On Mar 14, 11:21 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 14, 11:12 am, David Perkinson dav...@reed.edu wrote:
Using Sage 3.4, sage -i 4ti2-20061025 does not work for me. I have
attached the relevant section of install.log.
Dave
Somewhere in 4ti2 you need to
#include
On Mar 16, 8:09 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear All,
I've some trouble compiling the doc:
SNIP
File /usr/local/sage/sage/devel/sage/doc/common/builder.py, line 498, in
get_module_docstring_title
__import__(module_name)
ImportError: No module
On Mar 16, 9:53 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Here's yet *another* person that can't use our binary on OS X 10.4
PPC. Michael, can you change the binary name to make it clear that it
won't work?
I have removed both OSX 10.4 binaries from them mirror directory
mentioned is
in:
mabsh...@sage:/scratch/mabshoff/sage-3.4.1.alpha0/devel/sage$ hg
export 11798
# HG changeset patch
# User mabsh...@sage.math.washington.edu
# Date 1236752650 25200
# Node ID ca39c0a70fabe3d73377523ed0cfdbb0ca23bde1
# Parent 71fa9d6a2232cd23c4c71d10fae6091d7d54d13b
Remove no longer
On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
same issue you described. I am poking around to see what is
happening ...
An observation:
pickling environment... done
checking consistency... WARNING
On Mar 16, 11:08 am, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
same issue
On Mar 16, 11:25 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Hi
There is a quaternion_order.rst in devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
algebras that seems to be autogenerated.
After nuking the output directory rebuilding all documentation
repeatedly works.
I tried this
On Mar 16, 11:43 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
It might be, but this is the error reported: OSError: [Errno 24] Too
many open files
Can you check with ulimit -a what your current limit is (it seems to
be 1024 on sage.math for example) and increase it and try
On Mar 16, 1:43 pm, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I also came across the problem with quaternion_order_ideal.py, but for
me it went away when I re-built from a clean tarball (rather than
upgrading from 3.4.rc0 as I had done before). But even the final 3.4
tarball
On Mar 24, 1:27 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I temporarily put a few ip's into /etc/resolv.conf until I can restart
the vmware server safely (i.e., I'm onsite), and according to
http
On Mar 25, 11:26 am, Henryk Trappmann bo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
Oh, then I have some questions.
First how shall the class finally be named (the current name
PowerSeriesI is rather a working title):
LazyPowerSeries (conflict with Mike Hansen's package),
InfinitePowerSeries, LIPS?
Why
On Mar 24, 3:20 am, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Mar-23 12:38:45 -0700, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD and I've reached the point where I can compile sage-3.4 on
FreeBSD-8/amd64 (using gcc/g++/gfortran 4.3) and get it to start.
Which
On Mar 25, 8:26 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Dear Henryk, dear Mike,
SNIP
Mike: could you plse answer this e-mail???
Right now it is spring break at UW, so I expect Mike to pop up soon
again.
We really really really don't want two separate
On Mar 27, 4:14 pm, ghtdak gl...@tarbox.org wrote:
I've been wrestling with this a few days and can't quite figure out
whats wrong.
I'm trying to install Google Protocol Buffers in sage-3.4 which used
to go without a hitch in previous versions. I've successfully
installed qt-45, vtk, the
can be found in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/
Please build, test and report any issues.
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 3.4.1.alpha0:
#2129: William Stein, Ryan Hinton: implement sage -t for .spyx files
[Reviewed by Jason Grout]
#2551: Francis Clarke
On Mar 28, 8:53 pm, Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu wrote:
I've just finished compilation of 3.4.1.alpha0 + small patches in
sage.math, but it refuses to run based on missing sse4_1 flag.
However, sage.math seems to still have 24 cores all of them with
sse4_1...
Did you upgrade
On Mar 28, 9:08 pm, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Mar-28 20:00:12 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Peter Jeremy
peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/lseries_ell.py
On Mar 28, 9:05 pm, Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu wrote:
I did an upgrade from 3.4 as follows:
1. sage -br main --- switch to main, which is CLEAN
2. sage
-upgradehttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/sa...
3. once that was finished, I pulled
On Mar 28, 9:17 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:12 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I also looked athttp://wiki.sagemath.org/freebsd/sage-3.4and I am
dubious about some of the patches, especially about most of the bits
from ports. I
On Mar 29, 10:46 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
So CBC can't ever be included in Sage unless CBC changed their license.
The only way I see forward to have faster linear programming included
*standard* in Sage:
1. Speed up GLPK.
2. Get the license on CBC changed.
3.
