Hi Adrien,
I would also really like to know if this is settled. When I answered the
doodle, it seemed like the most probable date was the 10th of March. But
now I see many more people have answered and it could be the 7th of April
(where I'm not available).
So when is it at the end? (I need to
Ah thanks, that answers my immediate questions, so you can ignore the other
posting about GSoC13 work (it appears that part is working fine).
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:16:00 AM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
Rasmi Elasmar changed the communication to support web sockets during GSoC
2013. In
On a git ticket, click on the name of the branch (which should be green if
it applies cleanly) and you'll get a diff of the changes that would occur
if the ticket were merged into the current development branch. This view
won't be affected by the kind of rebases that you mention.
Ok,
So we would use python to run the buildiing scripts for the sage
components... including python itself?
Maybe it is better in the long term, but it sounds weird.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Hello Guys ! Just sharing a funny adventure :
I have a function with an argument F that can be a finite field, or an
integer (its cardinality).
try:
my_integer = F.order()
except AttributeError:
my_integer = F
Does it work ?
No, because :
sage: 9.order()
+Infinity
Ahahaha.
Nathann
It was already deprecated (5 years ago). #15661 removes it :
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15661
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Friday, January 10, 2014 2:02:52 AM UTC-8, Stefan wrote:
On a git ticket, click on the name of the branch (which should be green if
it applies cleanly) and you'll get a diff of the changes that would occur
if the ticket were merged into the current development branch. This view
won't
Hi!
We would like to remove the pickles
_class__sage_combinat_sf_kschur_kSchurFunctions_t__.sobj
which come from an old implementation of k-Schur functions. This class
was deprecated for a year and has now been removed.
Any objections?
Anne
--
You received this message because you are
On 2014-01-10 17:23, Anne Schilling wrote:
Any objections?
I thought the policy was to *never* remove old pickles?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:30:12 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-01-10 17:23, Anne Schilling wrote:
Any objections?
I thought the policy was to *never* remove old pickles?
It was suggested by Volker, see
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15575#comment:39
Otherwise, can
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:30:09PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Does anyone know how to reproduce this? It does look like a dependency
checking error, which I'd like to fix.
I reproduced the error on sagemath.org. Currently if I run `make doc`
in /home/nthiery/sage-6.0 I
On 2014-01-06 22:46, Zimmermann Paul wrote:
Nils,
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:18:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca
On Monday, January 6, 2014 12:46:19 PM UTC-8, Zimmermann Paul wrote:
What about getting rid of real literals?
I think they exist mainly to let
FTR, I'm trying right now.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:51:20 AM UTC-8, anne1.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:30:12 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-01-10 17:23, Anne Schilling wrote:
Any objections?
I thought the policy was to *never* remove
I get the same error as Simon!
Anne
On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:40:24 AM UTC-8, Simon King wrote:
Am Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014 17:23:53 UTC+1 schrieb Nicolas M. Thiéry:
Did anyone stumble on errors like this when compiling the
documentation?
I just met a very similar yet
On Jan 8, 2014 6:27 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:24:19 PM UTC-5, William wrote:
Hi,
There is going to be Sage / SageMathCloud booth at the Joint
Mathematics Meetings in Baltimore next week. Like last year, I'm
planning to be there *most* of the
In practice Python is one of the non-specialist-maths parts that has a
decent build system, so building it isn't hard either way.
On Friday, January 10, 2014 1:04:09 AM UTC-10, mmarco wrote:
So we would use python to run the buildiing scripts for the sage
components... including python
On Friday, January 10, 2014 6:30:12 AM UTC-10, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I thought the policy was to *never* remove old pickles?
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_basics.html#the-pickle-jar
says:
Warning Sage’s pickle jar helps to ensure backward compatibility in sage.
Pickles
17 matches
Mail list logo
