Hi Viviane,
I am not a professional in the coercion framework, but I think this it
how it is supposed to behave. Coercion morphisms are cached for
efficiency, so if you try to define a coercion morphism after the
framework has already determined that it does not exist - it gives an
error.
to #8989 and then look at
sage.geometry.cone, since it was modified significantly).
Am 09.07.2010 19:35, schrieb Andrey Novoseltsev:
[..]
I don't agree that elements of LatticePolytope are its integer points.
As a set it is a subset of some real space, so usually it is infinite.
i don't agree
Hi Johannes!
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Johannes dajo.m...@web.de wrote:
I want to derive a new class from latticePolytopes, because i did not
want to change the code and i needed the __eq__ (and some more methods)
on simplices and i don't want to use external methods using two
Hello,
While writing an enhancement proposal on
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10777
I thought that it could be convenient to create a (finite) poset
without specifying its elements but perhaps adding them one-by-one as/
if they are created later.
It seems to me that it is not
On Feb 14, 9:10 am, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Could one work around this by simply creating a new poset with the
elements from the old one and also the new elements? I guess this
would be problematic if there is a lot of overhead in creating the
poset in the first place -- is that the
OK, I made a ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10783
Andrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hello everybody,
I would appreciate some input on the following ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10809
which constructs Cartesian products of toric varieties as a new toric
variety (without remembering the product structure). Currently
patches use Cartesian_product for this
Hi Nicolas,
On Mar 3, 7:00 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:30:03PM -0800, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
While writing an enhancement proposal on
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10777
I thought that it could
Hi Nicolas,
On Mar 3, 6:44 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:56:45AM -0800, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
I would appreciate some input on the following ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10809
which constructs
On Mar 4, 3:04 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
I am glad to see that we have the same need and can share the efforts
in this direction :-)
Btw: are you planning to come to Sage Days 30?
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days30
Cheers,
Hello,
I have discovered that a fan consisting only of the origin cannot
compute its cone lattice due to the following behaviour:
sage: G = DiGraph(1)
sage: print G
Digraph on 1 vertex
sage: P = Poset(G)
sage: print P
Finite poset containing 1 elements
sage: print P.bottom()
0
sage: print
Hello!
We have a heated debate on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10140
regarding the following issue.
When a user writes
Cone(rays=[(1,0), (0,1)])
and the internal framework that eliminates unnecessary generators
comes up with a cone generated by (0,1) and (1,0) (i.e. same rays but
On Jun 14, 9:46 am, Christian Stump christian.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Nicolas! With three opinions the majority is much more obvious
than with two ;-)
I recently used cones and got a little confused when my (obviously
equal) cones where not equal with C1 == C2, but only isomorphic. I
Dear Nicolas,
Thanks a lot for such a detailed report!
Is it possible to have step-by-step instructions for self-replicating
USB sticks posted somewhere?
I think these may be a great way to use Sage even in developed
countries. Last summer I used USB sticks for our summer school, with a
hope
On Monday, 20 January 2014 22:20:10 UTC-7, Anna Clawson wrote:
Here is the translation of the document. Anyone who knows Russian is
welcome to proofread it!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B87aVe10sJDAUU8wUjg5Vmo3UDg/edit?usp=sharing
Cheers,
Anna
Awesome! Although I would translate
On Friday, 31 January 2014 14:39:00 UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On 2014-01-19, Christian Stump christi...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Below my office mate's term for lattice polytope:
lattice polytope is
целочисленный многогранник
(by the way, both polytope and polyhedron
Why the module sage.combinat.dynkin_diagram is not listed on the
module index page http://sagemath.org/doc/html/ref/modindex.html ?
Andrey
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
I was also totally confused by the idea to make sum faster than
linear, but I think I know where it came from. If you have infinitely
(or at least n/2) processors, you can do n/2 additions in one step.
Then repeat it with the result and this gives you log_2(n) steps, but
on any partucular machine
Is it possible to realize some convenient and fast (in the sense of
keyboard use) cell splitting/merging? It seems to me that now it
involves manual copying of a part of code and creating/removing a
cell, or editing the text representation. I really liked the ability
to do it in Maple (back when
current (braindead) state. What hotkeys do
you want?
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Is it possible to realize some convenient and fast (in the sense of
keyboard use) cell splitting/merging? It seems to me that now it
involves manual copying of a part of code and creating
I'm fine with these, but actually any fast way will work for me.
On Apr 3, 9:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think of ctrl-enter to split, and ctrl-backspace to join with
previous?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
How about syntax highlighting in code cells?
