Jan 2010 01:23:10 -0800 (PST), Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com
wrote:
it does not help:
indeed, I do not see how e.g. the following:
--- a/sage/groups/class_function.py Wed Jan 20 15:09:32 2010 -0800
+++ b/sage/groups/class_function.py Tue Jan 26 09:10:38 2010 +1100
@@ -284,7
---
NameError Traceback (most recent call
last)
/usr/local/src/sage/sage-4.3.1/ipython console in module()
NameError: name 'zeta8' is not defined
any ideas?
Dima
On Jan 26, 6:58 pm, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:42:14 -0800 (PST), Dima
-0800 (PST), Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes, this works for numerical lists, but not for e.g.
[[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, -1, -1, -1], [2, -1, 2, -1,
2, 0, 0, 0], [2, 1, -2, -1, 0, -zeta8^3 - zeta8, zeta8^3 + zeta8, 0],
[2, 1, -2, -1, 0, zeta8^3 + zeta8, -zeta8
I have created the next version of gap-4.4.12 spkg, see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8076
for details and download location(s).
In particular, testers with access to working ia64 (Linux Itanium)
installations of Sage are needed!
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email
good that I saw this thread, as I was planning to create a
cvxopt-1.1.2 spkg
(I need it for my work...)
So, can this spkg be made official ?
Thanks,
Dima
On Jan 26, 7:35 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
GAP does not fix an ordering of the conj. classes, or an ordering of
the irreducibles. They depend upon the way
the group comes in, and as conj. classes and irreds are often computed
by randomised procedures,
it's very hard to predict them.
(and not fun to deal with issues that somtimes
the
same sequence--- not good, as you can imagine.
On Jan 26, 10:53 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
GAP does not fix an ordering of the conj. classes, or an ordering of
the irreducibles. They depend
linux. Therefore there is still a lot to do to
get this running everywhere!
greez harald
On Jan 26, 1:47 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
good that I saw this thread, as I was planning to create a
cvxopt-1.1.2 spkg
(I need it for my work...)
So, can this spkg be made
IMHO coercing (details to be worked out, I guess, otherwise we might
have precision losses...)
into complex numbers x+iy, and then compare lexicographically,
1st the real parts, and then the imaginary parts (to make this
consistent with the
event we compare reals!), is the only meaningful way to
cvxopt (a Sage package) has a MOSEK interface.
(to bring this thread back into Sage realm :))
On Jan 29, 3:22 am, dahl.joac...@gmail.com dahl.joac...@gmail.com
wrote:
MOSEK provides state-of-the-art commercial LP and SOCP solvers as
well as MIP solvers. They have a python interface and their
as discussed recently here in connection with GAP interface, the
following looks like an obvious deficiency of docstrings testing: a
computation returns a list in some unpredictable order, and docstrings
are in another order, even though the corresponding sets are the same.
Just sorting the list
it shows, by the way, that idea to use set() (or Set()) to remedy
differences in docstrings with
the output of randomised procedures, discussed
here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1f688f25bdd5dab2
does not really fly.
On Jan 30, 10:38 am, kcrisman
the
order of conj. classes etc is a priori not known)
Dima
On Jan 29, 2:09 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:06 PM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:59 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
as discussed recently here
about upgrading (a newbie question)
Against what release this upgrade is made?
Can I do
./sage -upgrade http://...
where ./sage is the stable 4.3.1?
Thanks,
Dima
On Feb 1, 5:44 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com
some file permissions are wrong (600 or 700) in 4.3.1,
namely
src/README
src/box/
(so they become unreadable to the world when the thing is installed as
root)
Best,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
I am trying to build Sage 4.3.2.alpha1 on ia64 (Redhat) using
gcc-4.4.3,
and the building of NTL fails.
[d...@cleo standard]$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /usr/local/gcc-4.4.3/src/gcc-4.4.3/configure --enable-
languages=c,c++,fortran --with-gnu-as
when doing (for 4.3.2.alpha1)
./sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/groups/
I get lots of messages like
doctest:681: UserWarning: legend.labelsep is deprecated. Update your
matplotlibrc to use legend.labelspacing instead.
...
they arise in
sage/groups/group.pyx
this is on boxen.math.washington.edu with default settings (gcc
version 4.2.4, etc)
On Feb 2, 4:40 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
when doing (for 4.3.2.alpha1)
./sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/groups/
I get lots of messages like
doctest:681: UserWarning: legend.labelsep
please also see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8150
for the docstring patches
On Jan 26, 7:59 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have created the next version of gap-4.4.12spkg,
seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8076
for details and download location(s
done
On Feb 2, 1:09 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dima,
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
some file permissions are wrong (600 or 700) in 4.3.1,
Could you please open a ticket for this issue with the optional lie
package? Things
there is
SAGEROOT/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/mpl-data/
matplotlibrc
but legend.labelsep is commented out in that file.
