[sage-devel] Patchbot raises error but status is still shown as pending.

Hi, At https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/23610/ you can see that the patchbot status of two different patchbots is mentioned as pending in all the tests listed on that page. However if you look at one of the logs

[sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

No, from testing it appears equality proofs are needed by 10 doctests in src/sage/manifolds/differentiable/metric.py so my idea does not work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

Note that this is changed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23592 David On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote: > No, from testing it appears equality proofs are needed by 10 doctests > in src/sage/manifolds/differentiable/metric.py > so my idea does not work.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

Hi, Le vendredi 11 août 2017 08:12:42 UTC+2, David Roe a écrit : > > Note that this is changed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23592 > This is not the same part of manifolds code: #23592 deals with comparison of points

[sage-devel] Windows release

Earlier this week I finally had an opportunity to build a Windows release for Sage 8.0 (which would have preferably been done before the release announcement of 8.0 but things didn't work out timing/communication-wise). I uploaded the release binary to GitHub at:

[sage-devel] Re: Windows release

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 9:28:59 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > Earlier this week I finally had an opportunity to build a Windows > release for Sage 8.0 (which would have preferably been done before the > release announcement of 8.0 but things didn't work out > timing/communication-wise).

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

Eric, I will be happy to test as soon as source code is modified. Just let me know. - Richard On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 2:22:24 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > Le vendredi 11 août 2017 08:12:42 UTC+2, David Roe a écrit : >> >> Note that this is changed in

[sage-devel] Re: Windows release

Thanks you very much for this release I was waiting for it to see how sage 8 behaves on windows and linux Best Henri Le vendredi 11 août 2017 10:28:59 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit : > > Earlier this week I finally had an opportunity to build a Windows > release for Sage 8.0 (which would have

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

Le vendredi 11 août 2017 15:30:08 UTC+2, Richard_L a écrit : > > Eric, > I will be happy to test as soon as source code is modified. Just let me > know. > For sure I will. Thanks. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

[sage-devel] failure installing giac (version 1.2.3.47.p0)

see attached log Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

[sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

Le vendredi 11 août 2017 16:21:45 UTC+2, Richard_L a écrit : > > That's a bit puzzling. In the Sage code, line 36 defines the manifold over > the real field. That is supposed to be inherited by the chart in line 39: > > M = Manifold(1*3,'R^3',field='real',start_index=1) > U = M.open_subset('U') >

[sage-devel] polytopes_db not on the mirrors?

Got the following [Errno 404] Not Found: '//sagepad.org/spkg/upstream/polytopes_db/polytopes_db-20170220.tar.bz2' Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

[sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

Clearly Robert has found a bug in maxima. Here's a little test further to my earlier "puzzle": If I write in sage as follows: #$is (equal(-(_SAGE_VAR_r13^2*_SAGE_VAR_r23-_SAGE_VAR_r23^3)/((-_SAGE_VAR_r23^4)+2*_SAGE_VAR_r13^2*_SAGE_VAR_r23^2-_SAGE_VAR_r13^4+_SAGE_VAR_r12^4),0))$ var('r12 r13

Re: [sage-devel] failure installing giac (version 1.2.3.47.p0)

Hum, it wants to re-run parts of autoconf to regenerate configure. There may be a time stamp issue. François > On 12/08/2017, at 09:01, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > see attached log > > Vincent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[sage-devel] Re: polytopes_db not on the mirrors?

Maybe review https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22400 first? ;P On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 10:58:57 PM UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote: > > Got the following > > [Errno 404] Not Found: > '//sagepad.org/spkg/upstream/polytopes_db/polytopes_db-20170220.tar.bz2' > > Vincent > -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: SIGSEGV in Maxima

That's a bit puzzling. In the Sage code, line 36 defines the manifold over the real field. That is supposed to be inherited by the chart in line 39: M = Manifold(1*3,'R^3',field='real',start_index=1) U = M.open_subset('U') Rho. = U.chart("r12:(0,+oo) r13:(0,+oo) r23:(0,+oo)") One