Hi Ondrej,
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:32:32 -0700, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
So I wanted to ask, would it be ok with all of you involved that we
use it in sympy under the BSD license? (We'll leave there the header
saying who wrote this and that we took it from Sage.)
I agree with the
Hi
Very interesting.
1. How does the speed of the Sage notebook running locally on your
computer compare to Spyder locally on your computer?
I don't think they can be comparable, doing so different functions...
Anyway I always use notebook from a server in the local network (which
is
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Very interesting.
1. How does the speed of the Sage notebook running locally on your
computer compare to Spyder locally on your computer?
I don't think they can be comparable, doing so different functions...
On 07/13/10 03:51 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
2) sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx
Andrew Sutherland's Probabilistic Image of Galois Algorithm
AUTHOR:
- William Stein, 2010-03 -- wrote the
how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
which looks like html5 canvas
Maurizio
On 14 Lug, 10:03, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio
On 07/13/10 03:51 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
2) sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx
Andrew Sutherland's Probabilistic Image of Galois Algorithm
AUTHOR:
- William Stein, 2010-03 -- wrote the
Hi Ondrej,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
So I wanted to ask, would it be ok with all of you involved that we
use it in sympy under the BSD license? (We'll leave there the header
saying who wrote this and that we took it from Sage.)
Fine by me. The main
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
how do you get the new canvas with matplotlib 1.0? I installed it
today, but from matplotlib.rcsetup.all_backends I don't get any item
which looks like html5 canvas
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9471
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 07/13/10 03:51 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
2) sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/galrep/wrapper.pyx
Andrew Sutherland's
I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm
sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an
optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage
now, so although it needs input and work, I would like to argue for
including it, so that we
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm
sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an
optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage
now, so although it
Hi
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:12:15PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
I finally got a chance to test this on a clean 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04
(lucid) install.
I began by apt-get'ing the icedtea6-plugin, which pulls in a lot of
other packages such as the OpenJDK version of Java. A simple 3d plot
would
(old phone leads to top-post)
re matplotlib/html5, is the speed affected by number of function sample points?
That seems likely, and something PNGs would not be. So you might need to tune
function sampling (or perhaps post-process and remove visually redundant
points...).
Of course, adequate
I know GPLK was added to Sage recently, and also that R is in Sage. I don't know
if there is any advantage, but there is a GLPK package for R.
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glpk/vignettes/glpk-intro.pdf
I don't know if there is any advantage in making that.
I assume it would be
I'm not aware of any bugs, but as it has not been tested by many
people other than myself, I'm sure it still needs work. I'm sure it
could be prettier. The issue is that I can't think of a way to test
it other than have people try it.
The only problem I am aware of is the issue I reported with
For the record, Jmol is also not working from the sage command line
(Fedora 13 x86_64):
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9232
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not going
to see that cephes is broken.
I hacked the package so that it would try to build on any operating system - not
just Cygwin.
Anyway, it has
Hi list,
i want to check which part of the sagecode makes problems when trying to
port it to python 3.x. For that, I want want to build it with the '-3'
option, but i dont want to edit every single makefile. is the a special
place to put something like a global python build parameter?
greatz
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johannes dajo.m...@web.de wrote:
i want to check which part of the sagecode makes problems when trying to
port it to python 3.x. For that, I want want to build it with the '-3'
option, but i dont want to edit every single makefile. is the a special
place to put
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johannes dajo.m...@web.de wrote:
i want to check which part of the sagecode makes problems when trying to
port it to python 3.x. For that, I want want to build it with the '-3'
option, but i
On a similar note cvxopt can make use of glpk as well.
Yes, it can --- I was just using this yesterday.
The trick is that you have to tell cvxopt that glpk is available when
it is compiled/installed. Now that glpk is standard, the install
script for cvxopt should be told to make use of it.
many thanks guys, i'll test it soon and give some feedback about the
results.
greatz Johannes
Am 14.07.2010 23:55, schrieb Carl Witty:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Johannes dajo.m...@web.de wrote:
i want to
Does it work if you install the new version of Jmol? See trac # 9238
(http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9238). I think this broke
when the notebook was put inside an egg. I took that into account
with the new version of Jmol
On Jul 14, 1:15 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Has this
already been done, or should I file a patch for this?
If you would be so kind... I saw no mention of it until I read your
message :-)
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 07/14/10 10:58 PM, Nathan Dunfield wrote:
On a similar note cvxopt can make use of glpk as well.
Yes, it can --- I was just using this yesterday.
The trick is that you have to tell cvxopt that glpk is available when
it is compiled/installed. Now that glpk is standard, the install
script
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I would propose a mercurial patch queue in the spgk root directory.
Then sage -pkg simply checks that either all patches in the queue are
applied or that there exists an old-style /patches directory and no
queue.
Since
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I would propose a mercurial patch queue in the spgk root directory.
Then sage -pkg simply checks that either all patches in the queue are
applied or
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Jonathan gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
I'd like to get wider distribution of the new interface for Jmol. I'm
sure it is not perfect, but I'm getting no feedback with it as an
optional .spkg. I'm pretty sure it works as well as what is in Sage
now, so although it
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not
going to see that cephes is broken.
I hacked the package so that
Since all the changes are basically user interface changes, I think it
mostly needs interactive testing. I also think that the major issues
are design, not whether it does what was intended (I fear my
intentions may be misinterpretations of what people wanted).
I'm not sure what you mean by
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
Hello all,
I just solved a relatively easy riddle, and I thought I'd share the results:
# Cython version of cputime():
cdef extern from time.h:
ctypedef unsigned long clock_t
cdef clock_t clock()
cdef enum:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Jonathan gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
Since all the changes are basically user interface changes, I think it
mostly needs interactive testing. I also think that the major issues
are design, not whether it does what was intended (I fear my
intentions may be
32 matches
Mail list logo
