I just marked it as needs work. it needs a (trivial, hopefully) rebase
for Sage 5.2.rc0.
Dima
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 10:19:56 UTC+8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Jason,
What is the status of your patch #9265? It is not marked as needing review
and I'd actually assumed it was already merged
Hi All!
I guarded Mark's patch for sage-5.2.rc0 since he will only be able to rebase
it next week.
The queue should now apply also for sage-5.2.rc0, but a lot of patches had
to be guarded. Please check the queue to see whether your patch is marked
#+5_2_rc0 needs rebase on 5_2_rc0!!!
and
Hey Andrew,
Here's my 2 cents.
1. When I am doing lot of calculations I often generate a large amount of
output and, consequently, I like this output to be as concise and readable
as possible. Most of the _repr_ and _str_ methods
do not achieve this.
What do people think about
On 7/24/12 6:06 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
The symmetric function patch #5457 is a big step towards being
able to work with the Hopf algebra of symmetric functions.
I am glad you appreciate the new functionalities!
Here's an interesting fact. Recall that the elements of the
symmetric function
Here is the log for 5.2rc0. I got the same problem with 5.1
givaro-3.2.13.p0
Extracting package
/home/chapoton/sage-5.2.rc0/spkg/standard/givaro-3.2.13.p0.spkg
-rw-r--r-- 1 chapoton chapoton 531724 juin 9 23:51
Hello,
I'd like to propose a Sage project for all groups interested. The project
is a version of Sage Math for Nintendo DS hardware. Sage's being
open-source software means the project may only be developed as a rom. The
hardware is more than capable for sage, and more suited for
Hi!
In a patch that I am writing I am getting doctest failures from sage but
when I run the code by hand it works. Specifically, inside sage I get see
the following behaviour
sage: res=ResidueSequence(3,[0,0,1], [0,1,2]); res
Residue sequence (0,1,2) of level 3
sage:
On 7/24/12 2:57 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose a Sage project for all groups interested. The
project is a version of Sage Math for Nintendo DS hardware. Sage's
being open-source software means the project may only be developed as a
rom. The hardware is more than capable
This is because the error in building GCC sort of messed up the whole
build. Either reinstall from scratch, or reinstall MPIR using:
$ ./sage -f mpir
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
FYI, it seems that somehow the infinity class is not bound to
GiNaC::infinity on the contrary to what happens to all the other pynac
classes.
Not sure why, but maybe there is a name clash with sage.rings.infinity or
the infinity variable declared therein.
At least, changing the infinity to
On 22 July 2012 22:26, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
If you have time, could you try running the commands
$ rm -rf SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/output
$ sage --docbuild all html -j
and see how many errors you get then, and whether the output looks any
better? In
I think linux32 make -- though I see a bunch of errors on ImportError: No
module named conf etc but sage seems to be built fine.
Thanks,
On Monday, July 23, 2012 2:40:19 PM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-07-23 18:54, tvn wrote:
I see -- no idea why though, perhaps to take
that should say linux32 make seems to work ok
Vu
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:57 AM, tvn nguyenthanh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think linux32 make -- though I see a bunch of errors on ImportError: No
module named conf etc but sage seems to be built fine.
Thanks,
On Monday, July 23, 2012
That does sound interesting. However, I'm concerned that the DS won't
be able to handle it entirely onboard. Looking at the specs, the DS
only has 4M of ram (with a possible extension of unknown size). If one
went for the 3DS (which has significantly higher specs), you might be
able to run a light
Le 24/07/2012 16:13, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
Then the big
issue would simply be the math handwriting detection (I say simply,
but it's not that simple).
I attended a talk about OCR for mathematics a few years ago, and from
what I remember, recognizing from a picture is indeed very very
Detexify does some neat mathematics handwriting recognition:
http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
--Christopher
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.netwrote:
Le 24/07/2012 16:13, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
Then the big
issue would simply be the math
Frankly, this sounds like a waste of time, and the original poster admits
he doesn't have a clue.
These devices cost $150 or more in US, according to wikipedia. For under
$250 you can buy
a low-end laptop that would be fine to run Sage.
The idea that existing technology for handwriting of
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:05:18 PM UTC-4, rjf wrote:
Frankly, this sounds like a waste of time, and the original poster admits
he doesn't have a clue.
These devices cost $150 or more in US, according to wikipedia. For under
$250 you can buy
a low-end laptop that would be fine to run
I believe it is easier to get VOICE input of math than handwriting, and
perfecting that
in a Sage context might be a fun project. But don't complicate your life
by programming
on (or for) a toy.
RJF
PS. If you can't use google to find references and are truly interested
and have
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:05 PM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, this sounds like a waste of time, and the original poster admits he
doesn't have a clue.
These devices cost $150 or more in US, according to wikipedia. For under
$250 you can buy
a low-end laptop that would be fine to
Le 24/07/2012 21:28, William Stein a écrit :
I googled the original poster (Kevin Smith) and found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Smith
It seems that he might be Silent Bob
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Bob), so I'm guessing he might
not be interested in VOICE input.
I'm
On 07/22/12 10:26 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:13:55 AM UTC-4, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to build sage-5.2.rc0 on an IBM x3650 server. This is fitted with
a pair
of quad core Intel Xeon X5460 (3.16 GHz) and has 48 GB RAM. It has CentOS
4.7,
which is a rather old
While looking through Stein's Three Lectures paper, I tried the examples in
\S 2.1.1. In particular, the last item, computing the order of the cubic
field's Galois group (72) seems to be straightforward when looking at the
paper. When I tried this in Sage 5.1, the computation twiddles away
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 24/07/2012 21:28, William Stein a écrit :
I googled the original poster (Kevin Smith) and found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Smith
It seems that he might be Silent Bob
24 matches
Mail list logo