So I am lost.
On Feb 2, 4:40 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
when doing (for 4.3.2.alpha1)
./sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/groups/
I get lots
On Jan 31, 1:15 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 1:46 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
William,
I think TESTS
.
On Feb 2, 1:07 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
well, I just test what is in EXAMPLES in TESTS (as string comparison
fails here, I have to write a bit of code to test properly)
It's a bit ugly, but it's a limitation of docstinsg that is impossible
to overcome.
(Please seehttp
in G.irreducible_characters()]) ==
expected
True
On Feb 2, 2:25 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 8:54 pm, YannLC yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately for irreducible characters (see groups/
class_function.py patch)
reduce seems to be the only way so far
it!
On Feb 2, 3:50 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
G.irreducible_characters() is a list of lists, not a list of tuples,
so one cannot just
take set() of them.
On Feb 2, 10:01 pm, YannLC yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe just using sets:
sage: G = GL(2,3
Thanks. The offending file matplotlibrc was actually in SAGEROOT/
I probably did something non-kosher when I updated 4.3.1...
Dmitrii
On Feb 2, 11:23 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 02/02/2010 02:42 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
there is
SAGEROOT/local/lib/python2.6/site
Obtained this trying to build from source on one of Skynet machines:
d...@iras:~/sage-4.3.2.alpha1 uname -a
Linux iras 2.6.16.46-0.12-default #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007
ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
with gcc version 4.1.2 20070115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
here is the relevant portion of
...
sage: abs(M.determinant())
Expected:
712483534798848
Got:
7.12483534798848e14
I can use an if to fix the sign, but them I am afraid I miss some
obvious
better way...
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
do abs
(-712483534798848) at the
sage prompt, I don't get 7.12483534798848e14, I get 712483534798848,
and this
is mighty annoying...
Dima
On Feb 3, 10:32 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
...
sage: abs
.
(sorry, I tried to make a short test to show this, but I can't: there
might be some imports involved that might affect this...)
Dima
On Feb 3, 10:43 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:32 PM, David Joyner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Dima
it looks OK just to coerse to integer and then do the python's abs:
ZZ(d).abs()
By the way, the determinant of a character table is either in Z or in
sqrt(-1)Z
DIma
On Feb 3, 12:34 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: d = M.determinant()
sage: d.norm().abs() # take
By the way, the determinant of a character table is either in Z or in
sqrt(-1)Z
oops, I meant to say that the square of the determinant of a character
table
is a positive integer
(namely, the sum of the orders of the centralisers of representatives
of conjugacy classes)
Dima
--
To post to
I need to issue updates to the patch on a trac ticket I issued.
What is the correct mode of operation:
open a new ticket referring to this one?
--- clear how to proceed
make a new patch replacing the present one?
--- I have trouble understanding how to do this in mercurial.
Do I backout my
These are the only Sun and ia64 machines I have reliable access to.
Can anyone build 4.3.2.alpha1 there?
And if yes, where and how?
(I spent some time trying, without success...)
I'd like to test my patches, in particular on ia64
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to
a day or so ago I posted here on
sage-4.3.2.alpha1: building problem on Linux ia64 (divsi3 can't be
found?)
On Feb 4, 10:38 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dima,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
These are the only Sun and ia64 machines
William,
can I steal/clone your Sage installation there?
Thanks!
On Feb 4, 10:52 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/2/3 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com:
Hi Dima,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
These are the only Sun and ia64 machines
Mercurial queues are great, as I am just beginning to see.
Thanks for sharing.
Dmitrii
On Feb 4, 3:03 am, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
make a new patch replacing the present one?
--- I have trouble understanding how to do this in mercurial.
Do I backout my previous patch and
While trying to upgrade the cvxopt package for Sage to version 1.1.2
of cvxopt, one encounters a build problem; more precisely, it's a
runtime error that comes from the dynamic library cholmod.so missing
a symbol.
I gather it had to be linked with against an appropriate Fortran
library
I am planning to write a few, in particular as I need to call cvxopt's
semi-definite programming solver.
Perhaps such things actually already exist (unreleased/work in
progress?), only I am not aware of this?
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
IMHO cvxmod should not be bundled into cvxopt – it's an optional
interface.