On Mar 29, 2:17 am, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I think I'm being credited with more than my fair share of reviewing
here:
#2551: Francis Clarke: __getitem__ for relative number field elements
is ... surprising [Reviewed by John Cremona, David Loeffler]
On Mar 30, 7:51 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm forwarding this mpir-devel. I know the lead developer of MPIR
(Bill Hart) has a Playstation with Linux, so maybe he's tried?
William
SNIP
This is very likely a problem of 32 vs. 64 bit default build for the
compiler.
On Mar 30, 2:05 pm, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:24 pm, Christophe Oosterlynck tif...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Consider matrices containing univariate polynomials over GF(2): is it
normal that calculating the smith normal form for such a matrix is
extremely
Hello folks,
for the last couple hours Sage's trac has been very slow or completely
unresponsive. This is caused by the MS as well as Yahoo search engines
hammering the website (as can be seen by the proxy error log as well
as trac's log). It is non-obvious to me how to fix this, i.e. the
tracd
On Apr 4, 7:21 pm, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:53 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
for the last couple hours Sage's trac has been very slow or completely
unresponsive. This is caused by the MS as well as Yahoo search engines
On Apr 5, 8:03 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
On Fedora 9, 32 bit, upgraded from 3.4.1.alpha0:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py
Total time for all tests:
On Apr 5, 2:31 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Built ok and all tests passed on 32-bit ubuntu.
On Suse 64-bit, built ok and one failure:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_bundle.py
--retesting (several times) it passed
In case you hadn't noticed 3.4.1.rc0 is out. The main problem is that
it does not even build on OSX (yet) due to two trivial bugs in new
version of MPIR and FLINT. I have fixed both of them and in the
process of putting together 3.4.1.rc1 which should at least build on
all test platforms :)
All
On Apr 6, 10:35 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:28 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having trouble after cloning on account of the accents on line
1212 of sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py.
The attached patch fixes this (I
On Apr 6, 12:23 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
On Fedora 9, 32 bit, after an update from rc0:
Hi Jaap,
SNIP
Looks like an easy patch.
Yes, it is a trivial oversight from #5308 and a patch is up at #5695
for someone to review :)
Jaap
Cheers,
Michael
/elliptic_curves/
monsky_washnitzer.py which only happens with -long, but on 32 and 64
bit builds
* #5695: doctest failure in combinat/words/words.py - this is 32 bit
specific and has a reviewed patch.
You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 by running
./sage -upgrade
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff
Trac is basically unusable at the moment again due to heavy search
engine traffic - I will adjust robots.txt to try to get rid of the
problem, but it will likely take a couple hours to take effect since
each crawler should only read robots.txt every so often.
Cheers,
Michael
On Apr 6, 6:30 pm, dmharvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
Hi David,
When I google for sage math, I get mathematica ads on the right. Is
that something they would have done on purpose?
It might be, it might be not. I am sure MMA is bidding for the keyword
math - it would be interesting to see
On Apr 6, 8:39 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Apr 6, 6:30 pm, dmharvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
Hi David,
When I google for sage math, I get mathematica ads on the right. Is
that something they would have done on purpose?
It might be, it might be not. I am sure MMA
Hello folks,
I spend the evening fixing OSX 10.6 build bugs in Sage since we want
to be ready once it is release in a couple months. Since I am running
a development snapshot on my laptop I figured it would be good to have
a working Sage again locally. It only takes a couple patches to get
Sage
On Apr 7, 3:27 pm, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi Justin,
here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
[snip]
You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 by running
./sage
-upgradehttp
On Apr 7, 5:37 pm, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
I upgraded from rc0 on four different machines running 32-bit
Archlinux. Testing fails on three files:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx
See the comment about that regarding Jaap which had the same
On Apr 7, 9:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Moinmoin in Sage is still stuck at the version from 3 years ago, which
doesn't even support textcha's. When the new moinmoin is put into
sage... whenever
On Apr 7, 10:11 pm, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
Hi, Michael,
SNIP
Hi Justin,
That one is fixed. I am surprised you did not get the mosky failure,
but I suspected if you did a -ba you would hit it.
Ha! I just (well, a while back) did './sage -ba' and then
./sage -t
On Apr 7, 10:43 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Strav essorcreati...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Thanks!
This was fixed by John Palmieri recently. See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5636
and
On Apr 7, 11:43 pm, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stan,
Funny, I must be receiving a lot fewer adds than everybody else. If I
type sagemath into Google, I get no adds whatsoever, if I type sage
math I get one add saying:
Sage Math
Looking for Sage Math? Find almost
On Apr 9, 11:01 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Arnaud Bergeron aberge...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Or simply, to keep the existing simplicity, change %myhandler to call
sage_myhandler and rename the existing ones. There is very little
On Apr 9, 12:28 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
SNIP
Thanks for the heads up. Is all Chrome stuff still windows only?