Also, I think that default line truncation can be improved: sometimes
even if a line fits my screen without horizontal scrolling it gets
truncated and I need to click on the output (twice) to make it look
better. Is it possible to determine the width
Please try refresh rather than left click (or in addition). If that
fixes the problem,
then it might have something to do with trouble getting jsmath to
parse the output (i.e.,
some sort of javascript timing issue).
The fix I used before was creating a new cell with the same content
and it
1) I think that completely white background would be the best.
2) Going to the download page, the first sentence I read is Sage for
Microsoft Windows is currently not native available, (and at the
first read I actually missed the word native). I don't think it is
good to start describing
Actually, yesterday was the first time I really tried to use Sage for
symbolic computations and it was quite frustrating for me.
1) It would be really nice if it was faster.
2) It seems to me that
((x+y)*y).coeff(y^2)
and
((x+y)*y).expand().coeff(y^2)
should return the same coefficient 1 (while
I tried to convert
2*x*y^2 + 2*a5*t*x*y - x^2 + (2*a4 - 8*t^3)*x - 1,
where a4, a5, and t are some complex parameters (which I would like to
keep as undetermined parameters), to Weierstrass normal form using
Nagell's algorithm and was not quite successful since some steps near
the end do not
pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It almost sounds to me like you'd rather be working in a multivariate
polynomial ring (which will be much, much faster).
- Robert
On May 22, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Actually, yesterday was the first time I really tried
I looked at the new site the second time and liked it much more!
Some other ideas/comments:
1) I think that the main page would look better if Our mission is in
bold and starts a separate paragraph.
2) Navigation buttons and their labels look great, but sublabels are
very small (smaller than
I am also strictly against translating command names. In addition to
the above comments, I think that English is better for keywords than
some other languages. For example, in Russian words are usually
longer, meaning more typing and less stuff fitting one line, and have
end-parts linking words in
Hello,
I am not sure if this is something well-known or experienced by
others, since I am not sure what to search for in topics or tickets.
When I press Shift+Enter in notebook cells, then sometimes (without
any system that I can notice) it inserts some extra stuff like
keywords, function names,
, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure if this is something well-known or experienced by
others, since I am not sure what to search for in topics or tickets.
When I press Shift+Enter in notebook cells, then sometimes (without
any system that I can notice
Hello,
It seems to me that developers guide is a bit out of date (e.g. it has
guidelines about adding [with patch, needs review] to tickets on trac)
and misses some things that would be nice to have there. I would
appreciate if someone can describe how to do the following (in the
guide or as a
I'll look over the referee patch.
Andrey
On Jan 21, 10:50 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I added a referee patch.
-Marshall
On Jan 21, 9:38 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:32 AM, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to
I think it would be nice also to have a list (or lists) of stuff
necessary to build documentation and have no problems in the notebook.
Latex should be present for documentation - what package exactly
should be installed on Ubuntu?
It is also necessary to install Java for using Jmol, fonts for
I also think that it would be nice to get the same machines - it is
convenient to be able to switch to another machine when another has
problems or is heavily loaded.
Also, it seems that there are regular fast disk problems - is it
possible to get analogs of sage.math /scratch on all machines?
Hello,
As of now show and view seem to do the same thing, yet show used to
produce displayed equations and I liked it mainly for bigger size of
fractions, but also for centering the output. Is there still a
possibility to get the old-style behaviour? There was some discussion
that show does not
Positive review, thank you!
Andrey
On Feb 8, 9:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As of now show and view seem to do the same thing, yet show used to
produce displayed equations and I liked
Hello,
I have started writing a class for Fano toric varieties, and as I
understand it should inherit from AmbientSpace. Going further,
AmbientSpace derives from ParentWithGens and in the beginning of the
corresponding file we see
.. note::
This class is being deprecated, see
Hello,
I happened to write a function for producing a list of names for
variables before I have found CategoryObject.normalize_names.
Naturally, I liked my own function more because it was doing exactly
what I wanted. However, it seems to me that some features of my code
may be objectively
I am against such restrictions, what if I don't care about complex
numbers and want to use i as an index variable? What if I want e to
stand for an edge?
When I do want to have i^2=-1, I will write the code appropriately,
and if I manage to use the same name for two objects I am working with
- I
to list. Some trademarks associated with this website and service are Wolfram
Alpha , Wolfram|Alpha , Wolfram , Alpha , Computational Knowledge Engine ,
Spikey , Wolfram Mathematica , Mathematica .
