[sage-devel] Re: arando patchbot spam

2015-03-27 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Hello, Hhrrm. Patchbot 2.3 seems to have a little problem right now, as it will probably never test any ticket, because 'git' is not a trusted user.. Please wait for the next release before upgrading your patchbots. Frédéric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sage-devel] Re: jmol/java on OS X 10.10.2

2015-03-27 Thread Ben Salisbury
Volker was correct. Previously, when trying to run jmol, I received a pop-up message saying I had to install the latest version of java, so I did. However, this was not the JDK version of Java. I received a new pop-up message when running $ java -version No Java runtime present, requesting

[sage-devel] Re: jmol/java on OS X 10.10.2

2015-03-27 Thread Volker Braun
You need a newer java version (https://www.java.com/en/download/). On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 2:10:06 AM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote: Hi, I'm trying to view 3d objects (which I have been able to do in the past), but now I'm receiving the following error. sage: L =

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Notebook shutdown

2015-03-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:48:37 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2015-03-26 20:17, William Stein wrote: Hi Sage Developers, We've posted the following message on the http://sagenb.org site: This Sage notebook server will be shut down April 17, 2015. I am very worried about

[sage-devel] Re: arando patchbot spam

2015-03-27 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
new patchbot 2.3.1 released, please upgrade sage -i http://chapoton.perso.math.cnrs.fr/patchbot-2.3.1.spkg Frederic Le vendredi 27 mars 2015 11:54:46 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : Hello, Hhrrm. Patchbot 2.3 seems to have a little problem right now, as it will probably never test any

[sage-devel] NTL v9.0

2015-03-27 Thread Victor Shoup
With much trepidation, I have introduced a (hopefully minor) backward incompatibility into NTL. The interface to the single-precision modular arithmetic routines has been modified slightly. This interface change allows for more flexible and more efficient implementation of these routines,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: jmol/java on OS X 10.10.2

2015-03-27 Thread kcrisman
In my experience, at this point Java-based Jmol on OS X is a lost cause. It *was* working in OS X 10.something for me a few months ago embedded in sagenb.org, but now it doesn't. In fact, even the java applets at the Jmol website don't work for me in any browser, even with Java

Re: [sage-devel] Re: jmol/java on OS X 10.10.2

2015-03-27 Thread Jonathan
I just tested a Sage 6.4.1 installation which has our latest Jmol/JSmol combination. You have to give lots of permissions, but you can run Java based Jmol in the notebook after clicking through all the warnings under Mac 10.10.2. That said, most of the time the default JSmol is fine. The

[sage-devel] Re: arando patchbot spam

2015-03-27 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
With which version of the patchbot ? Le vendredi 27 mars 2015 16:18:39 UTC+1, Jakob Kroeker a écrit : Ticket 15056 is also interesting - try run it explicitly and one will get: Switched to branch 'patchbot/base' Already on 'patchbot/base' fatal: 'None' does not appear to be a git repository

[sage-devel] Re: arando patchbot spam

2015-03-27 Thread Jakob Kroeker
Ticket 15056 is also interesting - try run it explicitly and one will get: Switched to branch 'patchbot/base' Already on 'patchbot/base' fatal: 'None' does not appear to be a git repository fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Is that connected to the fact that in ticket 15056 the

[sage-devel] contour_plot fails on zero

2015-03-27 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Hello, Any ideas how to work around the following bug? (Reported on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18074 ) contour_plot(0, (0, 1), (0, 1)).show() Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File _sage_input_177.py, line 10, in module exec

[sage-devel] tons of builds for 32 bits

2015-03-27 Thread Thierry
Hi, there is currenlty no 32-bits binary for 6.5 on the mirrors, and only a single one for 6.4.1 that runs on an unmaintained Ubuntu release (13.04). However, those are still needed for quite a lot of users i met (not only users with old computers but also those that run i686 kernel on a 64 bits

[sage-devel] Re: tons of builds for 32 bits

2015-03-27 Thread Volker Braun
With Sage-6.6 there will also be the usual 32-bit builds again. Our buildbot makes the binaries, and it would be great if we could increase coverage. Buildbot also has support for libvirt to build/run virtual machines, though we currently don't make use of it. Another possibility would be to