I've installed Chromium on Ubuntu (I think there's even a .deb for it).
Chromium is the open-source project that Chrome is
://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/rc1/gmp-mpir-1.0.rc7.spkg
drop it into $SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard and restart the build process
with make. I believe that the latest MPIR that will be in 3.4.1 once
it is out soon should fix it. If not I can get it fixed upstream and
update MPIR, but the issue
On Apr 9, 2:03 pm, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Apr-07 21:49:12 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
The reason it runs slow is a.factor() is bizarrely slow in Sage. It's
On Apr 9, 2:11 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Apr 9, 2:03 pm, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
SNIP
The primality test for pari is known to be lead to false results up to
10^14 or so (FLINT's is up to 10^16 IIRC what Bill told me a couple
days ago).
Opps
On Apr 9, 5:53 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
Great. I've refereed this (positively). You fixed *numerous* bugs in
the code, imho, when writing those 28 new doctests -- great work!
Let's keep
FYI: I have started a wiki page at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/doc4
If you are working on any coverage at the moment and/or have any
relevant tickets please add them there so we avoid duplication of
work.
Re p-adics: It would be nice if the doctesting issues at #5499 could
be resolved so that
On Apr 10, 4:54 pm, doug davisd...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks mabshoff
Hi Doug,
I was having the same problem on an Aspire One, gcc3.1.4, It is
compiling now.
I am not surprised that at least on the Aspire One this is fixed since
something similar was reported by Harald Schilly a couple
On Apr 10, 5:19 pm, doug davisd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
The compile failed again later in the process. First error was failed
yasm test
...
PASS: modules/parsers/nasm/tests/nasm_test.sh
Test nasm_test: W +0-1/1 0%
** W: orphanwarn did not match errors and warnings!
FAIL:
Sage Doc Day 4 will take place tomorrow Saturday, April 11th, 2008,
starting 9am
We will focus on writing doctests during Doc Days 4. Our goal is to
raise the coverage score for the Sage library to 70%.
Basis for the Doc Day should be 3.4.1.rc2 to be released on Friday,
i.e. April 10th, 2008.
On Apr 10, 6:37 pm, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
Back in my day, we didn't rest until we had 100% coverage! - Old Doc Test
:) - we are mostly paying dues now for sins of the past, i.e. when
code merged into Sage did not require to be doctested.
For what will be 3.4.1.rc2 in the next
Ok, the 3.4.1.rc2 release which serves as the basis for tomorrow's
DocDay is more or less out, i.e. I am happy with build testing and
doctests seem to pass. All the bits are in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/
i.e. a sage.math binary, souces and the upgrade
of Doc Day 4 this Saturday, so if you plan to participate
please build this as soon as possible. As usual a sage.math binary,
the sources and the update tree are all available at or in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/
Compared to 3.4.1.rc1 two doctests failures
On Apr 11, 1:06 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
I got an error building on OS X 10.4
/Users/robert/sage/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libmpir.dylib
(sizeinbase.o) definition of ___gmpz_sizeinbase
/Users/robert/sage/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgmp.dylib
(sizeinbase.o)
On Apr 12, 2:13 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Hartke har...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
As mentioned earlier in the thread, Sage does include cvxopt, which is GPLv3+.
While the latest release is GPL V3+ the version we ship is GPL V+.
On Apr 13, 11:25 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Maybe someone should make one about finite element methods using Python.
I agree, but SPD is much higher priority for me now:
On Apr 13, 12:41 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/13 Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com:
jinvariant ?
What Pat means is: in E.j_invariant(), the underscore is lost and the
following i is a subscript. Perhaps a \ i missing?
Yes, it is a typo. William marked it such in
On Apr 13, 1:26 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
On Apr 13, 1:37 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I made an Elementary Number Theory quickref, which I've posted here:
On Apr 14, 4:42 pm, Chris Swierczewski cswie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I'm creating a Sage wrapper for a numerics package called Clawpack.
Clawpack works like so: when a user compiles their custom subroutines
against a library an executable is produced as output. The executable
then
On Mar 24, 10:35 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:27 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Prompted by Gonzalo'semail, I looked into this again. I restarted
the vmware natd daemon, and now everything is working fine again on
all the vmware
On Apr 14, 11:08 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Due to some strange problems yesterday I am running sage'stracinside
a screen session on sagemath in my (mabshoff) account and I do not see
any errors at the moment. Thoughts?