If trademarking a letter is acceptable, maybe Sage should trademark
S, a, g, and e...
--
To
Hello,
Clicking on the left of a cell in the notebook used to cycle wrapped-
unwrapped-hidden output for text and typeset-LaTeX code-hidden for
typeset output. After upgrade to 4.3.3 in the second case I get
typeset-typeset-hidden cycle. Is it a bug or a design decision? I
personally liked this
I would be glad to have standard functions for triangulations!
Andrey
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
I agree that such a thing would be very convenient. I have found
myself always using something like
lattice_polytope.read_palp_matrix(r4 5
1 0 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1
0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 1)
for entering matrices since it involves much less typing than usual
matrix constructors (except for the function
Are the decorators used in these patches (rename_keyword and options)
documented somewhere? I cannot find their description.
In general, it could be good to have a list of all the decorators
available in Sage somewhere (like in the Developer's Guide, perhaps).
Thank you,
Andrey
--
To post to
Done!
On Apr 17, 4:16 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi!
I finally found out one of the main reason why latex/view was s
slow when displaying graphs with dot2tex and #7004. latex was calling
_latex_ twice, and view five times!
Now, e.g.
sage: g =
Suppose I have a scheme S. Then I can type
sage: S.ambTAB
to get
sage: S.ambient_space
Then I can do
sage: A = S.ambient_space()
sage: A.cooTAB
to get
sage: A.coordinate_ring
Is it at all possible to make
sage: S.ambient_space().cooTAB
yield
sage: S.ambient_space().coordinate_ring
?
For example,
Hello,
As a follow-up to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8609, I
tried to switch scheme homsets to new Parent. As I understand, since
SchemeHomset_generic in schemes/generic/homset.py inherits from
HomsetWithBase which inherits from new Parent, everything should
already be fine. So I
On Apr 27, 10:46 am, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com
wrote:
sage: loads(X.dumps()) == X
File sage_object.pyx, line 915, in
sage.structure.sage_object.loads (sage/structure/sage_object.c:9175
The source for 4.4 is available on sagemath.org and upgrade from
4.4rc0 also finds the new version. However, the upgrade didn't finish
successfully and trying to build from scratch on sage.math I get
abort: unresolved merge conflicts (see hg
Sorry, looks like I have messed up with copying/moving files.
Andrey
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
I think that one of the reasons for this difference is absence of a
real reason for copying MATLAB names, since Sage is not a free
MATLAB. I also don't think that all commercial software package use
always the same names for the same things, so making it easier to
transition from MATLAB would not
I think that if the doc-string includes exceptions, the output gets
cutoff, but you can see the whole version if you click to the left
from the output (which triggers wrap-unwrap-hide cycle with the usual
text output). I have also seen cases when the output of something?
looks weird with some
Hi Volker (and sage-devel),
I guess face_lattice trac ticket is not the best place for this discussion
;-)
What are your goals for toric varieties, at what stage is your work, and
when do you want/need to finish it?
My answers to these questions.
GOAL: have a nice framework for doing all the
From http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8656#comment:6
Comment(by vbraun):
I've implemented all the fan/lattice basics, cohomology and Chern
clases,
Chow ring, divisors, Mori cone.
The current status is at [http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/],
documentation is at
I've posted my current files on
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/novoselt/toric_varieties/
From a glance at Volker's code above, the most apparent difference in
approaches is that I was designing cones and fans to be standalone
(with the plan that they should go to sage/geometry eventually),
Hello,
What exactly does happen to self in docstrings or rather what exactly
*should* happen? Is it documented somewhere?
It seems to me that in instances of self. (with the dot)
self (without the dot) is somehow smartly replaced using context.
That is great, but why not change standalone self
Hello,
If I add a new file into Sage without TestSuite(...).run(), then sage
-coverage shows an ERROR for this file. Does this mean that a patch
without such a test has no chances to be merged? I really hope this is
not the case yet...
I think that TestSuite is an awesome idea and it did help me
to be some better instruction
on what to do.