What I meant, are straightforward wrappers, as the one that is used
for linear programming
in sage/numerical/optimize.py
Dmitrii
On Feb 7, 1:46 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 1:39 pm, Dima
On Feb 7, 6:59 pm, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 02:49:53AM -0800, Kiran Kedlaya wrote:
The following input segfaults sage 4.3.2 on sage.math, as well as sage
4.3 on various other machines.
P.x = PolynomialRing(RealField())
print
even better:
sage: P.x = PolynomialRing(RealField())
sage: P(0)*P(0)+P(0)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
On Feb 7, 10:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:59 pm, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010
The bug is in multiplication algorithm:
in sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_real_mpfr_dense.pyx
in function that does ring multiplication:
cpdef RingElement _mul_(left, RingElement _right):
there is line 431:
cdef PolynomialRealDense f = left._new(left._degree + right._degree)
that is creates a
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6395191
It's a bug, known for 4 years, and nobody is fixing it, it seems...
On Feb 8, 12:49 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
David Kirkby wrote:
On 1 February 2010 19:29, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
On Feb 8, 9:27 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
In 3.4.2 I get this:
sage: x = polygen(QQbar)
sage: f = 3*x^4 - 4*x^3 - 1046148*x^2 - 335575956*x - 30288853512
sage: rts = f.roots(multiplicities=False)
sage: [r.sqrt() for r in rts]
IHMO it's just the usual fp hell: data gets moved from registers into
memory and back, etc (but maybe I am wrong here, don't know)
Anyway, there is a way to avoid taking sqrt at all, just solve the
equation f(x^2)=0, not f(x)=0.
Dmitrii
On Feb 8, 11:26 pm, YannLC yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com
Why trying LP and MILP functionality required by e.g.
degree_constrained_subgraph in graphs/graph.py,
I noticed that just installing the corresponding package is not
enough, one must run
sage -b
afterwards.
Is it a bug, or a feature?
Best,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to
:42 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Is it a bug
No. See the following sage-support thread for a reason why this happens:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_frm/thread/fcc0918...
That thread also contains a solution to the problem you're
experiencing
Dear all,
I have just created track ticket #8229, that completes the task of
upgrading
gap.spkg (ticket #8076) and patching the relevant parts of devel/sage/
(ticket #8150)
by also upgrading gap_packages.spkg
Please test. Let's finish this story and upgrade to gap-4.4.12, at
last.
Thanks,
Dima
William,
On Feb 10, 10:55 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Minh,
IMHO, this is a missing feature of sage -f.
Either it should always do sage -b
after the building of the package is done,
or there should
well, it seems I have fixed all the outstanding issues (see the trac
updates)
Dima
On Feb 11, 10:07 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have just created track ticket #8229, that completes the task
Is it OK to assume that either gfortran on g95 is available?
I ask as I want to fix cvxopt-1.1.2 spkg so that it really builds
everywhere, and
this looks like a show-stopper, in particular as the
native cvxopt install makes it possible to use f77, so I ideally want
to get rid of f77blas and
sorry, made a typo in the subject, now it should be OK.
On Feb 14, 8:29 am, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it OK to assume that either gfortran on g95 is available?
I ask as I want to fix cvxopt-1.1.2 spkg so that it really builds
everywhere, and
this looks like a show-stopper
I understand from the zlib's SPKG.txt that OSX-specific thing was done
by Michael Abshoff, who has left the project.
When you talk about developing on OSX, there is a zillion possible,
and quite different from each other, building environments
* native Apple
* Fink
* MacPorts
which all have
, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it OK to assume that either gfortran on g95 is available?
Yes. A working Fortran compiler (and associated libraries) is required
for all supported platforms: Cygwin, Linux, Mac OS X, OpenSolaris,
Solaris. At the start of the build
So actually it's not checked that Sage compiles with g95, is it?
On Feb 14, 9:06 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dima,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't seem to have access to g95.
Is there a place on Skynet or on boxen/sage
'Setting RM=rm breaks newer libtools'
--- this one, maybe?
On Feb 15, 4:49 am, Pasha Zusmanovich justpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:46 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
This was caused by #7818. See ticket for details.
This is also happening on my linux system with versions
Dave,
Did you check that Cygwin does not have its own iconv patches?
It used to have patches...
Dmitrii
On Feb 15, 5:02 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The latest
How does one deal with name clashes?
E.g. a package (say, cvxopt) has its own matrix type,
so importing all of it into Sage without appropriate name substitution
makes a mess.
Are there any guidelines one should follow?
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Feb 16, 7:54 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 5:44 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: import cvxopt
sage: cvxopt.matrix
cvxopt.matrix can happily coexist with sage matrices, numpy matrices,
maxima matrices, etc.