Ok, two things:
(a) sagemath's trac runs
Ok, sorry for the noise, but I figured it out: The problem was that
the sage-trac Google group banned the email we were sending trac
emails from. I will hopefully be able to fix this today.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
On Apr 13, 6:51 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:55 AM, gerhard ge01...@yahoo.de wrote:
just to get back to the original question:
did 'inserting a usepackage{}' command ever get resolved?
No. Somebody should at least create a trac ticket.
I don't
On Apr 15, 1:32 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
SNIP
Hi Burcin,
There was also some effort to
get Sage on the list of software in the DLMF, but the wiki page for
this seems to be deleted. (mabshoff?)
I checked old backups and the directory I keep spam pages around and I
cannot
On Apr 15, 1:58 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
SNIP
Hi Burcin,
I checked old backups and the directory I keep spam pages around and I
cannot find it. So either the conversion a while ago caused the
trouble or something went terribly wrong. Sorry.
No problem.
On Apr 15, 1:55 am, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:38:39 +0100
SNIP
It is possible to call python code from C/C++, pynac has many examples
of this. The functions in sage/symbolic/pynac.pyx are all exported so
they are callable from C++.
You just need to
On Apr 15, 3:57 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:22 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
this is 3.4.1.rc2. Loads of Solaris fixes for doctests, additional
doctests, several spkg updates and misc fixes. All the details can be
HI
/mabshoff/sage-3.4.1.rc3/local/lib/python2.5/site-
packages/sage/algebras/quatalg/quaternion_algebra.py:docstring of
sage.algebras.quatalg.quaternion_algebra:11: (WARNING/2) Literal block
expected; none found.
WARNING: /scratch/mabshoff/sage-3.4.1.rc3/local/lib/python2.5/site-
packages/sage/algebras
On Apr 15, 5:01 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
It must be machine specific to some extent. I had no problems on my
laptop which is a lot smaller tha Bill's machine.
Bill is asleep, but I am sure I can get an account from him in the
morning to see if I can hit the
On Apr 15, 3:17 pm, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I agree that this is really great, but isn't the name a bit confusing?
Why not sagenotebook?
It is slightly more than the Sage notebook, hence sage-lite. The name
has historical reasons and in the end I think we should
On Apr 15, 5:23 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
I use the hg bundle and that works just fine for me.
Yes, the bundle worked and the problem was the rebased patch Mike did
initially since there were some
On Apr 15, 11:54 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hello!
With my sage 3.4, which unless I screwed up is a plain sage 3.4,
sage -t -verbose sage/interfaces/sage0.py
hangs forever at:
Trying:
sage0.get('x')###line 354:_sage_
On Apr 15, 8:08 pm, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Since I have an old AMD 64, i downloaded the sources and tried to
build sage. I am on ubuntu 8.10. Here is how far I got:
...
sage_fortran -fPIC -c stzrqf.f -o stzrqf.o
sage_fortran -fPIC -c stzrzf.f -o stzrzf.o
sage_fortran
On Apr 15, 6:26 pm, LBerlioz schaffer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luiz,
When I do:
sage: A=matrix(QQ,3,3,[-3,2,0 , 2,3,-2 , 0,-2,5 ])
sage: Q=QuadraticForm(2*A)
sage: Q
Quadratic form in 3 variables over Rational Field with coefficients:
[ -3 4 0 ]
[ * 3 -4 ]
[ * * 5 ]
If I try to get
with everything above
resolved so 3.4.1 can finally be released.
The bits are as usual in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/
Please build, doctest and report problems. Note that some build issues
like on OSX 10.4 have not been resolved yet. I have build on 64 bit
On Apr 16, 12:21 pm, Marshall Hampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
I am getting errors building linbox on an Intel mac, 10.4.11. I get
several errors of the form:
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/libtool: internal link edit
command failed
These are known problems, i.e. from above:
On Apr 16, 1:02 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
Hi Jaap,
this is rc3 and it is much larger than I anticipated. Loads of
doctests merged, i.e. we are at
On Fedora 9, 32 bit, after an upgrade:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage
On Apr 16, 9:24 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
#5659: Wilfried Huss: Use CRT to speed up solve_mod [Reviewed by
Wilfried Huss]
Actually reviewed by William Stein, of course - just in case anyone
thought we now have self-review :)
Oops, thanks for pointing that out. Fixed.
-
On Apr 16, 2:18 pm, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Jaap,
SNIP
Not sure what is happening here. In case it is reproducible for you
please open another ticket.
Not sure what you mean, but this happens all the time repeating
this test.
