a lot clearer -
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:22 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Dag Sverre
Seljebotnda...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic
So, here's the thing... and this is entirely IMHO (some may question
whether the H applies :-) There's been some off-and-on sidebar
chatter on this subject for a while and this thread seems a place to
insert it publicly.
Sage has a HUGE amount of functionality built in that is very useful
to
On Jul 1, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
least for the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
feedback from everyone on topics of interest.
rather than rehash much here, where
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results...
I don't know if I should interpret this as:
my interpretation is, that people simply want to learn more about
those tools which they already know about. sage
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Harald Schillyharald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 12:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2009/06/scipy-advanced-tutorials-results...
I don't know if I should interpret this as:
my interpretation is, that people
Note that there was already a Python+Sage talk at a recent SIAM conference
http://fdoperez.blogspot.com/2008/07/python-tools-for-science-go-to-siam.html
http://www.ams.org/ams/siam-2008.html#python
which was apparently very popular. It may be that those who attended the SIAM
conference and who
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
got the *most* no votes from the 30 people who actually voted (tying
only with Networkx), according to the table here:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
I sort of doubt that most people would make their decisions on what
tools to learn based on licenses, or at least I hope that's the case.
To be precise: amongst open source tools. I do use licenses as a
criterion: if
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
got the *most* no votes from the 30 people who actually voted (tying
William Stein wrote:
The best conclusion I can draw from all this is that for now at least
I'm going to focus on symbolic/algebraic computation, and let
Enthought continue to do a great job building the Python numerical
stack.
I think that the survey results are at least in part a reflection
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to add that not only is Sage very low on the above list, Sage
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
least for the time being.I don't have a problem with that
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:43 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Fernando Perezfperez@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Dag Sverre
Seljebotnda...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:20 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Anyway, +1 to their being a BSD'd build system. Most code in Sage
is GPL'd because either (1) it is derived from code GPL'd a decade
ago, or (2) we'll get ripped off by the Ma's. The build system
doesn't fall
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:20 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Anyway, +1 to their being a BSD'd build system. Most code in Sage
is GPL'd because either (1) it is derived from code GPL'd a decade
ago, or
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
(e.g., Magma, Maple, Mathematica) rather than the numerical side, at
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I'm taking this as a message to
focus in Sage more on the algebraic/symbolic side of mathematics
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:33 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/2 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
2009/7/1 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
Perhaps I'm
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
couple of minutes to fill out (no password or registration required):
http://doodle.com/hb5bea6fivm3b5bk
So please let us know which topics you are
Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
Does you mean people attending scipy09, or does it mean sage
developers, whether or not you are attending scipy09?
Thanks,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
Does you mean people attending scipy09, or
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The time for the Scipy'09 conference is rapidly approaching, and we
would like to both announce the plan for tutorials and solicit
feedback from everyone on topics of interest.
I hope the above isn't
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:32 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like specifying a function for plotting or differentiation is
a common point of confusion. For example, see these threads (and I
know there have been others):
Very nice. This something I always found confusing. One thing is not
clear to me:
why is sin not a callable symbolic expression by default? Is there a
coneptional
reason for this, or is it performance related?
On Mar 10, 8:07 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:32
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John H Palmieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should be included in the tutorial that's not already there? In
another thread
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_frm/thread/
77ddcfefa972bb9b/53fda9a549b12d63?
lnk=gstq=dirichlet#53fda9a549b12d63
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on rewriting the tutorial. Section 2.5.1 of the tutorial
is about Dirichlet characters, and I have some questions:
The introductory sentence discusses Dirichlet characters, and then
the first example uses
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:33 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on rewriting the tutorial. Section 2.5.1 of the tutorial
is about Dirichlet characters, and I have some questions:
The introductory
On May 30, 5:17 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:33 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on rewriting the tutorial. Section 2.5.1 of the tutorial
is about
Maybe they are better put in another place (Sage Constructions
perhaps), but I have some ideas for broadening the tutorial:
1) In calculus/differential equations, give a cythonized version of
Runge-Kutta, and maybe an @interact example on different numerical
methods; there are a couple of
Well, as I said, I'm trying to edit it. This will take several passes:
copy-editing (rewording, making the typesetting look better, etc.),
and then when I've done a big enough chunk, or when I see something
that seems out of place, thinking about re-organizing things. I don't
know if I
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:44 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe they are better put in another place (Sage Constructions
perhaps), but I have some ideas for broadening the tutorial:
1) In calculus/differential equations, give a cythonized version of
Runge-Kutta, and maybe an
Philippe wrote:
as I said last week, I am willing to give a little help for the usage
of SAGE in french educational system. One thing that showed to be
important was the availability of a tutorial in french.
I would appreciate some experts on that list (;-) to point me to an
existing
65 matches
Mail list logo