Yeahr exactly, but
on Linux, this can be obtained from /proc
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-display-cpu-information-number-of-cpus-and-their-speed/
On Feb 17, 4:51 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
There seems to be a lot of problems that either are, or might be associated
with
people
default must be gfortran, IMHO.
Sage is distributed with a copy of gfortran libs in case they are not
installed on the machine
that will run Sage.
There is a mechanism in Sage to detect fortrans that are available.
Anyhow, gfrortan is much more wide-spread on Linux (e.g. g95 is not a
part of
On Feb 17, 7:57 am, javier vengor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use sage to compute the Artin-Wedderburn decomposition
of a group algebra.
I am curious to know, how you are doing this. IMHO for this you need
to know
each irreducible representation explicitly --- but then you
On Feb 18, 2:09 am, javier vengor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dima,
On Feb 18, 6:26 am, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious to know, how you are doing this. IMHO for this you need
to know
each irreducible representation explicitly --- but then you can just
stack up
there, and off you go!
No need for 3000x3000 matrices...
HTH,
Dima
PS. I presume you know what you are doing, and your group algebra
elements are not
in the centre, for otherwise it's just a computation with
characters...
On Feb 18, 6:51 am, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2:09 am, javier
On t2, can we please follow he Skynet's /usr/local/skynet_bash_profile
mechanism to have a ready setup for building sage there?
It would also be nice to have chsh working, so that ppl can change the
default shell...
Thanks,
Dima
On Feb 21, 4:51 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
.spkg
Could you please fix this?
Thanks,
Dima
On Feb 22, 3:48 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dima,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
As it stands, updated optional spkgs for the new release are nowhere
to be found
(e.g. gap_packages
Dave,
The libraries are OK to include--- I was under impression is that you
propose to include basically the whole toolchain...
Sorry for a misunderstanding.
Dima
On Feb 22, 6:41 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Feb 22, 4:15 am, Dr. David Kirkby
Dave,
Is it possible to install screen on t2?
Even if I run screen on boxen and ssh to t2, the connection is still a
bit flaky.
Thanks,
Dima
On Feb 22, 7:52 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
I've just added a note to
William,
what about the spkg from
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/packages/
Does this work?
Best,
Dima
On Feb 24, 9:41 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just tried
./sage -optional
and see gap_packages-4.4.12_2. I then do
./sage -i gap_packages-4.4.12_2
, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
William,
what about the spkg fromhttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/packages/
Does this work?
Best,
Dima
On Feb 24, 9:41 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just tried
./sage -optional
and see gap_packages-4.4.12_2
if it is 2), there is already
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8236
to address this.
On Feb 24, 10:04 am, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, few checks:
1) what does gap_version() say?
2) do you have gap-4.4.12.p1.spkg in spkg/standard/ ?
(I saw this before
I tried building sage 4.3.0.1 (and 4.3.0.2.alpha5-6583 snapshot
created by Minh to demonstrate that unpleasant trac# 6583 bug) on
skynet's mark,
(SunOS mark 5.10 Generic_127111-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500)
and it fails at gnutls spkg (this is not happening on t2), with
messages indicating
it's an easy to fix bug in squarefree_decomposition in sage/rings/
polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx, line 1142
I can fix it if there are no takers...
Dima
On Feb 24, 1:30 pm, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
I just put this up on trac, but I'm not sure I put it in the right
I don't think transfer matrix is a standard term in this context.
To avoid confusion, I called such things vertex-vertex incidence
matrix in
the graph theory class I taught last term.
By the way, in enumerative combinatorics transfer matrix means
something totally different.
Dima
On Feb 28,
hmm, there are sparc solaris machines on skynet; they are much faster
than t2...
On Mar 2, 2:29 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
mhampton wrote:
Congratulations, it seems that you have made a great deal of progress
On Mar 2, 3:10 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2010, at 4:20 PM, slabbe wrote:
Hi Sage-devel,
I am currently experiencing some problems when comparing elements of a
QuadraticField. See below.
sage: Q.sqrt3 = QuadraticField(3)
sage: 0 sqrt3
I guess, this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7723
I have not idea when I can get back to this at the moment. Basically
what has happened is that I bit the bullet and implemented my own
numerical matrix class hierarchy which is usable without Sage (but
loosely modeled after it). That
perhaps it's a good idea to have these things added to
http://wiki.sagemath.org/MercurialQueues
On Mar 3, 9:24 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
'qimport' reports no issues, but
Dave,
you ought to say at least how to get the new spkg
Dima
On Mar 3, 10:51 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
If anyone has a minute, I would appreciate a review of
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8408
which is a simple update to the latest stable sqlite
there are interactions with lapack and atlas in CVXOPT, for instance.