That meant please open
On Apr 16, 1:41 pm, gerhard ge01...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi,
This started out in grading notebooks, but does not really belong
there.
-
I am happy to report the functionality to modify
the latex header for notebook output is already present in sage:
sage: import sage.misc.latex as
On Apr 16, 9:30 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:56:37PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Anyone getting the same behaviour?
I have seen it fail on occasion, but not reproducibly. Does that fail
for you every time in the same spot?
Over
On Apr 16, 7:51 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
SNIP
Just curious, what is OP?
Original poster.
SNIP
Actually one more question --- if I run the terminal, e.g. ipython,
then you have your own hook in ipython (executed after each command)
which checks which files were
On Apr 16, 9:34 pm, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rado,
Thanks Michael, that worked just fine. Since Ubuntu 8.10 is pretty
standard for linux-newbies, here are exactly the steps I did after the
crash (if someone googles the same error I got).
make clean
export
Hi Ondrej,
Why would you say that this bug is introduced in the modified version
of Sage ships? Just because it fixes the problem for you when you
remove the patch that does not mean it is the cause (I am not day it
isn't without looking at the other changes you did for SPD). If you
could argue
On Apr 16, 11:43 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:28 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Why would you say that this bug is introduced in the modified version
of Sage ships? Just because it fixes the problem for you when you
On Apr 17, 2:04 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:07 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Well, I think what we should do is merge as much of SPD into Sage as
possible to lessen the maintainance burden. One thing I could see here
On Apr 17, 2:25 am, Prabhu Ramachandran pra...@aero.iitb.ac.in
wrote:
On 04/17/09 13:37, mabshoff wrote:
If your plan is still to recreate all scripts to be BSD the above
would be more or less pointless, so you need to let us know what you
want to do. I really don't want to relicense my
On Apr 17, 12:27 am, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 16, 2009, at 09:10 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
Hi Justin,
this is rc3 and it is much larger than I anticipated. Loads of
doctests merged, i.e. we are at
[snip]
The bits are as usual in
http://sage.math.washington.edu
On Apr 17, 3:13 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:33 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Well, it would happen from my end. I think that in the process we
would do some serious cleanup, but the switch over should be quick
*if* we do
Ok, after analyzing all reports here, the build farm on boxen and
problems on selcted boxen on SkyNet it seems that we have a total of
four failures introduced in 3.4.1.rc3:
* #5805: Sage 3.4.1.rc3: numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/modular/
dirichlet.py
* #5806: Sage 3.4.1.rc3: failing test
On Apr 17, 5:01 am, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if it helps, but a ticket search yields
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4158
Yes, I am aware of that ticket and unfortunately it does not really
help. Last time this specific problem popped up (around Sage
On Apr 17, 12:37 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
On 32-bit ubuntu, after a successful build from scratch:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py
This one has actually been reported - see #5806 - but I would be
surprised if it
On Apr 17, 2:57 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/17 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
SNIP
File /home/john/sage-3.4.1.rc3/devel/sage/sage/modular/dirichlet.py,
line 1044:
sage: e.kloosterman_sum_numerical()
Expected:
7.21644966006e-16 + 1.73205080757*I
On Apr 17, 4:35 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, after analyzing all reports here, the build farm on boxen and
problems on selcted boxen on SkyNet it seems that we have a total of
four failures introduced in 3.4.1.rc3:
* #5805: Sage 3.4.1.rc3: numerical noise in devel/sage
On Apr 17, 5:21 pm, Chris Godsil cgod...@uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Michael
Hi Chris,
The compressed install log is athttp://quoll.uwaterloo.ca/install.log.gz
Your build did not finish:
GCC Version
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-apple-darwin9
Configured with:
On Apr 17, 7:08 pm, William Cauchois wcauc...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Bill,
I'm having trouble running the unit tests on sage/plot/plot.py
(using sage -t; this is Sage 3.4). The tests consistently time out
after about 360 seconds. Is this because my computer is slow (I've got
a
in the in the release notes, but in general
alpha or rc releases of sage-x.y[.z] can be found in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-x.y[.z]/
i.e. in case of 3.4.1 it is in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/
--
Bill
Cheers
On Apr 18, 5:05 pm, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:46 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted a patch so that
(1) doctests are ran in the same order as the file
(2) doctests can be run in random order
(3) doctests can be run in random order
On Apr 18, 6:06 pm, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
Hi Alex,
I'm slowly and painfully making my way through
schemes/generic/morphism.py and have run into some trouble that
persisted even after looking at rings/morphism.pyx which was recently
doctested by William.
So
2001 - 2100 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