John
On 16 May 2010 17:52, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
If I add a new file into Sage without TestSuite(...).run(), then sage
-coverage shows an ERROR for this file. Does this mean that a patch
without such a test has
Dear developers,
I have just posted a series of patches implementing toric varieties in
Sage and will be very grateful if someone (or maybe even somemany!)
could help reviewing them. There are 3 patches in algebraic geometry
slightly modifying schemes modules, 3 small patches for lattice
To add to the previous post, my future plans are:
- Make sure that faces enumeration is the same everywhere, especially
for vertices and facets. This is relevant for lattice polytopes,
polyhedra, cones, and fans. We have had recently to fix some doctests
in Polyhedra because of random sorting and
I am confused with the google-group - I posted the second message last
night, but I don't see it. And it shows 5 message on the top, but I
can only see 4. I don't know if others can see it, but (it seems no,
so I'll copy it from a saved file:
---
To add to the
On May 18, 11:46 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Why not allow arbitrary polytopal toric varieties instead of the
resolution of singular fano ones? The larger class still benefits from
the lattice polytope description and you can still talk about the
anticanonical
of combinatorial
formulas to compute Hodge numbers.
On May 19, 4:03 am, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] we can add PCR in
the beginning or the end (corresponding to PartialCrepantResolution).
Batyrev already defined the abbreviation
MPCP resolution =
(maximal projective crepant
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrey,
I've looked over your code and I think it would be good to extend the
class hierarchy of cones. I'm thinking about
Cone
Cone_of_fan(Cone)
keeps reference of fan
Cone_of_ToricVariety(Cone_of_fan)
keeps
Hi Volker,
That definitely makes sense, let me think a bit about it and then post
the comments/agreements.
You cannot pickle functions, so you cannot pass a factory to construct
cones (because you may need to have more cones later, so you need to
store it). If you apply my cone patch and remove
Hi Volker,
Fine, I am now convinced that you are right - we do need more
subclasses of cones ;-) And probably the same for fans?
Since I am still a bit paranoid about speed and memory consumption,
what do you think of the following scheme:
Make classes EnhancedFan and Enhanced Cone (not exposed
On May 21, 5:24 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Just to clarify, I only wanted to subclass Cones, but not Fans. The
fan is a container class for cones and that doesn't change. In
particular, I never felt the need to add any functionality at that
level in my code.
it would help with the future maintenance.
Good point, that would be cleaner and easier!
On May 21, 5:13 pm, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
I especially worry about cone/fan computations that trigger calls to
associated lattice polytopes and polyhedra
In the long run we
Hello,
When strings or objects with only _repr_ are typeset, they are just
wrapped as a chunk of text. The main problem with it is removing line
breaks. Another one - removing indentation. For example, if 123\n 23
is printed, we get
123
23
with 23 right under 23. The typeset version gives
123
this makes more sense ;-)
Andrey
On May 22, 10:07 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Just so that we are clear...
When strings or objects with only _repr_ are typeset, they are just
On May 22, 10:17 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
Though in Sage we use _repr_, which is used by __str__, __repr__ and
_latex_. I think this is a question about the default _latex_ which
does some postprocessing of _repr_.
sage: class A(SageObject):
: def
It seems to me that the argument use the right OS was quite often in
discussions about Windows port, pointing out also that many people
have an old computer where they can put Linux keeping Windows on the
main one, if they are so addicted. Well, I never agreed with this
approach.
Windows is
Hi Volker,
The first version (already documented and doctested) of toric lattices
is on trac:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9062
so you can take a look and comment if something is very bad. It is not
quite ready for review yet, but I don't anticipate changing existing
code - only
Hi Volker,
I put a new version of toric lattices patch. Now it should work nicely
with plain vectors and matrices, in particular homomorphisms seem to
do what they should (there is a simple example in the end of module
level documentation). I don't think anymore that there is any need
for a
On May 28, 1:02 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question I would like to know the answer to, what are extra
costs of
for i in range(n):
P[i]=gap('BigMat[1+'+str(i)+']')
over
P=gap('BigMat') ?
I.e. is it much more expensive to get many small chunks as opposed to
As I understand,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3304
should be just closed, not reviewed, since another ticket took care of
the issue.
Since only release managers should close tickets, I am leaving the
ticket as is and posting here.
Thank you,
Andrey
--
To post to this group, send
While I have no ideas/suggestions on how to implement it, I think that
it is highly desirable to have such a functionality. In addition to
simplifying life of those who write doctests with links, it will help
to make documentation more stable - if some classes/functions were
moved around modules
On Jun 3, 6:02 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
- Should we search the link in all.py or in the local module ? In the latter
solution we can only link what is imported in the current module, keeping the
doc coherent with the module.
Hi Florent,
I think it would be better
Also the file name indicates that it is not only an old version of
Sage, but even an alpha-version...