On Mar 3, 2:35 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
I couldn't find any good spline routines in Sage for constructing simple
splines with given boundary conditions (are there any? There are some
spline
actually, some of these optional things here only need an LP solver
(not a MILP solver), and Sage does have an LP solver, via
a standard package CVXOPT.
It would be nice to get rid of these dependencies on optional
packages.
Dima
On Mar 5, 8:14 am, ablondin alexandre.blondin.ma...@gmail.com
I've asked someone who is an active Debian developer about the removal
thing, how it is done...
Dmitrii
On Mar 5, 11:05 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
On 03/04/2010 11:14 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
On
here is the response from one of Debian folks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bill Allombert bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr
Date: 5 March 2010 18:49
Subject: Re: Fwd: Debian package...
To: Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:28:53PM -0800, Dima
if it's PARI-dependent, it makes sense to upgrade PARI to the latest
version.
PARI used by Sage is almost 2-year old.
They rolled out two upgrades in the meantime.
Dima
On Mar 6, 6:41 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to confirm that fix, and realized that this problem isn't
On Mar 6, 7:27 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Kasper Peeters wrote:
Has anyone considered emailing the official maintainer
Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu
and ask him whether he would be interested in handing over
maintainership to someone with more time to bring the
On Mar 6, 2:57 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Uli
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:33 AM, kuli strangequ...@gmx.at wrote:
SNIP
Secondly, I want to ask you, if it would make sense (I think it makes)
to develop a computational logic module for sage math. I'm thinking of
tools
Minh,
I wonder how one can contribute changes/patches to files in sage/doc/
en/constructions
It's also not always clear who wrote what there, and thus seems hard
to discuss possible
improvements with authors.
Thanks,
Dima
On Mar 6, 1:08 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
On
+1.
This might actually be the way to go, more or less --- make sage
debian package a downloader.
Debian actually has such packages, e.g., something that downloads free
fonts for OO...
Dima
On Mar 7, 3:47 pm, ma...@mendelu.cz ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
On 7 bře, 01:05, William Stein
No, there should be no automatic switchover to numerics, IM(not so)HO.
By the way, numerics might get very slow if the convergence is slow,
particularly
in multivariate cases (where Monte-Carlo might be the method of
choice), give weird results because
of bad scaling, etc...
Best,
Dima
On Mar
Harald,
you can have a look at
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/ttf-mscorefonts-installer
for a similar functionality in a debian package.
Dima
On Mar 8, 2:09 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 7, 9:28 am, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
This might
Mike,
if you need something specific for your goals implemented
on GAP side, please email gap-support and/or me.
Few further remarks:
I also noticed and reported here a while ago that Sage's functionality
for matrix group is not quite consistent with this functionality for
permutation groups
PS. Also, please advertise this project on gap-forum and gap-support
mailing lists.
I am sure there will be more people interested in helping out if you
explain that potentially one would be able to seamlessly call GAP
functions from
Python...
Dima
On Mar 9, 7:58 am, Mike OS
Dear all,
I recently had a rather unpleasant experience reviewing a ticket that
shall remain unnamed. It went as follows. I suggested few
improvements, asked few questions. Some suggestions were implemented,
some plainly ignored, along with questions. I suggested few more
improvements, asked (and
Hi Minh,
On Mar 11, 3:42 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dima,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
[...]
First, it is very frustrating that one has to rebase and rework a
patch multiple times. A case in point is the situation
Mythical Sage-month :-)
(cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month)
On Mar 11, 4:22 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:16:20PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
There's an article here:
Dear Nathann,
Thanks for the message.
On Mar 11, 8:11 pm, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello !
I do not know how whether I have my place in this discussion...
Several words, though.
I know I did not take very well one of your first messages, and I
progressively got the
On Debian stable, it's only possible to have python 2.6 out-of-tree
(i.e. in /usr/local, built from scratch, possibly with more stuff
needed to be built out-of-tree)
So from Debian point of view this means that such a package is only
feasible in the testing distro, where it's possible to have
Can't one just make a private copy of a SAGE_ROOT of an already built
installation?
(The only requirement is that everything in SAGE_ROOT is world-
readable.)
Dima
On Mar 13, 7:36 am, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
(This email got a bit long. See EXECUTIVE SUMMARY below for the
I suggested somewhere that such a package should just download a
binary installation of sage.
Even Debian has packages of this type.
Dmitrii
On Mar 14, 9:02 am, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Tim Abbott wrote:
As I mentioned on the bug report opened today at
101 - 200 of 5245 matches
Mail list logo
