Here is where I needed the feature, tell me what you think :
I have a FiniteAbstractPolynomialRing which is an abstract algebra
with different basis. It has the monomial basis which is created at
the beginging. And there are lots of ambient space basis which
correpond to polynomials indexed by
Hi Viviane,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:52:35PM +0200, Viviane Pons wrote:
I have a FiniteAbstractPolynomialRing which is an abstract algebra
with different basis. It has the monomial basis which is created at
the beginging. And there are lots of ambient space basis which
correpond to
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
While trying to subclass QuotientRing, I noticed that this class does
not follow the coercion model: It overrides __call__ and _coerce_impl,
which the reference manual frowns upon.
Yes. QuotientRing was implemented ages
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:46 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Whilst trying to debug a Solaris issue, I came across a bit of code
which appears on every platform, but which looks suspicious.
The code is in rings/finite_rings/stdint.h
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Since building packages in parallel has speeded up the build process
immensely, I thought I'd have a look at what stops it running even quicker.
Although I've not done any systematic tests, on my OpenSolaris Ultra
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:29 PM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 6 July 2010 19:39, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
For both of us, the Sage library is taking a long time. For you, the longest
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I created
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9487
to try to clarify exactly what are supported platforms and precisely what
we mean by them. We also need to resolve the problem that different sources
of
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:30 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 3, 2010, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 4:54 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
1) The src/ directory needs be under Mercurial version control. This
would increase the size of
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 4:25 pm, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote:
Well, it's a little dangerous for someone (me) who doesn't really
understand how to
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
What does closing a ticket mean? Is it the same as providing a
resolution such as fixed, wontfix, duplicate? Or is closing the
ticket something that comes *after* providing a resolution?
I think for clear cut cases,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:01 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
I was recently searching through the source and I noticed that some
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
BTW, the use of 'which' is not a good idea. First its non portable.
Secondly, do we not know the patch of cython? If so, why is it not
hard-coded? That will save some time. One a 3.33 GHz machine, the
overhead in calling 'which' is about 5
Hi Robert,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:52:24 -0700
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
As for syntax, I think the slice syntax is clever and fairly
intuitive. I can also understand using brackets to access operands
in an expression. Personally, I think the brackets make more
On 13 July 2010 06:14, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
3) The Sage library.
Is it really necessary for endless calls to
python `which cython`
to all be run serially? Could these be done in parallel?
They are run in parallel.
Good
BTW, the use of 'which' is not a
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Unsurprisingly, setting the random seed makes the random_expr() always
return the same value:
sage: set_random_seed(0xdeadbeef)
sage: random_expr(5)
tanh(-pi^real_part(v1)*sin(log(pi)*imag_part(v1)))
sage:
I'd say that's in the sagenb package.
You can use the instructions at:
http://nb.sagemath.org/dev.html
Specifically, the file interact.py contains a funciont called
interact, and then you'd have to read also the javascript part, which
is possibly in the file notebook_lib.js, around:
function
On Jul 13, 3:37 am, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Unsurprisingly, setting the random seed makes the random_expr() always
return the same value:
sage: set_random_seed(0xdeadbeef)
sage: random_expr(5)
There are two doctest failures on t2.math which are both quite recent. I'm not
100% sure if they are new to 4.5.rc0, or whether they existed in 4.4.4 too. The
two failures are
1) sage -t -long devel/sage/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/group_theory.rst
=
Group Theory and Sage
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
2) sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx
Andrew Sutherland's Probabilistic Image of Galois Algorithm
AUTHOR:
- William Stein, 2010-03 -- wrote the Cython wrapper
- Sutherland -- wrote the C
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:52:24 -0700
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
As for syntax, I think the slice syntax is clever and fairly
intuitive. I can also understand using brackets to
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
I think indexing into operands by number is a bit brittle, and
x.operands()[2] is much more explicit.
On the other hand, then you get expressions like
x.operands()[0].operands()[2].operands()[1].operands()[0]
Hi Robert,
On 12 Jul., 12:27, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
If providing resolution and closing is the same, then I recently
closed a ticket out of ignorance.
They are indeed the same. Which ticket was it?
#2151.
I am sorry for that. At least, there is no code attached to that
I am sorry for that.
Don't be!
Just to be perfectly clear, I'm not trying to be totalitarian here. I
think the following is a good rule of thumb:
If there is anything on the ticket that needs to be merged, even if it
is part of another ticket or implied by another ticket, or there is
anyone
On 2010-Jul-12 12:27:57 +0200, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
If providing resolution and closing is the same, then I recently
closed a ticket out of ignorance.
They are indeed the same. Which ticket was it?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:36 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 10:30 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Is there an easy way to make this work?
% sage -R
R version 2.10.1 (2009-12-14)
Copyright (C) 2009 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN
I see, there is an inheritance chain
QuotientRing_generic - IntegerModRing_generic -
FiniteField_prime_modn
and they all circumvent the official coercion model. That at least
explains why polynomials over finite fields break when changing
QuotientRing_generic!
Volker
--
To post to this group,
On 13 jul, 00:12, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
I finally got a chance to test this on a clean 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04
(lucid) install.
I began by apt-get'ing the icedtea6-plugin, which pulls in a lot of
other packages such as the OpenJDK version of Java. A simple 3d plot
would not
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:38 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool. There are numerous parameters one could imagine a nagbot
having. E.g,. max emails per week, how often messages sent, etc.,
which should be easily customized by each recipient. Ideas? Please
suggest them.
It
I just spend a couple of words about IDEs. I've personally spent a
decent amount of time on Spyder and Eric, and my impressions are:
- Eric is very well suited for general software development, it is not
completely polished, and it lacks (at least explicitly, I didn't get
those) useful features
Hi Sage Developers,
I'm setting the Sage-5.0 target date for August 31, 2010 (see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/milestone/sage-5.0). The goals
are:
1. Windows port via Cygwin: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort
2. Upgrade PARI to svn: #9343
3. Upgrade MPIR to version
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:57 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The problem I see now regarding scientific computing, is the not so
seamless integration of numpy-scipy: do you think SAGE may improve
numpy
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:48 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 14 July 2010 00:49, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage Developers,
I'm setting the Sage-5.0 target date for August 31, 2010 (see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/milestone/sage-5.0). The goals
are:
On 14 July 2010 01:23, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
There was one talk about Labview. It's also a sort of visual
programming language.
Yes.
I got the strong impression that it is
something people who don't know how to program use, and something
people who *do* know how to program
Hi,
I posted the slides from my short talk Sage Singular here:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days23.5/schedule?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=stein.pdf
William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to this group, send an email to
The following are from the thread sage-4.5.rc0 released on sage-release.
On 07/12/2010 03:54 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/12/10 09:47 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Right, this was one of the patches to allow for parallel spkg
building. Without it, the ecl build could fail. Dave, have you
Hi William!
Thanks. I wanted to ask you for them, as I will arrive after 11am.
I have an remark:
IMHO, Singulars Groebner basis computation is already more than
competetive to Maple
in general and to Magma over finite fields.
Cheers,
Michael
On Jul 14, 3:13 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
Hi William,
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:13:33 +0200, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted the slides from my short talk Sage Singular here:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days23.5/schedule?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=stein.pdf
Thanks for posting these. There's a small typo in
Hi,
about a year ago I got a permission from Jens (CCed) who wrote the file:
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/tip/sage/functions/wigner.py
to use his (original) code in SymPy and license it as BSD. We just got
more people interested in that, so we'd like to port it now. So I
thought I
38 matches
Mail list logo