On Jun 7, 6:58 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On the website:http://sagemath.org/download-windows.html
it says that we need VirtualBox, which is old information, as the
On Jun 10, 9:41 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
I imagine that after doctest coverage is up to 100% function
coverage that there will be a new push to then get the statement
coverage up to 100%. It would be interesting even now to see how much
statement coverage lagged
On Jun 11, 2:46 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
They can go in separate files, files which, for example, are not
included in the reference manual. The file sage/homology/tests.py is
an example. Each function should have doctests (so the goal is still
100%
I vote YES, because I think that in most cases when these functions
are used the intention is to end up with something similar but not
equal to the identity or zero matrix.
Andrey
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
Hello everybody,
A while ago I noticed that my *new independent module* on toric
varieties causes an error in a really obscure long output for one of
the tests in symbolic/random_tests.py. Volker Braun pointed in
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8988#comment:9
I think the change in the
Is it actually possible to build local Python documentation in
addition to Sage one and link to it? Because even if all links are
correct and everything is working nicely, it means that one has to
have an active internet connection for *browsing* the documentation
and I think it would be good to
I have no idea what is wrong, but I have had the same problem for a
while (but was too lazy to report it, since I usually use geom
anyway).
Andrey
On Jun 23, 2:36 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
I have an installation of sage-4.4.4.alpha1 on geom.math for which the
following command
Hello everybody,
Volker and I have some disagreement on names used in
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9296 and it would be VERY
nice to get other people opinions. I'll try to be short.
In toric geometry it is important/convenient to distinguish a lattice
and its dual. Standard names
My general two cents: explicit (=long) is better than implicit
(=short). However it should be easy for the user to define its own short
names.
My proposal in the ticket was to add a function that will create short
synonims for all such methods, if a user so desires. Of course, if
this is done,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Ewald's book Combinatorial convexity and algebraic geometry defines
the cospan of a (not strictly convex) cone to be its maximal linear
subspace. I think we should stick to dual when it comes to lattices
since this in
On Jul 7, 2:51 pm, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi Volker!
On 7 Jul., 20:30, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: FF = FiniteField(7)
sage: P.x = PolynomialRing(FiniteField(7))
sage: x+1
Apparently the problem is in the _element_constructor_:
sage: P(1)
...
On Jul 11, 6:38 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool. There are numerous parameters one could imagine a nagbot
having. E.g,. max emails per week, how often messages sent, etc.,
which should be easily customized by each recipient. Ideas? Please
suggest them.
Wiliam
Hi William,
On Jul 12, 10:20 am, Marco Streng marco.str...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm getting a bit confused about Parent objects and why
sage.schemes.generic.scheme.Scheme extends Parent.
Schemes are not really containers of anything, right? Calling
S.an_element() currently gives a
On Jul 13, 3:37 am, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Unsurprisingly, setting the random seed makes the random_expr() always
return the same value:
sage: set_random_seed(0xdeadbeef)
sage: random_expr(5)
I guess so:
sage: type(SR^3)
class
'sage.modules.free_module.FreeModule_ambient_field_with_category'
However
sage: isinstance(SR,
sage.rings.principal_ideal_domain.PrincipalIdealDomain)
False
and this creates problems in FreeModule_generic_pid constructor. I am
working on #9502 and when I
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com
wrote:
sage: isinstance(SR,
sage.rings.principal_ideal_domain.PrincipalIdealDomain)
False
sage: SR.is_field()
True
and this creates problems in FreeModule_generic_pid constructor. I am
if you could fix this issue, as I have no idea
what's going on...
Thank you,
Andrey
On Jul 15, 2:05 pm, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul 13, 3:37 am, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun
Thank you!!!
Andrey
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Carl,
For example this installation of sage-4.5.alpha1
novos...@sage:/scratch/novoselt/sage-4.5.alpha1/devel/sage
Somewhat related to this subject - is it possible to automatically put
into documentation parameters that were defined and documented in the
base method'? E.g. if I have
class A():
def f(self, a=1):
INPUT:
- ``a`` -- integer
...
class B(A):
def f(self, b=2, *args, **kwds):
I have just looked over PARI citing discussion and recently I had a
talk with a developer of a software package X who was concerned that
inclusion of X into Sage will mean that people will stop giving credit
to X (and this developer in particular ;-)) Sometime ago there were
suggestions to somehow
I think you should put sage: in front of all complete commands and
... in front of continuation lines. I was making multi-line cycles
this way. Triple quotes may conflict with the way how SageTeX produces
its files. Did you try triple single quotes? ( ' + ' + ' instead of
+ + )
Andrey
On Oct
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
