[sage-devel] Final stretch for 3.1.2 reviews

2008-09-02 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, the end of the 3.1.2 release cycle is near - at least the point where we will only merge bug fixes or even critical bug fixes. So if you have things sitting in trac waiting to make it in please find somebody to review the patch. Please also make sure that the positively reviewed

[sage-devel] Re: Final stretch for 3.1.2 reviews

2008-09-02 Thread John Cremona
I hope I didn't kill #1115's chances by relabelling it from a bug fix to an enhancement, since I didn't just fix the bug... The only problem with the current patch is that we found a call to dumps() crashes on a 64-bit machine but is fine on a 32-bit machine. Anyone have any idea what might

[sage-devel] Copying/moving worksheets

2008-09-02 Thread kcrisman
We are running a VMWare server for fall classes. However, we have run into the disturbing problem that if we want to use a newer version of Sage (such as to get the plotting improvements), we would need to (quoting William in the earlier version of this thread) upload them tediously one by one.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.2.alpha4 released

2008-09-02 Thread John Cremona
Build reports 32-bit: just the already known failures: sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/hmm.pyx sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py on Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.2.alpha4 released

2008-09-02 Thread David Joyner
installed fine and all tests passed on amd64 hardy heron. On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:06 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello folks, this is alpha4 and more progress toward the final 3.1.2. As some people have noticed this release is getting larger than the original 3.1, but I guess

[sage-devel] Re: Final stretch for 3.1.2 reviews

2008-09-02 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 2, 6:43 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John, I hope I didn't kill #1115's chances by relabelling it from a bug fix to an enhancement, since I didn't just fix the bug... Nope, code from that area is high level and usually does introduce no failures that are platform

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.2.alpha4 released

2008-09-02 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 2, 9:20 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Build reports Hi John, 32-bit: just the already known failures:         sage -t  devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx         sage -t  devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/hmm.pyx         sage -t  devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py on Linux

[sage-devel] Re: reopening Sage - Blender discussion

2008-09-02 Thread Jason Merrill
On Sep 2, 10:40 pm, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks very much for this response.  ffmpeg looks very useful to me, I am checking it out right now.  It is unclear to me what the overlap is with mplayer/mencoder.  It seems that ffmpeg is somewhat leaner and more portable, so I am

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.2.alpha4 released

2008-09-02 Thread mhampton
On a mac intel (10.5) I had: The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/lisp.py sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py ...which look like they are all known issues. -M. Hampton On Sep 2, 7:05 pm,

[sage-devel] Syntax Highlighting for the Notebook

2008-09-02 Thread Jason Merrill
Live syntax highlighting for the notebook would be awesome. I'm sure it would be hard to implement, but have a look at this demonstration of codemirror: http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/jstest.html which does live syntax highlighting for javascript in the browser. The details are pretty

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.2.alpha4 released

2008-09-02 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: Hello folks, this is alpha4 and more progress toward the final 3.1.2. As some people have noticed this release is getting larger than the original 3.1, but I guess such is life. THe m4ri issues have been sorted out, but there are still four major issues: * ghmm/hmm *